Home | Community | Message Board


Everything Mushrooms
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Invisibleluvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 33,712
Loc: Lost In Space
The man is an embarrassment to the word conservative.
    #2266506 - 01/23/04 06:58 PM (12 years, 10 months ago)

Bush to propose spending freeze


By Joseph Curl
THE WASHINGTON TIMES



President Bush will propose an increase of less than 1 percent for federal programs not related to defense or homeland security, effectively freezing discretionary spending in the next budget, after coming under fire from conservatives to control runaway spending.
But the president will propose increasing governmentwide homeland security funding by 9.7 percent in the fiscal 2005 budget, and the military budget is expected to increase by a small amount.
"This is going to be an austere budget," White House spokesman Trent Duffy said of the budget that Mr. Bush will send to Congress on Feb. 2.
The less-than-1 percent growth will be the smallest since Mr. Bush took office in 2001 ? and the lowest since his father, President Bush, proposed his fiscal 1993 budget.
"But we must spend what is necessary to win the war on terror, protect the American people at home and to restore economic growth. And because of these life-and-death priorities, the rest of government spending must be restrained," Mr. Duffy said.
Some fiscal conservatives, who sharply criticized the president and congressional Republicans this week for spending like "drunken sailors," said the proposal leaked yesterday is a step in the right direction so long as Mr. Bush follows through.
Brian Riedl, a budget analyst at the Heritage Foundation, said the proposal is "definitely a good start."
"The key question is whether the White House will back up this proposal with a veto threat, because last year the president proposed a 4 percent increase and, with the passage of the omnibus spending bill, he's about to sign a 9 percent increase," he said.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Tennessee Republican, told the U.S. Conference of Mayors yesterday that the 1 percent limit "is tight. Why? Because we have to reduce this deficit."
Some programs, including education initiatives, will rise by more than 1 percent, and others will be cut by an offsetting amount, Mr. Duffy said.
"It's safe to assume that there will be some proposals for streamlining some programs and to refocus spending on programs that actually work," he said.
For example, the president's budget blueprint will boost counterterrorism funding through the Justice Department to $2.6 billion, a 19 percent increase over 2004. The money will increase the number of FBI agents investigating terrorism and will bring overall FBI funding to $5.1 billion in fiscal 2005, a 60 percent increase over 2001 levels, the White House said.
Some other programs therefore will have to be trimmed substantially to make up for the high expenditure on counterterrorism.
In his State of the Union speech on Tuesday, Mr. Bush vowed to restrain spending in the next fiscal year.
"In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent," he said.
He said such an austere budget would "require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years."
The deficit is expected to top $500 billion this year.
Spending under Mr. Bush has been coming down drastically, Mr. Duffy said.
"In Bill Clinton's last year, fiscal year 2001, the growth rate in this category was 15 percent."
Mr. Bush trimmed spending growth in the non-homeland security, nondefense category, to 6 percent, then to 5 percent, and then, in the omnibus bill passed yesterday, to 4 percent.
Critics, however, say the bill just passed by Congress would increase discretionary spending ? federal outlays on programs not including automatic payments such as Social Security and Medicare ? by about 9 percent. In the two previous years, they say growth was 13 percent and 12 percent, respectively.
Although Mr. Bush proposed far less spending, critics say, Congress upped the amount, and Mr. Bush, who has not yet wielded his veto pen once, did nothing to stop it.
The president actually began making decisions for the budget in early December, long before the recent grumbling by Republicans, Mr. Duffy said, and thus is not responding to GOP complaints.
Conservative critics say Mr. Bush, in fact, has overseen a nearly 25 percent surge in spending over the past three years ? the fastest pace since the mid-1960s, when President Lyndon Johnson passed his "Great Society" programs while fighting the Vietnam War.
National leaders of six conservative organizations this week broke with the Republican majorities in the House and Senate and criticized Mr. Bush as well for overspending.
"The Republican Congress is spending at twice the rate as under Bill Clinton, and President Bush has yet to issue a single veto," said Paul M. Weyrich, national chairman of Coalitions for America. "I complained about profligate spending during the Clinton years but never thought I'd have to do so with a Republican in the White House and Republicans controlling the Congress."
Paul Beckner, president of Citizens for a Sound Economy, said excessive spending could come back to haunt Mr. Bush this election year.
"If the president doesn't take a stand on this, there's a real chance the Republicans' voter base will not be enthusiastic about turning out in November, no matter who the Democrats nominate," he said.
Democrats blamed Mr. Bush's tax cuts for undercutting spending on domestic programs.
"His proposals lack fiscal discipline. There are consequences for his reckless tax cuts," said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat.
Said Rep. John M. Spratt Jr. of South Carolina, the ranking Democrat on the House Budget Committee: "That won't have much of an impact on the deficit. Nondefense discretionary spending is almost frozen already."


Link


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleafoaf
CEO DBK?
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
Re: The man is an embarrassment to the word conservative. [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #2266582 - 01/23/04 07:23 PM (12 years, 10 months ago)

am I missing something?


--------------------
All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleluvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 33,712
Loc: Lost In Space
Re: The man is an embarrassment to the word conservative. [Re: afoaf]
    #2266590 - 01/23/04 07:26 PM (12 years, 10 months ago)

I forgot to add.....
He spends like a drunken liberal for 3 years and NOW he wants to limit spending?


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleafoaf
CEO DBK?
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
Re: The man is an embarrassment to the word conservative. [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #2266601 - 01/23/04 07:34 PM (12 years, 10 months ago)

<3


--------------------
All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblewhiterasta
Day careobserver
 User Gallery
Registered: 04/09/02
Posts: 1,780
Loc: Oregon
Re: The man is an embarrassment to the word conservative. [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #2268143 - 01/24/04 02:01 PM (12 years, 10 months ago)

Why this man is against Cannabis I'll never know. If anyone needs to count on short term memory loss by the american public it is him :lol:
WR :rasta:
:shake:


--------------------
To old for this place


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleTrueBrode
Stranger

Registered: 11/03/03
Posts: 287
Re: The man is an embarrassment to the word conservative. [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #2268177 - 01/24/04 02:20 PM (12 years, 10 months ago)

He's purposely trying to create a depression crisis. That way the Federal Government can institute national debit cards to "save" us from the crisis. They've wanted this for a long time.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Liberals suck. So do conservatives.
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
Anonymous 5,682 105 01/26/03 02:53 PM
by GoBlue!
* For your perusal...Bush speech to Conservative Pol. Action Conference
( 1 2 all )
blackegg 2,765 35 03/07/08 01:04 AM
by blackegg
* $2.57 Trillion Budget Ravus 1,860 19 05/02/11 10:33 AM
by Phred
* Federal Budget phi1618 269 0 02/11/05 11:13 PM
by phi1618
* House passes sweeping budget-cut bill lonestar2004 1,064 15 11/19/05 01:27 AM
by RandalFlagg
* Slashing the Budget? Solutarch 699 7 11/26/05 01:34 AM
by gregorio
* Conservatives Against a War with Iraq Evolving 557 3 03/12/03 02:27 AM
by luvdemshrooms
* Obama's fiscal stimulus phi1618 429 1 12/20/08 03:45 PM
by Seuss

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
717 topic views. 2 members, 0 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Gaiana.nl
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.053 seconds spending 0 seconds on 14 queries.