|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: Election Deniers [Re: TNK]
#23927027 - 12/14/16 05:31 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TheNatureKid said: No, they did.
Roughly half of America did. Regardless that Trump won still nearly half of the voting population voted for Hillary.
I asked why "the rest" of the country didn't vote for obama 3.0.
Fact is a lot of people are fed up with this shitty part time job Obamacare killing economy we have now
That's a big reason why Trump won
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 27 minutes
|
Re: Election Deniers [Re: Patlal]
#23927028 - 12/14/16 05:32 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Patlal said: Jesus fucking christ...
Normally people start judging a President a year after the election. After the "Honeymoon" phase. Everybody is judging even before he steps into office. I know this was an unusual election of an unusual candidate, but give the guy a chance.
His success = America's success = your success.
He's your three-legged race partner, if you don't work together, you'll both fall face down in the mud.
When he stops being incompetent he'll earn respect. He's more of a fuck up now than he was during the election. His cabinet picks are mind boggling stupid.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: Election Deniers [Re: koods] 1
#23927030 - 12/14/16 05:33 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: Yeah they did. By 2.8 million votes.
Yes, we know California did and most of the very liberal states did
I asked why "the rest" of the country didn't vote for her
|
TNK
Pleasures of Africa



Registered: 01/30/10
Posts: 14,237
Loc: I AM THUNDERBOT
Last seen: 1 month, 18 days
|
|
Quote:
koods said: Yeah they did. By 2.8 million votes.
It seems some people are just really bad at math; thinking that he won in a "landslide" victory even though half of the American voting population voted against him.Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
TheNatureKid said: No, they did.
Roughly half of America did. Regardless that Trump won still nearly half of the voting population voted for Hillary.
I asked why "the rest" of the country didn't vote for obama 3.0.
Fact is a lot of people are fed up with this shitty part time job Obamacare killing economy we have now
That's a big reason why Trump won
Last I checked Trump wasn't repealing Obamacare; you nutter.
I guess America would be better off if those people employed by fast-food/part-time employment didn't have jobs; right? I thought the goal was to produce more jobs for everyone regardless of the type of job it was as long as it produced an income for American families? I guess you would rather have 15,000 people making 40k a year rather than 500,000 people making 20k a year.
-------------------- Edited by TNK (02/22/22 22:22 PM)
|
Morel Guy
Stranger


Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Fox News, and Russian authored fake news as well as backwoods religion.
-------------------- "in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur" In filth it will be found in dung it will be found
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: Election Deniers [Re: Patlal]
#23927039 - 12/14/16 05:35 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Patlal said: Jesus fucking christ...
Normally people start judging a President a year after the election. After the "Honeymoon" phase. Everybody is judging even before he steps into office. I know this was an unusual election of an unusual candidate, but give the guy a chance.
His success = America's success = your success.
He's your three-legged race partner, if you don't work together, you'll both fall face down in the mud.
Liberals will never support him, just like they never supported Bush.
They won't even give him a chance and they'll never acknowledge any good he ever does.
To do that, would invalidate everything they believe in, they can't allow that because they aren't rational,
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: Election Deniers [Re: TNK]
#23927043 - 12/14/16 05:36 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TheNatureKid said:
Quote:
koods said: Yeah they did. By 2.8 million votes.
It seems some people are just really bad at math; thinking that he won in a "landslide" victory even though half of the American voting population voted against him.Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
TheNatureKid said: No, they did.
Roughly half of America did. Regardless that Trump won still nearly half of the voting population voted for Hillary.
I asked why "the rest" of the country didn't vote for obama 3.0.
Fact is a lot of people are fed up with this shitty part time job Obamacare killing economy we have now
That's a big reason why Trump won
Last I checked Trump wasn't repealing Obamacare; you nutter.
I guess America would be better off if those people employed by fast-food/part-time employment didn't have jobs; right? I thought the goal was to produce more jobs for everyone regardless of the type of job it was as long as it produced an income for American families? I guess you would rather have 15,000 people making 40k a year rather than 500,000 people making 20k a year.
20,000 a year? No thanks
Why didn't the rest of the country vote for her?
|
TNK
Pleasures of Africa



Registered: 01/30/10
Posts: 14,237
Loc: I AM THUNDERBOT
Last seen: 1 month, 18 days
|
|
You live in a very narrowed of the view world.
You can "Support" a president while having opposing opinions, you must think every "liberal" in america is foaming at the mouth for Trumps blood.
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
TheNatureKid said:
Quote:
koods said: Yeah they did. By 2.8 million votes.
It seems some people are just really bad at math; thinking that he won in a "landslide" victory even though half of the American voting population voted against him.Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
TheNatureKid said: No, they did.
Roughly half of America did. Regardless that Trump won still nearly half of the voting population voted for Hillary.
I asked why "the rest" of the country didn't vote for obama 3.0.
Fact is a lot of people are fed up with this shitty part time job Obamacare killing economy we have now
That's a big reason why Trump won
Last I checked Trump wasn't repealing Obamacare; you nutter.
I guess America would be better off if those people employed by fast-food/part-time employment didn't have jobs; right? I thought the goal was to produce more jobs for everyone regardless of the type of job it was as long as it produced an income for American families? I guess you would rather have 15,000 people making 40k a year rather than 500,000 people making 20k a year.
20,000 a year? No thanks
Why didn't the rest of the country vote for her?
So you're saying you'd rather see higher unemployment rates as long as all the new jobs provided a higher income? Thus reducing the entire American Workforce because their 20k (which is bigger than 0 mind you) isn't good enough? What kind of logic and work ethic is that?
You accuse Liberals of being lazy and want government handouts but you're the one who refuses to acknowledge that 20,000$ a year is bigger than 0$; maybe you just don't understand the struggle of prolonged unemployment but 20,000$ is sure of a hell lot bigger than 0.
-------------------- Edited by TNK (02/22/22 22:22 PM)
|
Morel Guy
Stranger


Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: Election Deniers [Re: TNK] 1
#23927061 - 12/14/16 05:41 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Trump won due to the middle class votes. That is exactly what republicans tend to fuck over.
-------------------- "in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur" In filth it will be found in dung it will be found
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: Election Deniers [Re: TNK]
#23927073 - 12/14/16 05:44 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
You can "Support" a president while having opposing opinions, you must think every "liberal" in america is foaming at the mouth for Trumps blood.
Have you read theses threads?
Quote:
So you're saying you'd rather see higher unemployment rates as long as all the new jobs provided a higher income? Thus reducing the entire American Workforce because their 20k (which is bigger than 0 mind you) isn't good enough? What kind of logic and work ethic is that?
You accuse Liberals of being lazy and want government handouts but you're the one who refuses to acknowledge that 20,000$ a year is bigger than 0$; maybe you just don't understand the struggle of prolonged unemployment but 20,000$ is sure of a hell lot bigger than 0.
No, I'm saying that America can do better, we used to be able to have good paying jobs that you could actully raise a family on without govt assistance,
Those are the jobs we need, those aren't the jobs Ofuckhead created
Food stamp use is at all time highs, that's not the sign of a strong economy
|
Patlal
You ask too many questions



Registered: 10/09/10
Posts: 44,797
Loc: Ottawa
Last seen: 12 hours, 58 minutes
|
|
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
Patlal said: Jesus fucking christ...
Normally people start judging a President a year after the election. After the "Honeymoon" phase. Everybody is judging even before he steps into office. I know this was an unusual election of an unusual candidate, but give the guy a chance.
His success = America's success = your success.
He's your three-legged race partner, if you don't work together, you'll both fall face down in the mud.
Liberals will never support him, just like they never supported Bush.
They won't even give him a chance and they'll never acknowledge any good he ever does.
To do that, would invalidate everything they believe in, they can't allow that because they aren't rational,
Kinda like the Conservatives did with Obama?
--------------------
Edited by Patlal (12/14/16 05:44 PM)
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
|
Quote:
Morel Guy said: Trump won due to the middle class votes. That is exactly what republicans tend to fuck over.
Wrong,
the middle class used to be brainwashed into thinking they were helped by democrats, but they found out they had actually abandoned them for illegals, big business and the climate hoax.
That is why they lost the middle class votes, Trump actulky cares about Americans, democrats have proven time and time again they don't and the middle class is finally waking up to that fact
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: Election Deniers [Re: Patlal]
#23927092 - 12/14/16 05:48 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Patlal said:
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
Patlal said: Jesus fucking christ...
Normally people start judging a President a year after the election. After the "Honeymoon" phase. Everybody is judging even before he steps into office. I know this was an unusual election of an unusual candidate, but give the guy a chance.
His success = America's success = your success.
He's your three-legged race partner, if you don't work together, you'll both fall face down in the mud.
Liberals will never support him, just like they never supported Bush.
They won't even give him a chance and they'll never acknowledge any good he ever does.
To do that, would invalidate everything they believe in, they can't allow that because they aren't rational,
Kinda like the Conservatives did with Obama?
Not quite, obama didn't do anything good, that's the difference
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Not quite, obama didn't do anything good, that's the difference
failpost.
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said:
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Not quite, obama didn't do anything good, that's the difference
failpost.
Okay shitposter
Name some accomplishments
|
Patlal
You ask too many questions



Registered: 10/09/10
Posts: 44,797
Loc: Ottawa
Last seen: 12 hours, 58 minutes
|
|
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
Patlal said:
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
Patlal said: Jesus fucking christ...
Normally people start judging a President a year after the election. After the "Honeymoon" phase. Everybody is judging even before he steps into office. I know this was an unusual election of an unusual candidate, but give the guy a chance.
His success = America's success = your success.
He's your three-legged race partner, if you don't work together, you'll both fall face down in the mud.
Liberals will never support him, just like they never supported Bush.
They won't even give him a chance and they'll never acknowledge any good he ever does.
To do that, would invalidate everything they believe in, they can't allow that because they aren't rational,
Kinda like the Conservatives did with Obama?
Not quite, obama didn't do anything good, that's the difference
That's not true. You know this. You can't be in office for 8 years and do nothing good. The pre-existing condition clause in Obamacare is extremely beneficial to you guys. There's no denying it.
--------------------
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: Election Deniers [Re: Patlal]
#23927183 - 12/14/16 06:16 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
That's not true. You know this. You can't be in office for 8 years and do nothing good. The pre-existing condition clause in Obamacare is extremely beneficial to you guys. There's no denying it
Well as the hardcore leftys here love to point out, that wasn't him, it was written by republicans
NEXT!
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Election Deniers [Re: Patlal] 1
#23927197 - 12/14/16 06:20 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: The pre-existing condition clause in Obamacare is extremely beneficial to you guys. There's no denying it.
There's no denying it if your one of the moochers.
There's plenty of denying it, if your one of those paying for the moochers.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Patlal
You ask too many questions



Registered: 10/09/10
Posts: 44,797
Loc: Ottawa
Last seen: 12 hours, 58 minutes
|
|
Quote:
luvdemshrooms said:
Quote:
koods said: The pre-existing condition clause in Obamacare is extremely beneficial to you guys. There's no denying it.
There's no denying it if your one of the moochers.
There's plenty of denying it, if your one of those paying for the moochers.
We're talking people who were dealt a bad hand. Poor heart, poor anything. They were born with a problem or already suffered a medical episode. You can't put money before well being of people. Healthy people are much more productive in the long run than dead people.
--------------------
|
Morel Guy
Stranger


Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
That's not true. You know this. You can't be in office for 8 years and do nothing good. The pre-existing condition clause in Obamacare is extremely beneficial to you guys. There's no denying it
Well as the hardcore leftys here love to point out, that wasn't him, it was written by republicans
NEXT!
Never heard a so called lefty even remotely suggest that
-------------------- "in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur" In filth it will be found in dung it will be found
|
|