|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
flickedbic
Sojourner



Registered: 03/21/11
Posts: 4,673
Loc: Fractalic Fabric
Last seen: 10 hours, 2 minutes
|
|
Ibotenic acid minus CO2 = Muscimol
Dry heat does it; no boiling. About 190F is the temp that works best.
Soma Shamans are selling stuff; they hardly say anything on their site besides "buy". I think I watched their video once and thought it was ok... it appears their book is about interpreting the Amanita as the Soma mentioned in the Rig Veda.
In the Siberian tradition the mushrooms are dried.
I have had good times with fresh nibbles chewed well; but for larger doses fresh gets nauseating and sedating... really fogs everything up.
-------------------- Favorite entheogen experiences in descending order: 1)Combo of oral DMT + smoked Bufotenine 2)Amanita (urine drank twice) 3)Mushrooms > Achuma 16"+cid(still need higher dose Achuma)> Cid (still need high dose) 4)Morning Glory-HBWR (+cumin, cinnamon aldehyde adducts) > Methyl chavicol (need more activators) 5)Salvia (need to try quid)
All readable matter in the above post is ficticious... any similarities to real life are purely coincidental. Blessing.
|
PsychedelicGinge
Cheeser



Registered: 11/06/13
Posts: 707
Last seen: 6 years, 10 months
|
|
Quote:
Peyote Road said:
Quote:
PsychedelicGinge said: LSD has always offered the most pure focused trip for me which I enjoy. With mushrooms I feel like I'm on a constant sidetrack without having much control but on LSD it feels like I know exactly what I want to do. I haven't been to a show on mushies before but with LSD it is just so remarkable if I like the band. LSD is definitely my favorite.
LOl I know what you mean about the mushrooms and getting side tracked.
The reason I prefer mushrooms over LSD is because I just find them so much more mysterious and interesting, as well as giving me a better body high and shorter come down.
The body high definitely feels better to me on mushrooms than LSD. I can easily say that but I'm also in love with the body high I get from L too. And yeah for me to not feel exhausted the next day I need to get at least 10 hours of sleep but I usually do less because I do them where the next day has something awesome happening.
-------------------- Do not let psychedelics allow you to think lower of people who haven't done them or don't plan on doing them because "they don't know the truth". Let your enlightenment acknowledge that everyone is equal and that no one is inferior. This mentality goes against what they are meant for. By the way, everything typed on this account is completely fictional and all for the purpose of entertainment.
|
Ando Banko
Everlasting Peace


Registered: 03/21/13
Posts: 717
Loc: Septentrio
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
|
|
I am more experienced with mushrooms. I prefer them over LSD. I believe the benefits of mushrooms more and the time lasting of them are for me. Haven't tried mescaline
-------------------- The smallest amount of love inside you is stronger than all of the evil in the Universe.
|
WChef


Registered: 10/27/14
Posts: 191
|
|
Quote:
flickedbic said: For single substances Amanita; I picked them in Northern California.
It is comforting and enjoyable in smaller doses.
But can swiftly propel you out of this realm, in the higher.
It keeps the profane from desecrating the palace; because only with respectful firing/baking does the sickening guardian Ibotenic acid transmute (decarboxylate) into the golden conveyance Muscimol - spiritual nitro-fuel when it's not bogged down by Ibotenic acid.
5 s recycled twice kicked my ass(stronger than any eighth of cubes); 'tho I loved it.
Online orders of it never really did much for me.
Regular shrooms are a close second, then LSD.
Things may shift when I finally harvest my high dose of Achuma cactus.
Achuma is game changer. People seem so resistant to allowing this cactus a category of its own, instead just lumping it in with every other cactus that produces mescaline. It's got a different mix of active alkaloids that create a different experience. People say mescaline is dreamy, calm, and sedating. Achuma is none of these.
|
impatientguy
Ganjalf a very mighty lab wizard



Registered: 11/26/14
Posts: 5,054
Loc: USA
|
Re: Ayahuasca [Re: WChef]
#22434065 - 10/25/15 10:41 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I like the dreamy calm sedating effects though they are like the main deal for me. Achuma doesn't sound to fun so far IMO
|
MagicalOrangutan
Curious Cat



Registered: 06/29/12
Posts: 3,538
|
Re: Ayahuasca [Re: WChef]
#22434067 - 10/25/15 10:41 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Achuma makes you simultaneously feel all good things of all kinds with nuclear intensity. In large enough amounts
-------------------- On the ground you lay, with your dogs you pray, at a neon hieroglyph sky you gaze Hugging your mind, praying to survive, feeling the love of the hieroglyphs in the sky We all need more love, and mainly less hate Hate is the blind that covers the heart's eye That makes the heart's eye cry Locked deep away in the skies of our minds It's all in the mind
|
MagicalOrangutan
Curious Cat



Registered: 06/29/12
Posts: 3,538
|
|
*all good feelings you've ever experienced simultaneously. Also the mind space is like falling fast deep into colorful mysterious lands of imagination.
-------------------- On the ground you lay, with your dogs you pray, at a neon hieroglyph sky you gaze Hugging your mind, praying to survive, feeling the love of the hieroglyphs in the sky We all need more love, and mainly less hate Hate is the blind that covers the heart's eye That makes the heart's eye cry Locked deep away in the skies of our minds It's all in the mind
|
impatientguy
Ganjalf a very mighty lab wizard



Registered: 11/26/14
Posts: 5,054
Loc: USA
|
|
Oh it's san pedro?! Haha nevermind that where I extract my mescaline from. I get a full spectrum extract that gets me going good.
Not much different than regular mescaline hcl though IMO
Edit:I don't trip very hard though on mescaline. I'll take about a half gram and just start to get visuals. It mostly just gets me super high.
Edited by impatientguy (10/25/15 10:48 PM)
|
WChef


Registered: 10/27/14
Posts: 191
|
|
Achuma is T. bridgesii. It's also considered the go-to cactus for people buying them just for the psychedelic effect, because its one of the few species that doesn't show a ridiculously random range of alkaloid content.
I don't fuck with San Pedro these days. It's all PC and all too unreliable.
|
impatientguy
Ganjalf a very mighty lab wizard



Registered: 11/26/14
Posts: 5,054
Loc: USA
|
Re: Ayahuasca [Re: WChef]
#22434241 - 10/25/15 11:35 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Google says achuma is san pedro.
This is what you find when you type in achuma in Google search: "Echinopsis pachanoi — known as San Pedro cactus — is a fast-growing columnar cactus native to the Andes Mountains at 2,000–3,000 m in altitude. Wikipedia"
San pedro is very reliable IMO Idk where you got the idea that san pedro is unreliable as a good mescaline source.
Here's some mescaline made from San pedro myself

In my experience on the shroomery and within my group of friends san pedro is considered the go to cactus for people buying cacti for a trip.
Edited by impatientguy (10/25/15 11:45 PM)
|
WChef


Registered: 10/27/14
Posts: 191
|
|
Quote:
impatientguy said: Google says achuma is san pedro.
This is what you find when you type in achuma in Google search: "Echinopsis pachanoi — known as San Pedro cactus — is a fast-growing columnar cactus native to the Andes Mountains at 2,000–3,000 m in altitude. Wikipedia"
San pedro is very reliable IMO Idk where you got the idea that san pedro is unreliable as a good mescaline source.
Here's some mescaline made from San pedro myself

In my experience on the shroomery and within my group of friends san pedro is considered the go to cactus for people buying cacti for a trip.
Achuma is bridgesii but granted the name is sometimes applied to other species. But I do believe the term Achuma most often refers to bridgesii. Wikipedia says Quote:
Echinopsis lageniformis (syn. Trichocereus bridgesii), Bolivian torch cactus, is a fast-growing columnar cactus from the high deserts of Bolivia. Among the indigenous populations of Bolivia, it is sometimes called achuma or wachuma, although these names are also applied to related species such as Echinopsis pachanoi which are also used for their psychedelic effects
And San Pedro is notoriously unreliable. Some specimens are of comparable strength to a good specimen of either Torches, some specimens require feet upon feet for an active dose, and in my book that's damn near inactive. Also I just googled Achuma and it doesn't say anything about San Pedro, so you must have some weird search settings.
Edited by WChef (10/26/15 12:20 AM)
|
impatientguy
Ganjalf a very mighty lab wizard



Registered: 11/26/14
Posts: 5,054
Loc: USA
|
Re: Ayahuasca [Re: WChef]
#22435630 - 10/26/15 11:40 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
WChef said:
Quote:
impatientguy said: Google says achuma is san pedro.
This is what you find when you type in achuma in Google search: "Echinopsis pachanoi — known as San Pedro cactus — is a fast-growing columnar cactus native to the Andes Mountains at 2,000–3,000 m in altitude. Wikipedia"
San pedro is very reliable IMO Idk where you got the idea that san pedro is unreliable as a good mescaline source.
Here's some mescaline made from San pedro myself

In my experience on the shroomery and within my group of friends san pedro is considered the go to cactus for people buying cacti for a trip.
Achuma is bridgesii but granted the name is sometimes applied to other species. But I do believe the term Achuma most often refers to bridgesii. Wikipedia says Quote:
Echinopsis lageniformis (syn. Trichocereus bridgesii), Bolivian torch cactus, is a fast-growing columnar cactus from the high deserts of Bolivia. Among the indigenous populations of Bolivia, it is sometimes called achuma or wachuma, although these names are also applied to related species such as Echinopsis pachanoi which are also used for their psychedelic effects
And San Pedro is notoriously unreliable. Some specimens are of comparable strength to a good specimen of either Torches, some specimens require feet upon feet for an active dose, and in my book that's damn near inactive. Also I just googled Achuma and it doesn't say anything about San Pedro, so you must have some weird search settings.
Lol San pedro isn't unreliable.
If you haven't been able to get good yeild it's because you suck at extractions.
San pedro rules and is cheap.
|
impatientguy
Ganjalf a very mighty lab wizard



Registered: 11/26/14
Posts: 5,054
Loc: USA
|
|
And you can say its unreliable all you want but without sources it's just random shit your saying on the internet.
I've done dozens of cacti extractions. San pedro is the way to go unless you have access to peyote.

San pedro for the win.
Edited by impatientguy (10/26/15 11:52 AM)
|
mushpunx
Fungus Punk



Registered: 04/20/14
Posts: 13,394
Last seen: 11 days, 13 hours
|
|
I like mushrooms myself. I enjoy growing them more than eating them at the mome nt, as a hobby they are awesome.
I dont have enough DMT experiences to call it a favorite but I do love that it is short in duration , you dont have to commit most of a day to it. You are fully back to yourself in an hour
--------------------
 Amateur Mycologists United AMU Q&A
|
WChef


Registered: 10/27/14
Posts: 191
|
|
Quote:
impatientguy said: And you can say its unreliable all you want but without sources it's just random shit your saying on the internet.
I've done dozens of cacti extractions. San pedro is the way to go unless you have access to peyote.

San pedro for the win.
https://www.erowid.org/plants/cacti/cacti_article1.shtml https://www.erowid.org/plants/cacti/cacti_sanpedro_potency_faq.shtml
Here's your sources.
Quote:
It is important to note that both T. pachanoi and T. peruvianus vary significantly in mescaline content from one specimen to the next, based on factors such as soil condition, altitude, amount of sun and age. Additionally, there is great confusion taxonomically concerning T. peruvianus. Most experts agree it's likely there are many distinct species being circulated as T. peruvianus.
Quote:
As you can see, pachanoi varies by 20X. This is not likely to be experimental error. H&B using consistent methodology came up with figures that nicely bracket all other citations.
I shouldn't have to provide and break down sources for you. This is common knowledge, you're just too stubborn to accept it because you personally have lucked out with pachanoi a few times.
Edited by WChef (10/26/15 12:43 PM)
|
impatientguy
Ganjalf a very mighty lab wizard



Registered: 11/26/14
Posts: 5,054
Loc: USA
|
Re: Ayahuasca [Re: WChef]
#22435882 - 10/26/15 12:40 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Lol that's what I thought. just because erowid says so doesn't mean shit.
Take it from sombody who extracts on a regular basis and has lots of experience. Your wrong.
I'm stubborn or lucked out because I get good yields? no I think you're stubborn because you refuse to accept the fact that San Pedro is just fine for source of mescaline. And cheap.
Your a fool.
And it's not lucky to get good yeilds about a dozen times. It's because san pedro rules.
|
WChef


Registered: 10/27/14
Posts: 191
|
|
Those Erowid articles are referencing actual scientific studies. I don't care what some guy thinks against actual scientific evidence. Typical ignorant response. "Well I haven't experienced that personally, so science must be wrong!"
|
impatientguy
Ganjalf a very mighty lab wizard



Registered: 11/26/14
Posts: 5,054
Loc: USA
|
Re: Ayahuasca [Re: WChef]
#22435908 - 10/26/15 12:49 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Old ass outdated scientific studies doesn't mean shit.
The best/cheapest source of mescaline is San Pedro cactus.
Your wrong. And I'm guessing you haven't ever even done any extractions, and therefor you have no real personal experience.
Do some extractions and then come talk to me.
Edited by impatientguy (10/26/15 12:51 PM)
|
WChef


Registered: 10/27/14
Posts: 191
|
|
Alright bro clearly you're not going to listen to reason nor evidence. So keep doing you and spreading misinformation. And I've done my fair share of extractions and pachanot never fails to disappoint.
|
moonzo
Getting Better



Registered: 06/04/14
Posts: 3,155
Loc: Kaneta
|
Re: Favorite Psychedelic and why? [Re: sheptownboi]
#22435980 - 10/26/15 01:04 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
1. LSD - Smooth, groovy vibes, insight, meditative.
2. DMT - mind blowing, conscious expansion
3. Mescaline - only did it once, it felt VERY good.
4. Shrooms - even though it's in last place, i still LOVE mushrooms. I like how they don't last as long and still provide the smoothest CEVS.
-------------------- "I don't make any sense, do not ever listen to me under any circumstance." <-- This is how I am viewed by a regular person in society "Were the aliens nice?" <-- How I hope to be treated on this forum Track record: http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=20394867&page=2&vc=1#20394867 Mescapsilosyergictryptamine
|
|