Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >  [ show all ]
Invisiblepineninja
Dream Weaver
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/17/14
Posts: 12,468
Loc: South Flag
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: wolfiewolfie]
    #23711792 - 10/05/16 11:21 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

:thumbup:


--------------------
Just a fool on the hill.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBrian Jones
Club 27
Male User Gallery


Registered: 12/18/12
Posts: 12,342
Loc: attending Snake Church
Last seen: 17 hours, 14 minutes
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: laughingdog]
    #23712158 - 10/06/16 05:32 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

laughingdog said:
Also amusing to consider that rocket scientists and mathematicians can calculate how to send a rocket to the moon, but can't throw a fast ball.

Whereas a pro baseball pitcher can throw a 90 mile an hour ball, and control it's placement within inches, but can't do calculus.
So how does the pitcher do it?

Or course if you asked either to tell you what muscles they used to,  for example, do something as simple as walk; and in what order, all those muscles need to contract and let go, they wouldn't have the faintest inkling, and neither would a guru or quantum physicist.
Same goes for even moving a finger, or talking, or chewing, - no one knows. (Although,of course few biologists and animators have studied the human gait, etc.)
But if anybody tried to consciously maintain their bodily functions that equal life, they would be dead within minutes. Respiration, digestion, nerve signal transmission, and the brain are all individually complex beyond imagination, let alone synchronized, or the even subtler cellular machinery,
and 3-D protein folding it’s all based on.
+
So it's easy to say it's 'all mind', but as no one can say definitively what the mind is, that seems rather uninformative - and certainly as pointed out above, most of it is unconscious, so saying it's (reality/aka the cosmos etc.)  'all consciousness',  also strikes me as glib.




    I don't know about any genius physicists or rocket scientists being great athletes. One of the founders of symbolic interactionism, Herbert Blumer,  was a football star at the University of Chicago. But almost nobody cares about microsociology, or cares about when the University of Chicago had a football team in the Big 10 in the 1930's. I think they won the conference.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

The worst thing about corruption is that it works so well,


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: wolfiewolfie]
    #23712508 - 10/06/16 09:05 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

wolfiewolfie said:
I tend to entertain the idea of subjective more so than objective. I can personally validate subjective reality as I am experiencing it first hand 24/7, however I can not 'conclusively' prove the existence of an objective reality. That is not to say it doesn't exist, it just seems logical to adhere to a framework that can be verified.

Belief's and choices also play a big role here. We all have the choice to believe in whatever we want so why not choose beliefs that will have a positive effect on our experience? From my perspective believing in a subjective reality benefits me personally more than the alternative, which seems sort of restrictive and limiting. You can experience an objective reality subjectively, getting the best of both worlds but you can not experience a subjective reality objectively.

Just my 2 cents.




Interesting points. :thumbup:


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblephio


Registered: 10/07/16
Posts: 369
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: wolfiewolfie]
    #23717834 - 10/07/16 09:14 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Objectivity reality exists beyond your subjective experience of it.
The reasoning holds easily. You don't have to stretch your mind that far.
Subjective reality is the only thing you can experience while maintaining free-will.
You cannot experience objective reality subjectively as you must surrender your will to be objective which halts your subjectivity.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: phio]
    #23717948 - 10/07/16 09:57 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Maybe your subjective will and the objective are one and the same?


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCory Duchesne
tabernacle
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/05/16
Posts: 915
Loc: Nova Scotia
Last seen: 4 days, 8 hours
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: DividedQuantum] * 3
    #23725233 - 10/10/16 01:14 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

What is real is comprised of things that are unreal.  Appearances are not scientific, and yet, appearances are all we ever know.  Therefore, through science we are introduced to more sophisticated appearances, but those sophisticated forms of thought have the same roots that we started with, namely tautological categories of thought that cannot be proven or disproven.  Appearances cannot be doubted or confirmed, but are always subject to change.


--------------------
C.G. Jung: "Please remember, it is what you are that heals, not what you know."

"I shall not commit the fashionable stupidity of regarding everything I cannot explain as a fraud." - Carl Jung

Krishna, as his friends called him, freely admitted his compulsive lying. He blamed it on simple fear of having his deceptions detected." NOTES OF A FRINGE-WATCHER MARTIN GARDNER on J Krishnamurti

"All your questions are born out of the answers you already have. Any answer anybody gives should put an end to your questions. But it does not." [UG-K]


Edited by Cory Duchesne (10/10/16 01:21 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: Cory Duchesne]
    #23725319 - 10/10/16 01:50 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Excellent. :thumbup:


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleredgreenvines
irregular verb
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,539
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: Cory Duchesne]
    #23725338 - 10/10/16 02:00 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

let us say that
  • 100% of our experience is subjective (S.E.),
  • we have dreams which include other people as part of our S.E.,
  • we meet people in the world and that also is S.E.
  • and these people also are living 100% in S.E.


Interestingly the other people and various aspects of the outer world, may be inferred to have existence outside of our S.E.
since,
when we talk to these people about events that are happening in the outer world, their S.E. about the outer world aligns closely if not exactly with our own S.E. (This is not likely to be a conspiracy of collective subjectivity).

That alignment or consensus suggests that Objective Existence (O.E.) actually is happening and O.E. has a large impact upon our S.E. individually and collectively.


--------------------
:confused: _ :brainfart:🧠  _ :finger:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: redgreenvines]
    #23725352 - 10/10/16 02:04 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

I like Cory's reply for its elegance, but I agree with you rgv.  Reality is real, at least as far as we're concerned.


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblelaughingdog
Stranger
 User Gallery
Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 4,828
Re: subjective vs. objective *DELETED* [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #23726849 - 10/10/16 10:05 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Post deleted by laughingdog

Reason for deletion: .


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: laughingdog]
    #23726946 - 10/10/16 10:32 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

laughingdog said:
Quote:

DividedQuantum said:
I like Cory's reply for its elegance, but I agree with you rgv.  Reality is real, at least as far as we're concerned.




but as you already know:
1) no one perceives reality
2) & on top of that people have many contradictory beliefs about reality, (which they probably tend to forget, most of the time, unless they're anthropologists).
3) conceptual reality is not the reality of present time experiencing
4) psychological studies reveal many further sand traps, biases,  self deceptions, rationalizations, defense mechanisms, we are all prone to...
etc. ...

so the reality is it's hard to be definitive about 'reality' !




It's extremely hard to be definitive about reality.  But I think eventually we have to take the commonsense approach and agree with our peers that we are experiencing the world, and that it is not, as rgv said, some kind of conspiracy.

But I don't really need to tell you that.  Some people could benefit from it, though.  Solipsism around these parts can be ferocious.


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblelaughingdog
Stranger
 User Gallery
Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 4,828
Re: subjective vs. objective *DELETED* [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #23726992 - 10/10/16 10:42 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Post deleted by laughingdog

Reason for deletion: .


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: laughingdog]
    #23727052 - 10/10/16 11:07 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Yeah it's spectacular down there.


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleredgreenvines
irregular verb
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,539
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #23727239 - 10/11/16 12:33 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

irl


--------------------
:confused: _ :brainfart:🧠  _ :finger:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblephio


Registered: 10/07/16
Posts: 369
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: redgreenvines]
    #23728536 - 10/11/16 02:56 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

pineninja said:
For what its worth my close friend is a leading Qauntum physicist he is also religious and very much into eastern philosophy. Our concepts of conciousness, time and dimensions all have alot to do not only the sciences we study but also the way we approach them.




May you expand upon your concepts of consciousness and space-time?
:nicesmile:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblepineninja
Dream Weaver
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/17/14
Posts: 12,468
Loc: South Flag
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: phio]
    #23728987 - 10/11/16 05:53 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

The links are endless and grey.
I suggest you do a bit of study into perception and the way it affects the way we approach and decipher time.
If you are trying to draw me on the fact that you see space time as objective it aint going to happen.


--------------------
Just a fool on the hill.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblephio


Registered: 10/07/16
Posts: 369
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: pineninja]
    #23729024 - 10/11/16 06:07 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

pineninja said:
The links are endless and grey.
I suggest you do a bit of study into perception and the way it affects the way we approach and decipher time.
If you are trying to draw me on the fact that you see space time as objective it aint going to happen.




I already have my answers, work, and a firm understanding of quantum physics. I was just curious, given the reference, what yours was...

Could of had an interesting conversation on the Delayed choice Quantum eraser experiment and things deeper. I guess I will take my toys and go home ..

:whoak:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblepineninja
Dream Weaver
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/17/14
Posts: 12,468
Loc: South Flag
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: phio]
    #23729065 - 10/11/16 06:20 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Sorry bud I am a little overly sensitve and defensive atm.
I think that the missing link in the DS experiment is the potential of another dimension or a misunderstanding of the ones we think we have identified.
I personally think that the way things seem to operate at a quantum level has direct relevance to the fundamental nature of the inner AND outer reaches of our conciousness/Universe.
What we may be seeing is a similar process where by a multiverse could exist ie max is hit and the new seemingly pops into existence from nowhere.
I am far from an expert just ask my mate.:wonka:


--------------------
Just a fool on the hill.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblephio


Registered: 10/07/16
Posts: 369
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: pineninja]
    #23729147 - 10/11/16 06:51 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

pineninja said:
Sorry bud I am a little overly sensitve and defensive atm.




:nicesmile:

Quote:

pineninja said:
I think that the missing link in the DS experiment is the potential of another dimension or a misunderstanding of the ones we think we have identified.
I personally think that the way things seem to operate at a quantum level has direct relevance to the fundamental nature of the inner AND outer reaches of our conciousness/Universe.
What we may be seeing is a similar process where by a multiverse could exist ie max is hit and the new seemingly pops into existence from nowhere.





That or it could be that people fail to 'see' the underpinnings of a free-willed conscious Universe that is very much self-contained. Nothing suggests that there is multi-verse or a 'hidden' dimension. Rather, what is being shown is that there is a purposely functional domain at a certain scale that behaves unlike other scales and does so for fundamental and supportive reasons....

The missing link in this experiment and the series of experiments related to it is a lack of testing of the transitional behavior from a probabilistic state to a finite end-state and an incorrect understanding of what mechanism(s) cause it.

Quote:

pineninja said:
I am far from an expert just ask my mate.:wonka:




I was hoping to get at what you and your mate believe and why.... It seems those closest to the topic of the (quantum domain) are incapable of the right perceptions to interpret it which is why it has remained an enigma for so long. Was wondering if your mate was an exception and had unknowingly cracked it... Alas, multi-verse.

Standing waves are seemingly a tricky concept....
:heytheresexy:
(The wetting of a tongue)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblepineninja
Dream Weaver
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/17/14
Posts: 12,468
Loc: South Flag
Re: subjective vs. objective [Re: phio]
    #23729176 - 10/11/16 06:58 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

What do you percieve to be the reasons? Are you suggesting a guiding hand? Multiverse is mine not his.
There are peer reviewed credible sources that would argue both sides of the multiverse arguement this is after all quantum THEORY.
Edit:Pose a direct question and I will run it by him.


--------------------
Just a fool on the hill.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Subjective v. Objective Reality
( 1 2 all )
Joshua 4,235 24 01/31/03 07:31 PM
by Joshua
* Subjectiveness ska8ball 1,305 8 04/03/03 03:07 PM
by shaggy101
* Are morals subjective?
( 1 2 all )
Anonymous 5,852 35 04/24/03 05:58 AM
by MarkostheGnostic
* Reality is subjective
( 1 2 all )
Huehuecoyotl 2,394 34 07/21/04 06:54 PM
by tak
* Objective Truth
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Huehuecoyotl 6,795 72 09/14/05 11:10 PM
by falcon
* can you prove the existence of absolute, objective morality?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
Anonymous 21,744 157 12/21/04 06:31 AM
by deafpanda
* Physicists: "Reality is an illusion!"
( 1 2 all )
exclusive58 3,336 29 10/10/05 10:13 AM
by Gomp
* Rationality, Objectivity and Logic
( 1 2 3 all )
SkorpivoMusterion 6,620 45 10/15/05 11:19 AM
by BlueCoyote

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
1,522 topic views. 0 members, 16 guests and 4 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.036 seconds spending 0.011 seconds on 15 queries.