|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: I'd rather not be specific and finger people for being an SJW because most of the time they share one or two stances with the movement and overall theyre alright as a person. Thats not to say it doesnt pop up in threads oriented around those typical topics though. Hence the pervasive anti-sjw sentiments, and dank memes.
you don't "share a stance" and become an SJW. the dichotomy is absurd. by this logic, the anti-SJWs are the anti-"stance" group...and a non-substance issue.
does everyone who is anti-SJW have to share all stances and views with other "anti-SJWs"?
i don't think that makes much sense, and i don't think that sentiment would sit well with you.Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:

post wasn't for you, then, obviously.
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
lol what are you trying to prove. If you want everyone to see everything exactly the way you see things you're better off jumping off a cliff.
Relax.
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said:
Quote:
Repertoire89 said:
Maybe he doesn't want to reduce this thread to personalisms...
bullshit. if he didn't want to say anything, then mission failed. he said something, i want him to confirm what he is saying isn't utter bullcrap.
because i'm on here pretty well everyday. never seen one "SJW" here. only "anti-SJWs", frankly.
I see a lot of the SJW mentality on here, but I'm not eager to directly criticize and berate people.
Better I think to argue about the issue.
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
people who rail against anything daily are also being SJWs, just with different "stances" than your usual SJW.
take Qman for example:
"they blacks need to CLEAN UP THEIR ACT!"
constant railing about social justice on the internet...isn't that an SJW? according to knowyourmeme, an SJW is just another word for keyboard warrior, oddly enough. so anytime someone is railing about something (hint hint, c'mon HINT) you can call them an SJW. only it might not mean the type of "SJW" that you see on collage campuses, and more just like anyone who rails against or for a particular stance, consistently, on the internet.
TL;DR?
too bad.
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said: notice: a handful of people +'d Qman's post. why? the answer is simple: there is a handful of people, whom have dissenting coalition views with another coalition of a handful of people, on this site, whom they don't like; awfully convenient that Qman makes a post in this thread, very simple stuff, and then there's a handful of the same people, as usual...seems like a simple case of pointing the finger -- the users that "are SJWs" are probably within that coalition of people Qman (and others) don't like, personally, and whom are considered "lefties", so are thus associated with SJWs as a means of dissuasion, clearly.
now, they are also probably not very small-time users here, nah, probably some more well-known ones. so let's have them pointed out.
why not? i mean really, why not? this is a dangerous thing, SJWs, *gasp*, must be handled in due coarse.
or could it be that when Qman points these figures out they are none other than common users whom people don't necessarily see as SJWs.
oh i wish i could know for sure whom he was talking about, instead of it being all on the sly...seem like pandering to me to just say "there are some here on this site" and then you get like 5-6 +'ing your post. seems conspicuous...i mean, if there are SJWs SURELY they should be excoriated, expunged, done away with, or at the very least, warned about.
so why won't Qman do it?
Very ironic post, you come in here insulting everyone, accusing everyone else of doing the same while complaining that no one is specifically insulting anyone.
Why are you taking this thread so personally?
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
Everybody brace yourselves for a hiroshima level akira melt. Hes super right and hes mad nobody gets it.
|
zZZz
jesus


Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 33,478
|
Re: SJWs [Re: spixce]
#23723733 - 10/09/16 09:27 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I don't think I've ever ran into those types of people, maybe cuz I don't really hang around young peeps.. Let alone peeps who are into all that bs.. The world is rife with cunts and assholes tho and I do run into them from time to time.. I don't mind them much tho.. I'm actually kinda attracted to cunts....
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: lol what are you trying to prove. If you want everyone to see everything exactly the way you see things you're better off jumping off a cliff.
Relax.
i am merely giving people the opportunity to (see things how i do).
i am also absolutely certain nonsense of "SJWs" is a sad and indeed fruitless one...one that merely consists of dissidents whom want to berate and stultify discussion...any "SJW" that does that is being just another idiot to me.
Quote:
Repertoire89 said:
I see a lot of the SJW mentality on here, but I'm not eager to directly criticize and berate people.
Better I think to argue about the issue.
fair enough. what is the SJW mentality? does it apply across the board to all people, or just a subset? which subset?
anything? or are you not discussion this particular issue? just curious.Quote:
Repertoire89 said: Very ironic post, you come in here insulting everyone, accusing everyone else of doing the same while complaining that no one is specifically insulting anyone.
Why are you taking this thread so personally?
insulting everyone? that's ironic. i never insulted anyone.
people can have differing opinions of people, even dislike them, without insulting them.
accusing everyone? nah. i am only pointing out that Qman poops in a completely irreverent post insinuating that the "evil SJWs" are even here, *gasp*, and i not only don't buy it, but i can see what he is doing...instigating people whom he can dissuade other's into looking at as an "SJW".
first off, i'm here to talk. just talk. i said "some people might have a mental disease"
i was gonna say too, maybe certain people with borderline or histrionic disorders are prone...but i digress....
i asked Qman to confirm what he was saying...knowing full well he won't. clearly he wants to insinuate people, i'm just asking him to go 100%. i see nothing wrong with that, when he's the one saying there are "SJWs here". it's a legitimate question, which he won't answer...and nor would anyone else whom claims to be against "SJWs".
frankly, aside from the Social Justice Coarse activists, SJWs are really just people "whom take certain stances" or "have a certain mentality"
which, i agree, could be seen across the board, in the mentality of those whom fight against one another to make a point about a political ideal. now we just have more crass words to level at each other, for doing that.
does that clarify anything for you? PS: i took nothing personally. i am asking Qman to not bullshit anyone and just come full-out with his theory of the SJWs on this board. i'd wager it's an attempt to stifle certain users with certain views, and to staple them as outliers in the sense that they should be looked at like the worst of the worst, and as not only fools, but also as those not to be trusted. it's underhanded. not only that, but it's based on biased bullshit, not ACTUALLY SJWs like the one described in Shroomism's first post in this thread.
no one LIKE THAT is actually here, that anyone knows about...because no one has identified themselves as such. there are only political ideologies here...and that's why Qman is bringing up "SJWs that are 'here'" at all.
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Everybody brace yourselves for a hiroshima level akira melt. Hes super right and hes mad nobody gets it.
nope. i just have some spare time. i don't give a fuck if anyone of the normal users here "get" anything. seriously. waste of my time. this is for the people whom might see this and take an impression from it. those are the people i might be able to convince of anything, at all. not the entrenched folks here. 
plus that's three motherfucking shrugs in this post, you can't deny that.
Edited by akira_akuma (10/09/16 09:41 PM)
|
zZZz
jesus


Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 33,478
|
|
Gettin right to the root of things, I like that
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
Crass is the only response you're gonna get when you espouse shit like this 
Its unfortunate, isnt it?
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
i see posters come in and literally just post that.
is that where you're coming from? or you mean TL;DR again?
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
|
I would say the term SJW represents a particular subset of views, as the term "social justice" would encompass anyone with a sense of morality or ethics.
Those views are the popular views of the new "left", some of those views I agree with, but I would say someone is a "SJW" when they subscribe arbitrarily to the general program.
I'm against the new left as much as I'm against the new right. Both want to put the rights and welfare of some groups before those of other groups.
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 9 hours, 50 minutes
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said: people who rail against anything daily are also being SJWs, just with different "stances" than your usual SJW.
take Qman for example:
"they blacks need to CLEAN UP THEIR ACT!"
constant railing about social justice on the internet...isn't that an SJW? according to knowyourmeme, an SJW is just another word for keyboard warrior, oddly enough. so anytime someone is railing about something (hint hint, c'mon HINT) you can call them an SJW. only it might not mean the type of "SJW" that you see on collage campuses, and more just like anyone who rails against or for a particular stance, consistently, on the internet.
TL;DR?
too bad.
A SJW might make a slanderous misquote with my name attached to it.
Edited by qman (10/09/16 09:41 PM)
|
Shroomslip
Architekt



Registered: 11/25/12
Posts: 23,651
Last seen: 2 hours, 54 minutes
|
|
I don't think the reason no one is answering has to do with there not being any or them not being able to provide examples. It has more to do with everyone knowing you and how you are and right now everyone is doing that fake "paying attention to something else and not making eye contact" thing people do when that one person in the group starts getting all huffy and making a fool of themselves.
--------------------
With my face against the floor I can’t see who knocked me out of the way. I don’t want to get back up but I have to so it might as well be today. Nothing appeals to me no one feels like me, I’m too busy being calm to disappear. I’m in no shape to be alone contrary to the shit that you might hear. You can't wake up, this is not a dream. You're part of a machine, you are not a human being With your face all made up, living on a screen. Low on self esteem, so you run on gasoline
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: SJWs [Re: qman]
#23723776 - 10/09/16 09:43 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
no, anyone can do that. that's the point. you're making boogymen out of people, intentionally, to cause dissolution of dissent.
there are those here whom literally know your opinions on "black america needs to clean up there act" because people whom visit this forum often enough see it from you, and other members (those whom haven't posted here yet), that it's a basic notion that you, essentially, to say things like that (exactly like that), and have made yourself quite clear.
Edited by akira_akuma (10/09/16 09:49 PM)
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
Shroomslip said: I don't think the reason no one is answering has to do with there not being any or them not being able to provide examples. It has more to do with everyone knowing you and how you are and right now everyone is doing that fake "paying attention to something else and not making eye contact" thing people do when that one person in the group starts getting all huffy and making a fool of themselves.
or you can't provide any examples of "SJWs" on this message board. definitely not any overt SJWs...see, it's only about people's "opinions" not lining up with another's, hence they are called SJW. i'd definitely like to make that distinction, and point out the most certain use of the word to attempt to ostracise certain members. originally, all i said was "point one out" and he couldn't, all he said was they are in schools and shit, which i can assure you, 90% of this forum as established that already.
this is why it's an issue with me. no one wants to address the elephant in the room. on the shroomery there are not really SJWs, just people other people don't like -- and like the rest of the internet, the term SJW, here on this site, is being used to stultify and hamper certain people's partaking in discussion here.
it's already well known. but this is a good thread to point out how this works.
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
shroomslips nailed it. Theres plenty of room to get a discussion going. You're just not that good at doing that without getting all wound up and it usually devolves into you going full autist and pumping out bricks of text nobody reads.
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
this discussion is a horse beating ritual. (also, the discussion is "what are SJWs" right? we all know what they are. don't be ridiculous, and purport that this is a pertinent discussion, simply mulling over the obvious, and then assessing "there are some here!" without fucking pointing them out. it's just malarky)
a more pertiniant discussion would be "why are their coalitions on the shroomery whom act like SJWs by claiming to be anti-SJWs."
otherwise, this thread has been done to death. i'm sorry the OP didn't realize that.
Edited by akira_akuma (10/09/16 10:53 PM)
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
Yes, well you've convinced nobody of anything and wasted a good deal of time doing it. If thats what you set out to do you've failed spectacularly.
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 9 hours, 50 minutes
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said: no, anyone can do that. that's the point. you're making boogymen out of people, intentionally, to cause dissolution of dissent.
there are those here whom literally know your opinions on "black america needs to clean up there act" because people whom visit this forum often enough see it from you, and other members (those whom haven't posted here yet), that it's a basic notion that you, essentially, to say things like that (exactly like that), and have made yourself quite clear.
Why do you continue to misquote and slander me?
Where is a social justice warrior when you need one?
|
|