Home | Community | Message Board

Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Bridgetown Botanicals CBD Concentrates   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >  [ show all ]
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
InvisiblemushboyMDiscord
modboy
 User Gallery


Registered: 04/24/05
Posts: 32,281
Loc: where?
Trusted Cultivator
OG Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: spacechildo]
    #23916005 - 12/11/16 11:09 AM (7 years, 1 month ago)

i should of used the quote box for moab on that one.

oh well.

anywho lets help OP get a canopy of wall to wall mushrooms in a monotub.
then discuss if automation is necessary.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemushhiehunter
Trichodermatologist
Male User Gallery


Registered: 10/11/16
Posts: 837
Loc: Česká republika
Last seen: 3 years, 2 months
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: mushboy]
    #23916018 - 12/11/16 11:15 AM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Hmm this thread got me thinking... Has anyone ever created a fully automated system using a monotub? (I know that tuned monotub is pretty much on auto-pilot) but I would like to see someone using arduino with sensors to show all the sweet data that would come out of the system. It certainly would be an amazing source for learning...


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePastywhyteMDiscord
Say hello to my little friend
Male User Gallery


Registered: 09/15/12
Posts: 37,810
Loc: Canada
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: mushhiehunter]
    #23916030 - 12/11/16 11:21 AM (7 years, 1 month ago)

The problem is that the configuration of a monotub doesn't lend itself to automation. The horizontal shape easily leads to oversaturation if you supply extra humidity (the sub already provides RH) and running fans is unnecessary as the sub provides plenty of heat currents to cycle the air. It's just going to complicate an already elegant and effective system.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineenlightenment
alchemist
 User Gallery

Registered: 08/09/09
Posts: 1,647
Loc: Europe
Last seen: 8 months, 21 days
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: mushhiehunter]
    #23916031 - 12/11/16 11:22 AM (7 years, 1 month ago)

:lol:
No need to automate something for monotubs.

I got an automated GH for my edibles controlled by a raspberry.
That's why I wrote a CO2 sensor could be interesting for me. Just to monitor/log the CO2 concentration and adjust the FAE. I like to watch and analyze diagrams. Of course it could be done without a sensor (I am doing it successful without one). Anyway for this price I will buy one even if I don't need it. Not neccessary but nice to have if it works.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleegobrain


Registered: 11/17/16
Posts: 180
Loc: Canada Flag
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: enlightenment]
    #23916041 - 12/11/16 11:31 AM (7 years, 1 month ago)

K.I.S.S.

Keep
It
Simple
Stupid

I live by this rule, not just in cultivation. Monitoring co2 seems pointless for cubes..

:popcorn:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinePussyFart
Retired Cultivation Extrodinaire
Male


Registered: 04/08/12
Posts: 22,502
Loc: Orbiting Earth
Last seen: 18 days, 8 minutes
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: egobrain]
    #23916192 - 12/11/16 12:36 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

:popcorn:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleJosex
#cheat_code
 User Gallery


Registered: 11/13/15
Posts: 8,995
Loc: Flag
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: mushboy]
    #23916243 - 12/11/16 12:58 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

mushboy said:
op got shat on because hes trying to replace fanning for automated FAE.
the problem is fanning doesnt provide fae. his point is invalid. user error.
file not found. bad command line. ect..

automated grow chambers sound cool if you want it. but to myself the whole
process of watching and reacting to what the mushrooms are telling me is the
essence of why i grow the mushroom in the first place. besides the drugs effect.

and no one flammed or trolled OP. i just said fanning isnt fae
and got the :rr: treatment



:ilold:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinecronicrFacebook
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/07/11
Posts: 61,436
Loc: Van Isle Flag
Last seen: 2 years, 8 days
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: Josex]
    #23916464 - 12/11/16 02:13 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Use the meter n measure the levels of a mono colonizing...one with poly in one taped then again after pinning.


--------------------

It doesn't matter what i think of you...all that matters is clean spawn

I'm tired do me a favor


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleArcanum
I'M BACK!
Male User Gallery


Registered: 01/30/10
Posts: 871
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: PussyFart]
    #23917167 - 12/11/16 05:47 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

PussyFart said:
First you insinuate that one of the reasons you are doing this is for better yield, and then you negate it by saying you are not looking for a better yield.....? :confused2:
Quote:

Arcanum said:
Second of all, having more control (or at least having the ability to monitor) CO2 levels allows more of an opportunity to dial in optimal conditions. Just because you can get a decent pin set in a tub with holes in it doesn't mean they're getting as much fresh air as they could (you have no way of knowing without a CO2 meter) or that you couldn't get better yields more reliably with better/more consistent FAE.








Allows more of an opportunity, can, could, couldn't... none of those are assertions.

Quote:

PussyFart said:
Secondly YOU CAN tell if they are getting enough FAE simply by looking at the fruits and the substrate and reading what it wants/needs, which comes with experience. No need for a co2 meter of any kind.




Not everyone has a shit ton of experience. If the amount of experience you need to "read what it wants" takes x many grows to gain, you'll have to pay the cost of those grows where you're likely to make mistakes. $10 worth of components, an hour of so of programming (which I could eliminate by sharing my code), and you've short-cut that learning curve. Bam! Usefulness. Second, "reading what the shrooms wants/needs" isn't empirical.

Quote:

spacechildo said:
I dont see any hate here, all I see is a confused OP misreading RR quotes and thinking since RR says to fan a sgfc that means we all fan monotubs for FAE, which we all know isnt true.

the best way to know if your air is stale in a tub is to look at the mushrooms, not the reading of some co2 meter.
the meter doesnt tell you what your culture wants, the mushrooms does.

If you want more FAE in a tub, loosen the poly. a monotub is automated so no need to do unnecessary work that probably only will screw things up for you :shrug:




I never said everyone fans monotubs. I said some people do.

Quote:

Pastywhyte said:
The problem is that the configuration of a monotub doesn't lend itself to automation. The horizontal shape easily leads to oversaturation if you supply extra humidity (the sub already provides RH) and running fans is unnecessary as the sub provides plenty of heat currents to cycle the air. It's just going to complicate an already elegant and effective system.




I never even said I was doing a monotub?

Quote:

Mad Season said:
:shrug: IMO people are trying to help him... correct me if I'm wrong. He seems to not have much experience, and they're trying to help him learn to walk (interpret mushroom/mycelial reactions) before he runs (makes a chamber with gizmos up the ass that accommodates to those reactions)

Is a person who needs more experience really the kinda person who should attempt this? If this was azur, pasty, cron, etc I wouldn't be saying anything but :popcorn: just saying..




:rofl: Gizmos up the ass? Really? It's a $3 micro-controller, two $2 sensors, two $0.50 PC fans, and a $5 ultrasonic humidifier, a little bit of circuitry, and a few hours of programming. I could finish it in a day if I didn't have other shit to do.

UGH! I KNOW I can grow shrooms just as easily with a plain monotub! That's not the fucking point! It baffles me why people have so much of a problem with the way I'm growing my shrooms. I'm monitoring humidity too so if I flush the air more than I need to, it's not hurting anything. If you don't find it necessary or useful, good for you, now move on and stop filling my thread with your irrelevant criticism.

I've already had successful grows before. I'm just trying something new for fucks sake because I want the challenge. I don't need massive amounts of shrooms so even if I get half the yield of a monotub, I really don't give a shit. With the fruit I do get, I'll trip knowing I grew them how I wanted to, not how I was badgered into doing it by people who don't understand why I grow them myself in the first place.


--------------------
:blankbubble:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleArcanum
I'M BACK!
Male User Gallery


Registered: 01/30/10
Posts: 871
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: Mad Season]
    #23917168 - 12/11/16 05:47 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

bodhisatta said:
Quote:



For testing purposes, I have a 6,400 cubic cm Sterlite container with a 60mm hole at the top (CO2 sinks, I know, but this is just a test)





CO2 doesn't sink. It's infinitely miscable it mixes with air nearly immediately and forms a homogeneous air mixture

Co2 will settle out sightly in huge sealed containers.

Even in the beer industry there's the misconception that co2 blankets




I was testing is a small container without any heat source to create convection currents. The only holes were at the top, as was the fan and there was a filter between it. I was getting pockets of air at the bottom that weren't circulating when the fan was on, and I know that because I measured it.


Quote:

Mad Season said:
That is concentrated co2 (probably 90+% co2 produced in an instant) far beyond anything you'd see in either a sealed room or the atmosphere, what you dont see is lots of particles dissipating into the air around it. The majority of it will go to the bottom, but in no time at all it will get mixed into the atmosphere again.



Quote:

Pastywhyte said:
Like the difference between drinking a glass of water and waterboarding. . .




I was testing the sensor, not modelling growing conditions. 

Quote:

mushboy said:
i looked up the calibration of the mq135 and its ridiculously fussy.

OP- correct me if wrong but if the power goes out or something you have
to re-calibrate the sensor? so the system is off while this happens? how long
does this take?
considering power could be out for awhile the automation aspect falls apart
and since its limited to its setup, the mushrooms are shut in a box with no
FAE happening.




You don't have to calibrate the sensor each time it is powered up, but it does have to warm up a little. Immediately after turning on, it will read high and slowly level off to expected levels over 30 - 60 seconds. That's not a big deal.

Quote:

Mad Season said:
Yep what space and PF said.

If this was just for fun then by all means go for it op! But you made it sound like this is the only way of figuring out what mushrooms want, when in reality all you need to do is learn every reaction they put off and accommodate to it.




Not once did I EVER say that this was the only way to grow shrooms well. In the original post, NOT ONCE did I say a word about expecting better yield or anything about yield, period. In response to people calling me  noob and telling me I was wasting my time, I said that this was for fun, experimentation, and learning experience (for microcontrollers, not necessarily growing shrooms)... and then mentioned that MAYBE, just MAYBE having monitoring abilities and consistent control over environmental conditions, there could be peripheral benefits. Someone claimed that no one fans for FAE, I quoted a respected grower outright contradicting that.

Quote:

Keep in mind, the reason people are saying that OP should do tubs, isn't because they hate him.. they don't want him to waste his time and money for something that isn't needed, at all.




With all due respect, I think that's bullshit. I don't think they personally hate me, but they definitely relish the idea of flexing their clearly superior shroom growing muscles at any chance they get for no reason other than the feeling of doing so. As I've already mentioned several times, I'm not investing my time and money into this project because I think it is necessary.


--------------------
:blankbubble:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineKenetic
Nam Sayin
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/24/14
Posts: 4,389
Loc: I don't believe in land Flag
Last seen: 5 years, 3 months
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: Arcanum]
    #23917177 - 12/11/16 05:50 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Good luck


--------------------
Todo Cambia
   

               
                                                :cookiemonster::elmo:



DMT said: Everyone know's me, they just don't know it yet


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePastywhyteMDiscord
Say hello to my little friend
Male User Gallery


Registered: 09/15/12
Posts: 37,810
Loc: Canada
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: Arcanum] * 1
    #23917226 - 12/11/16 06:02 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Dude you need to calm down. You responded to 2 posts from me, neither of which were directed at you or had anything negative to say about your project. Melting is no way to make a point.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinePussyFart
Retired Cultivation Extrodinaire
Male


Registered: 04/08/12
Posts: 22,502
Loc: Orbiting Earth
Last seen: 18 days, 8 minutes
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: Arcanum]
    #23917419 - 12/11/16 06:43 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

Arcanum said:
I was testing is a small container without any heat source to create convection currents.



Mycellium generates heat. Substrates generate humidity.

So in real world conditions, those test results wouldn't mean anything.


Edited by PussyFart (12/11/16 06:45 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinespacechildo
proletarians rise up
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/24/13
Posts: 19,243
Loc: Babylon
Last seen: 6 years, 4 months
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: PussyFart]
    #23917434 - 12/11/16 06:45 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

man I love pubbers in mush cult :crazy:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblebodhisattaMDiscordReddit
Smurf real estate agent
 User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 04/30/13
Posts: 61,889
Loc: Milky way
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: Pastywhyte]
    #23917435 - 12/11/16 06:45 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

people have a problem with it because you're trying to do something the experts have trouble with, start simple when you have no experience on your hands. you're building something based on assumptions and things you read. maybe get a few grows under your belt before trying to outsmart passive automation


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinecronicrFacebook
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/07/11
Posts: 61,436
Loc: Van Isle Flag
Last seen: 2 years, 8 days
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: bodhisatta]
    #23917441 - 12/11/16 06:47 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Co2 meters are pretty fucking sensitive from my understanding and breathing in the room will effect them.


--------------------

It doesn't matter what i think of you...all that matters is clean spawn

I'm tired do me a favor


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleMad Season
hookers and blackjack
 User Gallery


Registered: 09/16/12
Posts: 12,666
Loc: Canada Flag
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: cronicr]
    #23917729 - 12/11/16 08:04 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Lol! The dude fuckin didn't read anything and went all defensive because we told him he doesn't know the reactions

Good shit. Now read it again, and while youre at it, read other stuff too. Keep on reading and reading, and when you think you've done enough reading, you're not even 1% of the way there

Quote:

bodhisatta said:
people have a problem with it because you're trying to do something the experts have trouble with, start simple when you have no experience on your hands. you're building something based on assumptions and things you read. maybe get a few grows under your belt before trying to outsmart passive automation



I not only agree with this, I'm going to go further and say how do you know what your equipment is saying is accurate without knowing the mushrooms reactions? A sensor could tell me 99% rH or 600 ppm of co2, but the mushrooms themselves could look dry AF and need more surface hydration, or they're telling me they need more FAE.. the sensors don't replace what your eyes can, and I'd say 9/10 times they actually hinder the grower because they're contradicting what the mushrooms are telling him.

This is why I said learn to walk before running. These fancy gizmos aren't the mushrooms that are growing. They're just tools you shouldn't even need once you can tell their reactions.

Tl;dr once you can read the mushrooms, read the environment and calibrate your tools accordingly, then tell US how you figured out the best possible environment with your skills.


--------------------
contam and car window art
How to shroomery like a pro! (Seriously, everyone read this!)
Improve your sterile techniques! (A comprehensive guide to agar)
Links upon links of literally EVERYTHING UP TO DATE

AMU Q&A
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.


Edited by Mad Season (12/11/16 08:59 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleArcanum
I'M BACK!
Male User Gallery


Registered: 01/30/10
Posts: 871
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: Kenetic]
    #23918003 - 12/11/16 09:26 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

PussyFart said:
Mycellium generates heat. Substrates generate humidity.

So in real world conditions, those test results wouldn't mean anything.




I never said they would translate to real world conditions. I was testing the reliability of the sensor.

Quote:

Pastywhyte said:
Dude you need to calm down. You responded to 2 posts from me, neither of which were directed at you or had anything negative to say about your project. Melting is no way to make a point.




I apologize (genuinely). I'm getting frustrated having to repeat myself over and over again for the people that don't seem to understand why I am doing this. From your first post on this thread, I don't think you're one of those people, but there are people beating a strawman that I have not given them any reason to construct. I'm getting exasperated because I'd rather be talking about the actual topic of this thread.

Quote:

bodhisatta said:
people have a problem with it because you're trying to do something the experts have trouble with, start simple when you have no experience on your hands. you're building something based on assumptions and things you read. maybe get a few grows under your belt before trying to outsmart passive automation




For the third time, I already have experience with successful grows. They were years ago and maybe I'm not totally up to date on the know-how, but it is experience nonetheless.  I also have three years experience using microcontrollers and using them to interface with sensors, and another ten years writing code. I don't have much experience with CO2 sensors, but it's kind of hard to gain that experience without experimenting with one... which is the entire point of my project. I'm not doing anything outlandish. I'm using a novel method of sensing CO2 to programmatically control fans. It's not rocket science.

I have a big problem with people implying they know how it will affect growing shrooms despite the fact they themselves have no experience with CO2 meters and couldn't give anything close to an objective measure of CO2 levels inside their fruiting chambers. Show me someone who has empirically measured the CO2 produced by growing shrooms, and I will totally accept any criticism they have to give.

Quote:

Mad Season said:
Lol! The dude fuckin didn't read anything and went all defensive because we told him he doesn't know the reactions

Good shit. Now read it again, and while youre at it, read other stuff too. Keep on reading and reading, and when you think you've done enough reading, you're not even 1% of the way there





You know way more about growing shrooms than I do. No doubt. Believe it or not, I haven't professed or implied anything to suggest otherwise. That being said, you should try reading what I've written so maybe you'll actually understand why I am doing this project instead of junking up my thread with posts about how stupid and inexperienced I am.

Quote:

cronicr said:
Co2 meters are pretty fucking sensitive from my understanding and breathing in the room will effect them.




They are. People have actually used much more accurate CO2 sensors to roughly estimate the number of people inside of a room, but it depends on how well ventilated it is. That's irrelevant though, seeing as my fruiting chamber will be mostly enclosed.

Quote:

kenetic said:
Good luck




Thanks, I appreciate it :thumbup:


--------------------
:blankbubble:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleMad Season
hookers and blackjack
 User Gallery


Registered: 09/16/12
Posts: 12,666
Loc: Canada Flag
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: Arcanum]
    #23918006 - 12/11/16 09:28 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Please read my edited post.. I was working and didn't have time to sit down and type out why I said what I did, and sorry for talking down to you.. I do appreciate the thoughts on making your conditions best, but you have to understand that I help someone with sensors like hygrometers and co2 sensors all the time, and I've very rarely said "oh yeah that looks like it's got enough humidity/fresh air, good work!" Usually it's wow those are neglected looking, and they reply with but it's 99% and under 1000 ppm or something.. To which I say, you need to learn the myceliums reactions and accommodate to it. I really genuinely want people not to waste their time, ya know? If you're still just going to do it, I can't stop you. It's your grow, but I'm hoping you can understand my point of view.


--------------------
contam and car window art
How to shroomery like a pro! (Seriously, everyone read this!)
Improve your sterile techniques! (A comprehensive guide to agar)
Links upon links of literally EVERYTHING UP TO DATE

AMU Q&A
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.


Edited by Mad Season (12/11/16 09:38 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinecronicrFacebook
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/07/11
Posts: 61,436
Loc: Van Isle Flag
Last seen: 2 years, 8 days
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Extremely affordable method to roughly monitor CO2 concentration (for FAE automation) [Re: Arcanum]
    #23918010 - 12/11/16 09:29 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Well if your going to play with them test the numbers of a colonizing versus fruiting sub for moi:cheers:


--------------------

It doesn't matter what i think of you...all that matters is clean spawn

I'm tired do me a favor


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: Bridgetown Botanicals CBD Concentrates   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Methods of eliminating cO2 without fanning??? VIgnisFatuusI 1,186 16 07/09/03 02:07 PM
by crazycanadian
* Poor man's vs. average man's methods Crete 1,906 10 12/16/01 04:34 AM
by Purple_Voyage
* Measuring CO2 Level Che_Night_Soil 3,183 6 03/24/19 02:15 PM
by bodhisatta
* Humidity/perlite question EgoMagickian 1,337 7 10/15/03 01:48 AM
by Innernaut
* CO2 and fanning with the pickle jar method wackytron 1,275 11 11/17/03 04:02 PM
by wackytron
* Modify the PF TEK method to accomodate my lifestyle? Jaroon 2,371 9 09/30/04 05:01 PM
by george castanza
* what's the best method for air exchange? bravar 1,085 6 04/04/02 06:09 PM
by LSD_4me
* How fast does mycelium convert oxygen into CO2? Fd3000 3,420 16 07/22/02 07:05 PM
by diseased

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, veggie, mushboy, fahtster, LogicaL Chaos, 13shrooms, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta, Tormato, Land Trout, A.k.a
3,948 topic views. 32 members, 257 guests and 31 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.032 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 15 queries.