|
LogicaL Chaos
Ascension Energy & Alien UFOs




Registered: 05/12/07
Posts: 69,368
Loc: The Inexpressible...
Last seen: 18 minutes, 38 seconds
|
Re: Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 202,340 Votes [Re: Great Scott]
#23830936 - 11/14/16 12:19 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
PeyoteZen said:
Quote:
koods said: He probably means drain cleaner because you use NaOH in the extraction process. You see that kind of ignorance of chemistry all the time. Just because you use a chemical in a process, doesn't mean it remains in the product. I think people believe chemistry is like cooking.
Cooking can involve reductions tho. That excess water turns to steam and poof it's gone, transferred from the sauce into the atmosphere.
Cooking it removes the solvent, not the acid/base.
Lye is a base. If u extract DMT wrong, u can end up with lye in your DMT.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 4 hours, 53 minutes
|
Re: Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 202,340 Votes [Re: LogicaL Chaos]
#23830959 - 11/14/16 12:36 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
There's no reason you would get NaOH in DMT unless you're sloppy. The process is capable of completely isolating your product.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 202,340 Votes [Re: koods] 1
#23831315 - 11/14/16 06:40 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: I think the argument that we've had two elections in 16 years where the person who came in second wins the election has a lot of substance.
Except he came in first where it matters and he did it by the well known rules.
Your argument has no substance.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
LogicaL Chaos
Ascension Energy & Alien UFOs




Registered: 05/12/07
Posts: 69,368
Loc: The Inexpressible...
Last seen: 18 minutes, 38 seconds
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: endogenous]
#23834379 - 11/15/16 02:29 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Found a crazy article that claims that Hillary could have a 2 million vote lead after all votes are counted. WTF: http://www.ibtimes.com/popular-vote-latest-count-hillary-clinton-could-win-2-million-votes-over-president-2445684
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 4 hours, 53 minutes
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: LogicaL Chaos]
#23834402 - 11/15/16 03:16 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Every day her lead grows. Its up to 680k now.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Niffla



Registered: 06/09/08
Posts: 46,494
Loc: Texas
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: koods]
#23834408 - 11/15/16 03:25 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: Every day her lead grows. Its up to 680k now.
well at least she can always say that she won the popular vote
--------------------
HAIL OUR NEW OTD KING
|
LogicaL Chaos
Ascension Energy & Alien UFOs




Registered: 05/12/07
Posts: 69,368
Loc: The Inexpressible...
Last seen: 18 minutes, 38 seconds
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: Niffla] 1
#23834416 - 11/15/16 03:39 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
haha.
Sexy
|
Niffla



Registered: 06/09/08
Posts: 46,494
Loc: Texas
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: LogicaL Chaos]
#23834419 - 11/15/16 03:42 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
LogicaL Chaos said: haha.
Sexy 
Ole Hillary takes it like a true champ
--------------------
HAIL OUR NEW OTD KING
|
LogicaL Chaos
Ascension Energy & Alien UFOs




Registered: 05/12/07
Posts: 69,368
Loc: The Inexpressible...
Last seen: 18 minutes, 38 seconds
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: Niffla] 1
#23834420 - 11/15/16 03:44 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
She sure did....
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 4 hours, 53 minutes
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: Niffla]
#23834421 - 11/15/16 03:45 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Niffla said:
Quote:
koods said: Every day her lead grows. Its up to 680k now.
well at least she can always say that she won the popular vote

I hope the end result is large, not because it will help Clinton, but the larger her popular vote margin, the more absurd the electoral college system is revealed to be. When you start seeing numbers in the millions, it gets harder to justify that kind of disenfranchisement and the legitimacy of a system that would allow it.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
LogicaL Chaos
Ascension Energy & Alien UFOs




Registered: 05/12/07
Posts: 69,368
Loc: The Inexpressible...
Last seen: 18 minutes, 38 seconds
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: koods]
#23834424 - 11/15/16 03:48 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
i agree.
I wonder what the max amount of votes u can win in the popular vote by and still lose the electoral vote.....hmmmmmm.
|
Niffla



Registered: 06/09/08
Posts: 46,494
Loc: Texas
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: LogicaL Chaos]
#23834443 - 11/15/16 04:10 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Let me preface this by saying that I am not a Clinton supporter at all
That said I've always thought that the electoral college was ridiculous
It really should be by popular vote
I mean it's supposedly up to the people, right? Well isn't that what the popular vote would be all about?
Just count up the total votes for each candidate and whomever comes out on top in the end is president...pretty logical and straightforward, no?
Plus who knows how many people don't even vote simply due the fact that they're in a traditionally red or blue state...I hear it all the time in TX -- why vote? It doesn't matter because it's going to be a republican state anyway, right? I mean that's how a lot of people feel down here. And there's countless other people out there in other states who feel the same way -- that their vote doesn't matter.
If it was strictly by popular vote the turnout would be much, MUCH higher.
We're all US citizens in the end...just tally the votes up. All you gotta do. But naturally of course we gotta overthink shit and make things more complicated than they already are.
By the way didn't they start the idea of this electoral college shit back in the late 1700's?
--------------------
HAIL OUR NEW OTD KING
|
LogicaL Chaos
Ascension Energy & Alien UFOs




Registered: 05/12/07
Posts: 69,368
Loc: The Inexpressible...
Last seen: 18 minutes, 38 seconds
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: Niffla]
#23834460 - 11/15/16 04:32 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
u make a good point, if all the people in the midwest, north and south voted (as did Trumps supporters), they could definitely sway the popular vote since theres still a ton of people in those areas.
And as u said, if the president was by popular vote, the vote really would count, since a president could win by just one vote.
|
endogenous
נפל מגיהינום


Registered: 10/07/12
Posts: 2,365
Last seen: 25 days, 5 hours
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: Niffla]
#23834475 - 11/15/16 04:55 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
"Eliminating the Electoral College does not even require a constitutional amendment. An effort known as The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement among several U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their respective electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the overall popular vote. Once states totaling 270 electoral votes join the compact--which only requires passing state laws-- then the next presidential election will be determined the the popular vote, not the Electoral College.
As of November 9, 2016, ten states and the District of Columbia have signed the compact, totaling 165 electoral votes. So, we are already over 60% of the way there. If we can make this a national issue now, and if Democrats can do well at the state level in the 2018 midterm elections (which could happen under President Trump), then the winner of 2020 presidential election will be determined by popular vote." https://actionsprout.io/39C3FE/initial There's a petition at the above website to abolish the electoral college.
-------------------- The Day of the Lord has come like a thief in the night. -- It is there but no one knows it.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: endogenous]
#23834605 - 11/15/16 07:27 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
endogenous said: "Eliminating the Electoral College does not even require a constitutional amendment. An effort known as The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement among several U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their respective electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the overall popular vote. Once states totaling 270 electoral votes join the compact--which only requires passing state laws-- then the next presidential election will be determined the the popular vote, not the Electoral College.
As of November 9, 2016, ten states and the District of Columbia have signed the compact, totaling 165 electoral votes. So, we are already over 60% of the way there. If we can make this a national issue now, and if Democrats can do well at the state level in the 2018 midterm elections (which could happen under President Trump), then the winner of 2020 presidential election will be determined by popular vote." https://actionsprout.io/39C3FE/initial There's a petition at the above website to abolish the electoral college.
you guys worry about the electoral vote not going to the one with the popular vote but dont seem to give a shit about those votes actually going to the candidates that were actually voted for. the entire bastardization of the system was when states started the winner take all bullshit that awarded all the electors votes to whom ever got the majority in each state. they still want to keep that piece of corruption so they can try to sway the elections their way instead of having the best candidate win.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: koods] 1
#23834630 - 11/15/16 07:45 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: Every day her lead grows. Its up to 680k now.
And yet... still doesn't matter.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: Prisoner#1]
#23834641 - 11/15/16 07:52 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
endogenous said: "Eliminating the Electoral College does not even require a constitutional amendment. An effort known as The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement among several U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their respective electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the overall popular vote. Once states totaling 270 electoral votes join the compact--which only requires passing state laws-- then the next presidential election will be determined the the popular vote, not the Electoral College.
As of November 9, 2016, ten states and the District of Columbia have signed the compact, totaling 165 electoral votes. So, we are already over 60% of the way there. If we can make this a national issue now, and if Democrats can do well at the state level in the 2018 midterm elections (which could happen under President Trump), then the winner of 2020 presidential election will be determined by popular vote." https://actionsprout.io/39C3FE/initial There's a petition at the above website to abolish the electoral college.
you guys worry about the electoral vote not going to the one with the popular vote but dont seem to give a shit about those votes actually going to the candidates that were actually voted for. the entire bastardization of the system was when states started the winner take all bullshit that awarded all the electors votes to whom ever got the majority in each state. they still want to keep that piece of corruption so they can try to sway the elections their way instead of having the best candidate win.
BTW... in 2004, koods vote for president under this NPV system would have gone to GW Bush because GW won the popular vote, as would everyone in the state of california, imagine the landslide victory when those 10 states are forced to give up their elector votes to someone the whole state disagrees with
seems like liberals love getting fucked in the ass massively hard
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: Prisoner#1]
#23834655 - 11/15/16 08:00 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
That seems to contradict your earlier claim that the states could use this to "try to sway the elections their way".
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: psi]
#23834665 - 11/15/16 08:05 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
psi said: That seems to contradict your earlier claim that the states could use this to "try to sway the elections their way".
maybe you should read that post again
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Hillary Clinton Won The Popular Vote By 630,877 Votes [Re: Prisoner#1]
#23834680 - 11/15/16 08:12 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Ok, how can the states continue to try to "sway the elections their way" under this system if the law forces them to award their electoral college votes to the winner of the nationwide popular vote, even when the state's popular vote went the other way?
|
|