|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: greencrush420]
#23807068 - 11/06/16 03:10 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
i think i covered more than republicans, i said "the right-wing".
you never seem to be able to fully comprehend what is being displayed to you, and then you trip about your misapprehension, then say that i'm tripping.
|
greencrush420



Registered: 04/14/13
Posts: 1,014
Loc: U.S.A
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: greencrush420]
#23807078 - 11/06/16 03:14 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said: more than the republicans/conservatives, religious-right, do. clear as fucking day, in the light of actual reality. not your slogan filled nonsense.)
I must have misread. Nope, looks like I got it right. No misapprehension on my part.
Edited by greencrush420 (11/06/16 03:24 PM)
|
greencrush420



Registered: 04/14/13
Posts: 1,014
Loc: U.S.A
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: greencrush420]
#23807098 - 11/06/16 03:19 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
In any case, you're trying to put an argument on me that I never made. All I said was that using entheogens and being liberal are not synonymous. Religion/ conservatives/republicans... you brought all that shit up, which has nothing to do with the assertation I made. There is more to the spectrum than the two extremes.
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: greencrush420]
#23807152 - 11/06/16 03:38 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
greencrush420 said:
I must have misread. Nope, looks like I got it right. No misapprehension on my part.
you can't apprehend....
Quote:
(yet the right-wing prevents anyone from using substances, because think of the Children, and God) (PS: in case you couldn't tell, you are full of shit. liberals do not care as much about the agency of people, more than the republicans/conservatives, religious-right, do.
Quote:
greencrush420 said: In any case, you're trying to put an argument on me that I never made. All I said was that using entheogens and being liberal are not synonymous.
that's not all you said.
Quote:
I would expect a user of entheogens, which are banned by the government, to be less inclined to support the extreme government control and regulation that liberals want to impose upon the people.
this is the rest of what you said, which is what i responded to.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: akira_akuma]
#23807174 - 11/06/16 03:44 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said: what makes it a conservative ideology?
the definition of conservative:
"a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics."
"Conservatism (or conservativism) is any political philosophy that favours tradition (in the sense of various religious, cultural, or nationally-defined beliefs and customs) in the face of external forces for change, and is critical of proposals for radical social change."
Islam is a religion which favors tradition, and is averse to change (by and by through it's dictums within the Koran), and is also political, in large part, due to the subject of law within the Islamic doctrines.
and why do the libs lib...by and by, because they lib.
isnt slaughtering tens of thousands of people that dont believe exactly as you do working for change? it seems that ISIS is changing many from living persons to dead persons. another almost exclusively liberal trait
islam is a religion that favors oppression. just like liberals
|
Ezuma
Gontish Wizard



Registered: 12/02/13
Posts: 8,423
Loc: Roke
Last seen: 10 months, 21 days
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: Prisoner#1]
#23807187 - 11/06/16 03:50 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
akira_akuma said: what makes it a conservative ideology?
the definition of conservative:
"a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics."
"Conservatism (or conservativism) is any political philosophy that favours tradition (in the sense of various religious, cultural, or nationally-defined beliefs and customs) in the face of external forces for change, and is critical of proposals for radical social change."
Islam is a religion which favors tradition, and is averse to change (by and by through it's dictums within the Koran), and is also political, in large part, due to the subject of law within the Islamic doctrines.
and why do the libs lib...by and by, because they lib.
isnt slaughtering tens of thousands of people that dont believe exactly as you do working for change? it seems that ISIS is changing many from living persons to dead persons. another almost exclusively liberal trait
islam is a religion that favors oppression. just like liberals
your post is absurd but given your sense of humour I don't know how much you genuinely mean and how much is facetious, if you define liberalism as working for a change, and any kind of change, then every political party ever would be liberal...
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: Ezuma]
#23807438 - 11/06/16 05:18 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Ezuma said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
akira_akuma said: what makes it a conservative ideology?
the definition of conservative:
"a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics."
"Conservatism (or conservativism) is any political philosophy that favours tradition (in the sense of various religious, cultural, or nationally-defined beliefs and customs) in the face of external forces for change, and is critical of proposals for radical social change."
Islam is a religion which favors tradition, and is averse to change (by and by through it's dictums within the Koran), and is also political, in large part, due to the subject of law within the Islamic doctrines.
and why do the libs lib...by and by, because they lib.
isnt slaughtering tens of thousands of people that dont believe exactly as you do working for change? it seems that ISIS is changing many from living persons to dead persons. another almost exclusively liberal trait
islam is a religion that favors oppression. just like liberals
your post is absurd but given your sense of humour I don't know how much you genuinely mean and how much is facetious, if you define liberalism as working for a change, and any kind of change, then every political party ever would be liberal...
except the republicans, they want the same shit they always wanted, at least that\s what akira says
|
Ezuma
Gontish Wizard



Registered: 12/02/13
Posts: 8,423
Loc: Roke
Last seen: 10 months, 21 days
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: Prisoner#1] 1
#23807446 - 11/06/16 05:20 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
they may be consistent in their wants (I don't think they have been when you go back a few decades) but they still want to change the system as it currently stands, like anyone else in politics, to varying degrees. Hence why that definition of liberal is silly
|
greencrush420



Registered: 04/14/13
Posts: 1,014
Loc: U.S.A
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: akira_akuma] 1
#23808326 - 11/06/16 11:32 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Right, so you did say Republicans, and I did not mention conservatives or Republicans. I just said that I would expect entheogen users to do the opposite of support the liberal establishment. What exactly does that mean, you ask? Well, the opposite of supporting the liberal/Democratic establishment is to NOT support the liberal establishment. See how that has nothing to do with conservatives/republicans? Thanks for agreeing. WTF were you trying to prove? Lol
|
endogenous
נפל מגיהינום


Registered: 10/07/12
Posts: 2,365
Last seen: 25 days, 2 hours
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: greencrush420] 1
#23808483 - 11/07/16 02:12 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
greencrush420 said: Using entheogens has nothing to do with being a liberal. I would argue the opposite. I would expect a user of entheogens, which are banned by the government, to be less inclined to support the extreme government control and regulation that liberals want to impose upon the people.
Well - Nixon didn't agree with you. He thought the hippies were larely responsible for the anti-war movement.
One of the only things I agree with him about.
-------------------- The Day of the Lord has come like a thief in the night. -- It is there but no one knows it.
|
endogenous
נפל מגיהינום


Registered: 10/07/12
Posts: 2,365
Last seen: 25 days, 2 hours
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: Prisoner#1] 1
#23808508 - 11/07/16 02:52 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said: wrong, a number of precincts have already found that the dead are casting ballots
http://denver.cbslocal.com/2016/09/22/cbs4-investigation-finds-dead-voters-casting-ballots-in-colorado/
I won't be surprised if the people doing that are Republicans. 2 Republicans have already been charged with double voting.
"A Republican woman in Iowa has been arrested on suspicion that she voted twice in the general election, according to a new report.
Terri Lynn Rote, 55, was arrested and charged with first-degree election misconduct, The Des Moines Register reported.
Rote allegedly voted early at an election office in Des Moines and then cast another ballot at a satellite voting location, according to police.
The woman is one of three people suspected of voter fraud in the county, according to the newspaper. Two others allegedly voted in person and also sent mail-in ballots, though Rote is the only one who has been arrested as of Friday morning.
Police are investigating the case.
The Blaze noted Friday that the woman was an early supporter of GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump.
Trump has repeatedly warned his supporters about the possibility for voter fraud during the election." -- http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/303406-iowa-republican-voter-arrested-for-alleged-voter-fraud
-------------------- The Day of the Lord has come like a thief in the night. -- It is there but no one knows it.
Edited by endogenous (11/07/16 02:53 AM)
|
endogenous
נפל מגיהינום


Registered: 10/07/12
Posts: 2,365
Last seen: 25 days, 2 hours
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: Prisoner#1]
#23808522 - 11/07/16 03:15 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Endogenous said:
Quote:
Alot of people think that being involved with Entheogens would likely mean that you're a liberal. Nixon and Trump certainly are representative of that point of view.
that's simply your assumption. would you care to show us trump's stance on marijuana? he's already stated he supports medical marijuana 100%, obama never gave a claim on marijuana outside of the senate races when he claimed to support it, in his presidential campaigns people just assumed that because he was a liberal he supported medical and legalization efforts, once elected he of course showed his true face with the statement that his administration would make no efforts toward legalization and while he released a number of memos claiming he'd scale back raids on marijuana dispensaries, he actually stepped up those raids
we do know that hillary will tell people what they want to hear, she has a long history of that, she has also stated she has a public position and a private position on everything which aligns with her telling people what she believes they want to hear, so publicly she claims to support reducing marijuana to a schedule 2 drug and supporting medical marijuana, the former, rescheduling it, also not being a good option because while it does open the door for research, it also puts it under tighter controls of the FDA
Trump is talking about going back to the "War On Drugs". He wants to be like Nixon --"tough on crime". He's a "law and order" candidate. He's going to go after illegal substances, like what the Shroomery is all about, and bring back Mandatory Minimums which force judges to give long sentences to non-violent people even when they don't want to do that.
He wants to go back to the days of Nixon's War on Drugs so the military industrial complex can make plenty of money and plenty of wars - and like Nixon's people - they think that "hippies" and blacks are preventing that.
"While Trump advocates increased border and law enforcement, including a return to now widely discredited mandatory minimum sentencing for drug offenders, Clinton does not include funding for drug enforcement and interdiction efforts in her proposal. Such funding would presumably come through normal appropriations channels.
Instead of a criminal justice crackdown, Clinton vows that her attorney general will issue guidance to the states urging them to emphasize treatment over incarceration for low-level drug offenders. She also supports alternatives to incarceration such as drug courts (as does Trump). But unlike Trump, Clinton makes no call for increased penalties for drug offenders.
Trump provides lip service to prevention, treatment and recovery, but his rhetorical emphasis illuminates his drug policy priorities: more walls, more law enforcement, more drug war prisoners.
There is one area of drug policy where both candidates are largely in agreement, and that is marijuana policy. Both Clinton and Trump have embraced medical marijuana, both say they are inclined to let the states experiment with legalization, but neither has called for marijuana legalization or the repeal of federal pot prohibition.
If Clinton's drug policies can be said to be a continuation of Obama's, Trump's drug policies are more similar to a return to Nixon's. "
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/trumps-dopey-drug-policies
-------------------- The Day of the Lord has come like a thief in the night. -- It is there but no one knows it.
Edited by endogenous (11/07/16 04:04 AM)
|
endogenous
נפל מגיהינום


Registered: 10/07/12
Posts: 2,365
Last seen: 25 days, 2 hours
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: Prisoner#1]
#23808588 - 11/07/16 04:33 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Ezuma said:
Quote:
ohcrapitsnico said:
Quote:
koods said: You're delusional if you think a Jihadist is liberal. You literally can't get more conservative
Hillary and obama created ISIS, ISIS couldn't be more liberal.
pft not even. I would say they inadvertently created it, but even if it was directly their creation, ISIS is not liberal, at worst its a highly conservative-minded pawn of corporate shills disguised as neo-liberals
Clinton isn't even nearly a liberal by my standards anyways
clinton and obama created, funded, armed and assisted the propagation of ISIS
and you're right, clinton is a 'progressive' liberal, the most dangerous sort
Trump says that Bush's war in Iraq was a total disaster.
The Iraqi war created ISIL.
Clinton may have been deceived by Bush's lies about Hussein, and voted for the war --but it was totally Bush's war -- not Clinton's.
-------------------- The Day of the Lord has come like a thief in the night. -- It is there but no one knows it.
|
endogenous
נפל מגיהינום


Registered: 10/07/12
Posts: 2,365
Last seen: 25 days, 2 hours
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: Prisoner#1]
#23808592 - 11/07/16 04:35 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
ohcrapitsnico said:
Quote:
koods said: You're delusional if you think a Jihadist is liberal. You literally can't get more conservative
Hillary and obama created ISIS, ISIS couldn't be more liberal.
does ISIS support the right of the citizens to be armed and defend themselves against all enemies both foreign and domestic?
Did the Republicans support the right of the Black Panthers to do that?
-------------------- The Day of the Lord has come like a thief in the night. -- It is there but no one knows it.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: endogenous]
#23808644 - 11/07/16 05:40 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
endogenous said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Endogenous said:
Quote:
Alot of people think that being involved with Entheogens would likely mean that you're a liberal. Nixon and Trump certainly are representative of that point of view.
that's simply your assumption. would you care to show us trump's stance on marijuana? he's already stated he supports medical marijuana 100%, obama never gave a claim on marijuana outside of the senate races when he claimed to support it, in his presidential campaigns people just assumed that because he was a liberal he supported medical and legalization efforts, once elected he of course showed his true face with the statement that his administration would make no efforts toward legalization and while he released a number of memos claiming he'd scale back raids on marijuana dispensaries, he actually stepped up those raids
we do know that hillary will tell people what they want to hear, she has a long history of that, she has also stated she has a public position and a private position on everything which aligns with her telling people what she believes they want to hear, so publicly she claims to support reducing marijuana to a schedule 2 drug and supporting medical marijuana, the former, rescheduling it, also not being a good option because while it does open the door for research, it also puts it under tighter controls of the FDA
Trump is talking about going back to the "War On Drugs". He wants to be like Nixon --"tough on crime". He's a "law and order" candidate. He's going to go after illegal substances, like what the Shroomery is all about, and bring back Mandatory Minimums which force judges to give long sentences to non-violent people even when they don't want to do that.
He wants to go back to the days of Nixon's War on Drugs so the military industrial complex can make plenty of money and plenty of wars - and like Nixon's people - they think that "hippies" and blacks are preventing that.
"While Trump advocates increased border and law enforcement, including a return to now widely discredited mandatory minimum sentencing for drug offenders, Clinton does not include funding for drug enforcement and interdiction efforts in her proposal. Such funding would presumably come through normal appropriations channels.
Instead of a criminal justice crackdown, Clinton vows that her attorney general will issue guidance to the states urging them to emphasize treatment over incarceration for low-level drug offenders. She also supports alternatives to incarceration such as drug courts (as does Trump). But unlike Trump, Clinton makes no call for increased penalties for drug offenders.
Trump provides lip service to prevention, treatment and recovery, but his rhetorical emphasis illuminates his drug policy priorities: more walls, more law enforcement, more drug war prisoners.
There is one area of drug policy where both candidates are largely in agreement, and that is marijuana policy. Both Clinton and Trump have embraced medical marijuana, both say they are inclined to let the states experiment with legalization, but neither has called for marijuana legalization or the repeal of federal pot prohibition.
If Clinton's drug policies can be said to be a continuation of Obama's, Trump's drug policies are more similar to a return to Nixon's. "
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/trumps-dopey-drug-policies
according to liberal fuckbags at alternet, maybe use a real source of news, not a bunch of hacks like mother jones and alternet
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: endogenous]
#23808649 - 11/07/16 05:42 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
endogenous said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
ohcrapitsnico said:
Quote:
koods said: You're delusional if you think a Jihadist is liberal. You literally can't get more conservative
Hillary and obama created ISIS, ISIS couldn't be more liberal.
does ISIS support the right of the citizens to be armed and defend themselves against all enemies both foreign and domestic?
Did the Republicans support the right of the Black Panthers to do that?
yes, they did in fact support that right for all men. it was the democrats that fought against civil rights for blacks
|
endogenous
נפל מגיהינום


Registered: 10/07/12
Posts: 2,365
Last seen: 25 days, 2 hours
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: Prisoner#1]
#23808684 - 11/07/16 06:16 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
endogenous said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
does ISIS support the right of the citizens to be armed and defend themselves against all enemies both foreign and domestic?
Did the Republicans support the right of the Black Panthers to do that?
yes, they did in fact support that right for all men. it was the democrats that fought against civil rights for blacks
"Newton, who had studied law, knew that it was perfectly legal to carry loaded weapons in California as long as they were not concealed. With that knowledge, the Panthers began walking the streets of Oakland armed, converging on police who pulled over black residents to observe and, it must be said, intimidate.
Later, in 1967, the Panthers went to the California Legislature in Sacramento, also while armed. The episode led then-governor Ronald Reagan, a Republican, to call for gun-control legislation. “Anyone who would approve of this kind of demonstration must be out of their mind,” Reagan said." -- http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/02/01/black-panther-party-facts-black-history-month/79351632/
-------------------- The Day of the Lord has come like a thief in the night. -- It is there but no one knows it.
Edited by endogenous (11/07/16 06:17 AM)
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: endogenous] 1
#23808695 - 11/07/16 06:22 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
endogenous said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
endogenous said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
does ISIS support the right of the citizens to be armed and defend themselves against all enemies both foreign and domestic?
Did the Republicans support the right of the Black Panthers to do that?
yes, they did in fact support that right for all men. it was the democrats that fought against civil rights for blacks
"Newton, who had studied law, knew that it was perfectly legal to carry loaded weapons in California as long as they were not concealed. With that knowledge, the Panthers began walking the streets of Oakland armed, converging on police who pulled over black residents to observe and, it must be said, intimidate.
Later, in 1967, the Panthers went to the California Legislature in Sacramento, also while armed. The episode led then-governor Ronald Reagan, a Republican, to call for gun-control legislation. “Anyone who would approve of this kind of demonstration must be out of their mind,” Reagan said." -- http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/02/01/black-panther-party-facts-black-history-month/79351632/
so you support the right of the people to go into congress or the state legislature sessions while armed
good to know
Edited by Prisoner#1 (11/07/16 06:23 AM)
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: endogenous]
#23808701 - 11/07/16 06:29 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Reagan wanted safer streets, democrats wanted segregation
Quote:
Virginia's Democratic Rep. Howard W. Smith was a staunch segregationist and strongly opposed the Civil Rights Act.
Smith, who was chairman of the House Rules Committee, came up with many tactics to discourage the passage of the bill's Title VII, which would outlaw employment discrimination because of race, color, religion or national origin.
Quote:
Most people don't realize that today at all -- in proportional terms, a far higher percentage of Republicans voted for this bill than did Democrats
Quote:
Ohio's Republican Rep. William McCulloch had a conservative track record -- he opposed foreign and federal education aid and supported gun rights and school prayer. His district (the same one now represented by House Speaker John Boehner) had a small African-American population. So he had little to gain politically by supporting the Civil Rights Act.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2014/04/10/politics/civil-rights-act-interesting-facts/index.html?client=safari
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: The Republicans Are Purging Millions Of Democrats From the Voting Roles [Re: hostileuniverse]
#23808774 - 11/07/16 07:23 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
he supports storming the capitals of each state and the nation with guns so that the legislature can conduct their business in safety, without intimidation from outside forces of people like the citizens of the states.
I wonder how well it would go over if people had walked into the senate or the house floor while armed with AR-15s and shotguns when they were conducting the votes on obamacare. do you think he would have been enraged by 'republicans take congress hostage'?
|
|