|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Sade]
#22416085 - 10/21/15 10:56 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sade said: End result bring your shotgun out to another militaries invasion. I'm sure you will do fine. In the meantime let's have the kids shoot up schools in the meantime. Even hunting you can use a bow and it takes more skill.
are liberals really so dumb as to believe that the US military would start shooting US citizens, keep in mind, gun owners are conservatives, the military is filled with conservatives. it's the libtard gun grabbers that have to worry about the military shooting them... remeber, the conservatives have all the guns, the liberals will be herded to concentration camps like sheep to slaughter
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Sade]
#22416092 - 10/21/15 10:59 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sade said:
Quote:
Dr.Wongburger said: It's all going in the opposite direction for liberals any ways . Constitutional Carry is a huge hit, the people of those places love it. It's just a matter of time. Just like marijuana legalization, the states that have it... they all love it and its just a matter of time until it spreads every where else!
What the fuck are you talking about. Homosexual marriage is nation wide. If I remember correctly, mainly republicans want weapons and hate homosexuals. Also with all the shootings in schools do you really think they will alow more people to own firearms?
why do all those shooting happen in places where homosexuals and liberals seem to be most populous... is it because liberals are self loathing homosexuals that want to destroy themselves and take a hundred of their kind with them? seems like a cult
|
rackem



Registered: 11/27/09
Posts: 14,024
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22416093 - 10/21/15 11:02 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
liberals have a pill for that.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: rackem]
#22416102 - 10/21/15 11:04 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
rackem said: liberals have a pill for that.
it's not a pill and it's somewhat bullet shaped
|
rackem



Registered: 11/27/09
Posts: 14,024
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22416106 - 10/21/15 11:05 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
ha!
anything to avoid reality.
|
Dr.Wongburger
Yes!!


Registered: 08/23/15
Posts: 1,308
Loc: Colorado, USA
Last seen: 6 years, 11 months
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22416109 - 10/21/15 11:05 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I seen some post's on social media saying the Holocaust happen because none of them had guns. They could not defend them selves. I will check up later.. I need to smoke...and shower. I just got off work.
The liberals would go to concentration camp's with smiles on their faces, "Trust thy Government!"
"we don't need to defend our selves from our own Government, lets just give them the all the guns and the power.. nah they wont hurt us!".
What would the Liberals do if some foreign nation invaded us?
Other nations know damn well better than attack us on our own soil because they will get shot up by Civilians to.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: rackem]
#22416135 - 10/21/15 11:13 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
rackem said: ha!
anything to avoid reality.
the reality is that they dont hate guns, they just hate the thought of someone that isnt in a position of power having guns, kinda strange when you consider that they also see those people as being a serious problem, maybe it's why koods wont tell us who will protect us when the guns are removed from our hands... maybe he wants everyone to be a victim
|
WileyWilly
Stranger
Registered: 10/19/15
Posts: 16
Last seen: 8 years, 3 months
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: JayZ Morgan]
#22419540 - 10/22/15 06:30 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
JayZ Morgan said: This whole gun talk is ridiculous because nobody wants to take away guns, if ,
This is a quote from Senator Dianne Feinstein "If I could've gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them--Mr. and Mrs. America turn 'em all in--I would have done it."
|
Atreyu
Never Ending


Registered: 03/18/14
Posts: 4,083
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22419913 - 10/22/15 07:50 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Sade said: End result bring your shotgun out to another militaries invasion. I'm sure you will do fine. In the meantime let's have the kids shoot up schools in the meantime. Even hunting you can use a bow and it takes more skill.
are liberals really so dumb as to believe that the US military would start shooting US citizens, keep in mind, gun owners are conservatives, the military is filled with conservatives. it's the libtard gun grabbers that have to worry about the military shooting them... remeber, the conservatives have all the guns, the liberals will be herded to concentration camps like sheep to slaughter
Yeh because this NEVER happened.
--------------------
つ ◕_◕ ༽つ N = R* • fp • ne • fl • fi • fc • L
|
Dr.Wongburger
Yes!!


Registered: 08/23/15
Posts: 1,308
Loc: Colorado, USA
Last seen: 6 years, 11 months
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Atreyu]
#22420214 - 10/22/15 08:42 PM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|

This advertisement was published in American Rifleman, November 1940
"In 1940, 75 years ago, the British stood alone against Hitler’s war machine. From May 27 through June 4, the British evacuated more than 300,000 troops from France in the face of the advancing German Blitzkreig. It was called the “Miracle of Dunkirk," but while the soliders were able to fight another day, they left much of the equipment—especially arms—on the beach. The American Committee for the Defense of British Homes ran this notice in the November 1940 American Rifleman.
Due to policies of civilian disarmament, the British people were stripped of their guns by their own government policies, arms needed to defend themselves against potential Nazi invasion. Individual Americans responded to the call, but most of the guns were never returned."
The very Government that took their guns away had to run to America to ask for them back. Tell me, why should we take our guns away again?
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,057
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 6 minutes, 47 seconds
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: WileyWilly]
#22421909 - 10/23/15 08:34 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
WileyWilly said:
Quote:
JayZ Morgan said: This whole gun talk is ridiculous because nobody wants to take away guns, if ,
This is a quote from Senator Dianne Feinstein "If I could've gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them--Mr. and Mrs. America turn 'em all in--I would have done it."
She was talking about her bill to ban assault weapons, not all guns. She wanted an outright ban, but the bill was whittled down to a partial ban.
According to case law from the Supreme Court, bans on these types of weapons are perfectly constitutional. Scalia even specifically says a ban on m-16s would be legal.
2. Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,057
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 6 minutes, 47 seconds
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Dr.Wongburger]
#22421915 - 10/23/15 08:37 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Dr.Wongburger said:

This advertisement was published in American Rifleman, November 1940
"In 1940, 75 years ago, the British stood alone against Hitler’s war machine. From May 27 through June 4, the British evacuated more than 300,000 troops from France in the face of the advancing German Blitzkreig. It was called the “Miracle of Dunkirk," but while the soliders were able to fight another day, they left much of the equipment—especially arms—on the beach. The American Committee for the Defense of British Homes ran this notice in the November 1940 American Rifleman.
Due to policies of civilian disarmament, the British people were stripped of their guns by their own government policies, arms needed to defend themselves against potential Nazi invasion. Individual Americans responded to the call, but most of the guns were never returned."
The very Government that took their guns away had to run to America to ask for them back. Tell me, why should we take our guns away again?
This is why we have the 2nd amendment, so that citizens can repel foreign invasion. That is it's only purpose.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
myc_check1212
Through Brass


Registered: 05/18/09
Posts: 4,545
Loc: Rio Lobo
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22421956 - 10/23/15 08:52 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Sade said: End result bring your shotgun out to another militaries invasion. I'm sure you will do fine. In the meantime let's have the kids shoot up schools in the meantime. Even hunting you can use a bow and it takes more skill.
are liberals really so dumb as to believe that the US military would start shooting US citizens, keep in mind, gun owners are conservatives, the military is filled with conservatives. it's the libtard gun grabbers that have to worry about the military shooting them... remeber, the conservatives have all the guns, the liberals will be herded to concentration camps like sheep to slaughter
I have faith that the US military would refuse that order if given. I know I would, that is clearly an unlawful order.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: koods]
#22421968 - 10/23/15 08:55 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: This is why we have the 2nd amendment, so that citizens can repel foreign invasion. That is it's only purpose.
How is it you never tire of spouting such utter stupidity? Or are you just reduced to lying? Let's see what those who founded the country and wrote the document had to say on the subject...
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops." - Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787
"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of." - James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788
"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788
"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them." - Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 1833
"What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty .... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins." - Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, I Annals of Congress 750, August 17, 1789
"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28
"If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28, January 10, 1788
"As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms." - Tench Coxe, Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789
I could go on but unless you're being deliberately obtuse, there's more than sufficient evidence available.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Atreyu]
#22421977 - 10/23/15 08:58 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Atreyu said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Sade said: End result bring your shotgun out to another militaries invasion. I'm sure you will do fine. In the meantime let's have the kids shoot up schools in the meantime. Even hunting you can use a bow and it takes more skill.
are liberals really so dumb as to believe that the US military would start shooting US citizens, keep in mind,gun owners are conservatives, the military is filled with conservatives. it's the libtard gun grabbers that have to worry about the military shooting them... remeber, the conservatives have all the guns , the liberals will be herded to concentration camps like sheep to slaughter
Yeh because this NEVER happened.
werent those liberals, liberal anti-war protesting, gun grabbing liberals? maybe you forgot that part of what I had said
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: koods]
#22421993 - 10/23/15 09:04 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Dr.Wongburger said:

This advertisement was published in American Rifleman, November 1940
"In 1940, 75 years ago, the British stood alone against Hitler’s war machine. From May 27 through June 4, the British evacuated more than 300,000 troops from France in the face of the advancing German Blitzkreig. It was called the “Miracle of Dunkirk," but while the soliders were able to fight another day, they left much of the equipment—especially arms—on the beach. The American Committee for the Defense of British Homes ran this notice in the November 1940 American Rifleman.
Due to policies of civilian disarmament, the British people were stripped of their guns by their own government policies, arms needed to defend themselves against potential Nazi invasion. Individual Americans responded to the call, but most of the guns were never returned."
The very Government that took their guns away had to run to America to ask for them back. Tell me, why should we take our guns away again?
This is why we have the 2nd amendment, so that citizens can repel foreign invasion. That is it's only purpose.
so you're saying now that the public needs to keep their guns, good to see you're a second amendment supporter even if you're wrong again
Quote:
Do you solemnly swear that you will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that you take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which you are about to enter: So help you God?
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 7 minutes, 40 seconds
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: koods]
#22422196 - 10/23/15 09:57 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Dr.Wongburger said:

This advertisement was published in American Rifleman, November 1940
"In 1940, 75 years ago, the British stood alone against Hitler’s war machine. From May 27 through June 4, the British evacuated more than 300,000 troops from France in the face of the advancing German Blitzkreig. It was called the “Miracle of Dunkirk," but while the soliders were able to fight another day, they left much of the equipment—especially arms—on the beach. The American Committee for the Defense of British Homes ran this notice in the November 1940 American Rifleman.
Due to policies of civilian disarmament, the British people were stripped of their guns by their own government policies, arms needed to defend themselves against potential Nazi invasion. Individual Americans responded to the call, but most of the guns were never returned."
The very Government that took their guns away had to run to America to ask for them back. Tell me, why should we take our guns away again?
This is why we have the 2nd amendment, so that citizens can repel foreign invasion. That is it's only purpose.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: qman]
#22422224 - 10/23/15 10:02 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
koods said: This is why we have the 2nd amendment, so that citizens can repel foreign invasion. That is it's only purpose.

He says so many stupid things that it's difficult to pick the most stupid. I'd say this is right up there.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: luvdemshrooms]
#22422294 - 10/23/15 10:16 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
luvdemshrooms said:
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
koods said: This is why we have the 2nd amendment, so that citizens can repel foreign invasion. That is it's only purpose.

He says so many stupid things that it's difficult to pick the most stupid. I'd say this is right up there.
no, in order to pick the most stupid all you have to do is look for this
Quote:
koods said:
anything he's posted is going to be the most stupid
I still dont have his dumb answer on who will protect the populace since we know he doesnt want cops on the streets and he doesnt want people to be able to defend themselves. who will start protecting us? these shining examples of the democratic party?
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Convince me why guns are bad for America [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22422315 - 10/23/15 10:20 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
luvdemshrooms said:
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
koods said: This is why we have the 2nd amendment, so that citizens can repel foreign invasion. That is it's only purpose.

He says so many stupid things that it's difficult to pick the most stupid. I'd say this is right up there.
no, in order to pick the most stupid all you have to do is look for this
Quote:
koods said:
anything he's posted is going to be the most stupid
I still dont have his dumb answer on who will protect the populace since we know he doesnt want cops on the streets and he doesnt want people to be able to defend themselves. who will start protecting us? these shining examples of the democratic party?
So we'll disagree on what the most stupid thing he said was and agree that he quite frequently says stupid things.
Compromise is a wonderful thing.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
|