|
Mush 4 Brains
about tree fiddy


Registered: 12/19/07
Posts: 8,298
Loc: Tacos
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: SonicTitan]
#23896217 - 12/05/16 09:05 AM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Im sure there are more women here than what we think. There's only one good way for all these beautiful shroomy gals to prove theyre actually ladies. Like they say pics or it didn't happen. Thats right! You gals all meed to post picures of your adams apple-less throats
|
Webster10
Up like Trump



Registered: 12/03/13
Posts: 9,966
Loc: Strawberry Fields
Last seen: 6 years, 3 months
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: Mush 4 Brains]
#23896355 - 12/05/16 10:08 AM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Seriously_trippin said:
Quote:
sh4d0ws said:
Quote:
Webster10 said: What kind of girl would be interested in chatting with anonymous drug users on the shroomery who are usually ugly as fuck and socially awkward. Maybe if the other guys here were more alpha we'd attract some more pussy
It's probably because of posters like Webster.
Whatever you say, man. Women usually enjoy talking to me in real life, and they consider me charming and nice. So think what you think, but really, the reason there aren't more women here isnt because of me occasionally being crass. It's because a majority of the guys on this site are shit-tier people lmao.
--------------------
Edited by Webster10 (12/05/16 10:22 AM)
|
404
error


Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 14,539
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: Webster10] 6
#23896362 - 12/05/16 10:12 AM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
It's because a majority of the guys on this site are shit-tier people lmao.
Oh, the irony.
|
Mandarinfish

Registered: 01/27/15
Posts: 1,365
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? *DELETED* [Re: Sheekle]
#23896407 - 12/05/16 10:25 AM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by Mandarinfish
Reason for deletion: .
|
CookieCrumbs
Fucked off to the pub


Registered: 12/10/11
Posts: 14,146
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: finalexplosion] 2
#23896422 - 12/05/16 10:30 AM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
finalexplosion said:
Quote:
Crystal G said:
What final explosion says about IQ and gender is somewhat true. While most people of both genders tend to be in the center or average, if you look on a bell curve, men are more likely to be either extremely intelligent or extremely stupid and retarded. They show a greater level of variance.
But the reason for this, supposedly, is because men get their intelligence from their mothers. Apparently the gene for intelligence is passed through the X chromosome. So, part of the reason that men vary so widely and tend to display greater extremes of stupidity or high intellect, is largely because of the single X chromosome they get.
Women on the other hand inherit two X chromosomes, one from their mother and one from their father, so the combination of the two tends to balance itself out.
Exactly. Men go out, compete for the eggs, and it yields to more variations in IQ.
As for that in bold, would love to see a source. I find the info all fascinating. I bet heavily that much of the data and info now will later be contradicted or disputed in a future now.
That doesn't make sense.
How do they "compete for the eggs"?
--------------------
Free time is the only time
|
finalexplosion
Stranger
Registered: 11/04/16
Posts: 370
Last seen: 7 years, 1 month
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: CookieCrumbs]
#23896606 - 12/05/16 11:42 AM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
CookieCrumbs said:
That doesn't make sense.
How do they "compete for the eggs"?
Women have babies. I know this is troublesome for you. Men have more sperm. Women have less eggs and period of fertility. This is not sexist *your favorite claim* that is biology.
The variation of male IQ ----- >>> Einstein/Edison/Franklin <------> JACK THE FUCKING RIPPER!
Female IQ has variations but, not nearly as much as the Male IQ spectrum. Why? Gender is not a construct despite all the junk science in schools across north America. Males participate in higher-risk behavior more than females. TBI and SCI are classic examples. Its practically nonexistent in the female population. Again, males are out competing for the eggs. Hypergamy is hardwired into female biology since the dawn of time.
For a man to get a woman, some other man did not. Classic example of gene warfare. Survival of the fittest.
Again, I know this is hard for you to understand.
-------------------- The light of wisdom is driving away the darkness. Look at the ground. Now you can see your own shadow. If you are scared by the shadow that follows you, just remember, wherever shadows fall, light is always nearby.
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: finalexplosion] 1
#23896637 - 12/05/16 11:49 AM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
finalexplosion said: The variation of male IQ ----- >>> Einstein/Edison/Franklin <------> JACK THE FUCKING RIPPER!
Do you have some reason to believe that Jack the Ripper had an especially low IQ?
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: Mandarinfish]
#23896642 - 12/05/16 11:51 AM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Mandarinfish said:
Quote:
Sheekle said: Some may refer to white males are "crackers" and "honkeys"
Honkeys. LOLZ
That made my day day. 
We prefer the term "Honkers"
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 13 hours, 9 minutes
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: hostileuniverse] 3
#23896678 - 12/05/16 12:00 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
I think there's enough males on this site with high levels of femininity to make up the different of the small female presence.
|
CookieCrumbs
Fucked off to the pub


Registered: 12/10/11
Posts: 14,146
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: finalexplosion] 1
#23896758 - 12/05/16 12:29 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
I never even actually called you sexist and I used the word once. You have reading comprehension problems.
And your explanation still doesn't really make sense. Every time I think I start to get it you say "competing for eggs" and then I feel like the problem isn't my understanding of reproductive science but the idiot way youre trying to explain it.
--------------------
Free time is the only time
Edited by CookieCrumbs (12/05/16 12:32 PM)
|
Crystal G



Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 8 months, 6 days
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: finalexplosion] 2
#23897205 - 12/05/16 03:32 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
finalexplosion said:
Quote:
CookieCrumbs said:
That doesn't make sense.
How do they "compete for the eggs"?
Women have babies. I know this is troublesome for you. Men have more sperm. Women have less eggs and period of fertility. This is not sexist *your favorite claim* that is biology.
The variation of male IQ ----- >>> Einstein/Edison/Franklin <------> JACK THE FUCKING RIPPER!
Female IQ has variations but, not nearly as much as the Male IQ spectrum. Why? Gender is not a construct despite all the junk science in schools across north America. Males participate in higher-risk behavior more than females. TBI and SCI are classic examples. Its practically nonexistent in the female population. Again, males are out competing for the eggs. Hypergamy is hardwired into female biology since the dawn of time.
For a man to get a woman, some other man did not. Classic example of gene warfare. Survival of the fittest.
Again, I know this is hard for you to understand.
You have to make sense for people to understand you. What you have failed to establish is exactly how competiting for eggs affects IQ or even relates to IQ at all. The theory I posited at least makes logical scientific sense.
|
finalexplosion
Stranger
Registered: 11/04/16
Posts: 370
Last seen: 7 years, 1 month
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: psi]
#23897660 - 12/05/16 05:57 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
psi said:
Quote:
finalexplosion said: The variation of male IQ ----- >>> Einstein/Edison/Franklin <------> JACK THE FUCKING RIPPER!
Do you have some reason to believe that Jack the Ripper had an especially low IQ?
The reference is not just in respect of higher or lower IQ but rather, to indicate the variations.
-------------------- The light of wisdom is driving away the darkness. Look at the ground. Now you can see your own shadow. If you are scared by the shadow that follows you, just remember, wherever shadows fall, light is always nearby.
|
finalexplosion
Stranger
Registered: 11/04/16
Posts: 370
Last seen: 7 years, 1 month
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: Crystal G]
#23897700 - 12/05/16 06:11 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Crystal G said:
You have to make sense for people to understand you. What you have failed to establish is exactly how competiting for eggs affects IQ or even relates to IQ at all. The theory I posited at least makes logical scientific sense.
Funny given your response prior on being emotional and irrational lol
It is in response to female choice. Women have been selectors and gatekeeper since the dawn of time. Women control and shape human history by being selectors. Women select males from a variety of different levels of intelligence and thus, shape human nature. Women have selected more violent males since the dawn of time meaning those writing poetry or crying about their feelers had genes weeded out of existence. This is preselection. Access or denial of the eggs. Men compete for the eggs. It goes back to hypergamy and survival of the fittest.
It is typically why professional athletes marry extremely attractive women. Again, men compete for the eggs.
-------------------- The light of wisdom is driving away the darkness. Look at the ground. Now you can see your own shadow. If you are scared by the shadow that follows you, just remember, wherever shadows fall, light is always nearby.
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 13 hours, 9 minutes
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: finalexplosion] 1
#23897709 - 12/05/16 06:16 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
finalexplosion said:
Quote:
Crystal G said:
You have to make sense for people to understand you. What you have failed to establish is exactly how competiting for eggs affects IQ or even relates to IQ at all. The theory I posited at least makes logical scientific sense.
Funny given your response prior on being emotional and irrational lol
It is in response to female choice. Women have been selectors and gatekeeper since the dawn of time. Women control and shape human history by being selectors. Women select males from a variety of different levels of intelligence and thus, shape human nature. Women have selected more violent males since the dawn of time meaning those writing poetry or crying about their feelers had genes weeded out of existence. This is preselection. Access or denial of the eggs. Men compete for the eggs. It goes back to hypergamy and survival of the fittest.
It is typically why professional athletes marry extremely attractive women. Again, men compete for the eggs.
Or maybe the stronger and violent males just raped the women they wanted to have sex with, a females selection process hasn't always been their own to make.
|
Crystal G



Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 8 months, 6 days
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: finalexplosion]
#23897710 - 12/05/16 06:16 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
finalexplosion said: Funny given your response prior on being emotional and irrational lol
Are you confusing me for somebody else? I made no such post.
Quote:
Women have selected more violent males since the dawn of time meaning those writing poetry or crying about their feelers had genes weeded out of existence.
They didn't. Have you ever heard of the Age of Enlightenment? Ancient Greece?
Quote:
It is typically why professional athletes marry extremely attractive women. Again, men compete for the eggs.
What does that have to do with IQ? Doesn't that have more to do with money and fame?
|
Crystal G



Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 8 months, 6 days
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: qman]
#23897715 - 12/05/16 06:17 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
finalexplosion said:
Quote:
Crystal G said:
You have to make sense for people to understand you. What you have failed to establish is exactly how competiting for eggs affects IQ or even relates to IQ at all. The theory I posited at least makes logical scientific sense.
Funny given your response prior on being emotional and irrational lol
It is in response to female choice. Women have been selectors and gatekeeper since the dawn of time. Women control and shape human history by being selectors. Women select males from a variety of different levels of intelligence and thus, shape human nature. Women have selected more violent males since the dawn of time meaning those writing poetry or crying about their feelers had genes weeded out of existence. This is preselection. Access or denial of the eggs. Men compete for the eggs. It goes back to hypergamy and survival of the fittest.
It is typically why professional athletes marry extremely attractive women. Again, men compete for the eggs.
Or maybe the stronger and violent males just raped the women they wanted to have sex with, a females selection process hasn't always been their own to make.
That's a good point, qman. Yes, it seems very likely that in early human history a significant percentage of stronger, violent men passed on their genes through forcible rape.
|
yogabunny
fancy cat



Registered: 11/01/09
Posts: 11,281
Loc: Nasty Women Get Shit Done
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: Crystal G]
#23897731 - 12/05/16 06:21 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
I think he's referring to something I said in a different thread.
--------------------
|
finalexplosion
Stranger
Registered: 11/04/16
Posts: 370
Last seen: 7 years, 1 month
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: qman]
#23897756 - 12/05/16 06:27 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said: Or maybe the stronger and violent males just raped the women they wanted to have sex with, a females selection process hasn't always been their own to make.
Not been the case here in the west for 100s of years. Swift to cry rape though. Nicely done. I have never heard that one before lol
-------------------- The light of wisdom is driving away the darkness. Look at the ground. Now you can see your own shadow. If you are scared by the shadow that follows you, just remember, wherever shadows fall, light is always nearby.
|
Crystal G



Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 8 months, 6 days
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: LogicaL Chaos]
#23897764 - 12/05/16 06:29 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
finalexplosion said: As for that in bold, would love to see a source. I find the info all fascinating. I bet heavily that much of the data and info now will later be contradicted or disputed in a future now.
Since you wanted to see a source, here is one.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB835919711841023500
If you can get a passcode and login for this, let me know cause I'd like to read it: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1016917/
Quote:
LogicaL Chaos said: im not sure im buying that.
For example, i got two half brothers. One we share moms, and my other half brother is a lot smarter than me.
Then my other half brother, on my dads side is about the same intelligence as me.
Intelligence is complex and isnt so simple as "if moms smart, the son is smart". Many genes control IQ and its also the environment that influences it too.
It's not the only factor, that's for sure. Genetics only play a part into how somebody turns out, a lot of it is social conditioning. Somebody who uses their brain primarily to read books or write is going to turn out with a different type of intelligence than someone who actively exercises their brain doing math and playing music.
|
Crystal G



Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 8 months, 6 days
|
Re: Why isn't there a stronger female presence here? [Re: finalexplosion] 2
#23897776 - 12/05/16 06:31 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
finalexplosion said:
Quote:
qman said: Or maybe the stronger and violent males just raped the women they wanted to have sex with, a females selection process hasn't always been their own to make.
Not been the case here in the west for 100s of years. Swift to cry rape though. Nicely done. I have never heard that one before lol
.... You were just talking about female choice and reproduction in early human history which is supposedly what evolved and shaped men's IQ's, not "in the west" for the past 100 years. Seriously.
Edited by Crystal G (12/05/16 06:37 PM)
|
|