Home | Community | Message Board

MushroomMan Mycology
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Kraken Kratom Kratom Capsules for Sale   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   North Spore Cultivation Supplies   PhytoExtractum Kratom Powder for Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | < Back | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | Next > | Last >
OfflineGreat Scott
Trigger Lover
Male User Gallery

Registered: 05/05/03
Posts: 19,797
Loc: Control Grid
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: koods]
    #23608320 - 09/03/16 02:59 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

You practically have to be your own lawyer these days just to exist in America as a free man. Everything from travelling to simply going trout fishing is under scrutiny and poses the risk of having to engage in complicated verbal word battles with automaton jackboots at any given moment. Or you can always just take the "express checkout lane" and forfeit your rights and personal liberty.


--------------------
:thumbup: :thumbdown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCrumist
Stranger
I'm a teapot User Gallery

Registered: 11/02/13
Posts: 781
Last seen: 7 years, 2 months
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #23608321 - 09/03/16 02:59 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Prisoner#1 said:let me say it again. there are border patrol checkpoints that are 100 fucking
miles from the border that stop the cars with white people to ask if they're
citizens because stopping the brown people is racial profiling, you reallocate
those resources to the fucking border. somehow you think that with 300,000 people
who's job it is to guard this country from intrusion by terrorists and illegal
aliens that we need to hire more? fuck that, drag all of them to the border, make
them hold hands and we can have a human wall. fuck that, we can play red rover
along the gods damned border with the number of personnel already working for DHS

"red rover red rover send Jose Miguel Francisco Antonio Alejandro Manuel de Jesus right over"




Hur hur, the funny looking brown people have strange names :crazy2:

It is trump's position to triple the number of ICE agents, paid for by "eliminating tax credits to illegal immigrants" Yeah, okay. :rolleyes:
He's also spoken about increasing funding to the border patrol.


--------------------
'I am all for resources being allocated to the widowed single mother of 3, lost husband over seas fighting for our country. I am for vets getting mental health access and resources following war. I am not for free money cause a woman can't close her legs or some chump with low testosterone no going to work cause "i'm sad."' -finalexplosion
Nice knowin ya'll! https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/23904704/vc/1#23904704

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCrystal G
I'm a teapot


Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 9 months, 6 days
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crumist]
    #23608327 - 09/03/16 03:01 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Crumist said:
It is trump's position to triple the number of ICE agents, paid for by "eliminating tax credits to illegal immigrants" Yeah, okay. :rolleyes:




LOL, do people really believe illegal immigrants receive tax credits?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCrystal G
I'm a teapot


Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 9 months, 6 days
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Great Scott]
    #23608343 - 09/03/16 03:04 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

PeyoteZen said:
You practically have to be your own lawyer these days just to exist in America as a free man. Everything from travelling to simply going trout fishing is under scrutiny and poses the risk of having to engage in complicated verbal word battles with automaton jackboots at any given moment. Or you can always just take the "express checkout lane" and forfeit your rights and personal liberty.




It's crazy, I started noticing about 10 years ago, that everybody entering the country through the airport, even Americans, were required to give all 10 of their fingerprints upon arrival at checkpoint. All tourists as well, they must provide all 10 of their fingerprints upon entering the country. Apparently this is something that creeps a lot of tourists out.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineGreat Scott
Trigger Lover
Male User Gallery

Registered: 05/05/03
Posts: 19,797
Loc: Control Grid
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crystal G]
    #23608356 - 09/03/16 03:07 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Crystal G said:
This is what the Border Patrol manual states:

Quote:

Non-Intrusive Inspection (NII) technology enables CBP to detect contraband (e.g., narcotics and weapons) and materials that pose potential nuclear and radiological threats. Technologies deployed to our Nation’s land, sea, and air ports of entry include large-scale X-ray and Gamma- ray imaging systems, as well as a variety of porta- ble and handheld technologies.

An integral part of the CBP comprehensive strat- egy to combat nuclear and radiological terrorism is the scanning of all arriving conveyances and containers with radiation detection equipment prior to release from the port of entry. CBP’s nuclear and radiological detection equip- ment includes Radiation Portal Monitors (RPM), Radiation Isotope Identification Devices (RIID), and Personal Radiation Detectors (PRD) to 329 ports of entry nationwide.

CBP currently has 1,469 RPMs deployed. Utilizing RPMs, CBP is able to scan approximately 100 per- cent of all mail and express consignment mail/ parcels; approximately 100 percent of all truck cargo, 100 percent of personally owned vehicles arriving from Canada and Mexico; and approxi- mately 99 percent of all arriving sea-borne con- tainerized cargo for the presence of radiological/ nuclear materials. Additionally, CBP has deployed 2,811 RIIDs and 29,345 PRDs nationwide.




https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nii_factsheet_2.pdf


So, they are somehow scanning all incoming vehicles with this device. But they claim it is "non-intrusive," I don't know how. Perhaps the person either has to step out of the vehicle to scan, or they scan the vehicle in a way that only scans the trunk or something? I don't know the specifics.




B.P. Policy is in conflict with Federal Code, which is in conflict with the U.S. Constitution. It simply cannot be reconciled without lying about it and obfuscating from the inherent fraud and lawlessness therein. B.P. can only request of you to step out of your vehicle. You are lawfully within your right to decline such offer up until the point where B.P. has a lawful reason (probable cause) to force you to do so. If you keep your mouth shut and have nothing of an illegal nature in plain view, then technically B.P. is prevented from even reaching a stage where they can even lawfully utilize such devices. Koods makes a good point about stow-aways. If a human smuggler obliges to the request to pull into a secondary inspection station and step out of his vehicle, the scanner can then be utilized since the presumption is that there are no further occupants in the vehicle.


--------------------
:thumbup: :thumbdown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,493
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 8 hours, 58 minutes
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crystal G]
    #23608361 - 09/03/16 03:08 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Crystal G said:
Quote:

Crumist said:
It is trump's position to triple the number of ICE agents, paid for by "eliminating tax credits to illegal immigrants" Yeah, okay. :rolleyes:




LOL, do people really believe illegal immigrants receive tax credits?



You can't do business with the government without documentation.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineGreat Scott
Trigger Lover
Male User Gallery

Registered: 05/05/03
Posts: 19,797
Loc: Control Grid
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crumist]
    #23608362 - 09/03/16 03:09 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Crumist said:
It is trump's position to triple the number of ICE agents, paid for by "eliminating tax credits to illegal immigrants" Yeah, okay. :rolleyes:




And what's wrong or even unfeasible about that? Sounds like a smart money manager move to me.


--------------------
:thumbup: :thumbdown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineGreat Scott
Trigger Lover
Male User Gallery

Registered: 05/05/03
Posts: 19,797
Loc: Control Grid
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crystal G]
    #23608388 - 09/03/16 03:16 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Crystal G said:
Quote:

PeyoteZen said:
You practically have to be your own lawyer these days just to exist in America as a free man. Everything from travelling to simply going trout fishing is under scrutiny and poses the risk of having to engage in complicated verbal word battles with automaton jackboots at any given moment. Or you can always just take the "express checkout lane" and forfeit your rights and personal liberty.




It's crazy, I started noticing about 10 years ago, that everybody entering the country through the airport, even Americans, were required to give all 10 of their fingerprints upon arrival at checkpoint. All tourists as well, they must provide all 10 of their fingerprints upon entering the country. Apparently this is something that creeps a lot of tourists out.




I meant "travelling" as in any form of free movement within the country; such as making a simple Walmart run to and from your home near a border town. And by "express checkout lane", I mean playing ball with the cops instead of "law-blocking" every single one of their attempts to get you to waive one of your rights. But yeah, the whole airport situation is pretty much a joke too. I haven't flown since 2006, I can't even imagine how much worse it's gotten under Obama's tenure.


--------------------
:thumbup: :thumbdown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCrystal G
I'm a teapot


Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 9 months, 6 days
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crystal G]
    #23608392 - 09/03/16 03:17 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

More info from CBP

Quote:

The Non-Intrusive Inspection (NII) Systems Program furthers this mission by providing technologies to inspect and screen conveyances or cars, trucks, railcars, sea containers, as well as personal luggage, packages, parcels, and flat mail through either x-ray or gamma-ray imaging systems. CBP Officers use NII systems to help them effectively and efficiently detect and prevent contraband, including drugs, unreported currency, guns, ammunition, and other illegal merchandise, as well as inadmissible persons, from being smuggled into the United States, while having a minimal impact on the flow of legitimate travel and commerce. The imaging system used on the conveyance itself collects photographic and other images that may contain personally identifiable information (PII), such as vehicle identifiers (e.g., license plate numbers). CBP is conducting this Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) pursuant to Section 208 of the E-Government Act of 20021, because NII systems use information technology to collect, maintain, and disseminate PII in the form of scanned, photographic, or video images.

Specifically, data elements that may be stored on the NII system, some of which may contain PII, include:
 Body scans revealing persons attempting to enter the United States illegally, imported or exported cadavers, deceased persons, or persons otherwise concealed in a conveyance or container;
 Body scans of people who choose to remain in vehicles being scanned by a Z-Portal;
 Business name;
 Driver's license;
 Entry documentation;
 Vessel name, including registration number;
 Container number;
 Sender of the goods;
 Notes from officers related to a DHS/CBP action;
 Property description;
 Port of entry;
 Date of entry;
 Time of entry;
 Case number or seizure number;
 Type of violation or suspected violation;
 Date and place of violation or alleged violation;
 On-site disposition actions, such as whether a seizure was made, an item was
detained, or inspection occurred;
 Memoranda; or
 Actions taken by DHS or CBP.

With respect to the biometric information listed above, these NII body scans have lower resolution that does not display a person’s skeletal structure (or metal implants within the body); but NII body scans may display items carried on the person (e.g., a handgun tucked into a waistband), or more macro body characteristics such as, for example, if a person has limbs missing.  In the case of people who choose to remain in their vehicles during a Z-Portal examination of a vehicle, after being presented with the option to exit the vehicle by a CBP Officer prior to the vehicle being driven through the Z-Portal, the low level of x-rays used is within the health and safety limits allowable for members of the public.

Mitigation: Long-standing customs authorities allow for border searches to be performed with or without suspicion that the merchandise being searched may be in violation of U.S. law or may contain evidence of such a violation.7 Such border search authority permits the physical examination of every container and conveyance presented at the border. However, CBP’s mission also includes facilitating legitimate international trade.




https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/privacy_pia_cbp_nii_jan2014.pdf

So basically, the way they're getting around people to consent, is by simply posting signs saying that these X-ray machines are in use. It looks like you are not actually able to decline the X-rays themselves:

Quote:

4.1 How does the project provide individuals notice prior to the collection of information? If notice is not provided, explain why not.

With regard to members of the public physically at a POE, signage is posted throughout POEs with large or small-scale NII systems that notify the public that NII image recording devices are in use. In POEs where Z-Portals are in use, signage at the port advises the public of the low level of radiation for Z-Portal scans, as people may choose to remain in their vehicles during Z-Portal examinations. At POE along the southern border, the warning signage is printed in English and Spanish. Please see the Appendix for sample signage. However, no signage exists for persons attempting to enter or exit the United States illegally while hidden in a shipment.




Quote:

4.2 What opportunities are available for individuals to consent to uses, decline to provide information, or opt out of the project?

Individual members of the public do not have the opportunity or right to decline to provide information that NII images or photography may collect. Generally, the decision of whether to import or export articles to or from the United States is a matter with the discretion of the individual. NII image information must be provided pursuant to applicable statutes by all persons and cargo traveling through a U.S. port of entry where NII systems are in use. The only legitimate means of declining to provide the subject information is to not seek to enter, transport, ship, or mail goods/merchandise at or through a POE or other CBP operational area, or to choose not to remove such goods or merchandise from a POE or other CBP operational area.



Edited by Crystal G (09/03/16 03:27 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCrystal G
I'm a teapot


Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 9 months, 6 days
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: koods]
    #23608395 - 09/03/16 03:18 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

koods said:
Quote:

Crystal G said:
Quote:

Crumist said:
It is trump's position to triple the number of ICE agents, paid for by "eliminating tax credits to illegal immigrants" Yeah, okay. :rolleyes:




LOL, do people really believe illegal immigrants receive tax credits?



You can't do business with the government without documentation.




If you have documentation and are doing business with the government, or if you have the ability to receive tax credits, that means you have some kind of valid residence or visa or social security number.

Edited by Crystal G (09/03/16 03:24 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,493
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 8 hours, 58 minutes
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Great Scott]
    #23608397 - 09/03/16 03:19 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

At an actual border, your consent to be searched is implied when you cross the border. If you don't want to be subject to a search. you don't have to enter the US.

These highway check points are a different matter. I would assume that they actually need some cause to search your vehicle.

Quote:

PeyoteZen said:
Quote:

Crumist said:
It is trump's position to triple the number of ICE agents, paid for by "eliminating tax credits to illegal immigrants" Yeah, okay. :rolleyes:




And what's wrong or even unfeasible about that? Sounds like a smart money manager move to me.



Well, it's kinda dumb when you think about it. If the government knows a payment is going to an illegal, then they could just get the guy at the address the check is sent to. Of course, in reality, unless you start to scrutinize all the credits being paid out, it's probably very hard to know when a claim is fraudulent. that requires a lot more resources because you have to start auditing everything.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineGreat Scott
Trigger Lover
Male User Gallery

Registered: 05/05/03
Posts: 19,797
Loc: Control Grid
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crystal G]
    #23608398 - 09/03/16 03:19 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Hmmmmm



*Before you chime in with the smartypants shit, yes, I'm aware this is photoshopped.  :calledajoke:


--------------------
:thumbup: :thumbdown:

Edited by Great Scott (09/03/16 03:22 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCrystal G
I'm a teapot


Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 9 months, 6 days
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: koods]
    #23608405 - 09/03/16 03:21 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

koods said:
At an actual border, your consent to be searched is implied when you cross the border. If you don't want to be subject to a search. you don't have to enter the US.

These highway check points are a different matter. I would assume that they actually need some cause to search your vehicle.




According to the quotes I just posted, they are saying it is legal because of this:  "CBP is conducting this Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) pursuant to Section 208 of the E-Government Act of 20021, because NII systems use information technology to collect, maintain, and disseminate PII in the form of scanned, photographic, or video images."

So basically, because they are using technology, it's not considered to be an actual physical search of the vehicle, and is therefore considered to be lawful. I think?? I mean how else would they be able to use this technology at the Superbowl without anybody knowing? Nobody consents to that.

They also have pictures of some of their scans if you click the link. They look similar to the images I posted earlier.

Edited by Crystal G (09/03/16 03:28 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,493
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 8 hours, 58 minutes
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crystal G]
    #23608425 - 09/03/16 03:35 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

http://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-04/18-border-searches.html

Quote:

Inland stoppings and searches in areas away from the borders are a different matter altogether. Thus, in Almeida-Sanchez v. United States,281 the Court held that a warrantless stop and search of defendant's automobile on a highway some 20 miles from the border by a roving patrol lacking probable cause to believe that the vehicle contained illegal aliens violated the Fourth Amendment. Similarly, the Court invalidated an automobile search at a fixed checkpoint well removed from the border; while agreeing that a fixed checkpoint probably gave motorists less cause for alarm than did roving patrols, the Court nonetheless held that the invasion of privacy entailed in a search was just as intrusive and must be justified by a showing of probable cause or consent.




--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCrystal G
I'm a teapot


Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 9 months, 6 days
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crystal G]
    #23608434 - 09/03/16 03:38 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

I noticed that the DHS site kept using the term "POE" to signify Port of Entry.

I looked up POE locations within the state of California, and a lot of them are not even remotely close to the border. Some are in San Francisco and Fresno and Los Angeles and those kind of areas: https://www.cbp.gov/contact/ports/ca

So, I don't know for sure if they are using them at all POEs, or in POEs outside of the border. They are definitely using these on every single personal car that enters the country though.

This is their fiscal year 2015 achievements:

Quote:

Scanned 100 percent of all mail, express consignment mail, and parcels; nearly 100 percent of all truck cargo, 100 percent of personally owned vehicles arriving from Canada and Mexico; and approximately 99 percent of all arriving sea-borne containerized cargo for the presence of radiological or nuclear materials




https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/documents/2016-May/nii-radiation-detection-fy15-review_0.pdf

But, I would think, if they are capable of using this at the Superbowl like they admitted to doing, they are capable of doing this legally at any other port of entry within the United States as well: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/spotlights/2016-02-03-000000/cbps-super-bowl-security-starts-cautious-deliveries

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCrystal G
I'm a teapot


Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 9 months, 6 days
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: koods]
    #23608442 - 09/03/16 03:42 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

koods said:
http://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-04/18-border-searches.html

Quote:

Inland stoppings and searches in areas away from the borders are a different matter altogether. Thus, in Almeida-Sanchez v. United States,281 the Court held that a warrantless stop and search of defendant's automobile on a highway some 20 miles from the border by a roving patrol lacking probable cause to believe that the vehicle contained illegal aliens violated the Fourth Amendment. Similarly, the Court invalidated an automobile search at a fixed checkpoint well removed from the border; while agreeing that a fixed checkpoint probably gave motorists less cause for alarm than did roving patrols, the Court nonetheless held that the invasion of privacy entailed in a search was just as intrusive and must be justified by a showing of probable cause or consent.







These are for physical searches though, not "technological searches pursuant to the E-Government Act of 20021," as DHS puts it.

I mean, how else are they using these same machines at the Superbowl?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,493
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 8 hours, 58 minutes
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crystal G]
    #23608476 - 09/03/16 03:58 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

That statement refers to the privacy issues over the images themselves.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineGreat Scott
Trigger Lover
Male User Gallery

Registered: 05/05/03
Posts: 19,797
Loc: Control Grid
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Crystal G]
    #23608485 - 09/03/16 04:00 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Crystal G said:
Quote:

Prisoner#1 said:
let me say it again. there are border patrol checkpoints that are 100 fucking
miles from the border that stop the cars with white people to ask if they're
citizens because stopping the brown people is racial profiling




They're not stopping whites for that reason.

What you don't realize is that behind those border patrol checkpoint booths are X-ray machines that secretly scan cars to see if there's drugs or bodies hiding in the trunk of people's cars.




Let's get this conversation back on track. The in-land Border Patrol Checkpoint's primary function (in actual practice and surface-level application) is detaining primarily white people to ask them if they are brown people (illegal brown people). Putting aside all the legal jargon and mumbo jumbo about confirming U.S. Citizenship, essentially what B.P. is doing, in practice, is stopping huge numbers of obviously white Americans and asking them if they are indeed white Americans. :facepalm:
But of course we know that's not the real reason, and of course we know the Federal Government is not quite that stupid and/or incompetent. So what's the real reason? Okay, we know the real reasons. Next question then. Why can't the Federal Government just be honest about their real intentions? It's because their real intentions would conflict with their publicly stated intentions and the American people would consider them a fascist piece of shit government entity more interested in violating American's rights than with stopping illegal immigration...which is exactly what's been happening as more and more people wake up.

Edited by Great Scott (09/03/16 04:05 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCrystal G
I'm a teapot


Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 9 months, 6 days
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: koods]
    #23608492 - 09/03/16 04:01 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

So then, I'm confused, how were they able to use these at the Superbowl, like they've admitted to doing?

Is it because it's a private event and not public property?

And if that's the case, then how come it was DHS and border patrol that was doing the scanning, and not some private security company? Because similar X-ray technology is sold to private security companies as well.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineCrystal G
I'm a teapot


Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 9 months, 6 days
Re: The Great Wall of China vs The Great Wall of Trump [Re: Great Scott]
    #23608501 - 09/03/16 04:03 PM (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

PeyoteZen said:
Let's get this conversation back on track. The in-land Border Patrol Checkpoint's primary function (at least superficially) is to detain white people and ask them if they are Mexican. Putting aside all the legal jargon and mumbo jumbo about confirming U.S. Citizenship, essentially what B.P. is doing, in practice, is stopping huge numbers of obviously white Americans and asking them if they are indeed white Americans. :facepalm:
But of course we know that's not the real reason, and of course we know the Federal Government is not quite that stupid and/or incompetent. So what's the real reason? Okay, we know the real reasons. Next question then. Why can't the Federal Government just be honest about their real intentions? It's because their real intentions would conflict with their publicly stated intentions and the American people would consider them a fascist piece of shit government entity...which is exactly what's been happening as more and more people wake up.




They were always stopping white Americans at border patrol checkpoints, even long before 9/11.

The reason is because you can't tell somebody's ethnicity by simply looking at them, a lot of Mexicans are fair-skinned with blonde-hair and blue eyes. So one of the things they are actually looking for, is whether somebody has an American accent or not when they speak.

I'm sure nowadays they have much more invasive reasons for stopping all people, however.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | < Back | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | Next > | Last >

Shop: Kraken Kratom Kratom Capsules for Sale   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   North Spore Cultivation Supplies   PhytoExtractum Kratom Powder for Sale


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* great wall of china spudamore 686 11 07/10/05 12:20 PM
by Redstorm
* Going to China!!!! hawksapprentice 1,602 11 12/09/06 10:31 PM
by nightkrawler
* LSD phenomena v. hallucinations kake 1,130 6 08/25/05 11:31 AM
by Gillette
* China Cat Sunflower Ripple 2,852 17 05/05/04 03:57 AM
by Krishna
* Donald Trump
( 1 2 3 all )
Disco Cat 3,759 45 01/21/17 07:12 AM
by akira_akuma
* Trump pledges to 'strongly' consider concealed carry in schools
( 1 2 3 4 ... 17 18 )
musiclover420 3,699 342 03/05/18 09:49 AM
by trendal
* The New Cold War, usa, russia, china
( 1 2 all )
ZippoZM 3,443 31 06/01/07 06:12 PM
by joekenorer
* Pink Floyd's "The Wall"
( 1 2 all )
trendalM 4,657 25 07/23/05 06:33 PM
by TheFakeSunRa

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
9,171 topic views. 2 members, 28 guests and 28 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.032 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 14 queries.