|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 22 days
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: amp244]
#23664966 - 09/21/16 12:46 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
That's some damn good advice. You should listen to yourself.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
ballsalsa
Universally Loathed and Reviled



Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,876
Loc: Foreign Lands
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: amp244] 1
#23665071 - 09/21/16 01:29 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
amp244 said: Well let me see if I'm digging what you're laying down...So are you arguing that Obamacare fits those qualifications? Narrowly tailored? Least restrictive means? Government interest or Special interests? The government can't penalize you without due process. They can tax their asses off. They can't fine people without due process.
compelling government interest--preventing the deaths of uninsured americans
Narrowly tailored--infringes on fundamental rights only so far as is necessary to pursue the compelling interest. (asking people to purchase insurance, or taxing them to make up the balance if they decide not to)
Least restrictive means-- i dunno about this part really. It seems less restrictive IMO to simply do away with private insurance altogether and just pay for the shit with taxes completely. but barring that, i don't see a less restrictive means of expanding healthcare coverage for americans.
--------------------
Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,516
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: amp244] 1
#23665157 - 09/21/16 02:01 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
amp244 said:
So if a lawsuit was filed, which jurisdiction would it be under?
Most likely federalQuote:
Would both parties not be entitled to a federal jury?
Depends on what we're talking about. A jury would never decide a question of law.Quote:
Would not the constitutionality of the law that gave rise to the penalty not be an issue concerning the legitimacy of the penalty?
An issue of law, so it wouldn't go to a jury.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Douglas Howard
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/15
Posts: 1,678
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: Enlil]
#23667090 - 09/22/16 03:21 AM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
|
Douglas Howard
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/15
Posts: 1,678
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
|
Douglas Howard
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/15
Posts: 1,678
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
|
#banhammer
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 22 days
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: elax420] 1
#23668944 - 09/22/16 06:16 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Douglas Howard
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/15
Posts: 1,678
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
A number of writers have claimed that the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was involved in cocaine trafficking during the 1980s. These claims have led to investigations by the United States government, including hearings and reports by the United States House of Representatives, Senate, Department of Justice, and the CIA's Office of the Inspector General. The subject remains controversial. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_trafficking
Major General Nestor Luis Reverol, who was in charge of the National Anti-Drug Organization (ONA) in Venezuela, is officially a fugitive from US justice, according to New York’s Eastern District Federal Court in Brooklyn.
Reverol, who was appointed on Tuesday, August 2 as Interior Minister of Justice and Peace by President Nicolás Maduro, has been charged by the United States with crimes related to his participation in drug trafficking. https://panampost.com/sabrina-martin/2016/08/03/venezuela-maduro-promotes-general-accused-of-drug-trafficking-in-us-to-minister/
|
Douglas Howard
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/15
Posts: 1,678
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
The State Department under Hillary Clinton authorized arms sales to countries that had donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, according to a new report.
State approved $165 billion worth of weapons sales to 20 foreign governments during Clinton's tenure, the International Business Times reports. Among the countries involved in the sales were Algeria, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
The Clinton Foundation received between $54 million and $141 million in donations from the foreign governments and defense contractors involved in those sales, the report says. Certain defense contractors also paid her husband, former President Bill Clinton, for speaking engagements during that time. http://thehill.com/regulation/international/243089-hillary-clinton-facing-criticism-over-international-weapons-deals
Edited by Douglas Howard (09/23/16 03:01 AM)
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Wow that was even lamer than I thought it would be
Her attempts at pandering to millennial voters are painfully awkward
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 22 days
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: elax420]
#23670778 - 09/23/16 11:29 AM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
WhQuote:
elax420 said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Wow that was even lamer than I thought it would be
Her attempts at pandering to millennial voters are painfully awkward
When I posted the video yesterday, it had just over 100,000 views. Now it has over 3 million views and climbing fast. This was clearly a very successful video for Hillary, so it's understandable why her haters don't like it. 
I don't like Hillary, but I lol'd.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
|
It just sucked. People I dislike can be funny, perfect example would be Kanye west
Of course it's climbing Viacom is almost garaunteed to sponsor her campaign and it's the first video on YouTubes homepage.
3million isnt that great. Bieber vids get 100's of millions, and unsponsored cat videos do too. I wonder how much money her team wasted on that video that will have little if any effect on the polls.
|
ballsalsa
Universally Loathed and Reviled



Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,876
Loc: Foreign Lands
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: elax420] 1
#23671603 - 09/23/16 04:28 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
between two ferns is the perfect comedy show for hillary to seem funny. Galifianakis' awkward and uncomfortable brand of humor meshes perfectly with Hillary's lack of any sense of timing or delivery. Even though it was for fun, there was one moment when Hillary shined through and we got to catch a glimpse of the HRC that the secret service is always telling us about.
--------------------
Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here
|
starfire_xes
I Am 'They'



Registered: 10/24/09
Posts: 21,590
Loc: Dallas with all the assho...
Last seen: 7 months, 2 days
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: ballsalsa] 2
#23671765 - 09/23/16 05:53 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
A vote for Hillary is proof you can't fix stupid.
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 22 days
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: elax420]
#23671990 - 09/23/16 07:17 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
elax420 said: 3million isnt that great. Bieber vids get 100's of millions, and unsponsored cat videos do too.
It's not a music video, which get WAY more views.
And it Now has over 4 million views on its second day - if it exceeds 5 million within 7 days, it's unofficially considered "viral".
It's doing extremely well, in spite of your apparent denial. 
PS - vote 3rd party
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
|
Hilalry's gone "viral"! May as well cancel the lection, she's got it wrapped up!
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
|
It's obvious pandering.
If you think looking desperate to connect to young voters is a good look it's amazing Hillary hasn't made you her chief of staff yet.
I am starting to think trump actually has a chance and that's pretty funny
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: elax420]
#23672247 - 09/23/16 08:53 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I wonder how many views her lil siezure got
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 22 days
|
Re: A vote for Hillary... [Re: elax420]
#23672338 - 09/23/16 09:34 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
elax420 said: If you think looking desperate to connect to young voters is a good look it's amazing Hillary hasn't made you her chief of staff yet.
I didn't say anything about whether this would help Hillary or not. I simply refuted your point that it wasn't doing great.
Quote:
elax420 said: I wonder how many views her lil siezure got 
3.2 million. That didn't make it to "viral".
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
|