|
Hobozen


Registered: 11/03/11
Posts: 10,634
Loc:
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: morrowasted]
#23691325 - 09/29/16 05:31 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
morrowasted said: I mean, can't an employer deny a person a job for like, any reason whatsoever...?
That's not PC bro
|
Hobozen


Registered: 11/03/11
Posts: 10,634
Loc:
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: abltsandwich]
#23691327 - 09/29/16 05:32 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I can be a cock, but your argument is still shit.
|
abltsandwich
JFK = Jelly Donut




Registered: 06/16/09
Posts: 11,537
Loc: Dildoville
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: Hobozen]
#23691329 - 09/29/16 05:33 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
My argument that hairstyle doesn't necessarily dictate performance is shit? LOL Prove me wrong, show me some stats that 100% correlate a specific hairstyle with diminished performance in a given job. I won't wait though, because you'll be searching forever. But let me know...
|
Hobozen


Registered: 11/03/11
Posts: 10,634
Loc:
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: abltsandwich]
#23691344 - 09/29/16 05:39 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
That's not the argument.
|
abltsandwich
JFK = Jelly Donut




Registered: 06/16/09
Posts: 11,537
Loc: Dildoville
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: Hobozen]
#23691355 - 09/29/16 05:42 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
OK, Quote me saying anything else? Here's a hint: My argument hasn't changed at all, and your reading comprehension of what I'm saying is low.
|
Hobozen


Registered: 11/03/11
Posts: 10,634
Loc:
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: abltsandwich]
#23691426 - 09/29/16 06:00 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Do you remember my original post you replied to?
Thr argument is why an employer shouldnt have the right to choose who he hires. Do you have an answer?
|
Bigfeely123
Stranger
Registered: 01/30/15
Posts: 2,594
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: Seriously_trippin]
#23691461 - 09/29/16 06:08 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Dreadlocks look unprofessional as fuck. If I was the hiring manager I wouldn't have hired her ass either. That's life... Don't like it then find a job working at pizza hut or something.
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,517
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: Seriously_trippin]
#23691492 - 09/29/16 06:15 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
The court got that one right.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: Enlil]
#23691513 - 09/29/16 06:19 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
i call people with dreadlocks Fuzzie-Wuzzie...haha, they aren't people.
|
abltsandwich
JFK = Jelly Donut




Registered: 06/16/09
Posts: 11,537
Loc: Dildoville
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: Hobozen]
#23691534 - 09/29/16 06:22 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Hobozen said: Do you remember my original post you replied to?
Thr argument is why an employer shouldnt have the right to choose who he hires. Do you have an answer?
As far as that reply, I simply typed in the reply box at the bottom of the thread without reading yours at all. Unfortunately, the forum software defaults the reply to the last poster in the thread, which happened to be you that time. I never made the argument you think I did. Do I have an answer to your direct question? Yes. I'm mostly apathetic to the specific topic in a legal sense and the "right" you reference is at a state level, which is part of the larger question of states' autonomy, with which I generally agree on a fundamental level. If I didn't agree with that, I couldn't agree with a states' right to make pot legal either. So there. That's the argument you think I posted.
Edited by abltsandwich (09/29/16 06:27 PM)
|
Jean-guy Masta
Railyard Ghost


Registered: 09/23/14
Posts: 1,827
Loc: MT-Hell
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: akira_akuma]
#23691549 - 09/29/16 06:25 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
dreadlocks is the natural human hair style
--------------------

|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,517
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: Jean-guy Masta]
#23691556 - 09/29/16 06:26 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
All hairstyles are natural.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Morel Guy
Stranger


Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: Jean-guy Masta]
#23691559 - 09/29/16 06:26 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
abltsandwich said:
Quote:
Hobozen said: Do you remember my original post you replied to?
Thr argument is why an employer shouldnt have the right to choose who he hires. Do you have an answer?
As far as that reply, I simply typed in the reply box at the bottom of the thread without reading yours at all. Unfortunately, the forum software defaults the reply to the last poster in the thread, which happened to be you that time. I never made the argument you think I did.
That kinda mistake happens oftenQuote:
Jean-guy Masta said: dreadlocks is the natural human hair style 
If you go without a shower for a long time
-------------------- "in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur" In filth it will be found in dung it will be found
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: Hobozen] 1
#23691561 - 09/29/16 06:27 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Hobozen said: What if someone shaped their hair into a cock? Would that fall under the performance category?

now that ain't natural, unless....you sleep in multiple dimensions.
|
Crystal G



Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 8 months, 6 days
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: akira_akuma]
#23691572 - 09/29/16 06:28 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
It would suck if you had naturally curly "afro" type hair though, it means you'd have to spend 1-2 hours every morning styling your hair and perming the shit out of it just to look "clean" for work. All I have to do is brush my hair and many mornings I don't even do that and I look just fine.
|
searching



Registered: 06/08/11
Posts: 4,128
Last seen: 5 months, 5 days
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: abltsandwich]
#23691582 - 09/29/16 06:30 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
abltsandwich said: My argument that hairstyle doesn't necessarily dictate performance is shit? LOL Prove me wrong, show me some stats that 100% correlate a specific hairstyle with diminished performance in a given job. I won't wait though, because you'll be searching forever. But let me know...
So you think someone someone in a high profile sales position would perform just as well with dreads as without? What about a public relations representative? There are many jobs that your appearance can affect your performance. Not necessarily because a person with dreads would behave differently, but because it affects the way customers perceive them.
I can't show you a study because maybe one has never been done before. Show me a study that shows hairstyle or even appearance can't affect job performance.
--------------------
|
stzacrack
Stranger


Registered: 05/07/05
Posts: 3,871
Loc: United States
Last seen: 6 hours, 50 minutes
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) *DELETED* [Re: Crystal G] 1
#23691585 - 09/29/16 06:30 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by EnlilReason for deletion: Not pub-appropriate.
|
abltsandwich
JFK = Jelly Donut




Registered: 06/16/09
Posts: 11,537
Loc: Dildoville
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: searching]
#23691591 - 09/29/16 06:31 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
The word "necessarily," right there clear as day in the first sentence I typed, is paramount in my reply to everything you just said. Hairstyle can also affect soldier's vision in a war scenario. So?
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: Crystal G]
#23691593 - 09/29/16 06:31 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
can't you just put it under the tap, and like, go looking like Morticia, like you come crawling out from some fountain.
that'll save time.
|
Crystal G



Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 8 months, 6 days
|
Re: Federal court rules employers can deny a job if a person has dreadlocks. (Real) [Re: stzacrack]
#23691597 - 09/29/16 06:32 PM (7 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Let's see how you look
|
|