Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Next >
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: Hobozen]
    #23726689 - 10/10/16 09:16 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

again, Bodhi's 2C-I holes are eating up his ability to comprehend faulty syllogism.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSophistic Radiance
Free sVs!
Female


Registered: 07/11/06
Posts: 43,135
Loc: Center of the Universe
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
    #23726690 - 10/10/16 09:16 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Bodhi of Ankou said:
Cis is a disgusting word that was resurrected by an equally disgusting person.




Cis never fell out of use :shrug: its a damned useful word for describing the relative orientation of a body in physical space. Just ask any scientist.


--------------------
Enlil said:
You really are the worst kind of person.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: qman]
    #23726692 - 10/10/16 09:17 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

qman said:
Quote:

Sophistic Radiance said:
Yeah, he kinda made it sound like liberal policies aren't actually to blame for the political turmoil in Europe, but I'm sure he was just too caught up in his buzzword tapestry to notice.




When the biggest "marketers" of certain policies are officially labeled as "liberal", that ideology will take the blame.

When the citizens who support those polices are liberals, it only reconfirms that reasoning.

The supporters of those liberal polices are real, therefore we have a real backlash.



but the whole left/right thing is backwards in EU, and Canada, right? like flipped....


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePatrickKn
I'm a teapot


Registered: 07/10/11
Posts: 20,564
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
    #23726699 - 10/10/16 09:19 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Bodhi of Ankou said:
If it looks like a duck...



But it can't be a duck, it walks like a goose.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*
Other

Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan Flag
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23726700 - 10/10/16 09:20 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

I cant find it now, the search results are swamped with articles about its use. When it first started cropping up I researched it and its modern day usage could be tied back to a single militant fem-nazi who wanted a derogatory word that was the inverse of trans. This was 2 or 3 years ago iirc.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineqman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 11 hours, 47 minutes
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23726703 - 10/10/16 09:20 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

akira_akuma said:
Quote:

qman said:
Quote:

Sophistic Radiance said:
Yeah, he kinda made it sound like liberal policies aren't actually to blame for the political turmoil in Europe, but I'm sure he was just too caught up in his buzzword tapestry to notice.




When the biggest "marketers" of certain policies are officially labeled as "liberal", that ideology will take the blame.

When the citizens who support those polices are liberals, it only reconfirms that reasoning.

The supporters of those liberal polices are real, therefore we have a real backlash.



but the whole left/right thing is backwards in EU, and Canada, right? like flipped....




Well, Obama is officially a SJW/BLM liberal, but we both know what he truly is.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*
Other

Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan Flag
Re: SJWs [Re: qman] * 1
    #23726705 - 10/10/16 09:21 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Black and out to get whitey?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSophistic Radiance
Free sVs!
Female


Registered: 07/11/06
Posts: 43,135
Loc: Center of the Universe
Re: SJWs [Re: qman]
    #23726708 - 10/10/16 09:21 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Is there an official SJW committee responsible for deciding who is or isn't PC?


--------------------
Enlil said:
You really are the worst kind of person.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: qman]
    #23726709 - 10/10/16 09:21 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

some amalgamation of political ideals that makes him annoying, somehow? i dunno, it's all flipped where i come from, supposedly.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
    #23726722 - 10/10/16 09:26 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Bodhi of Ankou said:
I cant find it now, the search results are swamped with articles about its use. When it first started cropping up I researched it and its modern day usage could be tied back to a single militant fem-nazi who wanted a derogatory word that was the inverse of trans. This was 2 or 3 years ago iirc.



i can see nothing about it's origins being from some rad-fem. on wikipedia, there is a German doctor ascribed to as being the inventor of the word, in relations to gender, ie, cisgender.

maybe it was co-opted at one time by this rad-fem (maybe Valerie Solana? she's the only radical fem i can remember by name...but if this was one of the third-wave feminists or second-wave feminists, it's been co-opted from elsewhere, they didn't invent the term, according to the wiki.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineqman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 11 hours, 47 minutes
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou] * 1
    #23726729 - 10/10/16 09:27 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Bodhi of Ankou said:
Black and out to get whitey?




He's a bought and paid for puppet who takes orders from his masters, where have you been?  The last I saw, he had white cock deep down his throat.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: qman]
    #23726735 - 10/10/16 09:30 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

right-wing Koch.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*
Other

Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan Flag
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23726742 - 10/10/16 09:32 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

I might be wrong, it was quite a while ago, but it definitely hasnt been in use since Roman times. 3-5 years ago the word wasnt even on anybodies radar. It only really started gaining traction when trans people started being noticed by society more. Saying its always been around is total horseshit.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleShroomismM
Space Travellin
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/13/00
Posts: 66,015
Loc: 9th Dimension
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma] * 5
    #23726748 - 10/10/16 09:35 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

First of all, the Shroomery isn't exactly a bastion of the SJW movement, it's too diverse.
They prefer to live in Echo Chambers (see tumblr).. they blow up when people slightly disagree with them *cough*. So you can see how here would be a problem.
I'd say there's a few that follow some of the ideologies of the SJW, but none here that are outright. Probably a few in the closet.
If the Shroomery were more PLUR maybe they would come busting out of the woodwork?

SJWs can most assuredly be defined. They are those who repeatedly and vehemently engages in social justice topics with oftentimes shallow, not very well thought out arguments. You will always find them in the over-defense of whatever popular beliefs that are promoting a victim mentality and discrimination. They are quick to "fight" for social justice and even quicker to abusively vilify, slander and bully anyone they deem a "bigot", aka anyone who disagrees with them. It's practically impossible to hold a rational debate with them, because they don't follow the rules of logic and facts, they live in the land of emotion and passion, they are always right and if you disagree then you might as well be Satan incarnate. They are easy to offend and quick to try and police speech.  They are the main propagators of cultural marxism.  They will use labels, twist definitions of words, make appeals to emotion, and repeat unreliable/fake statistics ad nauseum. Immaturity, intolerance, self-righteousness, stupidity, vindictiveness, and malevolence are some of the tools they use. They are hypocrites and instead of engaging in rational discussion prefer to attack and label their opposition from the start and put them on the defensive and attack with ad-hominems and strawmen and so on. The idea is that by demonizing their opponent, regardless of any facts.. they will appear to others as the victor. They don't attack ideas, they attack people personally. This is just a broad definition and it could of course go for much deeper or in different directions, but that's the gist of it.

It only started with feminism, and Stalinism... but now it's turned into the modern SJW which is the "fuck you cis white male" generation. Fuck your white cis thin ableism patriarchy privilege
They are mostly on the internet, yes.. because that's where they can be the loudest, generally.
But where do you think people on the internet come from??... uhhhh.... we don't have AI botnet yet.
Yes these people exist in real life. I've met lots of them. One of them has infected my workplace and needs to be purged.
Most of them are probably just misinformed, misaligned.... But it's by design. And that doesn't make them any less malicious.

They are being churned out of the colleges like crazy. They've successfully managed to brainwash half a generation, luckily most people with a brain see through total bullshit.
You can all laugh it off as just a bunch of stupid kids if you like, but it's fucking cultural marxism and it degrades society and it's being done on purpose. You will not have your Communist Utopia.

It's also funny how anyone who disagrees with SJWs is always ridiculed and taunted, to try and dissuade others from speaking out.
All just a part of the Master plan of the dark cabal, which is going to fucking fail miserably, LOL. New World Order these nuts in your mouth

Anyway bro, the shroomery is like the underbelly of the intrawebs. SJWs don't really proliferate here.. or they are in disguise.. you'll have to find them elsewhere for the most part, or lure them out of their shells with threads


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSophistic Radiance
Free sVs!
Female


Registered: 07/11/06
Posts: 43,135
Loc: Center of the Universe
Re: SJWs [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
    #23726753 - 10/10/16 09:36 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Bodhi of Ankou said:
I might be wrong, it was quite a while ago, but it definitely hasnt been in use since Roman times. 3-5 years ago the word wasnt even on anybodies radar. It only really started gaining traction when trans people started being noticed by society more. Saying its always been around is total horseshit.




Spoken like a true plebeian... You know how bad trans fats are, right? Trans fats being lipids which are comprised at least partially of trans-unsaturated long-chain fatty acid residues.

Do you know what the opposite of a trans-unsaturated fatty acid is?

That's right... a cis-unsaturated fatty acid.

:smug:

But yeah, IUPAC is transphobic as fuck :shrug:


--------------------
Enlil said:
You really are the worst kind of person.



Edited by Sophistic Radiance (10/10/16 09:42 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSophistic Radiance
Free sVs!
Female


Registered: 07/11/06
Posts: 43,135
Loc: Center of the Universe
Re: SJWs [Re: Shroomism] * 1
    #23726754 - 10/10/16 09:37 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Shroomism said:
First of all, the Shroomery isn't exactly a bastion of the SJW movement, it's too diverse.
They prefer to live in Echo Chambers (see tumblr).. they blow up when people slightly disagree with them *cough*. So you can see how here would be a problem.
I'd say there's a few that follow some of the ideologies of the SJW, but none here that are outright. Probably a few in the closet.
If the Shroomery were more PLUR maybe they would come busting out of the woodwork?

SJWs can most assuredly be defined. They are those who repeatedly and vehemently engages in social justice topics with oftentimes shallow, not very well thought out arguments. You will always find them in the over-defense of whatever popular beliefs that are promoting a victim mentality and discrimination. They are quick to "fight" for social justice and even quicker to abusively vilify, slander and bully anyone they deem a "bigot", aka anyone who disagrees with them. It's practically impossible to hold a rational debate with them, because they don't follow the rules of logic and facts, they live in the land of emotion and passion, they are always right and if you disagree then you might as well be Satan incarnate. They are easy to offend and quick to try and police speech.  They are the main propagators of cultural marxism.  They will use labels, twist definitions of words, make appeals to emotion, and repeat unreliable/fake statistics ad nauseum. Immaturity, intolerance, self-righteousness, stupidity, vindictiveness, and malevolence are some of the tools they use. They are hypocrites and instead of engaging in rational discussion prefer to attack and label their opposition from the start and put them on the defensive and attack with ad-hominems and strawmen and so on. The idea is that by demonizing their opponent, regardless of any facts.. they will appear to others as the victor.

It only started with feminism, and Stalinism... but now it's turned into the modern SJW which is the "fuck you cis white male" generation. Fuck your white cis thin ableism patriarchy privilege
They are mostly on the internet, yes.. because that's where they can be the loudest, generally.
But where do you think people on the internet come from??... uhhhh.... we don't have AI botnet yet.
Yes these people exist in real life. I've met lots of them. One of them has infected my workplace and needs to be purged.
Most of them are probably just misinformed, misaligned.... But it's by design. And that doesn't make them any less malicious.

They are being churned out of the colleges like crazy. They've successfully managed to brainwash half a generation, luckily most people with a brain see through total bullshit.
You can all laugh it off as just a bunch of stupid kids if you like, but it's fucking cultural marxism and it degrades society and it's being done on purpose. You will not have your Communist Utopia.

It's also funny how anyone who disagrees with SJWs is always ridiculed and taunted, to try and dissuade others from speaking out.
All just a part of the Master plan of the dark cabal, which is going to fucking fail miserably, LOL. New World Order these nuts in your mouth

Anyway bro, the shroomery is like the underbelly of the intrawebs. SJWs don't really proliferate here.. or they are in disguise.. you'll have to find them elsewhere for the most part, or lure them out of their shells with threads





Tell me more about how neatly your views align with those of penis-hating radical feminists


--------------------
Enlil said:
You really are the worst kind of person.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: Shroomism]
    #23726762 - 10/10/16 09:41 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

i think you've most described them well enough, but to me, it seems easy to see that some people just co-opt the terms that are used "against...cis males" (me, befuddled still) like the one you used "fuck you cis white male generation" (lol) in order to do more SJW bullshit, which is to try and co-opt everything that isn't white and male, unless that white male is a cuck. LOL which is the only time that word will ever make sense outside of cuckoldry, by the by (oh these internet words). you can reign in feminists to the SJW-fad by co-opting their language and viola, you got more confused people thinking their fighting for something like feminism, and are really just being seen as SJW morons.

but you pretty much summed up how ewww these people are, and have shown that that is NOT what you see on the shroomery. you can see the most Feminist user Alyssa, even at the most outrageous, has never gone so far as to fill-out even a fraction of that requisite of SJW, noted above.

which is accurate, i might add.

Quote:

It's also funny how anyone who disagrees with SJWs is always ridiculed and taunted, to try and dissuade others from speaking out.




i wouldn't mind ridiculing those, however, whom presume to call people SJWs, whom aren't SJWs. :shrug: that creates the same kind of effect you just described.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleShroomismM
Space Travellin
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/13/00
Posts: 66,015
Loc: 9th Dimension
Re: SJWs [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23726770 - 10/10/16 09:43 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

one can still use SJW tactics however, without being a full card-carrying member.

Quote:

Sophistic Radiance said:
Tell me more about how neatly your views align with those of penis-hating radical feminists




Not very much, apparently.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*
Other

Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan Flag
Re: SJWs [Re: Sophistic Radiance] * 1
    #23726773 - 10/10/16 09:44 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Sophistic Radiance said:
Quote:

Bodhi of Ankou said:
I might be wrong, it was quite a while ago, but it definitely hasnt been in use since Roman times. 3-5 years ago the word wasnt even on anybodies radar. It only really started gaining traction when trans people started being noticed by society more. Saying its always been around is total horseshit.




Spoken like a true plebeian... You know how bad trans fats are, right? Trans fats being lipids which are comprised at least partially of trans-unsaturated fatty acids.

Do you know what the opposite of a trans-unsaturated fatty acid is?

That's right... a cis-unsaturated fatty acid.

:smug:

But yeah, IUPAC is transphobic as fuck :shrug:




:facepalm:

In relation to describing your average man or womens gender. No its never been used for that, and the word itself is seen as deragatory by a lot of people who are ok with what they were born with. Its normphobic as fuck, and totally unnecessary.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: SJWs [Re: Shroomism]
    #23726782 - 10/10/16 09:47 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Shroomism said:
one can still use SJW tactics however, without being a full card-carrying member.




which i'd love to have described, because i've seen people who will cuss at someone, "SJW!", for simply disagreeing with them on a point of view. :shrug: isn't that SJW tactics (shouting down dissenting views, without using your words, and just calling out names)? but it's weird, i've seen that tactic used by anti-SJWs, it's very strange.

i can't reconcile this logic.
i mean, seriously, what is "the tactics"?

is it doxxing? incentivizing hate campaigns against man-babies who hated the new Ghostbusters? what?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Next >

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* what makes a SJW bad?
( 1 2 all )
tryptkaloids 758 33 07/19/17 08:44 PM
by Fathwell
* Joe Rogan laughing at retarded SJWs
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Patlal 1,294 60 03/06/17 09:18 AM
by Webster10
* New Pendulum
( 1 2 all )
noticeofeviction 3,357 24 07/16/10 07:44 PM
by My Heart
* Pendulum
( 1 2 all )
2Cents 1,197 20 02/06/11 02:00 AM
by 2Cents
* Pendulum in NYC this Sunday Gumby 997 19 10/26/08 07:11 PM
by Gumby
* Pendulum's new album - Immersion Shins 628 15 10/02/10 07:18 PM
by Shins
* Pendulum just finished playing two miles from where I live Visionary Tools 613 7 06/29/08 01:25 PM
by Psy Baba
* Can you imagine the amount of SJW meltdowns we'll see on YouTube if Trump wins???
( 1 2 3 all )
Patlal 1,278 45 11/09/16 04:45 PM
by moonrockmushy

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
3,395 topic views. 0 members, 45 guests and 44 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.036 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 15 queries.