Home | Community | Message Board


Mushrooms.com
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
InvisibleDoctorJ
Stranger
 Arcade Champion: Frogger

Registered: 06/30/03
Posts: 8,451
Loc: space
FCC investigates Janet's titty
    #2297006 - 02/03/04 12:29 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

source: http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/02/02/superbowl.jackson/

CNN) -- Singer Janet Jackson apologized Monday to anyone who was offended when her right breast was exposed during the halftime show Sunday at the Super Bowl.

"The decision to have a costume reveal at the end of my halftime show performance was made after final rehearsals," Jackson said in a statement.

"MTV was completely unaware of it. It was not my intention that it go as far as it did. I apologize to anyone offended -- including the audience, MTV, CBS and the NFL."

MTV produced the halftime show, which was broadcast by CBS. Both had issued their own apologies.

On Monday, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michael Powell ordered an investigation of the incident.

An estimated 140 million people were watching the show when at the end, pop star Justin Timberlake popped off part of Jackson's corset, exposing her breast.

Powell told CNN he was not convinced the incident was an accident.

"Clearly somebody had knowledge of it. Clearly it was something that was planned by someone," he said. "She probably got what she was looking for."

Jackson spokesman Stephen Huvane said the incident "was a malfunction of the wardrobe; it was not intentional. ... He was supposed to pull away the bustier and leave the red-lace bra."

Huvane said an unauthorized copy of Jackson's single "Just a Little While" has appeared on the Internet, so Virgin Records decided to release it Monday. The song is from the album "Damita Jo," set to be released March 30.

MTV posted this tease on its Web site last week: "Janet Jackson's Super Bowl show promises shocking moments."

Powell said he was watching the game Sunday evening with his two children and found the incident "outrageous."

"I knew immediately it would cause great outrage among the American people, which it did," he said, citing "thousands" of complaints received by Monday morning. "We have a very angry public on our hands."

Powell said MTV and the CBS network's more than 200 affiliates and company-owned stations could be fined $27,500 apiece.

"I think it's all of their problem," he said. "The law allows you to reach many of the different parties." He said he would like to see the enforcement penalties strengthened to 10 times their current amount.

"We all as a society have a responsibility as to what the images and messages our children hear when they're likely to be watching television," he said.

"I don't think that's being moralistic, and I don't think that's government trying to tell people how to run their businesses. I don't think you need to be a lawyer to understand the basic concepts of common decency here."

Powell said he "expressed my great displeasure" over the incident in a telephone call Monday with CBS President and CEO Mel Karmazin, who "promised to cooperate" with the investigation.

Although Karmazin expressed "a great deal of regret," Powell said those sentiments would not deter the investigation.

The stock price of Viacom, the parent of CBS, rose more than 1 percent Monday.

"CBS deeply regrets the incident that occurred during the Super Bowl halftime show," the network said in a statement. "We attended all rehearsals throughout the week, and there was no indication that any such thing would happen.

"The moment did not conform to CBS broadcast standards, and we would like to apologize to anyone who was offended."

A statement from MTV said the tearing of Jackson's costume "was unrehearsed, unplanned, completely unintentional and was inconsistent with assurances we had about the content of the performance.

"MTV regrets this incident occurred, and we apologize to anyone who was offended by it."

Despite its apology, MTV did not hesitate to promote the incident after the fact. A Web page headline said: "Janet Jackson Got Nasty at the MTV-Produced Super Bowl Halftime Show."

Continuing, the Web page said, "Jaws across the country hit the carpet at exactly the same time. You know what we're talking about ... Janet Jackson, Justin Timberlake and a kinky finale that rocked the Super Bowl to its core."

Not everyone was buying the apologies.

"They can apologize all they want, but this was wrong, and heads are going to fall," said New York-based media strategist Robbie Vorhaus, who once worked for CBS.

Performing together in a routine that had included a number of bump-and-grind moves, Timberlake reached across Jackson, flicking off the molded right cup of the bustier, leaving her breast bare except for a starburst-shaped decoration held in place by a nipple piercing.

Timberlake issued his own apology. "I am sorry if anyone was offended by the wardrobe malfunction during the halftime performance at the Super Bowl," he said. "It was not intentional and is regrettable."

The White House also weighed in on the issue. "Our view is that it's important for families to be able to expect a high standard when it comes to programming," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said.

NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue joined the chorus. "The show was offensive, inappropriate and embarrassing to us and our fans. We will change our policy, our people and our processes for managing the halftime entertainment in the future in order to deal far more effectively with the quality of this aspect of the Super Bowl."

AOL, owned by CNN parent company Time Warner, attempted to distance itself from the dispute.

"While AOL was the sponsor of the Super Bowl Halftime Show, we did not produce it. In deference to our membership and the fans, AOL and AOL.com will not be presenting the halftime show online as originally planned."


--------------------
peace, pot, and microdot!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleDoctorJ
Stranger
 Arcade Champion: Frogger

Registered: 06/30/03
Posts: 8,451
Loc: space
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2297012 - 02/03/04 12:32 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

My reaction:

Come the FUCK ON!!!! Its a fucking titty! Get the fuck over it!

Here's my impression of the head of the FCC:

"We're going to investigate this even if it costs taxpayers $10 million. Now I can buy that BMW I've always wanted. It'll go great with the big mansion ClearChannel bought me for protecting their hideous monopoly! Someone PLEASE think of the children!"


--------------------
peace, pot, and microdot!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineAzmodeus
Seeker

Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 3,392
Loc: Lotus Land!! B.C.
Last seen: 11 years, 10 months
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2297030 - 02/03/04 12:38 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

"He was supposed to pull away the bustier and leave the red-lace bra."

I never saw it, but didn't she have a nipple covering on? why would she wear that under a bra... :confused:

anyway who cares?!...bfd... :rolleyes:


--------------------
"Know your Body - Know your Mind - Know your Substance - Know your Source.

Lest we forget. "


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleinfidelGOD
illusion

Registered: 04/18/02
Posts: 3,040
Loc: there
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2297056 - 02/03/04 12:53 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

:lol:

there I was enjoying my sunday evening watching these guys screaming profanities and nearly decapitating each other but I'm bombarded with images of a titty! a TITTY! wtf?!?!
OH THE HORROR! there must be a full investigation immediately! we'll appoint an independent congressional panel to investigate who knew exactly what and get to the bottom of this! this nation needs to get its priorities straight!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleinfidelGOD
illusion

Registered: 04/18/02
Posts: 3,040
Loc: there
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: infidelGOD]
    #2297106 - 02/03/04 01:16 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

meanwhile in the real world:
pres. Bush has finally bowed to political pressure and has agreed to convene an independent commission to look into intelligence failures before the Iraq war. but he'll personally appoint all of it's members!

INDEPENDENT commission my ASS!
I have a feeling this will be a repeat of the Hutten report...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblesilversoul7
Chill the FuckOut!
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/10/02
Posts: 27,301
Loc: mndfreeze's puppet army
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2297159 - 02/03/04 01:38 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

What a coincidence! I've been "investigating" that titty as well.


--------------------


"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."--Voltaire


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleDoctorJ
Stranger
 Arcade Champion: Frogger

Registered: 06/30/03
Posts: 8,451
Loc: space
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: Azmodeus]
    #2297172 - 02/03/04 01:44 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

anyway who cares?!...bfd...




I fuckin care!

The FCC's duties should be restricted to making sure that radio and television broadcasts dont interfere with Air Traffic Control and Military frequencies. Regulating content should be none of their business. That fact that they do regulate content is, IMO, a flagrant violation of the first amendment. CBS, FOX, NBC, ABC- these are all privately owned networks. If the people that own these networks want to broadcast titties, they should be able to. The government has no business telling them what to do.

Quote:

Powell said MTV and the CBS network's more than 200 affiliates and company-owned stations could be fined $27,500 apiece.

"I think it's all of their problem," he said. "The law allows you to reach many of the different parties." He said he would like to see the enforcement penalties strengthened to 10 times their current amount.




Do you understand that? If Powell had his way, it would cost networks and their affiliates $275,000 just to push the envelope of what is acceptable in broadcasting. This is bullshit.

Remember my "Republican Hipocrisy" thread? This is a classic example. The FCC lifts restrictions on how many TV stations one company can own in the name of "deregulation", then they pull some shit like this in the name of "family values". What a colossal heap of bullshit.


--------------------
peace, pot, and microdot!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBaby_Hitler
Errorist
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/06/02
Posts: 22,840
Loc: To the limit!
Last seen: 2 months, 4 hours
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2297224 - 02/03/04 02:05 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

They should make television illegal.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Anonymous

Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2298391 - 02/03/04 07:45 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

The FCC's duties should be restricted to making sure that radio and television broadcasts dont interfere with Air Traffic Control and Military frequencies. Regulating content should be none of their business. That fact that they do regulate content is, IMO, a flagrant violation of the first amendment. CBS, FOX, NBC, ABC- these are all privately owned networks. If the people that own these networks want to broadcast titties, they should be able to. The government has no business telling them what to do.

right on.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinemonoamine
umask 077(nonefor you)

Registered: 09/07/02
Posts: 3,095
Loc: Jacksonville,FL
Last seen: 11 years, 2 months
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: ]
    #2298493 - 02/03/04 08:10 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

Yeah,the FCC oversteps its bounds.I agree that they routinely violate the first amendment.


--------------------
People think that if you just say the word "hallucinations" it explains everything you want it to explain and eventually whatever it is you can't explain will just go away.It's just a word,it doesn't explain anything...
Douglas Adams


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleafoaf
CEO DBK?
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2298636 - 02/03/04 08:53 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

:laugh:


--------------------
All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineEkstaza
stranger thanmost
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/11/03
Posts: 4,317
Loc: Around the corner
Last seen: 10 days, 2 hours
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: Azmodeus]
    #2299204 - 02/04/04 01:21 AM (12 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

Azmodeus said:
"He was supposed to pull away the bustier and leave the red-lace bra."

I never saw it, but didn't she have a nipple covering on? why would she wear that under a bra... :confused:

anyway who cares?!...bfd... :rolleyes:




She was wearing what is known as a nipple shield which is a popular form of body piercing jewelry that consists of a barbell going through the nipple holding on a circular shield that covers the areola. It is very likely that she would have been wearing this jewelry for her own personal benefit and not as an intentional ornament to be seen by an audience.


--------------------
YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH ANY GIVEN DRUG ISN'T THE DEFINITIVE MEASURE OF THE DRUGS EFFECTS.


Edited by Ekstaza (02/04/04 01:27 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineLearyfan
It's the psychedelic movement!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 29,755
Loc: High pride!
Last seen: 6 hours, 21 minutes
Re: FCC investigates Janet's titty [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2299212 - 02/04/04 01:24 AM (12 years, 9 months ago)

The human body, how disgusting.

Now back to wanton violence.





--------------------
--------------------------------


Mp3 of the month: The Loose Enz - The Black Door



Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* FCC looking for vulgar language SeussA 689 9 07/12/06 05:12 PM
by RosettaStoned
* FCC Raises maximum fine for indecency daussaulit 421 3 02/27/05 08:18 PM
by Phred
* KERRY SUPPORTS FCC INDECENCY CRACKDOWN
( 1 2 all )
luvdemshrooms 1,270 31 06/05/04 06:43 AM
by luvdemshrooms
* F*ck the FCC.... Innvertigo 756 11 03/26/04 08:27 AM
by muhurgle
* Lousiana Democratic Rep. William Jefferson [Representative A] Under Investigation DiploidM 1,082 10 05/24/06 12:59 PM
by gregorio
* The whole media/FCC thing
( 1 2 3 all )
rommstein2001 2,892 58 06/03/03 01:29 AM
by rommstein2001
* Future of the FCC? Gijith 269 1 12/05/04 03:39 PM
by GabbaDj
* FCC Rule changes repeal vote passes Senate! GernBlanston 427 4 09/17/03 02:45 AM
by DoctorJ

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
1,539 topic views. 0 members, 0 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Kratom Eye
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.052 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 14 queries.