Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder, Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | < Back | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | Next > | Last >
Offlinehostileuniverse
Stranger
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: starfire_xes]
    #23685515 - 09/28/16 06:17 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

starfire_xes said:
Quote:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

No one said we should replace the private sector with Government.  But certain things should come from the Government, such as freeways.







Yes they should.  From the state governments.  Why does federal need to duplicate everything?  And why should someone in Arkansas pay for someones roads in Illinois, or vice versa?




The infrastructure and education should be funded at the local level, and trump is right, we are 20 trillion in debt and our infrastructure is crumbling and our education is ranked very low compared to the rest of the developed world, for what the federal govt spends, we should be the best,

Then Progressives bitch about military spending, the one thing the federal govt does very well, our military is top notch compared to the rest of the world,


--------------------
http://www.countdowntotrump.com





Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBrian Jones
Club 27
Male User Gallery


Registered: 12/18/12
Posts: 12,340
Loc: attending Snake Church
Last seen: 5 hours, 39 minutes
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: hostileuniverse] * 2
    #23685654 - 09/28/16 07:45 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Major highways are interstates, and have been since Eisenhower developed the system in the 50's. It's impractical for states to build these independently, and for better or worse we have a trucking based economy.

    On to the subject of polls on the debate. I'm no mathematician or engineer but I'm thoroughly trained at grad school level in public opinion polling. Once your mind can conceive of what a sampling distribution is, inferential statistics is easy math for these applications. This is what the polls said. Every internet poll, which is just people shouting out their opinions, like this forum, said Trump won the debate. Every scientifically constructed poll had Hillary as the debate winner by a 10-12% margin. Anyone who tells you different is trying to blow smoke up your ass. Even Trump knows he lost, and he knows he did so poorly he is threatening to not participate in any further debates. He blames a bad microphone, but it was evident that he had his shit together for the most part for the first 10 minutes then fell apart. Both sides said the moderators were biased against them. Those are subjective arguments that can be made, but there is no doubt that Trump kept talking when it wasn't his turn to talk.

    I am a Hillary backer for 2 precise reasons. One, I knew she would win the election at least 18 months ago, and it's not going to be as close as many of you think. Hillary's serious opposition was Bernie, not Trump, although they both may have an impact on the mentality of future Presidential elections. The two third party candidates this year might as well be jacking off in the back yard for all the impact they will have on this election. Scientific polling shows there relatively low vote counts will be more or less equal in siphoning votes off from either party. Second, I back Hillary because I don't want Republicans shaping the SCOTUS. That's it. I don't back Hillary in any other way.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

The worst thing about corruption is that it works so well,


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblerelic
of a bygone era
Male

Registered: 10/14/14
Posts: 5,623
Loc: the right coast
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: hostileuniverse] * 1
    #23685882 - 09/28/16 09:13 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

hostileuniverse said:

The infrastructure and education should be funded at the local level, and trump is right, we are 20 trillion in debt and our infrastructure is crumbling and our education is ranked very low compared to the rest of the developed world, for what the federal govt spends, we should be the best,

Then Progressives bitch about military spending, the one thing the federal govt does very well, our military is top notch compared to the rest of the world,





you think states like MS, AL, LA, MO, TN, WV et al can adequately fund their own education and infrastructure?  you seriously think that?

they can't even educate or maintain their own right now with federal assistance.  the example states are poor, predominantly red states that comprise 6 of the top 10 states that are most dependent on federal tit (the top/worst ten being all red states, by the way).  take that away and we'll only move farther down the dumberer scale in relation to the rest of the world. 

remove the foolbags that want to teach creationism and undermine common principles like climate change in public schools while whitewashing history and you've made a good first step in the education arena.  remove money from the military industrial complex and use that for infrastructure investment and you suddenly have a way to keep our bridges from crumbling.  those are viable ways to better education and infrastructure, not putting the burden at the local level.

the 20 trillion in debt didn't happen overnight and didn't happen because of spending federal money on education and infrastructure; it's absurd and simplistic to relate those issues.  it predominantly happened because of trying to end the cold war, useless and baseless wars coupled with poor fiscal policy hawked by bush the lesser, and the worst recession since the great depression (for which some of the fault lies with clinton the 1st and deregulation).  the debt ballooned the last eight years because everyone knows that a country must spend its way out of recession; that's common knowledge.  unless you want to say 'fuck em' and create a much larger welfare dependency with austerity measures...yeah, that's fun and productive.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineDouglas Howard
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/15
Posts: 1,678
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: relic]
    #23686036 - 09/28/16 10:07 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

relic said:
Quote:

hostileuniverse said:

The infrastructure and education should be funded at the local level, and trump is right, we are 20 trillion in debt and our infrastructure is crumbling and our education is ranked very low compared to the rest of the developed world, for what the federal govt spends, we should be the best,

Then Progressives bitch about military spending, the one thing the federal govt does very well, our military is top notch compared to the rest of the world,





you think states like MS, AL, LA, MO, TN, WV et al can adequately fund their own education and infrastructure?  you seriously think that?

they can't even educate or maintain their own right now with federal assistance.  the example states are poor, predominantly red states that comprise 6 of the top 10 states that are most dependent on federal tit (the top/worst ten being all red states, by the way).  take that away and we'll only move farther down the dumberer scale in relation to the rest of the world. 

remove the foolbags that want to teach creationism and undermine common principles like climate change in public schools while whitewashing history and you've made a good first step in the education arena.  remove money from the military industrial complex and use that for infrastructure investment and you suddenly have a way to keep our bridges from crumbling.  those are viable ways to better education and infrastructure, not putting the burden at the local level.

the 20 trillion in debt didn't happen overnight and didn't happen because of spending federal money on education and infrastructure; it's absurd and simplistic to relate those issues.  it predominantly happened because of trying to end the cold war, useless and baseless wars coupled with poor fiscal policy hawked by bush the lesser, and the worst recession since the great depression (for which some of the fault lies with clinton the 1st and deregulation).  the debt ballooned the last eight years because everyone knows that a country must spend its way out of recession; that's common knowledge.  unless you want to say 'fuck em' and create a much larger welfare dependency with austerity measures...yeah, that's fun and productive.




Yes, if they knock off some of their unnecessary spending, like only teach the basic like Arithmetic, Reading and Spelling. and which that they will only need three teachers, and narrow the grade level by having students from ages to 5 thru 8 as one level and 9 thru 11 for the next and so on, like how some poor Asian's countries does it. That they start teaching 5 years old at college level with other children around their ages.... But Physical Education and other courses like Science, Cadet and History should be taken out. But if they want courses like those, and so then the parents should pay for them.  And they can have online schools that teaches children over the web that will save on transportation and electricity funding. But they still can have all of the rest of the courses that can be done online. And for Physical Education, just give each student a Jane Fonda's exercising video CD.  .


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblerelic
of a bygone era
Male

Registered: 10/14/14
Posts: 5,623
Loc: the right coast
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: amp244] * 2
    #23686080 - 09/28/16 10:19 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

amp244 said:
Yes Trump is rich, yes he LEGALLY avoids paying income tax, but he invests his money in the U.S. which puts U.S. citizens to work.




you addressed this to falcon, but i think you often have reasonably well thought out posts and couldn't help responding, amp.

you should've clarified this last statement above...trump invests a portion of his money in the US, but a very large portion goes overseas and you know this.  he doesn't just employ US citizens at his various overseas resorts, hotels, and factories and it's not just US citizens building them.

Quote:

amp244 said:
You know, there was a time when there was no such thing as the Income Tax in this country. People take for granted that there needs to be a massive gov't fucking with the economy for things to run correctly. They don't read far enough into history to take note of all of the prosperity that took place while the Federal Gov't sat on the sidelines(comparatively), and people took care of themselves.  How ever did we manage the Industrial Revolution without our precious Income Tax, Federal Reserve, and Inflation? How were people eating without the constant devaluation of the currency?





yes, the .00001% were extremely prosperous.  it was great if you were one of them; the land holding, white, male, elite.  if you were a little guy then your life was infinitely more simple and immensely more difficult.

and sure, there wasn't "income tax" at the time you speak of, but they DID have taxes and high tariffs on whiskey, contracts, playing cards, deeds, wills, newspapers, instructional pamphlets, lead, paper, paint, tea, sugar, taxes just to be eligible to vote, tobacco, textiles, etc. etc.

you know everything i'm writing, but you omit it when stating your case about not needing a strong central gov't with attendant income taxes...at that time we lived in an agrarian society where people created for and took care of themselves, by and large.  that era has long been gone and is never coming back.  during such a time the relative needs of the federal gov't were low compared to now.  hell, our need for a strong federal gov't was relatively low; we could muster militias and kick some ass with squirrel guns if we had to.  in addition, resources were seeming unlimited for those who were able bodied.

fast forward 200 years and people no longer make their own clothes, build their own houses, clear their own land and the list goes on and on.  we now have a global economy with a thousand extra players on the field and this is never going backwards but for a worldwide calamity.  even then, the global economy will eventually rebuild and we'll be back to where we now find ourselves.

in a global economy with the advancements in technology we've seen--along with our now dwindling resources and ever dangerous world players--a strong central gov't is both necessary and good...as long as we keep the beast in it's cage with checks and balances.

where we, as citizens of this republic, have failed is by not holding representatives accountable for their complicity in not keeping the beast in its cage.  that and allowing things like the citizens united ruling and lobbyists to be acceptable in american politics.  money has corrupted politics to an absurd level and there is so much wasted in the corrupting of politics that it's pretty fucking sick.  but that's getting off the point.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblerelic
of a bygone era
Male

Registered: 10/14/14
Posts: 5,623
Loc: the right coast
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: Douglas Howard] * 1
    #23686094 - 09/28/16 10:26 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Douglas Howard said:


Yes, if they knock off some of their unnecessary spending, like only teach the basic like Arithmetic, Reading and Spelling. and which that they will only need three teachers, and narrow the grade level by having students from ages to 5 thru 8 as one level and 9 thru 11 for the next and so on, like how some poor Asian's countries does it. That they start teaching 5 years old at college level with other children around their ages.... But Physical Education and other courses like Science, Cadet and History should be taken out. But if they want courses like those, and so then the parents should pay for them.  And they can have online schools that teaches children over the web that will save on transportation and electricity funding. But they still can have all of the rest of the courses that can be done online. And for Physical Education, just give each student a Jane Fonda's exercising video CD.  .





this is satire, right?

i'm pretty sure it's not, but i'm positive it should be.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 33,362
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 57 minutes, 50 seconds
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: Brian Jones]
    #23686204 - 09/28/16 11:09 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Brian Jones said:
Major highways are interstates, and have been since Eisenhower developed the system in the 50's. It's impractical for states to build these independently, and for better or worse we have a trucking based economy.

    On to the subject of polls on the debate. I'm no mathematician or engineer but I'm thoroughly trained at grad school level in public opinion polling. Once your mind can conceive of what a sampling distribution is, inferential statistics is easy math for these applications. This is what the polls said. Every internet poll, which is just people shouting out their opinions, like this forum, said Trump won the debate. Every scientifically constructed poll had Hillary as the debate winner by a 10-12% margin. Anyone who tells you different is trying to blow smoke up your ass. Even Trump knows he lost, and he knows he did so poorly he is threatening to not participate in any further debates. He blames a bad microphone, but it was evident that he had his shit together for the most part for the first 10 minutes then fell apart. Both sides said the moderators were biased against them. Those are subjective arguments that can be made, but there is no doubt that Trump kept talking when it wasn't his turn to talk.

    I am a Hillary backer for 2 precise reasons. One, I knew she would win the election at least 18 months ago, and it's not going to be as close as many of you think. Hillary's serious opposition was Bernie, not Trump, although they both may have an impact on the mentality of future Presidential elections. The two third party candidates this year might as well be jacking off in the back yard for all the impact they will have on this election. Scientific polling shows there relatively low vote counts will be more or less equal in siphoning votes off from either party. Second, I back Hillary because I don't want Republicans shaping the SCOTUS. That's it. I don't back Hillary in any other way.




Well said as always, and agree 100% :thumbup:


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleelax420
Anal Destroyer
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #23686225 - 09/28/16 11:16 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Brian if you are trained in public policy you know the powers that be control education and therefore the minds of the people.


I have a friend in poly sci. He told me his entire department was being funded by the DOD. Now tell me what interest does the DOD have in higher education? If definitely explains the obvious slant that gets pushed down your throats in college. My business school is and was funded by oligarchs that depend on Chicago school thinking, or else their workers would *gasp* unionize

Ah the humanity!!!


Edited by elax420 (09/28/16 11:18 AM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: hostileuniverse]
    #23686226 - 09/28/16 11:17 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

hostileuniverse said:
The infrastructure and education should be funded at the local level, and trump is right, we are 20 trillion in debt and our infrastructure is crumbling and our education is ranked very low compared to the rest of the developed world, for what the federal govt spends, we should be the best,

Then Progressives bitch about military spending, the one thing the federal govt does very well, our military is top notch compared to the rest of the world,




:curbyourenthusiasm:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleballsalsaMDiscord
Universally Loathed and Reviled
Male User Gallery


Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,813
Loc: Foreign Lands
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: Douglas Howard] * 1
    #23686234 - 09/28/16 11:19 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Douglas Howard said:

Yes, if they knock off some of their unnecessary spending, like only teach the basic like Arithmetic, Reading and Spelling. and which that they will only need three teachers, and narrow the grade level by having students from ages to 5 thru 8 as one level and 9 thru 11 for the next and so on, like how some poor Asian's countries does it. That they start teaching 5 years old at college level with other children around their ages.... But Physical Education and other courses like Science, Cadet and History should be taken out. But if they want courses like those, and so then the parents should pay for them.  And they can have online schools that teaches children over the web that will save on transportation and electricity funding. But they still can have all of the rest of the courses that can be done online. And for Physical Education, just give each student a Jane Fonda's exercising video CD.  .




No. Just no.

:nohellno:  :nowaitstopdammit:  :kummeli:


--------------------


Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineqman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 1 day, 1 hour
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #23686248 - 09/28/16 11:23 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
Quote:

Brian Jones said:
Major highways are interstates, and have been since Eisenhower developed the system in the 50's. It's impractical for states to build these independently, and for better or worse we have a trucking based economy.

    On to the subject of polls on the debate. I'm no mathematician or engineer but I'm thoroughly trained at grad school level in public opinion polling. Once your mind can conceive of what a sampling distribution is, inferential statistics is easy math for these applications. This is what the polls said. Every internet poll, which is just people shouting out their opinions, like this forum, said Trump won the debate. Every scientifically constructed poll had Hillary as the debate winner by a 10-12% margin. Anyone who tells you different is trying to blow smoke up your ass. Even Trump knows he lost, and he knows he did so poorly he is threatening to not participate in any further debates. He blames a bad microphone, but it was evident that he had his shit together for the most part for the first 10 minutes then fell apart. Both sides said the moderators were biased against them. Those are subjective arguments that can be made, but there is no doubt that Trump kept talking when it wasn't his turn to talk.

    I am a Hillary backer for 2 precise reasons. One, I knew she would win the election at least 18 months ago, and it's not going to be as close as many of you think. Hillary's serious opposition was Bernie, not Trump, although they both may have an impact on the mentality of future Presidential elections. The two third party candidates this year might as well be jacking off in the back yard for all the impact they will have on this election. Scientific polling shows there relatively low vote counts will be more or less equal in siphoning votes off from either party. Second, I back Hillary because I don't want Republicans shaping the SCOTUS. That's it. I don't back Hillary in any other way.




Well said as always, and agree 100% :thumbup:




So you back Hillary as well?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 33,362
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 57 minutes, 50 seconds
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: ballsalsa]
    #23686251 - 09/28/16 11:24 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

:lmafo:

Dumb down our already dumbed down education. Thatll put us back on top:


:nojustno:


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 33,362
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 57 minutes, 50 seconds
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: The Ecstatic] * 3
    #23686254 - 09/28/16 11:26 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

@qman i'm voting for her, if FL gets too close for comfort. And for the same reasons.

Hillary wont do anything to move us forward, but the GOP will move us backwards.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinestarfire_xes
I Am 'They'
Male User Gallery


Registered: 10/24/09
Posts: 21,590
Loc: Dallas with all the assho...
Last seen: 7 months, 22 hours
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: relic]
    #23686262 - 09/28/16 11:28 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

relic said:
Quote:

Douglas Howard said:


Yes, if they knock off some of their unnecessary spending, like only teach the basic like Arithmetic, Reading and Spelling. and which that they will only need three teachers, and narrow the grade level by having students from ages to 5 thru 8 as one level and 9 thru 11 for the next and so on, like how some poor Asian's countries does it. That they start teaching 5 years old at college level with other children around their ages.... But Physical Education and other courses like Science, Cadet and History should be taken out. But if they want courses like those, and so then the parents should pay for them.  And they can have online schools that teaches children over the web that will save on transportation and electricity funding. But they still can have all of the rest of the courses that can be done online. And for Physical Education, just give each student a Jane Fonda's exercising video CD.  .





this is satire, right?

i'm pretty sure it's not, but i'm positive it should be.







Here, this graph shows how much massive federal spending and the Dept of Education have made a significant contribution to education.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleballsalsaMDiscord
Universally Loathed and Reviled
Male User Gallery


Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,813
Loc: Foreign Lands
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: starfire_xes]
    #23686274 - 09/28/16 11:32 AM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

starfire_xes said:
Quote:

relic said:
Quote:

Douglas Howard said:


Yes, if they knock off some of their unnecessary spending, like only teach the basic like Arithmetic, Reading and Spelling. and which that they will only need three teachers, and narrow the grade level by having students from ages to 5 thru 8 as one level and 9 thru 11 for the next and so on, like how some poor Asian's countries does it. That they start teaching 5 years old at college level with other children around their ages.... But Physical Education and other courses like Science, Cadet and History should be taken out. But if they want courses like those, and so then the parents should pay for them.  And they can have online schools that teaches children over the web that will save on transportation and electricity funding. But they still can have all of the rest of the courses that can be done online. And for Physical Education, just give each student a Jane Fonda's exercising video CD.  .





this is satire, right?

i'm pretty sure it's not, but i'm positive it should be.







Here, this graph shows how much massive federal spending and the Dept of Education have made a significant contribution to education.




thats an interesting graph, no doubt, but it has nothing to do with duddits' suggested approach.


--------------------


Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinehostileuniverse
Stranger
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: ballsalsa]
    #23686382 - 09/28/16 12:09 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Well, one things for sure, our shitty education system and infrastructure will only get worse the more federal centralized control they have over it.

See my sig, the idea that MORE govt will fix any of this is basically a retatded notion


--------------------
http://www.countdowntotrump.com





Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleballsalsaMDiscord
Universally Loathed and Reviled
Male User Gallery


Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,813
Loc: Foreign Lands
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: hostileuniverse]
    #23686400 - 09/28/16 12:14 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

starfire's graph doesn't support your hypothesis.  It seems to show negligible differences in outcome under varying amounts of federal spending, except for science scores which dipped significantly in the Reagan years.  Maybe i'm reading it incorrectly?


--------------------


Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleelax420
Anal Destroyer
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #23686413 - 09/28/16 12:18 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
@qman i'm voting for her, if FL gets too close for comfort. And for the same reasons.

Hillary wont do anything to move us forward, but the GOP will move us backwards.





Lol @ move us forward


Fucking liberals.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: elax420] * 1
    #23686421 - 09/28/16 12:21 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)

he just said that she won't move anyone forward. :shrug: so what is so "fucking liberals" about that?

do you people even know how to have an original thought? :facepalm:

or wait, is it that you think by "us" he's referring to 'liberals'. cause i think he means 'the country'. because the country is composed of both liberals and conservatives (and then some), i'd say you have alot to consider in terms of what is the right direction for the country, more than just "my team".


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinehostileuniverse
Stranger
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
Re: Official Hillary vs Trump Debate Thread. [Re: ballsalsa]
    #23686422 - 09/28/16 12:22 PM (7 years, 3 months ago)





Our ranking, in comparison to what we spend, doesn't add up

When did the US start slipping in world rank? I'll let you research that, and then research when the federal govt seized control of education


--------------------
http://www.countdowntotrump.com





Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | < Back | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | Next > | Last >

Shop: PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder, Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Thread for tha liberals. oggleman 1,017 13 11/04/04 06:48 PM
by Worf
* TRUMP 2024
( 1 2 3 4 ... 1201 1202 )
XUL 284,991 24,030 01/27/24 06:43 PM
by Bigbadwooof
* Was Bush Wired During the Debate? EchoVortex 1,088 14 10/08/04 05:46 PM
by Gijith
* US debates bid to kill Hussein and avoid trial Edame 633 1 08/01/03 02:02 PM
by wingnutx
* HILLARY'S CHUTZPAH luvdemshrooms 409 0 11/02/03 05:27 PM
by luvdemshrooms
* Critique pinky's analysis of the debate here
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Phred 5,006 98 10/04/04 08:15 PM
by Divided_Sky
* CBS: Saddam challenges Bush to debate
( 1 2 all )
Angry Mycologist 2,995 38 02/25/03 12:45 PM
by MushyMay
* Hitler V Saddam
( 1 2 all )
germin8tionn8ion 4,258 28 07/03/04 09:20 AM
by Ed1

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
22,427 topic views. 0 members, 5 guests and 6 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.03 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 15 queries.