|
FlyOnTheWall
Stranger


Registered: 06/14/15
Posts: 1,274
Last seen: 6 years, 19 days
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: burgerbrain]
#22496357 - 11/08/15 03:53 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
burgerbrain said:
Making claims that people won't be arrested is very naïve.
It's really not. It's actually pretty simple how it all works.
Quote:
burgerbrain said:
Again you'll find your fellow Obowma supporters on attackwatch.com or mediamatters.org
I've never heard of those websites, and I am not a liberal.
It doesn't matter to me whether a person is a democrat or republican. I just enjoy pointing out how stupid people are. I have done that pretty effectively here, so my work is done.
Both parties are bullshit.
|
burgerbrain
Freedom Lover



Registered: 09/18/15
Posts: 962
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: FlyOnTheWall]
#22496383 - 11/08/15 04:00 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
FlyOnTheWall said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said:
Making claims that people won't be arrested is very naïve.
It's really not. It's actually pretty simple how it all works.
Quote:
burgerbrain said:
Again you'll find your fellow Obowma supporters on attackwatch.com or mediamatters.org
I've never heard of those websites, and I am not a liberal.
It doesn't matter to me whether a person is a democrat or republican. I just enjoy pointing out how stupid people are. I have done that pretty effectively here, so my work is done.
Both parties are bullshit.
It's simple how the liberal mind works; the Statute of Limitations is not simple.
Yes you pointed out how stupid you are, Obowmavoter. Your work is done.
Of course you know about attackwatch: you're performing an attackwatch function in this thread: "Obowma being criticized? Attack the racist!!!!!"
Now run along and worship Obowelmovement some more, libtard.
Edited by burgerbrain (11/08/15 04:06 PM)
|
FlyOnTheWall
Stranger


Registered: 06/14/15
Posts: 1,274
Last seen: 6 years, 19 days
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: burgerbrain]
#22496419 - 11/08/15 04:07 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
burgerbrain said: Of course you know about attackwatch, you're performing an attackwatch function in this thread: "Obowma being criticized? Attack the racist!!!!!"
You know an awful lot about this attackwatch site...
I'd keep that kind of talk to a minimum if I were you.
People might start to get suspicious about whose side you are really on...
edit: Oh god, why did you tell me about this place?? You should've warned me...the web design is atrocious...I feel like I need to gouge out my eyes and purge my brain...
|
burgerbrain
Freedom Lover



Registered: 09/18/15
Posts: 962
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: FlyOnTheWall]
#22496439 - 11/08/15 04:10 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
FlyOnTheWall said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said: Of course you know about attackwatch, you're performing an attackwatch function in this thread: "Obowma being criticized? Attack the racist!!!!!"
You know an awful lot about this attackwatch site...
I'd keep that kind of talk to a minimum if I were you.
People might start to get suspicious about whose side you are really on...
Obviously you're a liberal from attackwatch.com- the only explanation for this defend-Obowelmovement-no-matter-what attitude. Go back to your troll hole, Obowmavoter.
Hehe, attackwatch.com is an Obowma site- do you think I'm an Obowmavoter like you are? Hilarious
Hey, lib, next time you should try to answer the questions instead of ad-hominem;
"Why do hypocritical retards like Obowelmovement get to control the lives of 300 million people? (when it comes to cocaine)"
|
FlyOnTheWall
Stranger


Registered: 06/14/15
Posts: 1,274
Last seen: 6 years, 19 days
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: burgerbrain]
#22496485 - 11/08/15 04:21 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
burgerbrain said:
Obviously you're a liberal from attackwatch.com- the only explanation for this defend-Obowelmovement-no-matter-what attitude. Go back to your troll hole, Obowmavoter.
Hehe, attackwatch.com is an Obowma site- do you think I'm an Obowmavoter like you are? Hilarious
Politics aside, I am offended that you think I would ever venture into a website with a homepage that looks like that. I'm lucky I was able to close the window before the layout and color scheme was permanently burned into my mind.
Quote:
the lives of 300 million people?
Don't you mean "300,000 million"?
|
burgerbrain
Freedom Lover



Registered: 09/18/15
Posts: 962
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: FlyOnTheWall]
#22496518 - 11/08/15 04:26 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
FlyOnTheWall said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said:
Obviously you're a liberal from attackwatch.com- the only explanation for this defend-Obowelmovement-no-matter-what attitude. Go back to your troll hole, Obowmavoter.
Hehe, attackwatch.com is an Obowma site- do you think I'm an Obowmavoter like you are? Hilarious
Hey, lib, next time you should try to answer the questions instead of ad-hominem;
"Why do hypocritical retards like Obowelmovement get to control the lives of 300 million people? (when it comes to cocaine)"
Politics aside, I am offended that you think I would ever venture into a website with a homepage that looks like that. I'm lucky I was able to close the window before the layout and color scheme was permanently burned into my mind.
Quote:
the lives of 300 million people?
Don't you mean "300,000 million"? 
Hehe, you just can't resist the ad-hominem attack. The last resort of a defeated, mentally bankrupt, libtard.
Go get back to worshipping Obowelmovement the messiah, lib. You obviously can't debate with adults.
|
Arctic W. Fox

Registered: 09/23/14
Posts: 1,357
Last seen: 5 years, 2 months
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: burgerbrain]
#22496524 - 11/08/15 04:27 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
burgerbrain said: I encourage you to take a good look at your life, liberal, and reflect on your votes for Obowelmovement.
I personally don't vote. And after taking a good look at my life, liberal, I just want to make sure I'm never whatever you are. Where did you hear the word "Obowelmovement", parrot?
Quote:
burdbrain said: Obviously you're not a DEA agent so why are you making claims that "people won't be arrested"?
Obviously, neither are you. You're also not a lawyer, cop, educated, or even have a single clue about any of this. Making claims that others should be arrested because you were arrested just makes you look more like a tear-filled baby.
Quote:
turdbrain said: Making claims that people won't be arrested is very naïve.
You're just upset because you were stupid enough to get caught, and you wish everyone else was as stupid as you. Well, most of us have a loooooong way to go to get down to your IQ level, little boy.
Quote:
burdbrain said: Again you'll find your fellow Obowma supporters on attackwatch.com or mediamatters.org
I can tell you're a pennyjuice.com supporter and your homepage is Uglytub.com - I'm not judging you.

Quote:
burgerbrain said: You'll keep defending Obowelmovement no matter what, so have a nice day, liberal. Cya
You'll keep defending teacher pay cuts no matter what, so have a crappy day, retard. B'bye.
|
burgerbrain
Freedom Lover



Registered: 09/18/15
Posts: 962
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: Arctic W. Fox]
#22496552 - 11/08/15 04:33 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Arctic W. Fox said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said: I encourage you to take a good look at your life, liberal, and reflect on your votes for Obowelmovement.
I personally don't vote. And after taking a good look at my life, liberal, I just want to make sure I'm never whatever you are. Where did you hear the word "Obowelmovement", parrot?
Quote:
burdbrain said: Obviously you're not a DEA agent so why are you making claims that "people won't be arrested"?
Obviously, neither are you. You're also not a lawyer, cop, educated, or even have a single clue about any of this. Making claims that others should be arrested because you were arrested just makes you look more like a tear-filled baby.
Quote:
turdbrain said: Making claims that people won't be arrested is very naïve.
You're just upset because you were stupid enough to get caught, and you wish everyone else was as stupid as you. Well, most of us have a loooooong way to go to get down to your IQ level, little boy.
Quote:
burdbrain said: Again you'll find your fellow Obowma supporters on attackwatch.com or mediamatters.org
I can tell you're a pennyjuice.com supporter and your homepage is Uglytub.com - I'm not judging you.

Quote:
burgerbrain said: You'll keep defending Obowelmovement no matter what, so have a nice day, liberal. Cya
You'll keep defending teacher pay cuts no matter what, so have a crappy day, retard. B'bye.

Doesn't matter where the word "Obowelmovement" came from, it's an accurate description.
Yes cocaine use and cocaine is obviously illegal, so what's your point again?
What are those sites? Some sick libtard shit that you visit often?
I am smarter than you, so what are your statements saying about yourself?
|
FlyOnTheWall
Stranger


Registered: 06/14/15
Posts: 1,274
Last seen: 6 years, 19 days
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: burgerbrain]
#22496582 - 11/08/15 04:38 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
burgerbrain said: you just can't resist the ad-hominem attack
Have you made a single post in this thread that has not been an ad-hominem attack?
Do you even really understand what a logical fallacy is?
Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate
Quote:
Argumentum ad hominem (argument directed at the person). This is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather than the idea itself. The most obvious example of this fallacy is when one debater maligns the character of another debater (e.g, "The members of the opposition are a couple of fascists!"), but this is actually not that common. A more typical manifestation of argumentum ad hominem is attacking a source of information -- for example, responding to a quotation from Richard Nixon on the subject of free trade with China by saying, "We all know Nixon was a liar and a cheat, so why should we believe anything he says?" Argumentum ad hominem also occurs when someone's arguments are discounted merely because they stand to benefit from the policy they advocate -- such as Bill Gates arguing against antitrust, rich people arguing for lower taxes, white people arguing against affirmative action, minorities arguing for affirmative action, etc. In all of these cases, the relevant question is not who makes the argument, but whether the argument is valid.
|
FlyOnTheWall
Stranger


Registered: 06/14/15
Posts: 1,274
Last seen: 6 years, 19 days
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: FlyOnTheWall]
#22496636 - 11/08/15 04:48 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|

You will notice that name-calling (your main debate tactic) is at the bottom there.
It's even below ad-hominem. Have you learned enough for one day, or do you want to keep going?
|
burgerbrain
Freedom Lover



Registered: 09/18/15
Posts: 962
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: FlyOnTheWall]
#22496637 - 11/08/15 04:48 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
FlyOnTheWall said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said: you just can't resist the ad-hominem attack
Have you made a single post in this thread that has not been an ad-hominem attack?
Do you even really understand what a logical fallacy is?
Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate
Quote:
Argumentum ad hominem (argument directed at the person). This is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather than the idea itself. The most obvious example of this fallacy is when one debater maligns the character of another debater (e.g, "The members of the opposition are a couple of fascists!"), but this is actually not that common. A more typical manifestation of argumentum ad hominem is attacking a source of information -- for example, responding to a quotation from Richard Nixon on the subject of free trade with China by saying, "We all know Nixon was a liar and a cheat, so why should we believe anything he says?" Argumentum ad hominem also occurs when someone's arguments are discounted merely because they stand to benefit from the policy they advocate -- such as Bill Gates arguing against antitrust, rich people arguing for lower taxes, white people arguing against affirmative action, minorities arguing for affirmative action, etc. In all of these cases, the relevant question is not who makes the argument, but whether the argument is valid.
Derp derp. I asked 2 questions in my OP and all you libtards have this ad-hominem shit:
Quote:
FlyOnTheWall said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said: Why do hypocritical retards like Obowelmovement get to control the lives of 300,000 million people?


Numbers, how do they work?

|
burgerbrain
Freedom Lover



Registered: 09/18/15
Posts: 962
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: FlyOnTheWall]
#22496643 - 11/08/15 04:49 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
FlyOnTheWall said:

You will notice that name-calling (your main debate tactic) is at the bottom there.
It's even below ad-hominem. Have you learned enough for one day, or do you want to keep going?
I'm done educating you, lib. We all know you people have nothing so you ad-hominem. I'm glad you can admit to your logical fallacies.
|
FlyOnTheWall
Stranger


Registered: 06/14/15
Posts: 1,274
Last seen: 6 years, 19 days
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: burgerbrain]
#22496652 - 11/08/15 04:51 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
You said there are 300,000 million people in the US in your very first post.
From the link I gave you:
Quote:
It is always bad form to use the fallacy of argumentum ad hominem. But there are some cases when it is not really a fallacy, such as when one needs to evaluate the truth of factual statements (as opposed to lines of argument or statements of value) made by interested parties.
There are not 300,000 million people in the US. You were wrong. I was pointing out that you were wrong. That is not a fallacy, and that is not debateable.
|
burgerbrain
Freedom Lover



Registered: 09/18/15
Posts: 962
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: FlyOnTheWall]
#22496681 - 11/08/15 04:56 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
FlyOnTheWall said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said: you just can't resist the ad-hominem attack
Have you made a single post in this thread that has not been an ad-hominem attack?
Do you even really understand what a logical fallacy is?
Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate
Quote:
Argumentum ad hominem (argument directed at the person). This is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather than the idea itself. The most obvious example of this fallacy is when one debater maligns the character of another debater (e.g, "The members of the opposition are a couple of fascists!"), but this is actually not that common. A more typical manifestation of argumentum ad hominem is attacking a source of information -- for example, responding to a quotation from Richard Nixon on the subject of free trade with China by saying, "We all know Nixon was a liar and a cheat, so why should we believe anything he says?" Argumentum ad hominem also occurs when someone's arguments are discounted merely because they stand to benefit from the policy they advocate -- such as Bill Gates arguing against antitrust, rich people arguing for lower taxes, white people arguing against affirmative action, minorities arguing for affirmative action, etc. In all of these cases, the relevant question is not who makes the argument, but whether the argument is valid.
Derp derp. I asked 2 questions in my OP and all you libtards have this ad-hominem shit:
Quote:
FlyOnTheWall said: You said there are 300,000 million people in the US in your very first post.
From the link I gave you:
Quote:
It is always bad form to use the fallacy of argumentum ad hominem. But there are some cases when it is not really a fallacy, such as when one needs to evaluate the truth of factual statements (as opposed to lines of argument or statements of value) made by interested parties.
There are not 300,000 million people in the US. You were wrong. I was pointing out that you were wrong. That is not a fallacy, and that is not debateable.
And you continue your illogic.
Libtards focus on misprints rather than debate. Morons.
You didn't even answer the 1st question: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke but when I do it, it's illegal?
So you post something about "Statute of Limitations with exceptions" - which is not an argument, nor an answer to the question. But it is an assumption that Obowma has not done coke recently, so you're wrong again per usual.
|
ballsalsa
Universally Loathed and Reviled



Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,836
Loc: Foreign Lands
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: burgerbrain]
#22496710 - 11/08/15 05:00 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
burgerbrain said: I guess it's only legal for him and his monkey friends

so we finally get to the crux of the matter.
--------------------
Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here
|
burgerbrain
Freedom Lover



Registered: 09/18/15
Posts: 962
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: ballsalsa]
#22496736 - 11/08/15 05:05 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ballsalsa said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said: I guess it's only legal for him and his monkey friends

so we finally get to the crux of the matter.
Aaah another Obowma defender from attackwatch.com to the rescue!
|
FlyOnTheWall
Stranger


Registered: 06/14/15
Posts: 1,274
Last seen: 6 years, 19 days
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: burgerbrain]
#22496743 - 11/08/15 05:06 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
burgerbrain said: You didn't even answer the 1st question: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke but when I do it, it's illegal?
So you post something about "Statute of Limitations with exceptions" - which is not an argument, nor an answer to the question.

You are just embarrassing yourself now.
Quote:
But it is an assumption that Obowma has not done coke recently, so you're wrong again per usual.
It doesn't work like that. I wouldn't expect you to understand, though.
Edited by FlyOnTheWall (11/09/15 11:16 PM)
|
ballsalsa
Universally Loathed and Reviled



Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,836
Loc: Foreign Lands
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: burgerbrain]
#22496772 - 11/08/15 05:10 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
burgerbrain said:
Quote:
ballsalsa said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said: I guess it's only legal for him and his monkey friends

so we finally get to the crux of the matter.
Aaah another Obowma defender from attackwatch.com to the rescue!
never been to attackwatch.com, but i can assure you that no attacks are necessary. you've shown your true colors all on your own.
smart guy.
--------------------
Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here
|
airclay
Morbid and Wrong




Registered: 05/13/11
Posts: 2,788
Loc: Texas
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: ballsalsa]
#22506406 - 11/10/15 06:15 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
-------------------- Give no fucks, take no orders, smash the prisons and the borders. Circle that A motherfucker!
|
airclay
Morbid and Wrong




Registered: 05/13/11
Posts: 2,788
Loc: Texas
|
Re: Why does the moron in Chief get to do coke [Re: ballsalsa]
#22506421 - 11/10/15 06:19 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ballsalsa said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said:
Quote:
ballsalsa said:
Quote:
burgerbrain said: I guess it's only legal for him and his monkey friends

so we finally get to the crux of the matter.
Aaah another Obowma defender from attackwatch.com to the rescue!
never been to attackwatch.com, but i can assure you that no attacks are necessary. you've shown your true colors all on your own.
smart guy.
these dudes legit don't really understand racism that's not outwardly expressed and how it implicates their unconscious bias against color.
-------------------- Give no fucks, take no orders, smash the prisons and the borders. Circle that A motherfucker!
Edited by airclay (11/10/15 06:20 PM)
|
|