|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
AgarStudent
Noob


Registered: 01/25/15
Posts: 550
Last seen: 2 years, 10 days
|
Chico Nindo Question - Is this bacterial
#23790484 - 11/01/16 05:56 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
There seems like huge variation in the strain or I have f**ed up some jars. Is a jar like this after two months normal or most likely bacterial?

Thanks guys
-------------------- Why reinvent the wheel when someone here has already done the science?
|
Mad Season
hookers and blackjack



Registered: 09/16/12
Posts: 12,666
Loc: Canada
|
Re: Chico Nindo Question - Is this bacterial [Re: AgarStudent]
#23790685 - 11/01/16 08:46 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
|
AgarStudent
Noob


Registered: 01/25/15
Posts: 550
Last seen: 2 years, 10 days
|
Re: Chico Nindo Question - Is this bacterial [Re: Mad Season]
#23790699 - 11/01/16 08:52 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
There is definitely no trich in there, but the patterning is unusual? Do you often see variations like this in the stones?
-------------------- Why reinvent the wheel when someone here has already done the science?
|
Mad Season
hookers and blackjack



Registered: 09/16/12
Posts: 12,666
Loc: Canada
|
Re: Chico Nindo Question - Is this bacterial [Re: AgarStudent]
#23790705 - 11/01/16 08:56 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Lol right Chico nindo is a stone former xD! Yeah I'd just let it keep on going, to see how big them bitches get. Looks like a ton of tiny ass stones right now.
I thought this was something else, and if it were, that would be pretty much all bacteria lol
|
AgarStudent
Noob


Registered: 01/25/15
Posts: 550
Last seen: 2 years, 10 days
|
Re: Chico Nindo Question - Is this bacterial [Re: Mad Season]
#23790713 - 11/01/16 08:59 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Okay, thanks  There seems to be a huge amount of variation in the type of scerlotia formation for that strain, very dependent on both the texture and the colouring of the agar wedge.
-------------------- Why reinvent the wheel when someone here has already done the science?
|
oakley
Stranger

Registered: 10/31/16
Posts: 55
Last seen: 2 years, 4 months
|
Re: Chico Nindo Question - Is this bacterial [Re: AgarStudent]
#23791076 - 11/01/16 11:36 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I remember reading that chicon indo is a terrible multispore stone former, however, with strain isolation you can get good stone forming phenotypes, I remember stonesun talking about this in the past, so check his past thread perhaps.
|
AgarStudent
Noob


Registered: 01/25/15
Posts: 550
Last seen: 2 years, 10 days
|
Re: Chico Nindo Question - Is this bacterial [Re: oakley]
#23792618 - 11/01/16 07:22 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
This is a tub of the same stuff that I put in fruiting conditions after letting it colonise for a week and have had it in fruiting conditions for about 1.5 weeks in a monotub.

No pins yet, but does this look okay? I can see a droplet or something forming in the mycelial growth through the peat casing layer.
-------------------- Why reinvent the wheel when someone here has already done the science?
|
dankington
The Stranger




Registered: 03/14/15
Posts: 4,577
Loc: 8te
|
Re: Chico Nindo Question - Is this bacterial [Re: AgarStudent]
#23793248 - 11/01/16 10:14 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
AgarStudent said: There seems like huge variation in the strain or I have f**ed up some jars. Is a jar like this after two months normal or most likely bacterial?

Thanks guys
after 2 months, you should have visible stones IMLE. I agree with Mad that that looks bacterial. I hope you see some fruits though
|
AgarStudent
Noob


Registered: 01/25/15
Posts: 550
Last seen: 2 years, 10 days
|
Re: Chico Nindo Question - Is this bacterial [Re: dankington]
#23834656 - 11/15/16 08:01 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
It turned out that the jar was not bacterial at all - As I have seen multiple jars like this and the smell was distinctively mushroomy. Consequently I must have acted like a mycelial racist. What I think I have done here is selected a particular sub-strain that has not produced good stones. Rather than producing good large sized ones, it has produced a lot of tiny useless ones. There must be some use of this sub-strain. Still trying to fruit it out on pasteurised dung, as coco has not worked.
-------------------- Why reinvent the wheel when someone here has already done the science?
|
|
|
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, veggie, mushboy, fahtster, LogicaL Chaos, 13shrooms, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta, Tormato, Land Trout, A.k.a 455 topic views. 22 members, 188 guests and 39 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ] |
|