Home | Community | Message Board


Edabea
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >  [ show all ]
Invisibledaussaulit
Forgetful

Registered: 08/06/02
Posts: 2,894
Loc: Earth
Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays
    #2261637 - 01/22/04 01:56 AM (13 years, 8 months ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/14/politics/campaigns/14MARR.html?hp=&pagewanted=print&position=
Quote:

WASHINGTON, Jan. 13 ? Administration officials say they are planning an extensive election-year initiative to promote marriage, especially among low-income couples, and they are weighing whether President Bush should promote the plan next week in his State of the Union address.

For months, administration officials have worked with conservative groups on the proposal, which would provide at least $1.5 billion for training to help couples develop interpersonal skills that sustain "healthy marriages."

The officials said they believed that the measure was especially timely because they were facing pressure from conservatives eager to see the federal government defend traditional marriage, after a decision by the highest court in Massachusetts. The court ruled in November that gay couples had a right to marry under the state's Constitution.

"This is a way for the president to address the concerns of conservatives and to solidify his conservative base," a presidential adviser said.

Several conservative Christian advocacy groups are pressing Mr. Bush to go further and use the State of the Union address to champion a constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage. Leaders of these groups said they were confused by what they saw as the administration's hedging and hesitation concerning an amendment.

Administration officials said they did not know if Mr. Bush would mention the amendment, but they expressed confidence that his marriage promotion plan would please conservatives.

Ronald T. Haskins, a Republican who has previously worked on Capitol Hill and at the White House under Mr. Bush, said, "A lot of conservatives are very pleased with the healthy marriage initiative."

The proposal is the type of relatively inexpensive but politically potent initiative that appeals to White House officials at a time when they are squeezed by growing federal budget deficits.

It also plays to Mr. Bush's desire to be viewed as a "compassionate conservative," an image he sought to cultivate in his 2000 campaign. This year, administration officials said, Mr. Bush will probably visit programs trying to raise marriage rates in poor neighborhoods.

"The president loves to do that sort of thing in the inner city with black churches, and he's very good at it," a White House aide said.

In the last few years, some liberals have also expressed interest in marriage-education programs. They say a growing body of statistical evidence suggests that children fare best, financially and emotionally, in married two-parent families.

The president's proposal may not be enough, though, for some conservative groups that are pushing for a more emphatic statement from him opposing gay marriage.

"We have a hard time understanding why the reserve," said Glenn T. Stanton, a policy analyst at Focus on the Family, a conservative Christian organization. "You see him inching in the right direction. But the question for us is, why this inching? Why not just get there?"

The Rev. Louis P. Sheldon, chairman of a national group called the Traditional Values Coalition, has started an e-mail campaign urging Mr. Bush to push for an amendment opposing the legal recognition of same-sex marriage.

Other groups, like the Southern Baptist Convention and Focus on the Family, are pushing more quietly for the same thing, through contacts with White House officials, especially Karl Rove, the president's chief political aide, who has taken a personal interest in maintaining contacts with evangelical groups.

In an interview with ABC News last month, Mr. Bush was asked if he would support a constitutional amendment against gay marriage and gay civil unions.

"If necessary," he said, "I will support a constitutional amendment which would honor marriage between a man and a woman, codify that, and will ? the position of this administration is that whatever legal arrangements people want to make, they're allowed to make, so long as it's embraced by the state, or does start at the state level."

Asked to cite the circumstances in which a constitutional amendment might be needed, Trent Duffy, a White House spokesman, said on Tuesday, "That is a decision the president has to make in due time."

The House of Representatives has approved a proposal to promote marriage as part of a bill to reauthorize the 1996 welfare law, but the bill is bogged down in the Senate.

Without waiting for Congress to act, the administration has retained consultants to help state and local government agencies, community organizations and religious groups develop marriage-promotion programs.

Wade F. Horn, the assistant secretary of health and human services for children and families, said: "Marriage programs do work. On average, children raised by their own parents in healthy, stable married families enjoy better physical and mental health and are less likely to be poor."

Prof. Linda J. Waite, a demographer and sociologist at the University of Chicago, compiled an abundance of evidence to support such assertions in the book "The Case for Marriage" (Doubleday, 2000). Ms. Waite, a former president of the Population Association of America, said she was a liberal Democrat, but not active in politics.

Some women's groups like the NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund oppose government programs that promote marriage. "Such programs intrude on personal privacy, may ignore the risk of domestic violence and may coerce women to marry," said Timothy J. Casey, a lawyer at the fund.

Administration officials said their goal was "healthy marriage," not marriage for its own sake.

"We know this is a sensitive area," Dr. Horn said. "We don't want to come in with a heavy hand. All services will be voluntary. We want to help couples, especially low-income couples, manage conflict in healthy ways. We know how to teach problem-solving, negotiation and listening skills. This initiative will not force anyone to get or stay married. The last thing we'd want is to increase the rate of domestic violence against women."

Under the president's proposal, federal money could be used for specific activities like advertising campaigns to publicize the value of marriage, instruction in marriage skills and mentoring programs that use married couples as role models.

Federal officials said they favored premarital education programs that focus on high school students; young adults interested in marriage; engaged couples; and unmarried couples at the moment of a child's birth, when the parents are thought to have the greatest commitment to each other.

Alan M. Hershey, a senior fellow at Mathematica Policy Research in Princeton, N.J., said his company had a $19.8 million federal contract to measure the effectiveness of such programs for unwed parents. Already, Mr. Hershey said, he is providing technical assistance to marriage-education projects in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, New Mexico and Texas.

A major purpose, he said, is to help people "communicate about money, sex, child-raising and other difficult issues that come up in their relationships."

Dr. Horn said that federal money for marriage promotion would be available only to heterosexual couples. As a federal official, he said, he is bound by a 1996 statute, the Defense of Marriage Act, which defined marriage for any program established by Congress. The law states, "The word `marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife."

But Dr. Horn said: "I don't have any problem with the government providing support services to gay couples under other programs. If a gay couple had a child and they were poor, they might be eligible for food stamps or cash assistance."

Sheri E. Steisel, a policy analyst at the National Conference of State Legislatures, said, "The Bush administration has raised this issue to the national level, but state legislators of both parties are interested in offering marriage education and premarital counseling to low-income couples."




Also during bush's State of the Union Address he signalled his support for a constitutional amendment outlawing gay marriage, vowing to "defend the sanctity of marriage".


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibletimetravel
I'm going toMars!

Registered: 12/08/03
Posts: 163
Loc: Holland
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: daussaulit]
    #2261730 - 01/22/04 02:35 AM (13 years, 8 months ago)

<<This year, administration officials said, Mr. Bush will probably visit programs trying to raise marriage rates in poor neighborhoods.

"The president loves to do that sort of thing in the inner city with black churches, and he's very good at it," a White House aide said.>>>

I guess I won't be able to see him since I'll have to be in the free speach zone when he comes to the hood.
peace


--------------------
Everything in this post happened 7 years ago. If you do not feel good get a hobby like r/c airplane flying.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleluvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,234
Loc: Lost In Space
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: daussaulit]
    #2262022 - 01/22/04 05:07 AM (13 years, 8 months ago)

What an incredibly foolish waste of money.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleAnnapurna1
liberal pussy
Female User Gallery
Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,646
Loc: innsmouth..MA
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: daussaulit]
    #2262537 - 01/22/04 12:32 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

its easy to see an ulterior motive here in appealing to disenfranchised white males...but given how feminist power-tripping..and the labour surplus it creates..accounts for such a huge chunk of the corporate power base..no neocon would ever really be serious about promoting heterosexual marriage...after all..why do you think the currently male-dominated corporate media is so happy to publish rubbish like helen fisher..or produce SUV commercials that end with "threaten men in a whole new way" (in effect marketing feminism more than the product)??...

as women..we would be wise to give bush exactly what he says he wants..and see how well the neoconmen do with their cheap labour supply gone and the power-crazed feminists out of the picture...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleInnvertigo
Vote Libertarian!!
Male

Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 16,296
Loc: Crackerville, Michigan U...
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays *DELETED* [Re: Annapurna1]
    #2262566 - 01/22/04 12:57 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

its easy to see an ulterior motive here in appealing to disenfranchised white males...




HOW?


--------------------

America....FUCK YEAH!!!

Words of Wisdom: Individual Rights BEFORE Collective Rights

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson


Edited by Innvertigo (01/22/04 01:48 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleInnvertigo
Vote Libertarian!!
Male

Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 16,296
Loc: Crackerville, Michigan U...
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: daussaulit]
    #2262580 - 01/22/04 01:01 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

it's bad enough Bush is alienating his base with his Liberal-esque spending but is this really necessary? C'mon, i can think of a million other uses with that money that will affect this country in a positive manner...this is fucking stupid.


--------------------

America....FUCK YEAH!!!

Words of Wisdom: Individual Rights BEFORE Collective Rights

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleAnnapurna1
liberal pussy
Female User Gallery
Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,646
Loc: innsmouth..MA
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: Innvertigo]
    #2262602 - 01/22/04 01:14 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

Innvertigo said:
Quote:

no neocon would ever really be serious about heterosexual marriage...after all..why do you think the currently male-dominated corporate media so happy to publish rubbish like helen fisher..or produce SUV commercials that end with "threaten men in a whole new way" (in effect marketing feminism more than the product)??...




yes sir, we have ourselves a man hater...that explains your anger. :thumbup:




as is often typical of conservatives..you didnt read the second paragraph of my post...i dont hate men at all..quite the opposite (you seem to forget..im a lamian :smile:)..i was merely trying to point out how feminist prejudice..and the labour competition it creates..are propping up the far right..and one possible solution...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineAzmodeus
Seeker

Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 3,392
Loc: Lotus Land!! B.C.
Last seen: 12 years, 9 months
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays *DELETED* [Re: Innvertigo]
    #2262614 - 01/22/04 01:19 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Inny says:
"yes sir, we have ourselves a man hater..."

hell, did you see her avatar?! :crazy: :wink:


--------------------
"Know your Body - Know your Mind - Know your Substance - Know your Source.

Lest we forget. "


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleInnvertigo
Vote Libertarian!!
Male

Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 16,296
Loc: Crackerville, Michigan U...
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays *DELETED* [Re: Azmodeus]
    #2262621 - 01/22/04 01:24 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Actually i misunderstood her post, that's why i changed it...but it could be true.

but i want to know how hetro males can be disenfranchised (i hate that word)?


--------------------

America....FUCK YEAH!!!

Words of Wisdom: Individual Rights BEFORE Collective Rights

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEvolving
Resident Cynic

Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: daussaulit]
    #2262630 - 01/22/04 01:28 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

It is my understanding that the number one point of contention in mariages these days is FINANCIAL. When my kids grow up and get married the intense financial burden of George Bush's profligate spending is going to cause financial hardship which will strain their marriages. So as a gift of 'compassion,' this asshole will saddle the country with an ADDITIONAL $1.5 billion of debt (on top of all his other spending) so they can be helped with their marriage problems?

George Bush must go.


--------------------
To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.'  Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence.  Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains.  Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleAnnapurna1
liberal pussy
Female User Gallery
Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,646
Loc: innsmouth..MA
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: Evolving]
    #2262676 - 01/22/04 01:46 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

most of those financial problems are the direct result of husbands and wives competing against each other in the job market...without that competition..employers couldnt cut wages so quickly (and then use the loot to invest in further increases in power)...feminist bigotry also helps the far right in other ways..as witness helen fisher's vulgar genetic determinism..which is also used to justify racism and class structures...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleInnvertigo
Vote Libertarian!!
Male

Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 16,296
Loc: Crackerville, Michigan U...
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: Annapurna1]
    #2262678 - 01/22/04 01:47 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Actually i misunderstood what you wrote, that's why i edited my post. It didn't read very good which is why i misunderstood. my bad.


--------------------

America....FUCK YEAH!!!

Words of Wisdom: Individual Rights BEFORE Collective Rights

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson


Edited by Innvertigo (01/22/04 01:49 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleAnnapurna1
liberal pussy
Female User Gallery
Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,646
Loc: innsmouth..MA
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays *DELETED* [Re: Innvertigo]
    #2262698 - 01/22/04 01:59 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

Innvertigo said:
Quote:

its easy to see an ulterior motive here in appealing to disenfranchised white males...




HOW?




like this...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleInnvertigo
Vote Libertarian!!
Male

Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 16,296
Loc: Crackerville, Michigan U...
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays *DELETED* [Re: Annapurna1]
    #2262717 - 01/22/04 02:12 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

ha....you're not really serious are you?  I think it has to to a little less then apealing to white men (some blacks hate gays as well, i know it's shocking :shocked:) and more towards his religious beliefs...i thought that was obvious.


--------------------

America....FUCK YEAH!!!

Words of Wisdom: Individual Rights BEFORE Collective Rights

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEdame
gone

Registered: 01/14/03
Posts: 1,270
Loc: outta here
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: daussaulit]
    #2262721 - 01/22/04 02:13 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

In other news today, McDonalds have announced their largest ever giveaway promotion. They will be distributing $1.5 billion in free coupons to married (hetero) couples. "What better way to keep your marriage 'healthy' than to share a delicious (not scientifically proven to increase risk of obesity*) Big Mac meal with fries and a milkshake!" A McDonalds spokesperson said today.

* According to William Steiger, special assistant for international affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services.

Seriously though, doesn't the Constitution start "We the people of the United States"? How does a constitutional amendment outlawing gay marriage represent all of the people, and not just heterosexual married ones?


--------------------
The above is an extract from my fictional novel, "The random postings of Edame".
:tongue:

In the beginning was the word. And man could not handle the word, and the hearing of the word, and he asked God to take away his ears so that he might live in peace without having to hear words which might upset his equinamity or corrupt the unblemished purity of his conscience.

And God, hearing this desperate plea from His creation, wrinkled His mighty brow for a moment and then leaned down toward man, beckoning that he should come close so as to hear all that was about to be revealed to him.

"Fuck you," He whispered, and frowned upon the pathetic supplicant before retreating to His heavens.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleDoctorJ
Stranger
 Arcade Champion: Frogger

Registered: 06/30/03
Posts: 8,451
Loc: space
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: daussaulit]
    #2262898 - 01/22/04 03:38 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

I do believe republicans are sticking up for their own interests on this one.

more marriages means more families.

more familes means more "family values"

more familiy values means more brainwashed republicans spawning from America's heartland.

Republians win elections because they encourage massive breeding in their followers. Thats also how they get money, from brainwashed consumers.

Seriously, why would republicans or the captains of industry have an interest fostering the creation of liberal gay budhhists who dont want children or SUVs, or McDonalds?

tolerance of alternative culture does not fit in to their political or economic agendas.


--------------------
peace, pot, and microdot!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleInnvertigo
Vote Libertarian!!
Male

Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 16,296
Loc: Crackerville, Michigan U...
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2262915 - 01/22/04 03:47 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

more familes means more "family values"




do you actually believe that? There are tons of families out there that have absolutly no family values.

...and what's wrong with encouraging families to have values? Stay together, love your wife, kids, dogs, etc.

Quote:

more familiy values means more brainwashed republicans spawning from America's heartland




so liberals have NO family values?

Quote:

Republians win elections because they encourage massive breeding in their followers. Thats also how they get money, from brainwashed consumers.




this is quite rediculous.


I can't believe some of the conspiracy theories that come out of this forum, it's absolutly beyond crazy and bordering on just plain looniness.


--------------------

America....FUCK YEAH!!!

Words of Wisdom: Individual Rights BEFORE Collective Rights

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleDoctorJ
Stranger
 Arcade Champion: Frogger

Registered: 06/30/03
Posts: 8,451
Loc: space
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: Innvertigo]
    #2262933 - 01/22/04 03:53 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

its not a conspiracy when its plain as day.

republicans figured out a long time ago that in order to control a republic, you must have the bigger population on your side. thats why they've always pandered to people who breed incessantly. Thats why they are giving tax breaks to people who have kids. (how republican is that, BTW?)


--------------------
peace, pot, and microdot!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEvolving
Resident Cynic

Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2262950 - 01/22/04 03:58 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Democraps love to give free money to people who have kids and don't even pay taxes! They've always pandered to people who breed incessantly with no motivation to take responibility for their own actions.


--------------------
To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.'  Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence.  Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains.  Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleInnvertigo
Vote Libertarian!!
Male

Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 16,296
Loc: Crackerville, Michigan U...
Re: Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Marriage, no gays [Re: DoctorJ]
    #2262986 - 01/22/04 04:20 PM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

republicans figured out a long time ago that in order to control a republic, you must have the bigger population on your side.




so what happens if that population turns into a bunch of libbies? Is there a secret potion out there to make sure that they stay conservatives?

Quote:

thats why they've always pandered to people who breed incessantly.




Does that include the Welfare woman with 5 kids? I'm really having a hard time seeing where you're getting this information. What's to guarantee that these kids you speak of will be "loyal" to the conservatives...you were a kid once and didn't fall prey to this "trap".

Quote:

Thats why they are giving tax breaks to people who have kids. (how republican is that, BTW?)




So that's what your basing your whole "conspiracy" on? A tax break for those that have kids? Maybe, just maybe they want to let families have an easier time raising kids. Any tax break the govt gives is a good thing as long as the spending decreases.


--------------------

America....FUCK YEAH!!!

Words of Wisdom: Individual Rights BEFORE Collective Rights

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >  [ show all ]

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Bush Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Before Becoming President RonoS 1,307 12 09/29/03 03:00 PM
by Rono
* Had Bush planned this all along? Learyfan 532 2 03/26/03 10:10 AM
by pattern
* Bush plan to paint US planes in UN colours Alex213 1,358 13 02/03/06 04:15 PM
by nakors_junk_bag
* Bush PLANS on controlling Iraq and its resources... GabbaDj 369 2 02/13/03 05:40 AM
by Xlea321
* Once again BUSH is a DUMBASS RoachMan 952 18 09/27/07 06:46 PM
by wilshire
* Something Rather Ironic In An Article On Gay Marriage Twirling 247 0 07/09/04 05:45 PM
by Twirling
* New US Nuclear Plan. 7 Countries Named Targets. Ellis Dee 1,319 17 03/13/02 01:06 AM
by Jammer
* Bush sneaks through more tax cuts for the rich during war
( 1 2 all )
EchoVortex 2,972 39 03/26/03 11:09 PM
by luvdemshrooms

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
4,188 topic views. 2 members, 2 guests and 2 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Myco Supply
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2017 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.034 seconds spending 0.002 seconds on 18 queries.