|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
DavidReishi
Mediocrity Extraordinaire


Registered: 10/07/15
Posts: 1,333
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Alan Rockefeller]
#23764220 - 10/23/16 12:57 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Alan Rockefeller said:
Quote:
DavidReishi said: Can something not be done to clean up this thread? It's a disgrace the way Mr. Piggy and others, including some TIs, have been allowed to smear their proverbial feces all over the walls.
Notice that none of the other threads in this forum turned out this way.
What are you talking about, Alan? I've noticed for two+ seasons a particular trend of jealous nastiness that's been allowed to be practiced in the forum. Here's an recent thread: https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/23737274/page/1
Do you notice how the thread-ruiner in the above case has one little mushroom find under his belt and has spent the rest of his time here yapping like it's the pub? All the while, the dude who had his thread ruined by him had just been out hunting mushrooms for hours?
Here's another thread from just last night: https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/23761962/page/2
In this case, the thread-ruiner is Mr. Piggy. Look at how this well-known 'nasty-one' is actually defended by a TI, who claims that the nastiness is justified. Go figure that both of these also made their thread-ruining appearance here.
-------------------- Species found in the Bay area: P. allenii, P. cyanescens, P. ovoideocystidiata, P. stuntzii, P. azurescens
|
Hammer92
THC

Registered: 09/27/13
Posts: 338
Last seen: 6 years, 8 months
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: DavidReishi] 1
#23764247 - 10/23/16 01:08 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I agree. Mr piggy isn't the one who went to the market, or the one who had roast beef, he seems to be a mix of the one who went WAH WAH WAH and the one who stayed home. Lol, for real he's always a douche
This thread is toast
|
Blazeyy
Psychonaut



Registered: 08/25/14
Posts: 1,663
Loc: Land of the Phrygian Hats
Last seen: 6 days, 16 hours
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Hammer92]
#23764297 - 10/23/16 01:33 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
should lock this now it's non productive people
-------------------- I give you the choice of 2 pills.
With each containing one of the following: Cyanide... Psilocin... Would you take the risk? Didn't think so. This is why Positive Identification prior to consumption is important.
|
Raven44
Entry not permitted to muggles



Registered: 12/07/13
Posts: 1,970
Loc: My sovereign reality bubble
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Hammer92]
#23764311 - 10/23/16 01:38 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Everyone's opinion should be respected.
I hope ur right tho David, I hope azzies have been naturally acclimated or possibly even geneticly altered by man to produce a species fruiting in temps loke u have witnessed.
Very awesome. I'm drooling.
I talked to a man trying to cross pan cyans with ps. Cyans. Haha...
I dream of acclimating cyans to my area. Via making a patch with spawn. And then come fruiting season printing the fruits. Using those spores for next year's patch
Also cloning the fruits as well and using that clone as well as the print u took to make the patch next year...
Keep doing this... one year maybe the phenotype will naturally acclimate and fruit next year naturally
|
DavidReishi
Mediocrity Extraordinaire


Registered: 10/07/15
Posts: 1,333
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Raven44]
#23764319 - 10/23/16 01:45 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Raven44, what a coincidence! I was literally just looking back at your earlier comment to reply to something you said with some pics, and then I reloaded and you'd posted again! Thanks for your response...please gimme a few minutes.
-------------------- Species found in the Bay area: P. allenii, P. cyanescens, P. ovoideocystidiata, P. stuntzii, P. azurescens
|
nooneman


Registered: 04/24/09
Posts: 14,568
Loc: Utah
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: DavidReishi]
#23764501 - 10/23/16 03:09 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Alan and Byrain are right, you've been really negative in this thread and it's hurt the thread as a result.
You have at least three people telling you this at this point. I don't know how many more it's going to take to convince you. You should step back and consider that if three people think you're in the wrong, then you're probably in the wrong. This is not how most MH&I threads go.
There is no need to put people down because they disagree with you or have different ideas than you do.
|
DavidReishi
Mediocrity Extraordinaire


Registered: 10/07/15
Posts: 1,333
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Raven44]
#23764517 - 10/23/16 03:14 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Raven44 said: Those fruits are too concentrated imo.
I'm w joust. That's some professional spore bombing imo.

Would a patch like this change your mind? Lol, I don't mean as a bribe. But look how concentrated it is. I found the patch two years ago and I really doubt it was put there by hand. Sometimes they're just like that here in the Bay area...though that example may be a bit extreme.

But here's virtually the whole extent of the patch of P. allenii (yesterday), that sits at the same general location as the Azure patch. The latter covers 400-600% more area than these allenii.
Quote:
I hope ur right tho David, I hope azzies have been naturally acclimated or possibly even geneticly altered by man to produce a species fruiting in temps loke u have witnessed.
Actually my only position so far is that I don't think the patch is connected to any cultivation or 'spawning.' If I've ever mentioned the word "natural" regarding this patch, I meant it in the normal way we talk about the spreading of spores, including by means of human activity. Let's not forget that there's even people like SkagitHunter, who comes into direct contact with Azzies and just so happens to make periodic trips to the Bay area.
-------------------- Species found in the Bay area: P. allenii, P. cyanescens, P. ovoideocystidiata, P. stuntzii, P. azurescens
|
DavidReishi
Mediocrity Extraordinaire


Registered: 10/07/15
Posts: 1,333
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: nooneman]
#23764551 - 10/23/16 03:31 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
nooneman said: Alan and Byrain are right, you've been really negative in this thread and it's hurt the thread as a result.
You have at least three people telling you this at this point. I don't know how many more it's going to take to convince you. You should step back and consider that if three people think you're in the wrong, then you're probably in the wrong. This is not how most MH&I threads go.
There is no need to put people down because they disagree with you or have different ideas than you do.
Wtf? Are you some kind of sage who offers your services, or does this thread have the wrong sign on it saying "survey?" Anyway, if you think Byrain's right about anything here, then you automatically take yourself out the running for being considered seriously. I think you're here just to try to stir the pot and cause trouble again.
-------------------- Species found in the Bay area: P. allenii, P. cyanescens, P. ovoideocystidiata, P. stuntzii, P. azurescens
|
WhyDidiDoThis
Bay Area Mushroom Collector


Registered: 11/26/14
Posts: 3,338
Last seen: 6 years, 1 month
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: DavidReishi] 2
#23764590 - 10/23/16 03:47 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Will you ever stop?
|
AllDay420
Ghost0420

Registered: 09/03/16
Posts: 301
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: DavidReishi]
#23764591 - 10/23/16 03:47 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Ya'll just can't help but whip each other up.
-------------------- Approved puppet.
|
Ran-D



Registered: 12/19/10
Posts: 16,313
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Sirtalis] 4
#23764603 - 10/23/16 03:51 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
|
oxygen
Stranger


Registered: 09/25/16
Posts: 92
Last seen: 6 years, 8 months
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Ran-D] 1
#23764609 - 10/23/16 03:54 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Ran-D said:
Quote:
Sirtalis said: Heh, remember this? I wonder if it's his spawn.
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/22620833#22620833

Case closed.
|
Ran-D



Registered: 12/19/10
Posts: 16,313
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: oxygen]
#23764616 - 10/23/16 03:56 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I mean, even if it's not a directly cultivated patch, it's obviously much more likely that the spores came from a local source than straight from Washington. What the hell are we arguing about here?
That doesn't mean it's not a cool find, shit.
|
AllDay420
Ghost0420

Registered: 09/03/16
Posts: 301
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Ran-D]
#23764617 - 10/23/16 03:56 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Ran-D said:
Quote:
Sirtalis said: Heh, remember this? I wonder if it's his spawn.
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/22620833#22620833

It's plausible, but by no means a certainty.
-------------------- Approved puppet.
|
DavidReishi
Mediocrity Extraordinaire


Registered: 10/07/15
Posts: 1,333
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Ran-D]
#23764621 - 10/23/16 03:58 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Ran-D said: I mean, even if it's not a directly cultivated patch, it's obviously much more likely that the spores came from a local source than straight from Washington.
Obviously.
-------------------- Species found in the Bay area: P. allenii, P. cyanescens, P. ovoideocystidiata, P. stuntzii, P. azurescens
|
Ran-D



Registered: 12/19/10
Posts: 16,313
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: DavidReishi]
#23764622 - 10/23/16 03:59 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
So we are all in agreement then.
|
DavidReishi
Mediocrity Extraordinaire


Registered: 10/07/15
Posts: 1,333
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Ran-D]
#23764644 - 10/23/16 04:06 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Ran-D said: So we are all in agreement then. 
Yes, that you have no idea what you're saying. People come directly from the PNW to SF all the time, every day of every week, covered in spores. So why in heaven's name would it be "obviously much more likely" that some lone kid from the Shroomery who ordered a spore print was responsible for it?
-------------------- Species found in the Bay area: P. allenii, P. cyanescens, P. ovoideocystidiata, P. stuntzii, P. azurescens
|
oxygen
Stranger


Registered: 09/25/16
Posts: 92
Last seen: 6 years, 8 months
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: DavidReishi]
#23764652 - 10/23/16 04:08 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
DavidReishi said:
Quote:
Ran-D said: So we are all in agreement then. 
Yes, that you have no idea what you're saying. People come directly from the PNW to SF all the time, every day of every week, covered in spores. So why in heaven's name would it be "obviously much more likely" that some lone kid from the Shroomery who ordered a spore print was responsible for it?
i just think its funny to imagine that thats where they came from 
Makes this whole thread a little better from my perspective.
|
Ran-D



Registered: 12/19/10
Posts: 16,313
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: DavidReishi]
#23764676 - 10/23/16 04:22 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
DavidReishi said: some lone kid from the Shroomery who ordered a spore print was responsible for it?

Trolling confirmed.
|
DavidReishi
Mediocrity Extraordinaire


Registered: 10/07/15
Posts: 1,333
|
Re: The first case of Psilocybe Azurescens in the San Francisco Bay Area [Re: Ran-D]
#23764705 - 10/23/16 04:33 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Ran-D said:
Quote:
DavidReishi said: some lone kid from the Shroomery who ordered a spore print was responsible for it?

Trolling confirmed.
Another who shouldn't have a T.I. badge, confirmed.
-------------------- Species found in the Bay area: P. allenii, P. cyanescens, P. ovoideocystidiata, P. stuntzii, P. azurescens
|
|