Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Next >
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: falsereality]
    #23726308 - 10/10/16 07:28 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

you are just doing the same idiotic thing any idiot would do. painting people in broad strokes, just like an SJW would do.

this forum is here for discussion. someone brought up that there are SJWs here, i asked him to confirm for us that this was true. he couldn't. a discussion began from that point on about the legitimacy of the term.

no one is being jumped here. you're just jumping in and saying extra retarded shit to stir the pot. :shrug:

if you think you're being jumped by "SJWs", here, in the what is a flagrantly anti-SJW forum, then you must be the weakest user on this forum.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*
Other

Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan Flag
Re: SJWs [Re: falsereality] * 1
    #23726318 - 10/10/16 07:30 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

falsereality said:
I like how you can't even talk about the phenomenon of SJWs without getting jumped by them.




And then have their existence be denied ad nauseum via bricks of of poorly thought out arguments that arnt even worth addressing.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
    #23726325 - 10/10/16 07:32 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

you've been addressing them, and they've been beating you on your head the entire way.

you think i'm being an SJW for pointing out your flawed logic, don't you?

LOL

you still haven't shown anything about any SJWs that are supposedly here...just said somethings about someone you consistently disagree with, hence you label them an SJW, when they don't fit the bill. i've proven this, without a shadow of a doubt, and all you can do is try to dance.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSophistic Radiance
Free sVs!
Female


Registered: 07/11/06
Posts: 43,135
Loc: Center of the Universe
Re: SJWs [Re: falsereality] * 1
    #23726330 - 10/10/16 07:33 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Better start doxing people :hehehe:


--------------------
Enlil said:
You really are the worst kind of person.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineqman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 10 hours, 50 minutes
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma] * 2
    #23726338 - 10/10/16 07:35 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*
Other

Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan Flag
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23726341 - 10/10/16 07:36 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

akira_akuma said:
you've been addressing them, and they've been beating you on your head the entire way.

you think i'm being an SJW for pointing out your flawed logic, don't you?

LOL

you still haven't shown anything about any SJWs that are supposedly here...just said somethings about someone you consistently disagree with, hence you label them an SJW, when they don't fit the bill. i've proven this, without a shadow of a doubt, and all you can do is try to dance.




Last time we had this discussion I swayed you to admitting they existed. This is why Im feigning daftness, genuis.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSophistic Radiance
Free sVs!
Female


Registered: 07/11/06
Posts: 43,135
Loc: Center of the Universe
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
    #23726359 - 10/10/16 07:42 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:

Sophistic Radiance said:
I succeeded in getting a conversation started. That's all I was really going for. I didn't know what to expect, I didn't have a plan for what to do once that actually happened, there was a fat backlash, and the outcome was worse than I could have anticipated. But I definitely got a conversation started. For an issue that most people are too embarrassed to admit even thinking about, that is a big win in itself.

The trick is in getting it to the point of two steps forward, one step back, instead of one step forward, two steps back. I've pretty much given up on the whole fucking thing anyway, though I remain righteously indignant into perpetuity.




I think you won a fair bit of legitimacy. A lot of us didnt care about it until you started whining about it, and its one of the rare times I actually saw a considerable number of posters cede a position.




I'm gonna be honest with you, it was comforting to read this. I hope you're right. I poured a shitload of honest to God capital-W Work into that whole jag. It was emotionally and mentally exhausting, and I tend to write the whole thing off as a waste of my resources because it had such a negative outcome in terms of site policy and my own reputation.


--------------------
Enlil said:
You really are the worst kind of person.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineqman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 10 hours, 50 minutes
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou] * 2
    #23726362 - 10/10/16 07:43 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
    #23726363 - 10/10/16 07:43 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

yeah, i had assessed that the wording was faulty, seeing as "Social Justice" is inherently a good thing...what do you think this fucking latest hoopla about the next president elect is about? social justice. but what kind of social justice, the good kind, or the bad kind, and what is good or bad, is up for debate.

so i had a problem with the wording, i pointed it out, we discussed it, and i still have a problem with the wording, actually....

i never said they didn't exist, though. that's not what i said in that thread. in fact, i see in that thread we were talking about PC-police, and how they are qualitatively different from an SJW. PC-police do not dox, or slander, or whatever ect amount of bullshit SJWs do -- they try to police people's language. that's only a sliver of what an SJW does, as a given. (and we also discussed how someone who simply wants to have dialogue without harassing language in it isn't necessarily a "PC-Police". or an Sjw, for that matter -- they have to proceed to take into effect the stance of either or of these kind of people; either by presuming that everyone should be talking a certain way, either by law, or by some mandate, or some moral code -- and not just out of respect for a particular person, to take heed of their sensibilities within a discussion or dialogue, and some would argue, debate as well. seeing as though cussing someone out is a terrible debate tactic, just as referring to problem particulars as "niggers" or something equally retarded.)

so to re-iterate: i never said they didn't exist, genius. i said they aren't prevalent here, nor are their any users that regularly come here that are SJWs. you've said Asante is an SJW. i've shown how you're wrong (he decries their behavior, and is against the limiting of free speech, safe spaces ect)

can't that be enough to show that you might be entirely correct in your assertions? i think it is.

Quote:

qman said:





no one, in the history of this message board, has ever presumed that having an opinion, if it falls within a certain subject matter, is offensive. not once. thanks for the bereft input as usual, prevaricator.


Edited by akira_akuma (10/10/16 07:49 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*
Other

Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan Flag
Re: SJWs [Re: qman]
    #23726372 - 10/10/16 07:49 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Its not, and try to stay on topic.

Quote:

qman said:





AKIRA: They dont exist, nuh uh, they dont. you're all wrong and im right *rants incoherently about something thats not even marginally related for 5 paragraphs*


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
    #23726375 - 10/10/16 07:49 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

no one said they didn't exist. :shrug: now you're just putting words in my mouth. lazy.

Quote:

Bodhi of Ankou said:
Its not, and try to stay on topic.





don't be ridiculous. i am on topic. and it is. it totally is. you'll never see it, you're entrenched.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23726381 - 10/10/16 07:51 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

you've said Asante is an SJW. i've shown how you're wrong (he decries their behavior, and is against the limiting of free speech, safe spaces ect)

can't that be enough to show that you might be entirely correct in your assertions? i think it is.




IE, you were wrong.

period. so i think it is.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineqman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 10 hours, 50 minutes
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23726383 - 10/10/16 07:52 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: qman]
    #23726388 - 10/10/16 07:53 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

spamming. awesome.

you're not allowed to film here...:lolsy: i love that line, though. i admit.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*
Other

Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan Flag
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23726390 - 10/10/16 07:54 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

akira_akuma said:
Quote:

you've said Asante is an SJW. i've shown how you're wrong (he decries their behavior, and is against the limiting of free speech, safe spaces ect)

can't that be enough to show that you might be entirely correct in your assertions? i think it is.




IE, you were wrong.

period. so i think it is.




He's a social justice warrior because he's pushing for this sanitized lovey dovey version of reality all the time. Which isnt necessarily a bad thing.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleCitizen X
Call me Pepper,,
Other User Gallery
Registered: 01/19/14
Posts: 7,787
Loc: Djibouti
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou] * 2
    #23726409 - 10/10/16 08:00 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

I put SJW under my name and you wouldn't believe how many people were instantly offended it was quite ironic. Looking back on it quite funny


--------------------


Rate me here


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
    #23726428 - 10/10/16 08:06 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

see how confused you are. :shrug: but now let me just quote this for posterity.

Quote:

Bodhi of Ankou said:
He's a social justice warrior because he's pushing for this sanitized lovey dovey version of reality all the time. Which isnt necessarily a bad thing.




so he's not a social justice warrior, but you think he is anyway cause reasons, reasons that you find maybe appealing, or at least, find not necessarily bad.

well, at least that's half-way sensible.

most social justice cunts have a chip on their shoulder just like anyone else does, a hard-on for inequality...again, SEE the presidential debates. everyone wants in on this pie: i want MUH EQUALITY BACK, and everyone seems to have differing opinions on what that really means.

but we all know we can go after the government at least! the SJWs just take their activism a step further...they actually work with the government, and then some.

and mostly they are doing it for the same reasons anyone else wants to "make America great again", at least in their OWN MINDS.

point being, if you haven't gathered it yet: is that they aren't necessarily evil or dangerous people...and they aren't doing their crazy shit for nothing, they HAVE A MOTIVE. and it's a shared motive...only they go about it in a bat-shit absurd way, whilst tangling up lots of people whom might not be their enemies, and making them into enemies -- which is their own stupid fault.

but the things is, it's not that they are "necessarily" a bad thing...seemingly by necessity they (in their own minds) need to be unabashed and loud and proud as they can, but also, they (i'd say the majority) fall prey to acting out like children, and then simply not having their shit together to back up their shit, because alot of them are children, and haven't thought out all the positions, and assessed them objectively. if they had, they'd know they have more in common with people than is let on, and they'd stop being such asshats to people like Hugh Mungus. :shrug:


Asante is not a social justice warrior just because he espouses hippy-love views. it's just...if i can't get that through to you, by now, you've simply entrenched yourself far too deep to really make any sense about how you've just been shown to be wrong. :shrug:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleHobozen
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/03/11
Posts: 10,634
Loc: Flag
Re: SJWs [Re: Citizen X]
    #23726434 - 10/10/16 08:07 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

You are an SJW, though. At least you've argued from the stance of one if I remember right. Ya can't slither your way out of this one bud.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: Hobozen] * 1
    #23726436 - 10/10/16 08:08 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

i remember that time you did the same thing, SJW. :rolleyes:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleHobozen
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/03/11
Posts: 10,634
Loc: Flag
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23726443 - 10/10/16 08:10 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Your memory is shit.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Next >

Shop: PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* what makes a SJW bad?
( 1 2 all )
tryptkaloids 758 33 07/19/17 08:44 PM
by Fathwell
* Joe Rogan laughing at retarded SJWs
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Patlal 1,294 60 03/06/17 09:18 AM
by Webster10
* New Pendulum
( 1 2 all )
noticeofeviction 3,357 24 07/16/10 07:44 PM
by My Heart
* Pendulum
( 1 2 all )
2Cents 1,197 20 02/06/11 02:00 AM
by 2Cents
* Pendulum in NYC this Sunday Gumby 997 19 10/26/08 07:11 PM
by Gumby
* Pendulum's new album - Immersion Shins 628 15 10/02/10 07:18 PM
by Shins
* Pendulum just finished playing two miles from where I live Visionary Tools 613 7 06/29/08 01:25 PM
by Psy Baba
* Can you imagine the amount of SJW meltdowns we'll see on YouTube if Trump wins???
( 1 2 3 all )
Patlal 1,278 45 11/09/16 04:45 PM
by moonrockmushy

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
3,395 topic views. 1 members, 36 guests and 31 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.031 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 15 queries.