Home | Community | Message Board

World Seed Supply
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   North Spore Injection Grain Bag   PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Is science too "sciencey"?
    #23852571 - 11/20/16 07:45 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)



Well, is it punk?


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblephio


Registered: 10/07/16
Posts: 369
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23852602 - 11/20/16 08:00 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

No.
Many people just fail to spend the time necessary to grasp it or search out scientific facts conveyed in a manner that they can understand.

There are hundreds if not thousands of videos on youtube that explain even quantum physics to the lay. Seek with an open heart and mind and ye shall find.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23852615 - 11/20/16 08:04 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Real science is bedazzling.

:letyourspiritsoar:


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #23852632 - 11/20/16 08:12 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Without science we would not have invented the vajazzle!



:cookiemonster:


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblepineninja
Dream Weaver
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/17/14
Posts: 12,468
Loc: South Flag
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: phio]
    #23852639 - 11/20/16 08:16 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

And in another hundred years there will be another thousand or so saying how incorrect today's were.


--------------------
Just a fool on the hill.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblepineninja
Dream Weaver
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/17/14
Posts: 12,468
Loc: South Flag
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23852641 - 11/20/16 08:17 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

OrgoneConclusion said:
Without science we would not have invented the vajazzle!



:cookiemonster:



Necessity blah blah.


--------------------
Just a fool on the hill.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleThe Blind Ass
Bodhi
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,658
Loc: The Primordial Mind
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: pineninja] * 1
    #23852652 - 11/20/16 08:22 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

:carl:

is this post to posty?  :noyoudidawet:


--------------------
Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineWackyWizard
Stranger

Registered: 10/08/16
Posts: 17
Last seen: 7 years, 1 month
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23852679 - 11/20/16 08:39 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

OrgoneConclusion said:
Without science we would not have invented the vajazzle!



:cookiemonster:



I thought that was a swarm of insects on her cooch at first.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #23852706 - 11/20/16 08:57 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

The Blind Ass said:
:carl:

is this post to posty?  :noyoudidawet:




Did you know that a marketing genius got paid $200,000 for coming up with the name Juicy Juice? College degree FTW.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblephio


Registered: 10/07/16
Posts: 369
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: pineninja]
    #23852711 - 11/20/16 08:58 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

pineninja said:
And in another hundred years there will be another thousand or so saying how incorrect today's were.



Pretty much :ducklol:
which is why I always take it with a grain of salt ..


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineviktor
psychotechnician
Male User Gallery


Registered: 11/03/10
Posts: 4,293
Loc: New Zealand Flag
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion] * 2
    #23852873 - 11/20/16 10:26 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Real science is magical and awesome.

The cult of scientism is depressing, dreary and full of the same self-aggrandising shit as all other shit religions.

Members of the cult of scientism are always materialists, and they always believe that their belief in physicalism makes them morally superior to those who don't have it (despite the evidence). That's how you can pick them.

These guys are too sciency and need to let loose and get laid.


--------------------
"They consider me insane but I know that I am a hero living under the eyes of the gods."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblephio


Registered: 10/07/16
Posts: 369
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: viktor]
    #23852874 - 11/20/16 10:28 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

viktor said:
Real science is magical and awesome.

The cult of scientism is depressing, dreary and full of the same self-aggrandising shit as all other shit religions.

Members of the cult of scientism are always materialists, and they always believe that their belief in physicalism makes them morally superior to those who don't have it (despite the evidence). That's how you can pick them.

These guys are too sciency and need to let loose and get laid.



:asianofapproval:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleThe Blind Ass
Bodhi
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,658
Loc: The Primordial Mind
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: phio]
    #23852905 - 11/20/16 10:48 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Those "science" ads everywhere on the internet.  LMAO\

"SCIENCE JUST FIGURED OUT HOW TO MAKE UR DICK BIGGER AND UR BOOBS HUGE AND FOUND OUT THIS FOOD KILLS CANCER - SCIENTISTS ARE GOING CRAZY OVER IT "

        -  aka "Those dudes in Marketing and Advertising"


--------------------
Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThanatos10
Stranger
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/19/15
Posts: 2,770
Loc: South Florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: viktor]
    #23853063 - 11/21/16 12:26 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

viktor said:
Real science is magical and awesome.

The cult of scientism is depressing, dreary and full of the same self-aggrandising shit as all other shit religions.

Members of the cult of scientism are always materialists, and they always believe that their belief in physicalism makes them morally superior to those who don't have it (despite the evidence). That's how you can pick them.

These guys are too sciency and need to let loose and get laid.




Science tends to go with what is testable and obeservable, things spirituality is not.


--------------------
As lightless oblivion devours you, drown in the ever-blooming darkness.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblemetalfaith
Moron
Male User Gallery


Registered: 03/30/11
Posts: 1,842
Loc: FL
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: Thanatos10] * 1
    #23853099 - 11/21/16 12:47 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

You're missing it. Completely.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinebeforethedawn
Registered: 06/19/16
Posts: 1,859
Last seen: 4 years, 5 months
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: metalfaith]
    #23853156 - 11/21/16 01:40 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Thanatos read "Beliefs" by Aldous Huxley (an essay). I'm sure if you Google it...

Pretty much saves me typing my own essay on the topic here for you.:lol:


--------------------
Hostile humankind
Can't you see you're fucking blind?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: viktor]
    #23853326 - 11/21/16 05:35 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

viktor said:
Real science is magical and awesome.

The cult of scientism is depressing, dreary and full of the same self-aggrandising shit as all other shit religions.

Members of the cult of scientism are always materialists, and they always believe that their belief in physicalism makes them morally superior to those who don't have it (despite the evidence). That's how you can pick them.

These guys are too sciency and need to let loose and get laid.




As the Great Pacific Genocide continues, scientists are baffled, scientists are mystified.  They know how to create a nuclear plant, but no idea how to stop nuclear leaks. None, zero.  Scientists are baffled, scientists are mystified.

The ice wall really doesn't count.


--------------------
Anxiety is what you make it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: pineninja]
    #23853336 - 11/21/16 05:41 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

pineninja said:
And in another hundred years there will be another thousand or so saying how incorrect today's were.




In another 100 years, the earth will be so polluted with radiation and unless they stop spraying coal ash everywhere, coal ash everywhere, that life will be pretty much gone.  We've lost 60% of the earth's wildlife in the last 40 years, and that trend is quickening not slowing.  The global warming/methane releases are picking up that feedback loop is a real problem.  The radiation from Fukushima is the greatest catastrophe ever, ever, yet the greatest crime ever of the cover up continues.  Wonder just what the Trumps were talking to the PM of Japan about in secret?  Fukushima.  It's a disaster of EPIC proportions.

Meanwhile, marine biologists are baffled, they are mystified.


--------------------
Anxiety is what you make it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinewicca mixer
Marmalade, I like marmalade :)
Male User Gallery


Registered: 07/30/10
Posts: 158
Last seen: 6 years, 10 days
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: LunarEclipse]
    #23853365 - 11/21/16 06:19 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

There have also been (according to wikipedia) at least 2120 nuclear bomb tests on earth. That's all got to have had some effect too. I'm not really sure what to make of nuclear radiation. Chernobyl and Pripyat are apparently full of wildlife nowadays despite the radiation. Maybe it's a case of what doesn't kill you makes you stronger?

We (collective of humans and our mainstream science) tend to think we know it all with science, but we don't know shit.


Edited by wicca mixer (11/21/16 06:26 AM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: wicca mixer]
    #23853487 - 11/21/16 07:59 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

wicca mixer said:
There have also been (according to wikipedia) at least 2120 nuclear bomb tests on earth. That's all got to have had some effect too. I'm not really sure what to make of nuclear radiation. Chernobyl and Pripyat are apparently full of wildlife nowadays despite the radiation. Maybe it's a case of what doesn't kill you makes you stronger?

We (collective of humans and our mainstream science) tend to think we know it all with science, but we don't know shit.




Or it's a case of what doesn't kill you makes you sick and gives you cancer?  Radiation "treatment" along with chemo and/or surgery being a cure to something doesn't mean it's a good thing, just a last ditch effort to prolong the misery.

In Japan after Fukushima the leader said if you smile the radiation won't affect you.  It is deflected by the curvature uplift of your mouth.  Let a smile be your umbrella, as it were.


--------------------
Anxiety is what you make it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleThe Blind Ass
Bodhi
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,658
Loc: The Primordial Mind
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: LunarEclipse]
    #23853497 - 11/21/16 08:06 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

online forum ignorance never ceases to be a source of amazement for me.


--------------------
Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #23853577 - 11/21/16 08:42 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

The Blind Ass said:
online forum ignorance never ceases to be a source of amazement for me.




As a prince dies, a baby cries.  Purple Reign, Purple Reign. 

Well I hope you think that radiation is bad, that you don't think it's somehow making you stronger by not killing you softly with its song.  I mean you seem to be giving me some flack.

Sure, you can try to keep up with the Jones but this guy is on his game.



--------------------
Anxiety is what you make it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineviktor
psychotechnician
Male User Gallery


Registered: 11/03/10
Posts: 4,293
Loc: New Zealand Flag
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: LunarEclipse]
    #23854242 - 11/21/16 12:58 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Why didn't science figure out a way to stop us breeding to the point of ecological collapse? That's what I want an answer for.

Or maybe it did but religion stopped it.


--------------------
"They consider me insane but I know that I am a hero living under the eyes of the gods."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLRG
Supernaut
Male
Registered: 04/04/16
Posts: 871
Last seen: 4 years, 2 months
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: viktor]
    #23854277 - 11/21/16 01:08 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

I think so.

It is my belief you can figure out the secrets of the Universe with common sense alone. You really don't need math and this and that.

The wisest men in the history of our existence have all stood by one principle: Everything you need to know is within yourself.


--------------------
"I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay… small acts of kindness and love.” - Gandalf The Grey.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle

"I like to think of Jesus like with giant eagle's wings, and singin' lead vocals for Lynyrd Skynyrd with like an angel band and I'm in the front row and I'm HAMMERED DRUNK!" - Cal Naughton Jr. AKA The Magic Man. Abracadabra homes!

"Each tear is a drop of poison released." - Anonymous

"Could it be you're afraid of what your friends might say if they knew you believe in God above? They should realize before they criticize that God is the only way to Love."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: viktor] * 1
    #23854279 - 11/21/16 01:08 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Science invented the cork, the rubber band, scissors and the vacuum cleaner. What more do you require for birth control?


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinebeforethedawn
Registered: 06/19/16
Posts: 1,859
Last seen: 4 years, 5 months
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23854347 - 11/21/16 01:33 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

*pukes*


--------------------
Hostile humankind
Can't you see you're fucking blind?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleredgreenvines
irregular verb
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,539
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: beforethedawn]
    #23854576 - 11/21/16 03:13 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

the cork!!
naah


--------------------
:confused: _ :brainfart:🧠  _ :finger:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: redgreenvines]
    #23854592 - 11/21/16 03:16 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Are we back to the spork?


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: viktor]
    #23855017 - 11/21/16 05:20 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

viktor said:
Why didn't science figure out a way to stop us breeding to the point of ecological collapse? That's what I want an answer for.

Or maybe it did but religion stopped it.




Science made it possible for us to live side by side.  It's called indoor plumbing/sewers.  People used to shit in the streets which caused problems.  Now it's just dogs that shit in the streets which people seem to think is "fertilizer".  Dog owners and cigarette smokers are two of the rudest assholes in the world.  The absolute worst is a cigarette smoking dog owner who used to let his dog shit in my yard while he smoked a butt then would drop his butt on the yard to boot.  I literally put out a box with all his butt collected in it as a hint, he dropped the empty pack in there just to further piss me off.


--------------------
Anxiety is what you make it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: LunarEclipse]
    #23855025 - 11/21/16 05:24 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Did you dump his body in the river or make it part of a cement foundation?



--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleThe Blind Ass
Bodhi
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,658
Loc: The Primordial Mind
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: LunarEclipse]
    #23855035 - 11/21/16 05:30 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

LunarEclipse said:
Quote:

The Blind Ass said:
online forum ignorance never ceases to be a source of amazement for me.




As a prince dies, a baby cries.  Purple Reign, Purple Reign. 

Well I hope you think that radiation is bad, that you don't think it's somehow making you stronger by not killing you softly with its song.  I mean you seem to be giving me some flack.

Sure, you can try to keep up with the Jones but this guy is on his game.






Im not giving you any flack, I know radiation is damaging.  I know its employed by professionals for cancer treatment, but its awful - I have been through it , my Aunt has been through it, my grandfather has too, and if your lucky it damages the cancer cells in time before they take over, but not the healthy ones too much .. talk about a thin line no?.  No flack to you - that was directed at no one in general.  Just the general ignorance is amazing.  Stay perky, friend.


--------------------
Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #23855045 - 11/21/16 05:34 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

LE talks in musical riddles. He was referencing Roberta Flack.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23855088 - 11/21/16 05:51 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

OrgoneConclusion said:
LE talks in musical riddles. He was referencing Roberta Flack.






--------------------
Anxiety is what you make it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRJ Tubs 202
Male

Registered: 09/20/08
Posts: 6,016
Loc: USA Flag
Last seen: 15 hours, 21 minutes
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: viktor]
    #23855112 - 11/21/16 05:57 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

viktor said:

Why didn't science figure out a way to stop us breeding to the point of ecological collapse?




The 10 million species that have gone extinct speak to the reality of the situation.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblelaughingdog
Stranger
 User Gallery
Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 4,828
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: RJ Tubs 202]
    #23858744 - 11/22/16 08:52 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

RJ Tubs 202 said:
Quote:

viktor said:

Why didn't science figure out a way to stop us breeding to the point of ecological collapse?




The 10 million species that have gone extinct speak to the reality of the situation.




"Why didn't science..." well science requires funding

With CRISPR it should now be quite possible...
guys like Elon Musk would rather spend billions on going to mars
and Jeff Bezos on making even more billions
and we all know about governments
and corporate corruption
so the powers that be and those with concentrated wealth aren't really interested
and don't really 'think outside the box'

it remains to be seen what china, (and maybe India)
where there is much less regulation,
and there is science expertise (and perhaps a population problem)
does with CRISPR in the coming decade

I think even the more likeable
British billionaire Sir Richard Charles Branson is more interested
in Space travel than any other science research


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: laughingdog]
    #23858773 - 11/22/16 09:08 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

There are so many space species out there that we need to wipe out. It is a mighty big job, but I think we can do it! :thumbup:


--------------------


Edited by OrgoneConclusion (11/22/16 09:33 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleThe Blind Ass
Bodhi
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,658
Loc: The Primordial Mind
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23858809 - 11/22/16 09:23 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

"Science" does not figure out social problems. Or any thing else for that matter.  Its a method. And its applied to the major schools of natural study.

PEOPLE may use research that someone in the certain field has discovered through the scientific method and backing experiment to implement something to create some type of effect on society, thats all though.

Just like "science" did not make weapons.  The Atom Bomb for example.  Research using the scientific method and experiments led to the discovery of splitting atoms , thats all.

People then took that knowledge and implemented it for their own goals.

Science is not what half of you belive it is.

Science is not responsible, it is a tool, and a tool is never responsible.


--------------------
Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleRahz
Alive Again
Male


Registered: 11/10/05
Posts: 9,230
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23858812 - 11/22/16 09:24 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

What about the prime directive?


--------------------
rahz

comfort pleasure power love truth awareness peace


"You’re not looking close enough if you can only see yourself in people who look like you." —Ayishat Akanbi


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleThe Blind Ass
Bodhi
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,658
Loc: The Primordial Mind
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #23858817 - 11/22/16 09:25 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Stop confusing and stop saying " SCIENCE RESEARCH" when really you are referring to corporations and entities and individuals using research to implement there own agendas.  It is not the same.

oh and to that one guy :  Extinction is the rule , survival is the exception.

Its the way it goes.

A scientist may uncover that his hypothesis was not proved wrong by his experiment, that is all.

From that someone may buy his research and use it for their own agenda.  Then it moves out of the field of science and into something else, or maybe it is combined with other research that has been purchased and put to make something that furthers one goals or agenda, aka a machine.


--------------------
Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps


Edited by The Blind Ass (11/22/16 09:29 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: Rahz]
    #23858833 - 11/22/16 09:35 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

Rahz said:
What about the prime directive?




Kirk fucked the Prime Directive in the ass every third episode. Of course, they always had a rational reason for such a violation, like all leaders/politicians do.

"We never torture  - unless we do!" :cookiemonster:


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleThe Blind Ass
Bodhi
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,658
Loc: The Primordial Mind
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23858834 - 11/22/16 09:36 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

lmao


--------------------
Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLucisM
Nutritional Yeast

Registered: 03/28/15
Posts: 15,622
Last seen: 1 month, 29 days
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23858878 - 11/22/16 09:59 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

OrgoneConclusion said:
Without science we would not have invented the vajazzle!



:cookiemonster:





This was the first reason I supported science, then all the other fields it has benefited, like the medical field.


--------------------
©️


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinebeforethedawn
Registered: 06/19/16
Posts: 1,859
Last seen: 4 years, 5 months
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: Lucis]
    #23859036 - 11/22/16 11:19 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

The medical one's a good one ay.


--------------------
Hostile humankind
Can't you see you're fucking blind?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblelaughingdog
Stranger
 User Gallery
Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 4,828
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: Lucis] * 1
    #23860918 - 11/23/16 02:52 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

OrgoneConclusion said:
Without science we would not have invented the vajazzle!





pardon my 'autistic' view of the matter

But it's not an improvement
for either women or men

sticking tiny sharp objects around a bodily orifice
that hemorrhages blood monthly is plain stupid

and

if a man needs fake jewels around
a vagina to enjoy a woman's sexuality he is an ass

and the dangers are actually both very real and obvious
just check the web

is making fun of science by finding stupid examples of fashion
especially ones that are supposed to have a 'naughty'  or 'risque' element
really supposed to be great humor?

or, one might wonder, is it a fear of being seen as gay that motivates many men,
to posture as real men, by laughing at dumb stuff related to sexuality,
and to thus indicate they are aroused by the same things other men are?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: laughingdog]
    #23861094 - 11/23/16 03:49 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Because of your astute and in-depth analysis of my sexual insecurity, I am sending you a pair of snuggly Freudian Slippers for Christmas.



(I am keeping the va-jay-jay for myself!)


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: laughingdog]
    #23861197 - 11/23/16 04:28 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)



--------------------
Anxiety is what you make it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleRahz
Alive Again
Male


Registered: 11/10/05
Posts: 9,230
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23861888 - 11/23/16 08:43 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

To everyone's surprise Laughingdog was no longer laughing. - Gary Larson

Quote:

OrgoneConclusion said:
Because of your astute and in-depth analysis of my sexual insecurity, I am sending you a pair of snuggly Freudian Slippers for Christmas.



(I am keeping the va-jay-jay for myself!)




--------------------
rahz

comfort pleasure power love truth awareness peace


"You’re not looking close enough if you can only see yourself in people who look like you." —Ayishat Akanbi


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblelaughingdog
Stranger
 User Gallery
Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 4,828
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: Rahz]
    #23862208 - 11/23/16 11:22 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

indeed due my fear of intimacy I offend everyone equally

now you are all united

for a

HAPPY THANKSGIVING

:smile:


Edited by laughingdog (11/23/16 11:29 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRJ Tubs 202
Male

Registered: 09/20/08
Posts: 6,016
Loc: USA Flag
Last seen: 15 hours, 21 minutes
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: laughingdog]
    #23862376 - 11/24/16 01:05 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

I had no idea you celebrate Thanksgiving in England!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: RJ Tubs 202]
    #23862384 - 11/24/16 01:08 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Your ancestors have to had killed some gentle Native Americans for you to properly celebrate Thanksgiving; otherwise what is the point? :shrug:


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRJ Tubs 202
Male

Registered: 09/20/08
Posts: 6,016
Loc: USA Flag
Last seen: 15 hours, 21 minutes
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #23862390 - 11/24/16 01:12 AM (7 years, 2 months ago)

That's a foregone conclusion.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: RJ Tubs 202]
    #23864015 - 11/24/16 04:11 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

RJ Tubs 202 said:
That's a foregone conclusion.




Ax him to translate a sentience.  He will surprise you with his cleverness.

Or not.


--------------------
Anxiety is what you make it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: LunarEclipse]
    #23864074 - 11/24/16 04:36 PM (7 years, 2 months ago)



--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   North Spore Injection Grain Bag   PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Extinction and its Implications for Mankind RebelSteve33 2,750 19 12/10/02 02:39 AM
by Shroomalicious
* Dinosaurs extinct? Gomp 5,359 16 11/30/05 09:10 PM
by VirgilKane
* Science corrupts/perverts/exploits nature... HidingInPlainSight 1,190 17 01/24/04 04:12 PM
by NiamhNyx
* Merging science and spirituality..
( 1 2 all )
Anonymous 4,184 33 08/19/02 08:09 PM
by Murex
* Is science becoming more philosophical?
( 1 2 all )
Silversoul 2,634 22 06/23/06 12:36 AM
by SneezingPenis
* The ethics of mass extinction. ShroomDoom 1,306 9 02/07/08 08:00 PM
by WScott
* The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement RebelSteve33 1,871 14 08/12/02 02:00 AM
by kneegrow
* Animal Species Extinction: So what? Amber_Glow 1,257 14 05/07/07 05:05 PM
by Amber_Glow

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
1,136 topic views. 1 members, 11 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.042 seconds spending 0.013 seconds on 14 queries.