|
Does

Registered: 02/12/12
Posts: 2,846
|
Re: THIS JUST IN: Clinton wont face charges from FBI [Re: Repertoire89]
#23810292 - 11/07/16 05:15 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Repertoire89 said:
Quote:
Does said:

Doesn't really matter who it is
the guy said Sunday and it was Sunday. such a statement which I personally witnessed gives anyone hedges of credibility
|
ImSl8
Foreseein'



Registered: 07/11/14
Posts: 320
Last seen: 5 months, 7 days
|
Re: THIS JUST IN: Clinton wont face charges from FBI [Re: Bill_Oreilly] 1
#23810309 - 11/07/16 05:19 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Bill_Oreilly said:
Quote:
koods said: If you didn't want Hillary to be president, you shouldn't have nominated the only person with lower favorability numbers than her. Trump is the worst candidate to run in the general election since George Wallace. That's not Hillary's fault.
Extremely valid point
Just because trump is a lot worse than hillary doesnt mean we WANT hillary in. Its the lesser of 2 evils...evil being the ability to fuck america up beyond belief
personally? id vote for Bill Oreilly
It's all a matter of perspective.
IMO Hillary is 100x worse than Trump.
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: THIS JUST IN: Clinton wont face charges from FBI [Re: ImSl8]
#23810317 - 11/07/16 05:22 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Of course she's worse, only a brain dead shill wouldn't be able to see that.
|
ImSl8
Foreseein'



Registered: 07/11/14
Posts: 320
Last seen: 5 months, 7 days
|
Re: THIS JUST IN: Clinton wont face charges from FBI [Re: hostileuniverse]
#23810345 - 11/07/16 05:29 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
|
Bill_Oreilly
ANIMALS (the RAINBOW SERPENT)


Registered: 11/12/11
Posts: 26,370
Loc: Boston
|
Re: THIS JUST IN: Clinton wont face charges from FBI [Re: koods]
#23810373 - 11/07/16 05:37 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Repertoire89 said:
Quote:
ImSl8 said:
You don't know me man. Haha
It's not hard to tell that is what she is.
My opinion on her is only one facet of the infinity of my (our) being.
Can you bullet point her verifiable, heinous crimes?
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Domino pasta sex ring
Ok that was hilarious
-------------------- Something there is mysteriously formed, Existing before Heaven and Earth, Silent, still, standing alone, unchanging, All-pervading, unfailing, I do not know its name; I call it tao. If forced to give it a name, I call it Great (ta). Being great, it flows out; Flowing out means far-reaching; Being far-reaching, it is said to return. It's just a shot away..
|
ImSl8
Foreseein'



Registered: 07/11/14
Posts: 320
Last seen: 5 months, 7 days
|
Re: THIS JUST IN: Clinton wont face charges from FBI [Re: Bill_Oreilly]
#23810386 - 11/07/16 05:40 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Bill_Oreilly said:
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Repertoire89 said:
Quote:
ImSl8 said:
You don't know me man. Haha
It's not hard to tell that is what she is.
My opinion on her is only one facet of the infinity of my (our) being.
Can you bullet point her verifiable, heinous crimes?
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Email
- Domino pasta sex ring
Ok that was hilarious
hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 4 minutes, 52 seconds
|
Re: THIS JUST IN: Clinton wont face charges from FBI [Re: daytripper05]
#23810816 - 11/07/16 07:30 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
daytripper05 said:
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
daytripper05 said: You can't write a program to read the 33,000 emails that were deleted from her server after she was subpoenaed to turn them over. She knew what she was doing was wrong, and destroying evidence during an investigation is a felony. Pretty black and white really. It's the top people of the government colluding together to get her elected to prevent the unraveling of Obama's "legacy". Context clues people. And you can't ask "where's the evidence" when Hillary is deleting it, and there is no grand jury to cross examine the evidence found by the people doing the investigations at the FBI.
She didn't destroy the emails. Some technician did.
Lol. What's so funny is your responses would be entirely different if it was a republican that was caught red handed deleting emails after a subpoena. As a software engineer (and previously a technician), I would never delete the emails without being ordered to explicitly do so. That point aside, the person at the top being subpoenaed should be help responsible. I guess the political elite are held to a different standard than mere the middle class citizen.
He was ordered to delete them long before the supoena was issued. The technician didn't follow the instructions he was given.
Quote:
Comey added in a later congressional hearing that the FBI learned no one on Clinton’s staff specifically asked the employee to delete the emails following the New York Times story and subpoena. Rather, the employee made that decision on his own.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/09/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-deleted-33000-em/
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
|