|
OrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group



Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
|
Is science too "sciencey"?
#23852571 - 11/20/16 07:45 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|

Well, is it punk?
--------------------
|
phio


Registered: 10/07/16
Posts: 369
|
|
No. Many people just fail to spend the time necessary to grasp it or search out scientific facts conveyed in a manner that they can understand.
There are hundreds if not thousands of videos on youtube that explain even quantum physics to the lay. Seek with an open heart and mind and ye shall find.
|
DividedQuantum
Outer Head


Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
|
|
Real science is bedazzling.
-------------------- Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici
|
OrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group



Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
|
|
Without science we would not have invented the vajazzle!

--------------------
|
pineninja
Dream Weaver



Registered: 08/17/14
Posts: 12,468
Loc: South
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: phio]
#23852639 - 11/20/16 08:16 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
And in another hundred years there will be another thousand or so saying how incorrect today's were.
-------------------- Just a fool on the hill.
|
pineninja
Dream Weaver



Registered: 08/17/14
Posts: 12,468
Loc: South
|
|
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said: Without science we would not have invented the vajazzle!


Necessity blah blah.
-------------------- Just a fool on the hill.
|
The Blind Ass
Bodhi



Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,658
Loc: The Primordial Mind
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: pineninja] 1
#23852652 - 11/20/16 08:22 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|

is this post to posty?
-------------------- Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps
|
WackyWizard
Stranger

Registered: 10/08/16
Posts: 17
Last seen: 7 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said: Without science we would not have invented the vajazzle!


I thought that was a swarm of insects on her cooch at first.
|
OrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group



Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
|
|
Quote:
The Blind Ass said:

is this post to posty? 
Did you know that a marketing genius got paid $200,000 for coming up with the name Juicy Juice? College degree FTW.
--------------------
|
phio


Registered: 10/07/16
Posts: 369
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: pineninja]
#23852711 - 11/20/16 08:58 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
pineninja said: And in another hundred years there will be another thousand or so saying how incorrect today's were.
Pretty much which is why I always take it with a grain of salt ..
|
viktor
psychotechnician



Registered: 11/03/10
Posts: 4,293
Loc: New Zealand
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
|
Real science is magical and awesome.
The cult of scientism is depressing, dreary and full of the same self-aggrandising shit as all other shit religions.
Members of the cult of scientism are always materialists, and they always believe that their belief in physicalism makes them morally superior to those who don't have it (despite the evidence). That's how you can pick them.
These guys are too sciency and need to let loose and get laid.
-------------------- "They consider me insane but I know that I am a hero living under the eyes of the gods."
|
phio


Registered: 10/07/16
Posts: 369
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: viktor]
#23852874 - 11/20/16 10:28 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
viktor said: Real science is magical and awesome.
The cult of scientism is depressing, dreary and full of the same self-aggrandising shit as all other shit religions.
Members of the cult of scientism are always materialists, and they always believe that their belief in physicalism makes them morally superior to those who don't have it (despite the evidence). That's how you can pick them.
These guys are too sciency and need to let loose and get laid.
|
The Blind Ass
Bodhi



Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,658
Loc: The Primordial Mind
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: phio]
#23852905 - 11/20/16 10:48 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Those "science" ads everywhere on the internet. LMAO\
"SCIENCE JUST FIGURED OUT HOW TO MAKE UR DICK BIGGER AND UR BOOBS HUGE AND FOUND OUT THIS FOOD KILLS CANCER - SCIENTISTS ARE GOING CRAZY OVER IT "
- aka "Those dudes in Marketing and Advertising"
-------------------- Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps
|
Thanatos10
Stranger


Registered: 01/19/15
Posts: 2,770
Loc: South Florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: viktor]
#23853063 - 11/21/16 12:26 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
viktor said: Real science is magical and awesome.
The cult of scientism is depressing, dreary and full of the same self-aggrandising shit as all other shit religions.
Members of the cult of scientism are always materialists, and they always believe that their belief in physicalism makes them morally superior to those who don't have it (despite the evidence). That's how you can pick them.
These guys are too sciency and need to let loose and get laid.
Science tends to go with what is testable and obeservable, things spirituality is not.
-------------------- As lightless oblivion devours you, drown in the ever-blooming darkness.
|
metalfaith
Moron



Registered: 03/30/11
Posts: 1,842
Loc: FL
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: Thanatos10] 1
#23853099 - 11/21/16 12:47 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
You're missing it. Completely.
--------------------
|
beforethedawn
Registered: 06/19/16
Posts: 1,859
Last seen: 4 years, 5 months
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: metalfaith]
#23853156 - 11/21/16 01:40 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Thanatos read "Beliefs" by Aldous Huxley (an essay). I'm sure if you Google it...
Pretty much saves me typing my own essay on the topic here for you.
-------------------- Hostile humankind Can't you see you're fucking blind?
|
LunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story


Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: viktor]
#23853326 - 11/21/16 05:35 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
viktor said: Real science is magical and awesome.
The cult of scientism is depressing, dreary and full of the same self-aggrandising shit as all other shit religions.
Members of the cult of scientism are always materialists, and they always believe that their belief in physicalism makes them morally superior to those who don't have it (despite the evidence). That's how you can pick them.
These guys are too sciency and need to let loose and get laid.
As the Great Pacific Genocide continues, scientists are baffled, scientists are mystified. They know how to create a nuclear plant, but no idea how to stop nuclear leaks. None, zero. Scientists are baffled, scientists are mystified.
The ice wall really doesn't count.
-------------------- Anxiety is what you make it.
|
LunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story


Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: pineninja]
#23853336 - 11/21/16 05:41 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
pineninja said: And in another hundred years there will be another thousand or so saying how incorrect today's were.
In another 100 years, the earth will be so polluted with radiation and unless they stop spraying coal ash everywhere, coal ash everywhere, that life will be pretty much gone. We've lost 60% of the earth's wildlife in the last 40 years, and that trend is quickening not slowing. The global warming/methane releases are picking up that feedback loop is a real problem. The radiation from Fukushima is the greatest catastrophe ever, ever, yet the greatest crime ever of the cover up continues. Wonder just what the Trumps were talking to the PM of Japan about in secret? Fukushima. It's a disaster of EPIC proportions.
Meanwhile, marine biologists are baffled, they are mystified.
-------------------- Anxiety is what you make it.
|
wicca mixer
Marmalade, I like marmalade :)



Registered: 07/30/10
Posts: 158
Last seen: 6 years, 10 days
|
|
There have also been (according to wikipedia) at least 2120 nuclear bomb tests on earth. That's all got to have had some effect too. I'm not really sure what to make of nuclear radiation. Chernobyl and Pripyat are apparently full of wildlife nowadays despite the radiation. Maybe it's a case of what doesn't kill you makes you stronger?
We (collective of humans and our mainstream science) tend to think we know it all with science, but we don't know shit.
Edited by wicca mixer (11/21/16 06:26 AM)
|
LunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story


Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
|
Re: Is science too "sciencey"? [Re: wicca mixer]
#23853487 - 11/21/16 07:59 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
wicca mixer said: There have also been (according to wikipedia) at least 2120 nuclear bomb tests on earth. That's all got to have had some effect too. I'm not really sure what to make of nuclear radiation. Chernobyl and Pripyat are apparently full of wildlife nowadays despite the radiation. Maybe it's a case of what doesn't kill you makes you stronger?
We (collective of humans and our mainstream science) tend to think we know it all with science, but we don't know shit.
Or it's a case of what doesn't kill you makes you sick and gives you cancer? Radiation "treatment" along with chemo and/or surgery being a cure to something doesn't mean it's a good thing, just a last ditch effort to prolong the misery.
In Japan after Fukushima the leader said if you smile the radiation won't affect you. It is deflected by the curvature uplift of your mouth. Let a smile be your umbrella, as it were.
-------------------- Anxiety is what you make it.
|
|