|
CosmicFool
Psychoholic



Registered: 05/14/06
Posts: 9,581
Loc: 203
Last seen: 23 days, 21 minutes
|
self driving cars and Asimov's Laws
#22441104 - 10/27/15 05:18 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
http://www.iflscience.com/technology/should-self-driving-car-be-programmed-kill-its-passengers-greater-good-scenario
Picture the scene: You’re in a self-driving car and, after turning a corner, find that you are on course for an unavoidable collision with a group of 10 people in the road with walls on either side. Should the car swerve to the side into the wall, likely seriously injuring or killing you, its sole occupant, and saving the group? Or should it make every attempt to stop, knowing full well it will hit the group of people while keeping you safe?
--------------------
|
Herbologist
Grrratata


Registered: 05/09/10
Posts: 7,471
Loc: Casa Bonita
Last seen: 3 years, 1 month
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: CosmicFool]
#22441111 - 10/27/15 05:19 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Manual over ride and run them bitches over
-------------------- Shroomery Law: Don't piss off the leftist mods & their friends!
|
CosmicFool
Psychoholic



Registered: 05/14/06
Posts: 9,581
Loc: 203
Last seen: 23 days, 21 minutes
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: Herbologist]
#22441310 - 10/27/15 06:11 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I would think if there was enough time to recognize the situation and switch to manual there is probably enough time for the car to not kill you
--------------------
|
4HO-DMT


Registered: 01/11/11
Posts: 5,073
Loc: County Line Road
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: CosmicFool]
#22441372 - 10/27/15 06:26 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Interesting scenario. It gives rise to autonomous AI. It would be kind of scary to have the technology make the decision for you.
|
ReposadoXochipilli
Here, there, inbetween



Registered: 08/30/05
Posts: 7,501
Loc: Sand and sunshine
Last seen: 19 days, 18 hours
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: 4HO-DMT]
#22442023 - 10/27/15 08:40 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
im personally not ready for automated driving unless it was in an area where all motor vehicle were on the same deal. maybe nice for traffic jams and stuff?
--------------------
|
blackhawk
Newton's Law of Majesticity



Registered: 04/02/11
Posts: 8,465
Loc: Where Jimmies are Rustled
Last seen: 37 minutes, 41 seconds
|
|
I'm not driving a self-driving car. I love my car that I control. I wear the pants!
--------------------
|
trekie
Metal man



Registered: 05/11/09
Posts: 11,085
Loc: Larger cities
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: blackhawk]
#22442201 - 10/27/15 09:08 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
blackhawk said: I'm not driving a self-driving car. I love my car that I control. I wear the pants!
|
CosmicFool
Psychoholic



Registered: 05/14/06
Posts: 9,581
Loc: 203
Last seen: 23 days, 21 minutes
|
|
Quote:
ReposadoXochipilli said:
im personally not ready for automated driving unless it was in an area where all motor vehicle were on the same deal. maybe nice for traffic jams and stuff?
I think this will be a hurdle for sdc's how will all cars "be on the same deal" if people are afraid to be the first to change
--------------------
|
CosmicFool
Psychoholic



Registered: 05/14/06
Posts: 9,581
Loc: 203
Last seen: 23 days, 21 minutes
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: blackhawk]
#22443551 - 10/28/15 07:12 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
blackhawk said: I'm not driving a self-driving car. I love my car that I control. I wear the pants!
I think there will always be a market for manual cars just like there is a strong following of "classic cars"
--------------------
|
clock_of_omens
razzle them dazzle them


Registered: 04/10/14
Posts: 4,097
Last seen: 1 year, 1 month
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: CosmicFool]
#22443886 - 10/28/15 08:51 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
To answer the question, yeah it probably should. I just watched a Sam Harris interview yesterday where he was talking about cognitive dissonance in regards to highway deaths and collateral damage. 30,000 people die every year because of driving, but people don't care about that as much as other situations where far less people die. Anyway, he said that once it is proven that self driving cars bring the death toll down, one would be a moral monster if one insists on driving a manual car just for the enjoyment of driving.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: CosmicFool]
#22443901 - 10/28/15 08:54 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
CosmicFool said: http://www.iflscience.com/technology/should-self-driving-car-be-programmed-kill-its-passengers-greater-good-scenario
Picture the scene: You’re in a self-driving car and, after turning a corner, find that you are on course for an unavoidable collision with a group of 10 people in the road with walls on either side. Should the car swerve to the side into the wall, likely seriously injuring or killing you, its sole occupant, and saving the group? Or should it make every attempt to stop, knowing full well it will hit the group of people while keeping you safe?
|
Dest
Roller-Derby Coach


Registered: 06/14/09
Posts: 2,444
Last seen: 6 years, 5 months
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22446615 - 10/28/15 09:00 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Sounds like some kinda wacko suicide cult to me.
|
DTCharlieB
yum yum fish.


Registered: 08/31/07
Posts: 1,027
Loc: Yak attack
Last seen: 5 years, 8 months
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22446691 - 10/28/15 09:15 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
CosmicFool said: http://www.iflscience.com/technology/should-self-driving-car-be-programmed-kill-its-passengers-greater-good-scenario
Picture the scene: You’re in a self-driving car and, after turning a corner, find that you are on course for an unavoidable collision with a group of 10 people in the road with walls on either side. Should the car swerve to the side into the wall, likely seriously injuring or killing you, its sole occupant, and saving the group? Or should it make every attempt to stop, knowing full well it will hit the group of people while keeping you safe?

Haha wear the heck do you find these memes? Do you search for them when a topic arises or do you just remember them from somewhere?
-------------------- I like lasagna.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: DTCharlieB]
#22446731 - 10/28/15 09:23 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I made that one just for this thread
|
trekie
Metal man



Registered: 05/11/09
Posts: 11,085
Loc: Larger cities
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22448859 - 10/29/15 11:43 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
The meme generator is strong in this one
|
LeningradCowboy
Yes, my name is you?



Registered: 08/01/15
Posts: 1,962
Loc: Siperia underground
Last seen: 20 days, 9 hours
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: trekie]
#22449126 - 10/29/15 12:52 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
How good do you know the laws of robotics?
The first rule by itself prevents this kind of paradoxes.
-------------------- From tundra with love!
FREE HAMHEAD 2020!
|
CosmicFool
Psychoholic



Registered: 05/14/06
Posts: 9,581
Loc: 203
Last seen: 23 days, 21 minutes
|
|
Quote:
LeningradCowboy said: How good do you know the laws of robotics?
The first rule by itself prevents this kind of paradoxes.
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
this is exactly why the original question was posed moving will cause the deaths of humans and not moving will cause the deaths of humans but even Asimov often created exceptions to the rules showing that they are imperfect
the First Law may forbid a robot from functioning as a surgeon, as that act may cause damage to a human, however Asimov's stories eventually included robot surgeons ("The Bicentennial Man" being a notable example). When robots are sophisticated enough to weigh alternatives, a robot may be programmed to accept the necessity of inflicting damage during surgery in order to prevent the greater harm that would result if the surgery were not carried out, or was carried out by a more fallible human surgeon
--------------------
|
LeningradCowboy
Yes, my name is you?



Registered: 08/01/15
Posts: 1,962
Loc: Siperia underground
Last seen: 20 days, 9 hours
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: CosmicFool]
#22449601 - 10/29/15 03:15 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
CosmicFool said:
Quote:
LeningradCowboy said: How good do you know the laws of robotics?
The first rule by itself prevents this kind of paradoxes.
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
"Through inaction, allow human being to come to harm."
What I'm saying is that robot does not allow the scenario to happen
-------------------- From tundra with love!
FREE HAMHEAD 2020!
|
CosmicFool
Psychoholic



Registered: 05/14/06
Posts: 9,581
Loc: 203
Last seen: 23 days, 21 minutes
|
|
Quote:
LeningradCowboy said: "Through inaction, allow human being to come to harm."
What I'm saying is that robot does not allow the scenario to happen
in a perfect situation the robot would be able to identify and avoid this situation entirely but robotics/ai is in it's infancy and a long way from perfect if it processes the information too slow, it's sensors are inadequate, there is a bug/malfunction, or unusual conditions (rain, snow, ice, tornados, etc) than mistakes can happen
it's all a backup fail safe the plan b
not to mention the only way a robot will obey Asimov's law is if it's programed to
--------------------
|
LeningradCowboy
Yes, my name is you?



Registered: 08/01/15
Posts: 1,962
Loc: Siperia underground
Last seen: 20 days, 9 hours
|
Re: self driving cars and Asimov's Laws [Re: CosmicFool]
#22449775 - 10/29/15 04:03 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
this is exactly why the original question was posed
So I assume we are talking about Asimov's laws of robotics, right?
If that kind of thing would enyway happen. You would be alone in the calculations against ten possible victims.
-------------------- From tundra with love!
FREE HAMHEAD 2020!
Edited by LeningradCowboy (10/29/15 04:04 PM)
|
|