|
Konyap

Registered: 06/30/07
Posts: 33,945
Loc: Planet Piss
Last seen: 4 years, 2 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Webster10]
#23734665 - 10/13/16 04:25 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
just proves she's a fucking racist or whatever since she's probably drinking at all those dinners
|
Webster10
Up like Trump



Registered: 12/03/13
Posts: 9,966
Loc: Strawberry Fields
Last seen: 6 years, 3 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Konyap]
#23735020 - 10/13/16 06:47 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Hillarys hugely racist indeed. Something tells me there's gonna be a bombshell video or email of her being racist.
--------------------
|
Konyap

Registered: 06/30/07
Posts: 33,945
Loc: Planet Piss
Last seen: 4 years, 2 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Webster10] 2
#23735116 - 10/13/16 07:15 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
im pretty sure all of their engagements in the middle east support this notion
|
Webster10
Up like Trump



Registered: 12/03/13
Posts: 9,966
Loc: Strawberry Fields
Last seen: 6 years, 3 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Konyap] 2
#23735179 - 10/13/16 07:34 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
No doubt. Not to mention she called former KKK member Robert Byrd, her "mentor," called blacks "super predators," and is responsible for the mass incarceration of undeserving African Americans. She's racist big league
--------------------
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: koods]
#23735350 - 10/13/16 08:46 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
koods said: Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.
hillary has admitted to it being true
Source?
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/23733635#23733635
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Connoisseur]
#23735377 - 10/13/16 08:54 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Connoisseur said:
Quote:
koods said: Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.
oh really?
you know how it is, when it was about bush or republicans, wikileaks was 100% infallible
now that it's exposing the woman that koods wants to be, it's all lies
but you know the response was, "the russians hacked the DNC emails!" as opposed to "I guess we should have known better than to email each other a bunch of racist crap and conspire againsnt one of our own, for that we are sorry"
now it's "wikileaks is trying to sully my reputation" instead of "I'm only human, of course I run a criminal enterprise, murder people, have others murdered and sit back and cackle while still more are murdered, I embezzle funds from my charity, sell government secrets and nuclear arms to our enemies and even eat babies for breakfast because I am satan
Edited by koods (10/15/16 05:14 AM)
|
Turtletotem
Dutch Delight



Registered: 09/02/13
Posts: 3,763
Last seen: 4 years, 11 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Prisoner#1]
#23739150 - 10/15/16 04:20 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Koods can't see that the Bushes and the Clintons are two hands on the same belly.
"B-but.. she's a woman. And a democrat. I have been programmed to see her as the good guy!"
Hahahahahaha  You lot haven't had a honest election since Eisenhower.
--------------------
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Turtletotem]
#23739154 - 10/15/16 04:24 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Turtletotem said:
Hahahahahaha  You lot haven't had a honest election since Eisenhower.
Don't forget shit rolls down hill, and the US is at the top of that hill
|
Turtletotem
Dutch Delight



Registered: 09/02/13
Posts: 3,763
Last seen: 4 years, 11 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: koods]
#23739157 - 10/15/16 04:27 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.
Wikileaks has proven over the years to be the most trustworthy source of information over any mainstream media institutions.
Is it that hard to believe that a person can say one thing in front of the camera's, but a different thing behind closed doors?
It's called being a lying bitch. Many people, especially politicians, do it all the time.
Now ask yourself, again:
Why would bankers need to be assured she'll stand against pot legalization?
And there you have it. That is what is going on. You stand with Her, but she sure as hell aint standing with us.
Quote:
Repertoire89 said:
Quote:
Turtletotem said:
Hahahahahaha  You lot havenot had a honest election since Eisenhower.
Don't forget shit rolls down hill, and the US is at the top of that hill
But I don't wanna go to war with Russia because some rich billionaire fucks in the US needed to fuck with the Middle East
--------------------
Edited by Turtletotem (10/15/16 04:29 AM)
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 5 hours, 10 minutes
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Prisoner#1]
#23739194 - 10/15/16 05:14 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Connoisseur said:
Quote:
koods said: Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.
oh really?
you know how it is, when it was about bush or republicans, wikileaks was 100% infallible
now that it's exposing the woman that koods wants to be, it's all lies
but you know the response was, "the russians hacked the DNC emails!" as opposed to "I guess we should have known better than to email each other a bunch of racist crap and conspire againsnt one of our own, for that we are sorry"
now it's "wikileaks is trying to sully my reputation" instead of "I'm only human, of course I run a criminal enterprise, murder people, have others murdered and sit back and cackle while still more are murdered, I embezzle funds from my charity, sell government secrets and nuclear arms to our enemies and even eat babies for breakfast because I am satan
Wikileaks is definitely attempting to sully her reputation. Clearly, these leaks are an attempt to destroy Clinton's ability to win the election. Assange has said as much, and keeps advertising bombshell revelations will lead to her indictment. .
The rest of what you said is total bullshit.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Konyap

Registered: 06/30/07
Posts: 33,945
Loc: Planet Piss
Last seen: 4 years, 2 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: koods]
#23739210 - 10/15/16 05:43 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
nvm
Edited by Konyap (10/15/16 05:48 AM)
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 5 hours, 10 minutes
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Konyap]
#23739221 - 10/15/16 05:59 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Turtletotem said:
Quote:
koods said: Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.
Wikileaks has proven over the years to be the most trustworthy source of information over any mainstream media institutions.
Is it that hard to believe that a person can say one thing in front of the camera's, but a different thing behind closed doors?
It's called being a lying bitch. Many people, especially politicians, do it all the time.
Now ask yourself, again:
Why would bankers need to be assured she'll stand against pot legalization?
And there you have it. That is what is going on. You stand with Her, but she sure as hell aint standing with us.
Of course politicians tailor their message to their audience. I don't think she had put much though into pot legalization at the time. Her position is pretty mainstream. She has stated that she would not interfere in states that allow recreational use and that she would reschedule pot to recognize its medical utility. She supports decriminalization, but not full legalization. Frankly what she said to the bankers does not conflict with her public position at all. It should be noted that the federal government would be violating international treaties if it legalized pot.
Quote:
“I think that states are the laboratories of democracy, and four states have already taken action to legalize, and it will be important that other states and the federal government take account of how that’s being done, what we learn from what they’re doing. I think that the states moving forward is appropriate and I think the federal government has to move to make this more available for research that they can then distribute to interested people across our country. I do think on the federal level we need to remove marijuana from the Schedule I of drugs, move it to Schedule II, which will permit it to be the basis for medical research because it’s important that we learn as much as possible. And since it was a Schedule I drug we haven’t done that research. A lot of experts in the field are telling me we’ve got to learn a lot more.” WBZ NewsRadio, January 25, 2016
I think that is a totally reasonable position.
meanwhile, who knows what Trump thinks. He's such a dullard, you really can't make much sense of his word salad:
Quote:
“In terms of marijuana and legalization, I think that should be a state issue, state-by-state. … Marijuana is such a big thing. I think medical should happen — right? Don’t we agree? I think so. And then I really believe we should leave it up to the states.” Washington Post, October 29, 2015
“I’d say [regulating marijuana] is bad. Medical marijuana is another thing, but I think it’s bad and I feel strongly about that. [Moderator: “What about the states’ right aspect of it?”] If they vote for it, they vote for it… But I think, medical marijuana, 100%.” C-SPAN, June 23, 2015
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
Edited by koods (10/15/16 06:09 AM)
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 5 hours, 10 minutes
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Turtletotem] 4
#23739252 - 10/15/16 06:28 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Turtletotem said: Koods can't see that the Bushes and the Clintons are two hands on the same belly.
"B-but.. she's a woman. And a democrat. I have been programmed to see her as the good guy!"
Hahahahahaha  You lot haven't had a honest election since Eisenhower.
I don't care if she's a woman it is important to me that a democrat is in the White House for the next four years. I think the Republican Party is philosophically incapable of governing. They are so anti-government that they shouldn't be given the responsibility for running one. The reject science. They are anti-intellectual. They are in total disarray,
But, I will say this, if Donald Trump were the democrat and Hillary Clinton the republican, I would still vote for Clinton. At this point, the primary concern of the American public should be to ensure that Donald Trump does not become president. He is someone who shows no ability to actually do the job. He is mentally unstable, capricious, paranoid, impulsive, vindictive, lazy, unprepared, unable to focus on tasks, thinks he an expert at everything despite being an expert at almost nothing, only listens to yes men, is a pathological liar, and he lacks even basic levels of humility and empathy. He's a narcissistic simpleton and an embarrassment to the country.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Turtletotem
Dutch Delight



Registered: 09/02/13
Posts: 3,763
Last seen: 4 years, 11 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: koods]
#23739257 - 10/15/16 06:34 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Turtletotem said:
Quote:
koods said: Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.
Wikileaks has proven over the years to be the most trustworthy source of information over any mainstream media institutions.
Is it that hard to believe that a person can say one thing in front of the camera's, but a different thing behind closed doors?
It's called being a lying bitch. Many people, especially politicians, do it all the time.
Now ask yourself, again:
Why would bankers need to be assured she'll stand against pot legalization?
And there you have it. That is what is going on. You stand with Her, but she sure as hell aint standing with us.
Of course politicians tailor their message to their audience. I don't think she had put much though into pot legalization at the time. Her position is pretty mainstream. She has stated that she would not interfere in states that allow recreational use and that she would reschedule pot to recognize its medical utility. She supports decriminalization, but not full legalization. Frankly what she said to the bankers does not conflict with her public position at all. It should be noted that the federal government would be violating international treaties if it legalized pot.
Quote:
“I think that states are the laboratories of democracy, and four states have already taken action to legalize, and it will be important that other states and the federal government take account of how that’s being done, what we learn from what they’re doing. I think that the states moving forward is appropriate and I think the federal government has to move to make this more available for research that they can then distribute to interested people across our country. I do think on the federal level we need to remove marijuana from the Schedule I of drugs, move it to Schedule II, which will permit it to be the basis for medical research because it’s important that we learn as much as possible. And since it was a Schedule I drug we haven’t done that research. A lot of experts in the field are telling me we’ve got to learn a lot more.” WBZ NewsRadio, January 25, 2016
I think that is a totally reasonable position.
 Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Turtletotem said: Koods can't see that the Bushes and the Clintons are two hands on the same belly.
"B-but.. she's a woman. And a democrat. I have been programmed to see her as the good guy!"
Hahahahahaha  You lot haven't had a honest election since Eisenhower.
I don't care if she's a woman it is important to me that a democrat is in the White House for the next four years. I think the Republican Party is philosophically incapable of governing. They are so anti-government that they shouldn't be given the responsibility for running one. The reject science. They are anti-intellectual. They are in total disarray,
But, I will say this, if Donald Trump were the democrat and Hillary Clinton the republican, I would still vote for Clinton. At this point, the primary concern of the American public should be to ensure that Donald Trump does not become president. He is someone who shows no ability to actually do the job. He is mentally unstable, capricious, paranoid, impulsive, vindictive, lazy, unprepared, unable to focus on tasks, thinks he an expert at everything despite being an expert at almost nothing, only listens to yes men, is a pathological liar, and he lacks even basic levels of humility and empathy. He's a narcissistic simpleton and an embarrassment to the country.
If the only good points about your candidate are that she isn't as bad as the other guy, how fucked as a nation is the US?
--------------------
|
Konyap

Registered: 06/30/07
Posts: 33,945
Loc: Planet Piss
Last seen: 4 years, 2 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Turtletotem] 1
#23739264 - 10/15/16 06:38 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
TRUMP = DEATH LOL
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Konyap] 1
#23739270 - 10/15/16 06:42 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Konyap said: TRUMP = DEATH LOL
That's not unlikely.
Put a thoroughly incompetent fool like Trump in the oval office, someone impatient, with an inflated ego and seemingly no ability to think, and we could quickly be drawn into another war. People die in wars.
|
Konyap

Registered: 06/30/07
Posts: 33,945
Loc: Planet Piss
Last seen: 4 years, 2 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Repertoire89]
#23739272 - 10/15/16 06:44 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Turtletotem]
#23739283 - 10/15/16 06:50 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Turtletotem said:
Quote:
Repertoire89 said:
Quote:
Turtletotem said:
Hahahahahaha  You lot havenot had a honest election since Eisenhower.
Don't forget shit rolls down hill, and the US is at the top of that hill
But I don't wanna go to war with Russia because some rich billionaire fucks in the US needed to fuck with the Middle East
I just meant that we're all fucked
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,066
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 5 hours, 10 minutes
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: Konyap] 3
#23739286 - 10/15/16 06:52 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Did i say that?
My position on trump has nothing to do with his politics. He's not up to the task of being president. He doesn't have the experience, he doesn't have the discipline, he doesn't have the knowledge and he doesn't have the intellect to manage the executive branch of the us government. it's like if the guy who runs the snack bar in a hospital were applying to be the chief surgeon.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Turtletotem
Dutch Delight



Registered: 09/02/13
Posts: 3,763
Last seen: 4 years, 11 months
|
Re: In Leaked Speech, Clinton Promises Bankers to Stand Against Pot Legalization [Re: koods]
#23739302 - 10/15/16 07:04 AM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: Did i say that?
My position on trump has nothing to do with his politics. He's not up to the task of being president. He doesn't have the experience, he doesn't have the discipline, he doesn't have the knowledge and he doesn't have the intellect to manage the executive branch of the us government. it's like if the guy who runs the snack bar in a hospital were applying to be the chief surgeon.
Look, man, I agree with everything you have written there. Trump is a fucking moron, it is totally incredible to me that he got as far as he did to begin with.
Turnip might start a war, yeah? Because he's a selfish crazy bastard. I don't want that.
But Hillary will continue the wars that we're already in, and she will scale them up. She has got her dirty fingers all over Lybia, and look at that place now. Iraq, Afghanistan, Lybia, Syria.. what's next? A war against Iran? According to the wikileaks, that is exactly what we can expect with Hillary in the white house.
And the other major players on the bloke can't be having with this sort of thing anymore. The American pollitical elite is just a bunch of warmongering privateers, and Hilldawg is part of the club. I don't want a war! We have NO business in the middle east. Yet every fucking time, the US drags us into it. Now Russia and China are rattling their sabres, and for what? What good did all these wars do? For us, it's a mass of refugees and a whole bunch of terrorist. That is what the United States government is doing for us. (And France and the UK, probably. Assholes.)
You want Hillary in the office? The woman who cackled like some mad witch when she joked about Kadaffi getting raped by a bayonet? It's over, people aren't having it anymore. Hillary is a fraud, lying bitch, warmongerer, warcriminal, etc. etc. The whole US government is complicit, and it must end right now!
Edit: Look, you idiots: Bill Clinton was Bad, so you got Bush. He was bad, so you got Obama. He is bad, so now it's Hilly or Trumpy.. god damn it can't you see it's NOT these puppets that are doing all this?
--------------------
Edited by Turtletotem (10/15/16 07:05 AM)
|
|