|
spirit_shadow
Feature not a bug



Registered: 08/15/11
Posts: 25,674
Last seen: 1 hour, 55 minutes
|
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: koods]
#22422028 - 10/23/15 09:15 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Guns dont kill people. i just told it to go kill and its just ignoring me
-------------------- ERROR 418 IM A TEAPOT.....(this account is automated, all posts related to illegal activities or advice thereof are strictly from numerous online sites and are for informational purposes only)- Circa 2011 Ban lotto
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
|
Quote:
morrowasted said: I hope you have an accident with one of your guns, dude.
Wishing ill on others seems rather childish and inhuman.
Quote:
Both of you put together are dumber than my left pinky toe.
Ah. Insults. A sure sign of the failure to make your point.
Kudos though for showing what you're made of.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: koods]
#22422031 - 10/23/15 09:16 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: No, he's saying that gun nuts will use their guns to prevent any legally and constitutionally valid repeal of the second amendment. They don't give a shit about the constitution and the rule of law, they just want their damn guns.
so why hasnt the second amendment been repealed yet koodsie?
|
morrowasted
Worldwide Stepper



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 31,377
Loc: House of Mirrors
Last seen: 4 days, 17 hours
|
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: Prisoner#1] 1
#22422033 - 10/23/15 09:17 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
morrowasted said: You guys are seriously treating the fucking document like it is a Holy Book or something. What's the big deal?
when is the last time you prayed to god and god said "yes my son, I'll do as you wish", I bet that's never happened with you or anyone else, we're a nation of law, not a nation of religion, god doesnt answer our prayers so we have to have someone there to protect the citizens. now let me ask, do you trust the government to protect your right? we all know that government wouldnt ever send thugs in to kill unarmed civilians, never in the history of the world has there ever been an instance of some government official saying 'kill them, kill them all" when it came to people under their power so of course we know that the cops would never falsely arrest someone or that a government would impose it's views on it's people
so, if you want to change those first 10 amendment, then by all means, give it a shot but you may want to learn what 'inalienable' means and then you may want to learn just how fast all the other rights are gone once any of the first 10 are
so yeah, it's like a holy book only more accurate and truthful and holding far more power
You know what I trust? Science. Reason. Data. No, I don't trust dudes who wrote a document over 200 years ago.
|
makaveli8x8
Stranger

Registered: 02/28/06
Posts: 21,636
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
|
those dudes from 200 years ago read more books in a day than you've read in your entire life
--------------------
  We were sent to hell for eternity Ø h® We play on earth to pass the time Over-population the root of all Evil-brings the Elites Closer to the gates.
|
morrowasted
Worldwide Stepper



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 31,377
Loc: House of Mirrors
Last seen: 4 days, 17 hours
|
|
Quote:
makaveli8x8 said: those dudes from 200 years ago read more books in a day than you've read in your entire life
No. They didn't. And even if they did, the books they read were from the fucking 1700s and prior
|
morrowasted
Worldwide Stepper



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 31,377
Loc: House of Mirrors
Last seen: 4 days, 17 hours
|
|
Just because you don't read (which is obvious, since you can'ts spell or form coherent thoughts or complete sentences) doesn't mean I don't read.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
Quote:
morrowasted said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
morrowasted said: You guys are seriously treating the fucking document like it is a Holy Book or something. What's the big deal?
when is the last time you prayed to god and god said "yes my son, I'll do as you wish", I bet that's never happened with you or anyone else, we're a nation of law, not a nation of religion, god doesnt answer our prayers so we have to have someone there to protect the citizens. now let me ask, do you trust the government to protect your right? we all know that government wouldnt ever send thugs in to kill unarmed civilians, never in the history of the world has there ever been an instance of some government official saying 'kill them, kill them all" when it came to people under their power so of course we know that the cops would never falsely arrest someone or that a government would impose it's views on it's people
so, if you want to change those first 10 amendment, then by all means, give it a shot but you may want to learn what 'inalienable' means and then you may want to learn just how fast all the other rights are gone once any of the first 10 are
so yeah, it's like a holy book only more accurate and truthful and holding far more power
You know what I trust? Science. Reason. Data. No, I don't trust dudes who wrote a document over 200 years ago.
without that document do you think we'd have science, data or reasoning?
everyone in politics today panders to the evangelical majority
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
|
Quote:
morrowasted said: Just because you don't read (which is obvious, since you can'ts spell or form coherent thoughts or complete sentences) doesn't mean I don't read.
I think you read. It's just that you read stuff which tells you how to think and feel. You seem to read stuff which has a prohibition on independent thought.
That's a damn shame. Thinking and reasoning for ones self is wonderful.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
makaveli8x8
Stranger

Registered: 02/28/06
Posts: 21,636
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
|
but i told u, that you couldn't write my name correct first and you keep going around calling people stupid we should like totally call you some names now or talk about how small your pee pee is
--------------------
  We were sent to hell for eternity Ø h® We play on earth to pass the time Over-population the root of all Evil-brings the Elites Closer to the gates.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
Quote:
morrowasted said:
Quote:
makaveli8x8 said: those dudes from 200 years ago read more books in a day than you've read in your entire life
No. They didn't. And even if they did, the books they read were from the fucking 1700s and prior 
so the age of a book makes it nonsense, it seems that many of you liberals like to cite wisdom from the ancient greeks, I guess we can disregard everything written prior to this statement because it was all so 10 minutes ago
|
morrowasted
Worldwide Stepper



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 31,377
Loc: House of Mirrors
Last seen: 4 days, 17 hours
|
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: Prisoner#1] 1
#22422088 - 10/23/15 09:33 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
morrowasted said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
morrowasted said: You guys are seriously treating the fucking document like it is a Holy Book or something. What's the big deal?
when is the last time you prayed to god and god said "yes my son, I'll do as you wish", I bet that's never happened with you or anyone else, we're a nation of law, not a nation of religion, god doesnt answer our prayers so we have to have someone there to protect the citizens. now let me ask, do you trust the government to protect your right? we all know that government wouldnt ever send thugs in to kill unarmed civilians, never in the history of the world has there ever been an instance of some government official saying 'kill them, kill them all" when it came to people under their power so of course we know that the cops would never falsely arrest someone or that a government would impose it's views on it's people
so, if you want to change those first 10 amendment, then by all means, give it a shot but you may want to learn what 'inalienable' means and then you may want to learn just how fast all the other rights are gone once any of the first 10 are
so yeah, it's like a holy book only more accurate and truthful and holding far more power
You know what I trust? Science. Reason. Data. No, I don't trust dudes who wrote a document over 200 years ago.
without that document do you think we'd have science, data or reasoning?
everyone in politics today panders to the evangelical majority
It doesn't matter, dude. It was a GREAT document for its time. It served its time very well. But it's been a long time since it was written. It's time for an update.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
morrowasted said:
Quote:
makaveli8x8 said: those dudes from 200 years ago read more books in a day than you've read in your entire life
No. They didn't. And even if they did, the books they read were from the fucking 1700s and prior 
so the age of a book makes it nonsense, it seems that many of you liberals like to cite wisdom from the ancient greeks, I guess we can disregard everything written prior to this statement because it was all so 10 minutes ago
hey pris, the revolutionary war didnt happen because it's recorded in a book from the 18th century, slavery never happened because it was the 1800s
|
morrowasted
Worldwide Stepper



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 31,377
Loc: House of Mirrors
Last seen: 4 days, 17 hours
|
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: Prisoner#1] 1
#22422093 - 10/23/15 09:34 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
morrowasted said:
Quote:
makaveli8x8 said: those dudes from 200 years ago read more books in a day than you've read in your entire life
No. They didn't. And even if they did, the books they read were from the fucking 1700s and prior 
so the age of a book makes it nonsense, it seems that many of you liberals like to cite wisdom from the ancient greeks, I guess we can disregard everything written prior to this statement because it was all so 10 minutes ago
No, the age of a book determines its relevance to the present. Plato has some great things to say about how one can be ethical, you know, in the personal sense. He didn't write any dialogues about gun control.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
|
I'd like to read the test that morrow seems to use. How else can I know if I'm a liberal or a conservative?
I couldn't possibly be in the middle or know how I feel about an individual issue without someone telling me how to think.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
Quote:
morrowasted said: It doesn't matter, dude. It was a GREAT document for its time. It served its time very well. But it's been a long time since it was written. It's time for an update.
you're right... we need to reinstitute slavery
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
|
Quote:
morrowasted said: It's time for an update.
There have been quite a few updates.
Want more? Give it a 'shot'.
Quote:
It was a GREAT document for its time.
Still is.
Quote:
It served its time very well.
Still does.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
Edited by luvdemshrooms (10/23/15 09:37 AM)
|
morrowasted
Worldwide Stepper



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 31,377
Loc: House of Mirrors
Last seen: 4 days, 17 hours
|
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: Prisoner#1] 1
#22422104 - 10/23/15 09:37 AM (8 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
morrowasted said: It doesn't matter, dude. It was a GREAT document for its time. It served its time very well. But it's been a long time since it was written. It's time for an update.
you're right... we need to reinstitute slavery
Hey, sure, everything should be up for re-evaluation. If reason determines that slavery is a good idea, then we should re-institute it. I doubt that reason would determine that.
|
morrowasted
Worldwide Stepper



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 31,377
Loc: House of Mirrors
Last seen: 4 days, 17 hours
|
|
Quote:
luvdemshrooms said:
Quote:
morrowasted said: It's time for an update.
There have been quite a few updates.
Want more? Give it a 'shot'.
Quote:
It was a GREAT document for its time.
Still is.
Quote:
It served its time very well.
Still does.
Tell that to the families of the 21 people who died died from gunshots yesterday.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
Quote:
morrowasted said: No, the age of a book determines its relevance to the present. Plato has some great things to say about how one can be ethical, you know, in the personal sense. He didn't write any dialogues about gun control.
I guess we can forget about gravity, it was nonsense written in the 1700
dont even mention pluto, he was way before the 1700s
|
|