|
CookieCrumbs
Fucked off to the pub


Registered: 12/10/11
Posts: 14,146
|
|
well yeah I agree. There are better ways to protest and counter protest. People do it all the time without anyone getting hurt.
See abortion protests or court protests
--------------------
Free time is the only time
|
specialpeopleclub


Registered: 04/10/14
Posts: 5,584
Loc: Mitten
Last seen: 3 years, 7 months
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: CookieCrumbs]
#23881595 - 11/30/16 01:11 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
We should just make all flags out of unburnaboe material
--------------------
|
TNK
Pleasures of Africa



Registered: 01/30/10
Posts: 14,237
Loc: I AM THUNDERBOT
Last seen: 1 month, 18 days
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: CookieCrumbs] 3
#23881603 - 11/30/16 01:13 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Burning the Flag hurts my feelings! Make it illegal!
Mean words hurt my feelings! Make it illegal.
Well shit, seems the PC movement has preached the high echelons of republican politicians. Were doomed.
-------------------- Edited by TNK (02/22/22 22:22 PM)
|
specialpeopleclub


Registered: 04/10/14
Posts: 5,584
Loc: Mitten
Last seen: 3 years, 7 months
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: TNK]
#23881609 - 11/30/16 01:15 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
It shouldn't be illegal, but you may get people pretty upset.
--------------------
|
ohcrapitsnico
The Other One


Registered: 06/06/09
Posts: 2,720
Loc: Houston
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: TNK] 3
#23881624 - 11/30/16 01:20 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Herbologist needs a safe space to be protected from flag burning.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 2 hours, 52 minutes
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: ohcrapitsnico]
#23881641 - 11/30/16 01:25 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
GOD HATES FLAGS!!!
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
SARAtonin
Violent Dreams


Registered: 09/28/11
Posts: 15,911
Loc: Deutschland
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: Herbologist]
#23881703 - 11/30/16 01:33 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Herbologist said:
Quote:
SARAtonin said: What good is your freedom of it is infringing upon anothers? Because that's exactly what America does, your first world luxuries come at the cost of global suffering. It must be nice to be able to ignore suffering you perpetuate because it's convenient and benificial to you.
Oh fuck off. We do not cause global suffering because of what we have here.
You surely must be being factitious, right? Take practically anything material you take for granted in your life and trace it back to its source you will find the poor and disenfranchised suffering for our convenience. Just think about the computer chips and cell phone parts, all obtained though child mining operations. All that cheap stuff from China, we all know why it's so cheap. I mean christ, even bananas aren't innocent, we set up dictatorships and topple governments to get bananas. Don't believe me look it up.
Simply put, if you truly believe American luxury isn't directly impacting the rest of the world in a negative way, we truly have nothing more to talk about.
-------------------- God kills indiscriminately and so shall we. For no creatures under God are as we are none so like him as ourselves. Want to join a cult? Click for details…
|
specialpeopleclub


Registered: 04/10/14
Posts: 5,584
Loc: Mitten
Last seen: 3 years, 7 months
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: koods]
#23881719 - 11/30/16 01:40 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
We do make flag underwear. It isn't so much the act as much as the fact as the retarded usually conspiracy laden ideas behind it. We prop places like Europe up, so they don't have to have large militaries. Sure we do things like lock up Bradley Manning for years in an isolated cell naked and alone without a trial, but it could be worse
--------------------
Edited by specialpeopleclub (11/30/16 01:57 PM)
|
abltsandwich
JFK = Jelly Donut




Registered: 06/16/09
Posts: 11,537
Loc: Dildoville
|
|
There are some idiots in this thread that don't even know what a third world country actually is. Here are a few third world countries to wrap your mini-brains around: Switzerland, Ireland, Sweden, Finland.
It's racist to assume that third-world means poor brown people in a shit-hole country.
|
mushiefeet
Soggy Sock's Rainy Day's



Registered: 01/18/11
Posts: 558
Loc: Washington State
Last seen: 11 days, 23 hours
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: SARAtonin]
#23881727 - 11/30/16 01:42 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
I am regularly up around 4/4:30 AM , my father and multiple best friends are also, neither of us are drug//meth addicts its called a full time job lol. Koods..
|
mushiefeet
Soggy Sock's Rainy Day's



Registered: 01/18/11
Posts: 558
Loc: Washington State
Last seen: 11 days, 23 hours
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: abltsandwich]
#23881741 - 11/30/16 01:44 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
abltsandwich said: There are some idiots in this thread that don't even know what a third world country actually is. Here are a couple third world countries to wrap your mini-brains around: Switzerland, Ireland, Sweden, Finland.
I never though of those as a 3rd world country, I Want to visit all those places es very beautiful
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: SARAtonin]
#23881742 - 11/30/16 01:45 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
--------------------
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: abltsandwich] 1
#23881752 - 11/30/16 01:49 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
abltsandwich said: There are some idiots in this thread that don't even know what a third world country actually is. Here are a few third world countries to wrap your mini-brains around: Switzerland, Ireland, Sweden, Finland.
It's racist to assume that third-world means poor brown people in a shit-hole country.
Dude this isn't WWII anymore. The definition of the term has changed to mean something else just like a million other words have changed to mean something else.
In WWII, 3rd world just meant neutral in the war, today it means poor/nonindustrial.
Back in the day retarded meant unable to be used for a certain action today it is synonymous with mental health.
--------------------
|
abltsandwich
JFK = Jelly Donut




Registered: 06/16/09
Posts: 11,537
Loc: Dildoville
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: natedawgnow]
#23881756 - 11/30/16 01:50 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Wrong. It doesn't even have to do with WWII. It's related to the Cold War. The definition hasn't changed; the use of the word has become incorrect. Derp derp derp. Keep on derpin'.
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: abltsandwich]
#23881761 - 11/30/16 01:52 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
ya sorry meant cold war not WWII even thought one created the other
still....read a book mange
--------------------
Edited by natedawgnow (11/30/16 01:54 PM)
|
abltsandwich
JFK = Jelly Donut




Registered: 06/16/09
Posts: 11,537
Loc: Dildoville
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: natedawgnow]
#23881764 - 11/30/16 01:53 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
WWII created the Cold War. Russia and US were allies in that war, derpy. You're thinking of ALlies and Axis. https://www.quora.com/What-are-First-World-Second-World-and-Third-World-countries
|
abltsandwich
JFK = Jelly Donut




Registered: 06/16/09
Posts: 11,537
Loc: Dildoville
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: natedawgnow]
#23881770 - 11/30/16 01:56 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Hahaha, nice edit. You're being as revisionist now as you are about the facts of the topic. I've obviously got a more firm grasp of the topic than you, who can't even get your facts straight and telling me to read a book. Hahahaha. Derp derp derp. Still derpin' hard. I'm not even going to engage with you anymore.
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 9 hours, 18 minutes
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: natedawgnow]
#23881774 - 11/30/16 01:58 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said:
Quote:
Herbologist said:
Quote:
SARAtonin said: What good is your freedom of it is infringing upon anothers? Because that's exactly what America does, your first world luxuries come at the cost of global suffering. It must be nice to be able to ignore suffering you perpetuate because it's convenient and benificial to you.
Oh fuck off. We do not cause global suffering because of what we have here.
This is the most ridiculous, ignorant statement I've seen in a while.
American luxury is most definitely built on the plight of 3rd world country dwellers. If you don't think that's true, you're an idiot.
I saw this documentary once about an indian family who worked at a leather tannery. The oldest son (age 13) worked as his dad's right hand man.
His job: scraping the fat off of all the leathers, and "softening" the leathers by stomping on them in a vat of water mixed with chicken shit for 12 hours for 1 hour intervals every other hour. The acidity of the chicken shit helped to soften up the leather making it more pliable. This kid's life was stomping in shit filled water day in and day out to help feed his family, not able to go to school or do anything.
Guess what these leathers were used to make? Designer dress shoes sold in the U.S.. The worst part is that if we stopped buying these shoes to alleviate the kids work load, his family would starve.
Our luxury created the economies of 3rd world countrymen and we exploit the shit out of them in exchange.
If you enjoy American luxury, you better be thanking the little guy we stomp all over to get it.
Also, I know plenty of vets who will fight tooth and nail for your right to burn a flag. My grandfather included who served in WWII, Korea, and Vietnam.
You're not even making any sense, you first claim we exploit third world workers and then in the same breath you say we give them their existence.
It is not our fault those nations don't control their population grow rates, do you really think they would be better off living in isolation from the West? Most of them would be living no differently than they did 1000 years ago if it wasn't for the West.
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: natedawgnow]
#23881784 - 11/30/16 02:00 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
How is it revisionist if I left my original unedited comment?
Quote:
natedawgnow said:
Quote:
abltsandwich said: There are some idiots in this thread that don't even know what a third world country actually is. Here are a few third world countries to wrap your mini-brains around: Switzerland, Ireland, Sweden, Finland.
It's racist to assume that third-world means poor brown people in a shit-hole country.
Dude this isn't WWII anymore. The definition of the term has changed to mean something else just like a million other words have changed to mean something else.
In WWII, 3rd world just meant neutral in the war, today it means poor/nonindustrial.
Back in the day retarded meant unable to be used for a certain action today it is synonymous with mental health.
Don't be angry bro
--------------------
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Trump "flag burners should lose rights" [Re: qman]
#23881789 - 11/30/16 02:03 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
natedawgnow said:
Quote:
Herbologist said:
Quote:
SARAtonin said: What good is your freedom of it is infringing upon anothers? Because that's exactly what America does, your first world luxuries come at the cost of global suffering. It must be nice to be able to ignore suffering you perpetuate because it's convenient and benificial to you.
Oh fuck off. We do not cause global suffering because of what we have here.
This is the most ridiculous, ignorant statement I've seen in a while.
American luxury is most definitely built on the plight of 3rd world country dwellers. If you don't think that's true, you're an idiot.
I saw this documentary once about an indian family who worked at a leather tannery. The oldest son (age 13) worked as his dad's right hand man.
His job: scraping the fat off of all the leathers, and "softening" the leathers by stomping on them in a vat of water mixed with chicken shit for 12 hours for 1 hour intervals every other hour. The acidity of the chicken shit helped to soften up the leather making it more pliable. This kid's life was stomping in shit filled water day in and day out to help feed his family, not able to go to school or do anything.
Guess what these leathers were used to make? Designer dress shoes sold in the U.S.. The worst part is that if we stopped buying these shoes to alleviate the kids work load, his family would starve.
Our luxury created the economies of 3rd world countrymen and we exploit the shit out of them in exchange.
If you enjoy American luxury, you better be thanking the little guy we stomp all over to get it.
Also, I know plenty of vets who will fight tooth and nail for your right to burn a flag. My grandfather included who served in WWII, Korea, and Vietnam.
You're not even making any sense, you first claim we exploit third world workers and then in the same breath you say we give them their existence.
It is not our fault those nations don't control their population grow rates, do you really think they would be better off living in isolation from the West? Most of them would be living no differently than they did 1000 years ago if it wasn't for the West.
One, I never said we give them their existence, just their current economy.
Two, who says you can't exploit something you created? Does the church not exploit its followers by collecting dues? Pastor Hagee of the cornerstone church is a multimillionaire because of his congregation. is that not exploitation?
Maybe you need to re read that paragraph
--------------------
|
|