|
rackem



Registered: 11/27/09
Posts: 14,024
|
Re: California is fucked [Re: Shroomism]
#23407016 - 07/03/16 12:45 PM (7 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
i wonder how far ab1511 goes.. does that mean if we go shooting legally i cant let you shoot my gun while i am there?
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Wherever you crop up and start posting innane inflammotry bullshit Ill be there bud.
Anyways thats great. Hopefully they keep banning them and taking them away. Guns are not a necessary part of day to day life.
Neither are mushrooms, weed or alcohol, I won't hold my breath waiting for you to demand they be banned...
Guns are weapons. There existence should have safeguards in place to prevent them from falling into the wrong persons hand. Just like alcohol and drivers licenses. They may not stop everything but for the most part they work. And to add to that personally I think confiscation is a little much.
|
Shroomism
Space Travellin



Registered: 02/13/00
Posts: 66,015
Loc: 9th Dimension
|
Re: California is fucked [Re: rackem]
#23407053 - 07/03/16 12:58 PM (7 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I think that's exactly what it means. Or letting anyone borrow. Or pass your guns down to your son or whatever.
--------------------
|
Eminence



Registered: 07/25/10
Posts: 16,623
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Rifle, pistol, whatever. Make them all complicated and difficult to attain. Mass shootings will plummet in response. Retards who wanna cry about "muh pershunal defense weapuns!" Can still get them. Everyones happy.
Why are people who want guns as personal defense considered whiny retards though? I wonder how many anti-gun people have been attacked and felt powerless, especially in their own homes and thought "damn, a gun would be pretty useful right now" before they were killed. Hopefully you're never in that situation, but trust me, if that time comes you'd likely change your opinion real quick.
--------------------
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Wherever you crop up and start posting innane inflammotry bullshit Ill be there bud.
Anyways thats great. Hopefully they keep banning them and taking them away. Guns are not a necessary part of day to day life.
Neither are mushrooms, weed or alcohol, I won't hold my breath waiting for you to demand they be banned...
Guns are weapons. There existence should have safeguards in place to prevent them from falling into the wrong persons hand. Just like alcohol and drivers licenses. They may not stop everything but for the most part they work. And to add to that personally I think confiscation is a little much.
So in one post you "hope they keep banning them and taking them away" and in the next "confiscation is a little much"
Bipolar much?
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
Re: California is fucked [Re: Eminence]
#23407098 - 07/03/16 01:12 PM (7 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Eminence said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Rifle, pistol, whatever. Make them all complicated and difficult to attain. Mass shootings will plummet in response. Retards who wanna cry about "muh pershunal defense weapuns!" Can still get them. Everyones happy.
Why are people who want guns as personal defense considered whiny retards though? I wonder how many anti-gun people have been attacked and felt powerless, especially in their own homes and thought "damn, a gun would be pretty useful right now" before they were killed. Hopefully you're never in that situation, but trust me, if that time comes you'd likely change your opinion real quick.
The honest answer is partisanship, they see gun owners as primarily republican and conservative, the enemy, they really don't give a fuck about guns, they just hate conservatives.
|
Eminence



Registered: 07/25/10
Posts: 16,623
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
|
I can see that being the case with a lot of them, idk about Bodhi, but I feel like Koods definitely fits that description lol.
--------------------
|
luvdemboomers
loner with a boner
Registered: 01/11/13
Posts: 5,054
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Wherever you crop up and start posting innane inflammotry bullshit Ill be there bud.
Anyways thats great. Hopefully they keep banning them and taking them away. Guns are not a necessary part of day to day life.
Neither are mushrooms, weed or alcohol, I won't hold my breath waiting for you to demand they be banned...
Guns are weapons. There existence should have safeguards in place to prevent them from falling into the wrong persons hand. Just like alcohol and drivers licenses. They may not stop everything but for the most part they work. And to add to that personally I think confiscation is a little much.
We have those. Federal background checks and severe punishment for straw purchases.
Edited by luvdemboomers (07/03/16 01:19 PM)
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
Re: California is fucked [Re: Eminence]
#23407139 - 07/03/16 01:22 PM (7 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Eminence said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Rifle, pistol, whatever. Make them all complicated and difficult to attain. Mass shootings will plummet in response. Retards who wanna cry about "muh pershunal defense weapuns!" Can still get them. Everyones happy.
Why are people who want guns as personal defense considered whiny retards though? I wonder how many anti-gun people have been attacked and felt powerless, especially in their own homes and thought "damn, a gun would be pretty useful right now" before they were killed. Hopefully you're never in that situation, but trust me, if that time comes you'd likely change your opinion real quick.
Because those situations are extremely rare, and statistically youre more likely to get shot owning a gun in that situation then you are not having one. Trust me. You and everyone you know is gonna go through their entire life without having to draw on someone.
|
luvdemboomers
loner with a boner
Registered: 01/11/13
Posts: 5,054
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
Eminence said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Rifle, pistol, whatever. Make them all complicated and difficult to attain. Mass shootings will plummet in response. Retards who wanna cry about "muh pershunal defense weapuns!" Can still get them. Everyones happy.
Why are people who want guns as personal defense considered whiny retards though? I wonder how many anti-gun people have been attacked and felt powerless, especially in their own homes and thought "damn, a gun would be pretty useful right now" before they were killed. Hopefully you're never in that situation, but trust me, if that time comes you'd likely change your opinion real quick.
Because those situations are extremely rare, and statistically youre more likely to get shot owning a gun in that situation then you are not having one. Trust me. You and everyone you know is gonna go through their entire life without having to draw on someone.
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
Eminence said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Rifle, pistol, whatever. Make them all complicated and difficult to attain. Mass shootings will plummet in response. Retards who wanna cry about "muh pershunal defense weapuns!" Can still get them. Everyones happy.
Why are people who want guns as personal defense considered whiny retards though? I wonder how many anti-gun people have been attacked and felt powerless, especially in their own homes and thought "damn, a gun would be pretty useful right now" before they were killed. Hopefully you're never in that situation, but trust me, if that time comes you'd likely change your opinion real quick.
Because those situations are extremely rare, and statistically youre more likely to get shot owning a gun in that situation then you are not having one. Trust me. You and everyone you know is gonna go through their entire life without having to draw on someone.
That myth is not true, unless you count suicides which account for over 2/3 of gun deaths. And no, those situations are not extremely rare. As a matter of fact, I have been in that situation.
Edited by luvdemboomers (07/03/16 01:25 PM)
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
Eminence said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Rifle, pistol, whatever. Make them all complicated and difficult to attain. Mass shootings will plummet in response. Retards who wanna cry about "muh pershunal defense weapuns!" Can still get them. Everyones happy.
Why are people who want guns as personal defense considered whiny retards though? I wonder how many anti-gun people have been attacked and felt powerless, especially in their own homes and thought "damn, a gun would be pretty useful right now" before they were killed. Hopefully you're never in that situation, but trust me, if that time comes you'd likely change your opinion real quick.
Because those situations are extremely rare, and statistically youre more likely to get shot owning a gun in that situation then you are not having one. Trust me. You and everyone you know is gonna go through their entire life without having to draw on someone.
So just like with drugs, we should rely on daddy govt to protect us from ourselves
We just aren't smart enough to know what's good for us, gol dern it!
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
One incident is not a substantial amount of data points. Overall the incident rate of home invasions in the states is fairly low, and the amount of people killed during them averages around a 100 a year. Nationwide. Compare that to the rate of mass shootings and its fairly cut and dry which side should lose if you want to appeal to personal safety. It isnt even an argument at this point.
You likely did something to warrant that home invasion happening anyways. Given the demographic of this sites userbase.
Honestly youre more likely to win a million+ dollar jackpot then getting shot in your home, but I doubt youre out there blowing your life savings on lottery tickets.
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
|
So self defense situations are "rare" but the fact is being a victim of a mass shooting is even more rare, so gun confiscation to prevent mass shootings is a BS excuse IMO
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
there were 226 victims of mass shootings in June alone. Is simple arithmetic beyond you? Does it actually trouble you to see which of those numbers is bigger or is shouting liberal at anything you dont agree with
|
hostileuniverse
Stranger



Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
there were 226 victims of mass shootings in June alone. Is simple arithmetic beyond you?
Derp, give me stats or STFU
|
luvdemboomers
loner with a boner
Registered: 01/11/13
Posts: 5,054
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: One incident is not a substantial amount of data points. Overall the incident rate of home invasions in the states is fairly low, and the amount of people killed during them averages around a 100 a year. Nationwide. Compare that to the rate of mass shootings and its fairly cut and dry which side should lose if you want to appeal to personal safety. It isnt even an argument at this point.
You likely did something to warrant that home invasion happening anyways. Given the demographic of this sites userbase.
Honestly youre more likely to win a million+ dollar jackpot then getting shot in your home, but I doubt youre out there blowing your life savings on lottery tickets.
Actually, no I did not do anything. Go fuck yourself.
There's 350,000 robberies a year in the US and firearms are used in 41% of them. Firearms are used in roughly 170k aggravated assaults per year, this is separate from the robberies.
Compare that to maybe 1000 injured by mass shootings year
Edited by luvdemboomers (07/03/16 01:44 PM)
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
Sorry, I didnt mean to confuse you with numbers. Ill stick to shouting innanities like "liberal" and "the donald" since those are the only concepts you seem capable of grasping.
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
Quote:
luvdemboomers said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: One incident is not a substantial amount of data points. Overall the incident rate of home invasions in the states is fairly low, and the amount of people killed during them averages around a 100 a year. Nationwide. Compare that to the rate of mass shootings and its fairly cut and dry which side should lose if you want to appeal to personal safety. It isnt even an argument at this point.
You likely did something to warrant that home invasion happening anyways. Given the demographic of this sites userbase.
Honestly youre more likely to win a million+ dollar jackpot then getting shot in your home, but I doubt youre out there blowing your life savings on lottery tickets.
Actually, no I did not do anything. Go fuck yourself.
There's 350,000 robberies a year in the US and firearms are used in 41% of them.
Most of them involve criminals on both sides. I wouldnt be surprised if you got your door kicked in over a drug debt. Its ok. We know things like this happen.
|
luvdemboomers
loner with a boner
Registered: 01/11/13
Posts: 5,054
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
luvdemboomers said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: One incident is not a substantial amount of data points. Overall the incident rate of home invasions in the states is fairly low, and the amount of people killed during them averages around a 100 a year. Nationwide. Compare that to the rate of mass shootings and its fairly cut and dry which side should lose if you want to appeal to personal safety. It isnt even an argument at this point.
You likely did something to warrant that home invasion happening anyways. Given the demographic of this sites userbase.
Honestly youre more likely to win a million+ dollar jackpot then getting shot in your home, but I doubt youre out there blowing your life savings on lottery tickets.
Actually, no I did not do anything. Go fuck yourself.
There's 350,000 robberies a year in the US and firearms are used in 41% of them.
Most of them involve criminals on both sides. I wouldnt be surprised if you got your door kicked in over a drug debt. Its ok. We know things like this happen.
I don't do drugs.
Care to back up your claim? Yeah less than 1000 injured in mass shootings is justification to strip the rights of hundreds of millions, but yeah, don't worry, the 300,000+ armed robberies and assaults a year are just criminals robbing criminals.
Edited by luvdemboomers (07/03/16 01:48 PM)
|
rackem



Registered: 11/27/09
Posts: 14,024
|
|
why did this go to a personal level? this is why this debate never gets anywhere productive. keep the personal attacks out of it.
|
|