|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
i'm sure that the people who are in this thread can feel good about contributing to nothing themselves.
SJWs!
they exist!
they aren't seen much though!
one exists at my job!
that's it! they are real!
see! and they are even here on this site!
oh no!
what is this a fucking spook story?
i ask: where are they?
people say: "there are those with the mentality" and "those whom take stances" of an SJW. i ask for clarification. i get none.
this is why i find it all to be a ball of bullshit that you're all eating up. sorry for trying to make you aware of your own tomfoolery.
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: SJWs [Re: qman]
#23723812 - 10/09/16 10:00 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said:
Why do you continue to misquote and slander me?
Where is a social justice warrior when you need one? 
it's not slander nor misquoting. it's called paraphrasing. do you seriously have no skill at polemic?
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/19842594#19842594
here is you talking about "black culture" needing "to change". which is the same thing as what i said. people are also aware of your comments. this isn't political. literally, people know what your rhetoric contains.
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
|
Its off-topic but I agree with everything Qman said in that 3 year old post.
Black American culture is surely fucked right now, the crime and poverty rates are insane, whatever the reason.
Something like 75% of black children grow up without their fathers, that is a fault in parenting, unintentional or otherwise. Growing up in a single parent household has been shown to have very negative consequences on a child.
On black leadership, yeah there is a big problem with enabling an entitled freeloading mentality.
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
is Asante an SJW, guys?
guys? simple question this time, is Asante an SJW?
but yeah, if OP or anyone would show me someone who fits the description of the OP that posts here, it'd be really insightful. nothing needs be disparaging, only insightful...what you think SJWs are just gonna stop one day out of the blue? naw, they needs be confronted, they needs be told "hey, we don't appreciate that".
so point one out. don't just point me out, either, that's cheating, surely Qman couldn't have been taking just about me. so please. this thread can then have a point other than mulling over the same useless diatribe about SJWs and how krrrazy they are, because guess what, it's old news, it's nothing new to anyone, and it can be summed up in Shroomisms first post. i hope that some pertinent discussion can arise from this thread, instead of just beating a dead horse.
do people who hold a certain "stance", are the automatically an SJW, or are they just taking on those traits? what's the difference?
all these are interesting questions put to people whom OBVIOUSLY know a whole bunch about SJWs, and that's what the thread is about...so why won't anyone discuss it?
it's easy to dissuade people about those you see in videos, or hear about...those crazy SJWs! but...when they are right in our midst, like Qman says, then why not discuss this? that's the thread! to discuss SJWs.
but it's harder to dissuade people by point out those that actually are within firing distance.
but oh well.
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
Asante, Sophist, Crystal G. Theres more then a few.
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
Repertoire89 said: Its off-topic but I agree with everything Qman said in that 3 year old post.
Black American culture is surely fucked right now, the crime and poverty rates are insane, whatever the reason.
Something like 75% of black children grow up without their fathers, that is a fault in parenting, unintentional or otherwise. Growing up in a single parent household has been shown to have very negative consequences on a child.
On black leadership, yeah there is a big problem with enabling an entitled freeloading mentality.
ok.
when i paraphrased Qman, however, for the record, there was no slander. i basically just affirmed what you just confirmed...that Qman shares that rhetoric, plainly speaking, alot.
hence why it was referred to.
but i love his deflections though. makes it that much hard to get him to fess up that he merely thinks people are SJWs because they espouse views that claim that Qman is "racially insensitive".
oh boo hoo.
but yeah, i agree, my kneegro.
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Asante, Sophist, Crystal G. Theres more then a few.
i don't see them acting like SJWs however. i see them espousing either hippy-dippy views, transgender topics, and with Crystal...well, she is just flippant and doesn't take shit seriously.
i don't see how this makes them SJWs. i can't deny that i may have missed something...and i can't deny that i can see how you came to your conclusion. but i am just saying...i think you're merely just being rhetorical, literally speaking. that is to say, you're just calling them SJWs with them not really fitting them bill...again, they are just "lefties". and they because of that, they are termed SJW.
i rest my case. Qman is mostly, when referring to these SJWs here, is just referring those whom call any liberal an SJW. only a few sum members do so, but it's quite uncalled for, and only stultifies discussion.
now thread can presume down it's usual course of idiocy. 
yeah, i met one...like once...it was like so annoying. i walked away. the end.
oh and this one time there was this group nobody listened to, who screamed at everyone about oppression, and stopped this guy from making a speaking arrangement, and i was very upset, awww.
Edited by akira_akuma (10/09/16 10:20 PM)
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
|
The problem I have with singling people out as a SJW, is that the term is often dressed as an insult. Personally I view it more as a neutral descriptor, but I would rather not unintentionally slander someone.
Is Asante a SJW? I don't know, I've heard him argue for peace and equality, but I can't remember him arguing for affirmative action (which I consider a cornerstone of the SJW agenda).
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
I'd rather not get personal either. Its better to attack the idea and do it subtly then it is to be so confrontational and personal with it anyways. You're kind of looking at things in a different way and then expecting us to just agree with your view by doing that.
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
Repertoire89 said: The problem I have with singling people out as a SJW, is that the term is often dressed as an insult. Personally I view it more as a neutral descriptor, but I would rather not unintentionally slander someone.
Is Asante a SJW? I don't know, I've heard him argue for peace and equality, but I can't remember him arguing for affirmative action (which I consider a cornerstone of the SJW agenda).
i don't consider it a cornerstone...i consider an article of faith. big difference. a cornerstone would be more like Feminism, but even then i'd still speculate that it's more along the lines of "equality" -- but the fake kind where you try to make everything in the world "right again" all while removing one's own ties, and history altogether, from the equation...like i tell black "white devil" preachers whom claim all the worlds evils are from white people...don't forget the slaying of the Albinos! don't forget the wars between your own "race" within Africa...i tell them these things to remind them they aren't exempt.
also: i'd agree with the notion that using the term is basically an insult now. and it's been thrown around so much, it's basically lost all meaning. that's why you see me making a stink about it now. it's a fucking ambiguous dumb overly used internet term once used to describe keyboard warriors....now they whom are against "SJWs" (the most ironically named insult, but i'm sure that was the point, and that made sense at the time), they level the accusation (the insult) at ANYONE they disagree with on any ONE stance. that's ABSURD. and it's because of people running with this absurd word.
Quote:
It's in this younger generation, many have been brainwashed into a victimization mentality from their academic superiors.
It's in our schools, our media and now our politics. Ask yourself why Trump might be the next US President, it's because of the backlash against PC and SJW's.
PS: superiors? i don't think so. also: didn't the commies already get booted out of the school system? oh just not the Marxists? ok.
well, i don't fear indoctrination, and certainly, no one should opt for it. i quit school for that reason. shit on me, eh?
also: yes, Trump is arising due to that popular tune, i'd agree. i hope he wins. Hillary makes my skin crawl.
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: I'd rather not get personal either. Its better to attack the idea and do it subtly then it is to be so confrontational and personal with it anyways. You're kind of looking at things in a different way and then expecting us to just agree with your view by doing that.
you think i post this shit with the thought that people will agree with me?
LOL
that's funny just by itself.
and know, people shouldn't take things personal and then try to attack people on that front...though, most everything a person believes is personal. to deny that is to deny your own ability to stand up for your own beliefs. so i wouldn't.
more to the point of why i wouldn't aspire to use the phrase SJW anymore than needs be. it's overused and stultifies discussion. i am plainly sick of seeing people just call someone it for disagreeing with them, or openly entertaining an idea that someone doesn't like, or when someone makes this insult as a way to denote that what the person is talking about is nonsense from the get-go, because they are "SJW". seeing as that what an SJW is "supposed to do" (target people to stifle dissenting views with tons of butt-blast), i find it even more egregious that these people (whom also EXIST, GASP!) call themselves "anti-SJWs", when they act just the same.
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said:
i don't consider it a cornerstone...i consider an article of faith. big difference. a cornerstone would be more like Feminism, but even then i'd still speculate that it's more along the lines of "equality" -- but the fake kind where you try to make everything in the world "right again" all while removing one's own ties, and history altogether, from the equation...like i tell black "white devil" preachers whom claim all the worlds evils are from white people...don't forget the slaying of the Albinos! don't forget the wars between your own "race" within Africa...i tell them these things to remind them they aren't exempt.
also: i'd agree with the notion that using the term is basically an insult now. and it's been thrown around so much, it's basically lost all meaning. that's why you see me making a stink about it now. it's a fucking ambiguous dumb overly used internet term once used to describe keyboard warriors....now they whom are against "SJWs" (the most ironically named insult, but i'm sure that was the point, and that made sense at the time), they level the accusation (the insult) at ANYONE they disagree with on any ONE stance. that's ABSURD. and it's because of people running with this absurd word.
I largely agree with what you're saying here and honestly have to reassess whether or not the term is really applicable to anyone on the Shroomery (regular posters, fucking rookies).
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
that's all i am saying. 
i find it funny i get called out on simply asking Qman to name names.
he is the one that brought it up, and i find his statement to be bullshit.
i guess that's not a popular view around here, but so be it. x2
also: it's ironic, yes. if he wants to name names, name them, don't tout that you know there are SJWs here without any evidence, it only arises suspicion of particular posters whom may share dissenting views, and only causes people to take those views and posters as just simply espousing SJW "bullshit", instead of taking a real look at what is being presented. i don't have the proper faculties to really make my point more clear, but the fact is, people are doing that here. more so then people are being "SJWs" here. eg, there are more people claiming there are SJWs here, than there are actual SJWs. it's a farce. and people are plainly falling for it, because it's what people do. path of least resistance. that's why this propaganda (which is what it is, mind you) is fucking stupid.
Edited by akira_akuma (10/09/16 10:44 PM)
|
Burke Dennings
baby merchant

Registered: 11/29/04
Posts: 81,641
|
|
This thread really triggered you.
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
not really. i just post alot of long posts when i'm bored, and like to point out people's bullshit.
people's bullshit tends to send me into apoplexy but that's fair game. triggering someone is more like talking about menstrual blood, or like talking about rape or graphic stuff...race stuff...all sorts of crap, really.
but not bullshit. bullshit is something that is better addressed and then hauled off to be shot sight-unseen in a pre-prepped grave.
|
Burke Dennings
baby merchant

Registered: 11/29/04
Posts: 81,641
|
|
Yeah, maybe you're right.
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
Such a fiery little autist. You know you're actually exemplifying sjw's by demanding we all dont use the term sjw right?
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
you're just trying to make me quote you, for posterity's sake; you know, for my future children. i'm not gonna be that guy. they shall know me only as "the Humble One".
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Such a fiery little autist.
precocious little humble and gentle Napoleon, nothing more, nothing less. that's fucking humbleness for you.
Edited by akira_akuma (10/09/16 11:50 PM)
|
falsereality


Registered: 04/01/13
Posts: 4,112
|
|
I found a great avatar for you akira.
|
PatrickKn



Registered: 07/10/11
Posts: 20,564
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said: they shall know me only as "the Humble One".
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
You know you're actually exemplifying sjw's by demanding we all dont use the term sjw right?
i'm exemplifying how crass the whole discussion is.
SJWs get brought up...and what is within the first few posts of the discussion...someone is levelling accusations at users here.
no one really expected to discuss this? well, i found it the most interesting thing that could be propounded on in this dead horse of a thread (no offence OP, but what can you learn from "SJWs are *insert diatribe here*" that you can't just learn from observation? or from this discussion. hope you've enjoyed it.).
and i'm not demanding anything. i'm not even asking anyone to do anything. all i wanted was for Qman to not bullshit people, and just tell everyone what he was talking about, instead of being all inconspicuous about it.
i don't like the term SJW because it gets thrown around too much by people who aren't levelling it at SJWs. that's doesn't mean it can't have it's place. i would be just as aggrieved if i saw anyone misusing any word or notion to aim to create dissent. in this political race, in the US, this has been a commonality...this "SJW" term, and the word "cuck". you do not, however, see all the conservatives around here being called "cuck" by alt-righters...but you do see the former...people being called SJW as simply an insult, which fuels propaganda.Quote:
falsereality said: I found a great avatar for you akira.
great contribution. hey, do more do more.
|
|