|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: Eminence]
#23884850 - 12/01/16 03:21 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Eminence said: That works too. I pretty much only use the grill though, after a light marinade soak overnight.
Chicken is the the best foil for flavors, in my opinion. better you can make a light marinade but spruce it up with all sorts of stuff, nevertheless. like maybe veg-wise.
Quote:
Crystal G said: Boiling ruins the skin, which is the best part. I like a good rotisserie myself. Flame-grill or deep-fry also works too.
yeah, the skin is the best part, for texture, just like with Fish.
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: philopian_tube]
#23884862 - 12/01/16 03:24 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Ol jimmy got the scoop on that crack rock and the fair wenches
Poor ol jimmy aint never held an oppossum but once before they took it away from him
I tried to tell him, You cant feed an opossum no crack rocks jimmy
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: Repertoire89]
#23884869 - 12/01/16 03:26 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
|
wicca mixer
Marmalade, I like marmalade :)



Registered: 07/30/10
Posts: 158
Last seen: 6 years, 10 days
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: Crystal G]
#23884882 - 12/01/16 03:28 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
The BBC are propaganda central. I live in the uk and they are terrible. RT can be ok at times along with al jazeera as you get different angles on things without the full on propaganda you get on the BBC. I say trust none of them. The best way to watch the news is with the sound muted and no subtitles so you can't hear their brainwashing. They show images while telling you what to think, and without hearing them telling you what to think you will have a much more accurate idea of what's going on.
Personally I don't watch tv, listen to the radio or read newspapers. Like Asante says, you always hear anything important from friends/family etc.
|
philopian_tube
Registered: 08/24/13
Posts: 443
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: wicca mixer]
#23885340 - 12/01/16 06:00 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
When are people going to sue Buzzfeed? They are provoking hate by digging where their noses shouldn't be.
--------------------
|
Crystal G



Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 8 months, 6 days
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: philopian_tube]
#23885352 - 12/01/16 06:05 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Who actually takes Buzzfeed seriously as a news source, they steal all their shit from Tumblr and 16 year old's blogs.
|
twighead
mͯó



Registered: 08/27/08
Posts: 29,560
Loc: Glenn Gould's Fuck Windmill
Last seen: 2 hours, 16 minutes
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: Crystal G] 4
#23885373 - 12/01/16 06:16 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Al Jazeera is for terrorist sympathizers, RT is for edgy america haters who are too naive to understand the global strategic situation, BBC is for neo-imperialists, CNN is for fuckheads, Fox is for inbreds, MSNBC is for people who think they're enlightened beings of peace but are really brainwashed idiots, Brietbart is for 4chan-indoctrinated social outcasts, alex jones/infowars is for schizophrenics, NYT/Washington post is basically the same as MSNBC, forbes/WSJ is for wall street dicksuckers, and basically every other internet news source is pure clickbait with no basis in reality whatsoever designed solely for advertising profit.. a lot of them hardly even care how they influence your mind.
Ultimately - the only way to get a rational view of the world is to view as many primary sources as you possibly can (videos of actual events) - try and talk to people who are actually involved and are present at the events - read internal documents from the governments and agencies involved in the news (if the source can be verified - internal chatter is usually much closer to the truth) - talk to active military personnel - talk to active police personnel - talk to active government workers - talk to politicians... Just DO ANYTHING but read someone elses bullshit opinion on exactly the same thing you could be doing yourself. Oh and study your fucking history or nothing at all will have any context and might as well be fucking meaningless.
|
Eminence



Registered: 07/25/10
Posts: 16,623
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: Crystal G]
#23885375 - 12/01/16 06:17 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Unfortunately, lots of people do.
--------------------
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 2 hours, 31 minutes
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: twighead] 3
#23885377 - 12/01/16 06:18 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
twighead said: Al Jazeera is for terrorist sympathizers, RT is for edgy america haters who are too naive to understand the global strategic situation, BBC is for neo-imperialists, CNN is for fuckheads, Fox is for inbreds, MSNBC is for people who think they're enlightened beings of peace but are really brainwashed idiots, Brietbart is for 4chan-indoctrinated social outcasts, alex jones/infowars is for schizophrenics, NYT/Washington post is basically the same as MSNBC, forbes/WSJ is for wall street dicksuckers, and basically every other internet news source is pure clickbait with no basis in reality whatsoever designed solely for advertising profit.. a lot of them hardly even care how they influence your mind.
Ultimately - the only way to get a rational view of the world is to view as many primary sources as you possibly can (videos of actual events) - try and talk to people who are actually involved and are present at the events - read internal documents from the governments and agencies involved in the news (if the source can be verified - internal chatter is usually much closer to the truth) - talk to active military personnel - talk to active police personnel - talk to active government workers - talk to politicians... Just DO ANYTHING but read someone elses bullshit opinion on exactly the same thing you could be doing yourself. Oh and study your fucking history or nothing at all will have any context and might as well be fucking meaningless.
So how do you end up so ill informed?
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
twighead
mͯó



Registered: 08/27/08
Posts: 29,560
Loc: Glenn Gould's Fuck Windmill
Last seen: 2 hours, 16 minutes
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: koods] 1
#23885394 - 12/01/16 06:25 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
twighead said: Al Jazeera is for terrorist sympathizers, RT is for edgy america haters who are too naive to understand the global strategic situation, BBC is for neo-imperialists, CNN is for fuckheads, Fox is for inbreds, MSNBC is for people who think they're enlightened beings of peace but are really brainwashed idiots, Brietbart is for 4chan-indoctrinated social outcasts, alex jones/infowars is for schizophrenics, NYT/Washington post is basically the same as MSNBC, forbes/WSJ is for wall street dicksuckers, and basically every other internet news source is pure clickbait with no basis in reality whatsoever designed solely for advertising profit.. a lot of them hardly even care how they influence your mind.
Ultimately - the only way to get a rational view of the world is to view as many primary sources as you possibly can (videos of actual events) - try and talk to people who are actually involved and are present at the events - read internal documents from the governments and agencies involved in the news (if the source can be verified - internal chatter is usually much closer to the truth) - talk to active military personnel - talk to active police personnel - talk to active government workers - talk to politicians... Just DO ANYTHING but read someone elses bullshit opinion on exactly the same thing you could be doing yourself. Oh and study your fucking history or nothing at all will have any context and might as well be fucking meaningless.
So how do you end up so ill informed?
I would ask you - how you actually think you're well informed when you actively ignore all primary sources and only slather up the corporate droppings of NYT/WA post and the hillary campaign
I mean, I can't even have a serious conversation about informational veracity with someone who hasn't even viewed - or can't process the correct information to acknowledge the primary rigging against Bernie... It's so obvious that it denotes a level of head up arse that is basically equal to how you would view a climate denier etc. Even fucking Trump knows it, lmao. But of course you don't know this because some sort of mental programming prevents you from viewing the primary source information about the events and you actually trust things like the Washington post that basically tell you what to believe
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 2 hours, 31 minutes
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: twighead]
#23885404 - 12/01/16 06:27 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Sure thing. Keep believing your conspiracy theories pushed on you because you want to believe them. Love to see the primary sources for your claims.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
ohcrapitsnico
The Other One


Registered: 06/06/09
Posts: 2,720
Loc: Houston
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: koods]
#23885421 - 12/01/16 06:32 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Id love to see those too. I read the emails and all i saw was that the folks at the dnc were privately for hillary but no thing actionable against bernie, no concrete plans to 'rig'.
|
twighead
mͯó



Registered: 08/27/08
Posts: 29,560
Loc: Glenn Gould's Fuck Windmill
Last seen: 2 hours, 16 minutes
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: koods]
#23885442 - 12/01/16 06:40 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Well to start I already linked you the video to the extremely obvious fraud at the nevada democratic convention...
Would you purport that the environment at that convention was proper to be able to hold a vocal vote in half a second? There is literally no way anyone could determine a vocal vote in those circumstances Oh and lo and behold, she ruled in Hillary's favor
And then your beloved MSM after that event posted articles about how 'unruly' Bernie supporters were without even showing or talking about the actual event.
Here's a good video about MSNBC's opinion on how it can use its leverage to influence voting in California before the polls close - as the MSM did throughout the primary- calling the winners before anything was even near set in stone-
Then after that you can start pursuing the thousands of personal reports about de-registration in Arizona... Half a dozen people I know personally checked their registrations within a week of the primary and were unregistered and unable to vote on voting day.
Then after that you can read some internal emails within the DNC proving interior collusion against Bernie.
Then after that you can read the personal stories written by both workers, & voters in Iowa, Kentucky, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Ohio, NY, Pennsylvania, puerto rico.. etc etc - there is literally SO much shit to sift through, so much damning evidence against the DNC you literally would need to probably spend a few hours looking into it to make up your mind. But you probably never will and are comfortable with the world view 20 minutes of absorbing an MSM source gives you.
This process can some serious fucking time, I can't hand feed you every piece of evidence I've witnessed over the last 16 months. Half because it would take all day, and half because I'm not convinced you give a shit about even seeing those proofs. But go ahead and review some of that stuff and tell me your opinion.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 2 hours, 31 minutes
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: twighead]
#23885461 - 12/01/16 06:48 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Then after that you can start pursuing the thousands of personal reports about de-registration in Arizona... Half a dozen people I know personally checked their registrations within a week of the primary and were unregistered and unable to vote on voting day.
And explain to me how that is rigging in favor of anyone
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
twighead
mͯó



Registered: 08/27/08
Posts: 29,560
Loc: Glenn Gould's Fuck Windmill
Last seen: 2 hours, 16 minutes
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: koods]
#23885467 - 12/01/16 06:52 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Then after that you can start pursuing the thousands of personal reports about de-registration in Arizona... Half a dozen people I know personally checked their registrations within a week of the primary and were unregistered and unable to vote on voting day.
And explain to me how that is rigging in favor of anyone
Because it was strategically coordinated along demographic and geographic lines. More young people were deregistered than old, more people in liberal leaning areas were deregistered than conservative.
Fortunately the DNC is smart enough about this sort of thing to make it seem coincidental to people who haven't ever studied electoral fraud and how it is performed 
But funny how this tactic is repeated by both republicans and democrats, across many elections, many states, etc. They do their research. The Hillary campaign was using a fucking computer algorithm to determine and check everything they were doing. They sure as hell knew who and what to hit in what amounts they could get away with. But I'm sure that's too wild to believe. Corporatist warmongers would rig an election against an outsider candidate calling for their asses to be put in place? Sounds like a conspiracy theory! Hurrr.
Here, from the beloved reputable WP
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/11/09/clintons-data-driven-campaign-relied-heavily-on-an-algorithm-named-ada-what-didnt-she-see/
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 2 hours, 31 minutes
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: twighead]
#23885471 - 12/01/16 06:54 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
So Clinton had a more sophisticated operation. Maybe that's how she won. Bernie should have focused on getting his supporters to register and vote instead of sharing memes on FB. This was probably your first election. You'll grow up and understand how political operations work eventually.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
Edited by koods (12/01/16 06:55 PM)
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: twighead]
#23885473 - 12/01/16 06:55 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Ada?

Ada Wong?
as in like proto-Adam?
|
ohcrapitsnico
The Other One


Registered: 06/06/09
Posts: 2,720
Loc: Houston
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: twighead]
#23885496 - 12/01/16 07:03 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
twighead said:
Well to start I already linked you the video to the extremely obvious fraud at the nevada democratic convention...
That's beyond absurd.
A quick google search paints a different picture, this article, is written by journalists who are the primary source because they were there and their analysis says no it was not rigged. Although I will say it appears the byzantine rules of the Nevada primary favor the establishment and their pick but thems the rules.
|
twighead
mͯó



Registered: 08/27/08
Posts: 29,560
Loc: Glenn Gould's Fuck Windmill
Last seen: 2 hours, 16 minutes
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: koods] 2
#23885515 - 12/01/16 07:10 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: So Clinton had a more sophisticated operation. Maybe that's how she won. Bernie should have focused on getting his supporters to register and vote instead of sharing memes on FB. This was probably your first election. You'll grow up and understand how political operations work eventually.
If sophisticated = being a corporatist whore in bed with all the media establishment and leveraging them against your opponent.. or perhaps you mean sophisticated by having all of her campaign workers appointed to the party leadership.
& Naw I was around in 2000 to see the election stolen by the republicans using the same exact tactics... But no big deal - nothing bad happened from someone stealing an election. Bush didn't do harm right? Fraud is k?
Just like nothing bad happened from the democrats appointing the most hated candidate in recent history Hillary Clinton... can you process that she just lost an election to fucking Donald Trump 
Who do you think would've won in this matchup?

Are you amused by how essentially the only region that was pro-hillary in a broad sense was the fucking south that never ever gives their electoral votes to dems?

Are you maybe able to comprehend why your party just got wrecked by one of the most pathetic candidates to ever run for public office in US History?
I doubt it 
The DNC is blaming everyone but themselves. But it is completely their fault for coronating such a blatantly corrupt corporate militarist whore. She had literally nothing, but rich people. And idiots screaming "woman president!" HISTORY!! And that shit can't win an election.
|
Deathby69
Хрусталёв, машину!


Registered: 08/21/16
Posts: 1,098
Last seen: 6 years, 4 months
|
Re: What are some REPUTABLE news sources? [Re: twighead]
#23885795 - 12/01/16 08:56 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
--------------------
|
|