Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | Next > | Last >
OfflineHerbologist
Grrratata
I'm a teapot

Registered: 05/09/10
Posts: 7,471
Loc: Casa Bonita Flag
Last seen: 3 years, 1 month
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: nuentoter]
    #22417483 - 10/22/15 10:05 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

The percentage of gun owners who just want to look cool are the idiots.


Carry concealed, if you're smart.  Nothing wrong with open carry, but I feel it puts you on the radar and I for one like to fly under the radar.

A nice IWB Kydex solves that problem :awesome:


--------------------
Shroomery Law:  Don't piss off the leftist mods & their friends! :banhamster:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleluvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: Herbologist]
    #22418968 - 10/22/15 04:12 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)



--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMachiavelliavore
Vermiculite Hater
 User Gallery


Registered: 12/08/14
Posts: 3,038
Loc: The Sporetorn States
Last seen: 3 months, 20 days
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: luvdemshrooms] * 1
    #22419014 - 10/22/15 04:26 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Herbologist said:
The percentage of gun owners who just want to look cool are the idiots.


Carry concealed, if you're smart.  Nothing wrong with open carry, but I feel it puts you on the radar and I for one like to fly under the radar.

A nice IWB Kydex solves that problem :awesome:





Open carry would be okay if it was utilitarian, but most of the people that open carry seem to be trolling for attention so they can give a "you can't take my guns away" speach to a police officer and post it on youtube or some shit.  Running around with AK's and tactical vests, or carrying a glock 17 and 3 mags.  That basically says:
a) you're carrying a weapon for offense not defense
b) you think black people and zombies are the same
c) you're a black guy and you need to stop the police from murdering you

If they were carrying a small 9mm or something it would be much easier to look at them and think "this dude isn't a nut"

Quote:

luvdemshrooms said:
:uhoh: koodsie's head is gonna explode...

NRA
58% favorable
35% unfavorable

:lmafo:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/186284/despite-criticism-nra-enjoys-majority-support.aspx?g_source=Politics&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles

:fuckyeahdance:




Man, I support carry and support the 2nd and still think the NRA is crazy.  That's quite suprising.


--------------------


I spawned some popcorn casings and had double-overlay cause I didn't put enough hydrogen peroxide in my automated aquarium mister.  I only got one mushroom so I cut off the head part where the seeds fall from and put it in a jar of LC and sprayed it all over a tin of PF cakes I made with gravel, cardboard, and bisquick in my microwave.  I think it will be good cause B+ is so potent.
Triggered yet?

Only a square would say "a cube is a cube."


No, this does not look right...


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHerbologist
Grrratata
I'm a teapot

Registered: 05/09/10
Posts: 7,471
Loc: Casa Bonita Flag
Last seen: 3 years, 1 month
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #22419017 - 10/22/15 04:26 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Add me to that 58% favorable, im joining soon :cookiemonster:


--------------------
Shroomery Law:  Don't piss off the leftist mods & their friends! :banhamster:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleluvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: Machiavelliavore]
    #22419037 - 10/22/15 04:31 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Machiavelliavore said:
b) you think black people and zombies are the same




:dudewtf:


Quote:

Man, I support carry and support the 2nd and still think the NRA is crazy.  That's quite suprising.




Nah, the media blows peoples stance on firearms way out of proportion.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHerbologist
Grrratata
I'm a teapot

Registered: 05/09/10
Posts: 7,471
Loc: Casa Bonita Flag
Last seen: 3 years, 1 month
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: Machiavelliavore]
    #22419046 - 10/22/15 04:32 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Machiavelliavore said:
Quote:

Herbologist said:
The percentage of gun owners who just want to look cool are the idiots.


Carry concealed, if you're smart.  Nothing wrong with open carry, but I feel it puts you on the radar and I for one like to fly under the radar.

A nice IWB Kydex solves that problem :awesome:





Open carry would be okay if it was utilitarian, but most of the people that open carry seem to be trolling for attention so they can give a "you can't take my guns away" speach to a police officer and post it on youtube or some shit.  Running around with AK's and tactical vests, or carrying a glock 17 and 3 mags.  That basically says:
a) you're carrying a weapon for offense not defense
b) you think black people and zombies are the same
c) you're a black guy and you need to stop the police from murdering you

If they were carrying a small 9mm or something it would be much easier to look at them and think "this dude isn't a nut"

Quote:

luvdemshrooms said:
:uhoh: koodsie's head is gonna explode...

NRA
58% favorable
35% unfavorable

:lmafo:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/186284/despite-criticism-nra-enjoys-majority-support.aspx?g_source=Politics&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles

:fuckyeahdance:




Man, I support carry and support the 2nd and still think the NRA is crazy.  That's quite suprising.





I've never seen anyone walking around with a shouldered Ar or Ak or something along the lines. Just looking for trouble.  Those people piss me off.  They don't scare me or make me uncomfortable they just  make responsible gun owners look bad and represent a very very small percentile of us responsible gun owners.

If I ever do see someone open carrying it usually is a typical hand gun, 1911 for example.

My state is very lax on gun laws so I suspect most gun owners here conceal carry since I rarely see open carry.


--------------------
Shroomery Law:  Don't piss off the leftist mods & their friends! :banhamster:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMachiavelliavore
Vermiculite Hater
 User Gallery


Registered: 12/08/14
Posts: 3,038
Loc: The Sporetorn States
Last seen: 3 months, 20 days
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: Herbologist]
    #22419068 - 10/22/15 04:38 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

My golden sunny homeworld banned open carry, probably because of tools swinging around AR's.  Not really sure what the status of concealed carry is here.  When I have money to make it a relevant question I'll research it.


--------------------


I spawned some popcorn casings and had double-overlay cause I didn't put enough hydrogen peroxide in my automated aquarium mister.  I only got one mushroom so I cut off the head part where the seeds fall from and put it in a jar of LC and sprayed it all over a tin of PF cakes I made with gravel, cardboard, and bisquick in my microwave.  I think it will be good cause B+ is so potent.
Triggered yet?

Only a square would say "a cube is a cube."


No, this does not look right...


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: Machiavelliavore] * 2
    #22419078 - 10/22/15 04:39 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

a civilian doesn't require an assault rifle...unless they're going to the bank. that's allowed, right?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblestuckinwonderland
Stranger
Male User Gallery


Registered: 11/22/12
Posts: 1,885
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: akira_akuma]
    #22419575 - 10/22/15 06:37 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Im pro guns they are kinda fun to target practice with, but mainly i have a couple incase someone trys to break in. Plus in the area i live in you gotta watch out for zombies (of the desperate for prescription drugs variety)


--------------------
Everything above here is a lie


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineWileyWilly
Stranger
Registered: 10/19/15
Posts: 16
Last seen: 8 years, 3 months
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: stuckinwonderland]
    #22419764 - 10/22/15 07:16 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

I want Open Carry in Florida for the sole purpose that if for some reason someone were to spot my concealed weapon (No one has-ever), I would not face legal trouble.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: WileyWilly]
    #22419774 - 10/22/15 07:19 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

do people in close-carry states have to wear long coats or something to conceal their weapons?

LOL all because it makes people feel like open-carry promotes a look of the wild west.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblestuckinwonderland
Stranger
Male User Gallery


Registered: 11/22/12
Posts: 1,885
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: akira_akuma]
    #22419841 - 10/22/15 07:36 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

I am shocked how many people conceal carry, i did it onece but even with a compact 9mm it was a pain in the ass, seems like everyone doing it must be using a subcompact or something


--------------------
Everything above here is a lie


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleAtreyu
Never Ending
 User Gallery

Registered: 03/18/14
Posts: 4,083
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: stuckinwonderland]
    #22419888 - 10/22/15 07:45 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

I use to be really into target practice as a kid but given the current climate of affairs I can't even get .22 lr.

Shit is getting way too expensive as well, I don't know how some people keep up with shooting regularly.

I can only imagine bullets are going to continue going up in price and being a rarity;

Looks like target practice will soon be a thing of the past.

It's pretty depressing actually.


--------------------


つ ◕_◕ ༽つ N = R* • fp • ne • fl • fi • fc • L 


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemorrowasted
Worldwide Stepper
Male User Gallery


Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 31,377
Loc: House of Mirrors
Last seen: 4 days, 20 hours
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: Atreyu] * 1
    #22419917 - 10/22/15 07:51 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

It is quite simple, to me. People should be allowed to have the guns that are appropriate to use for self-defense. AR-15s, Uzis and rocket launchers aren't necessary for self-defense.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleluvdemboomers
loner with a boner
Registered: 01/11/13
Posts: 5,054
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: morrowasted]
    #22420008 - 10/22/15 08:06 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

morrowasted said:
It is quite simple, to me. People should be allowed to have the guns that are appropriate to use for self-defense. AR-15s, Uzis and rocket launchers aren't necessary for self-defense.




An ar 15 carbine is one of the most practical self/home defense weapons. It fits the role better than any shotgun or hunting rifle.  Regulating what guns people can have based on what is "necessary" is straight up infringement, which the 2nd ammendment prohibits.

Why do you feel I should be forced to use a gun that is less practical in a potentially life or death situation?

Why do you think ar-15's should be banned?

Why do you feel it is okay to violate the constitution because you deem something protected by it as not "necessary"?


Edited by luvdemboomers (10/22/15 08:10 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemorrowasted
Worldwide Stepper
Male User Gallery


Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 31,377
Loc: House of Mirrors
Last seen: 4 days, 20 hours
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: luvdemboomers] * 1
    #22420034 - 10/22/15 08:10 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

luvdemboomers said:
Quote:

morrowasted said:
It is quite simple, to me. People should be allowed to have the guns that are appropriate to use for self-defense. AR-15s, Uzis and rocket launchers aren't necessary for self-defense.




An ar 15 carbine is one of the most practical self defense weapons. It fits the role better than any shotgun or hunting rifle.  Regulating what guns people can have based on what is "necessary" is straight up infringement.



No, it isn't. You can't put it in your pants, or in a holster, concealed. Therefore it is impractical. You can easily stop an attacker in public or at home with a pistol or a shotgun. If someone in public happens to have an automatic rifle, it's not like you're gonna be carrying your AR around with you anyway. A pistol will do. I don't care if it is infringement. Infringe the shit out of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution for all I care. The Constitution endorses slavery. Those documents are dated as fuck and we have every right to re-evaluate whether or not certain parts of them are still practical.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleluvdemboomers
loner with a boner
Registered: 01/11/13
Posts: 5,054
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: morrowasted]
    #22420051 - 10/22/15 08:13 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

morrowasted said:
Quote:

luvdemboomers said:
Quote:

morrowasted said:
It is quite simple, to me. People should be allowed to have the guns that are appropriate to use for self-defense. AR-15s, Uzis and rocket launchers aren't necessary for self-defense.




An ar 15 carbine is one of the most practical self defense weapons. It fits the role better than any shotgun or hunting rifle.  Regulating what guns people can have based on what is "necessary" is straight up infringement.



No, it isn't. You can't put it in your pants, or in a holster, concealed. Therefore it is impractical. You can easily shoot someone with a pistol or a shotgun. I don't care if it is infringement. Infringe the shit out of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution for all I care. The Constitution endorses slavery. Those documents are dated as fuck and we have every right to re-evaluate whether or not certain parts of them are still practical.




Generally to defend your home or land you don't need to be able to fit something in your pants.

Why do you think ar-15's are so evil? What about them warrants them being banned?


Edited by luvdemboomers (10/22/15 08:17 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemorrowasted
Worldwide Stepper
Male User Gallery


Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 31,377
Loc: House of Mirrors
Last seen: 4 days, 20 hours
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: luvdemboomers] * 1
    #22420067 - 10/22/15 08:16 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

No, but to defend your home a shotgun is perfectly suitable if you want something larger than a pistol. But a pistol will do just fine. What do you think is going to happen, someone is going to break into your head with their own AR15s blazing?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleluvdemboomers
loner with a boner
Registered: 01/11/13
Posts: 5,054
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: morrowasted]
    #22420090 - 10/22/15 08:21 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

morrowasted said:
No, but to defend your home a shotgun is perfectly suitable if you want something larger than a pistol. But a pistol will do just fine. What do you think is going to happen, someone is going to break into your head with their own AR15s blazing?




I assume you mean home?

I don't think anything is going to happen but it is not uncommon for home invasions to be commited by multiple armed people. Happened to a friend's neighbor actually.

Sure a pistol or shotgun is more than adequate in most cases, but I would rather not be told I can't choose a better fit weapon for the intended purpose because some ignorant liberal that knows jack shit about guns thinks the one I want is evil because it looks scary.

We might as well only let the police use shotguns and pistols... because well... anything more than that isn't neccessary, right?


Edited by luvdemboomers (10/22/15 08:24 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleluvdemboomers
loner with a boner
Registered: 01/11/13
Posts: 5,054
Re: The 2nd ammendment [Re: luvdemboomers]
    #22420127 - 10/22/15 08:29 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | Next > | Last >


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* U.S. government elite posses EARTHQUAKE machine?
( 1 2 3 4 ... 12 13 all )
c0sm0nautt 17,760 241 12/26/09 07:04 PM
by Cameron
* So many Earthquakes! Reno's going to collapse...
( 1 2 all )
Maverick 3,893 22 04/28/08 03:07 PM
by Maverick
* the coming of the 2nd depression TurnAround 2,100 19 03/27/08 12:31 PM
by misterdogman
* fuckin earthquake
( 1 2 all )
trscstghst 3,103 26 04/19/08 10:46 AM
by Mutatis Mutandis
* san francisco just got hit by a 5.6 mag Earthquake
( 1 2 all )
ZippoZM 4,959 39 10/31/07 03:28 PM
by notapillow
* Cali earthquake is a warning, cali is going down
( 1 2 all )
Irishdrunk 1,907 23 07/31/08 07:32 AM
by Seuss
* China Earthquake caused by HAARP weapon Wolfgang 1,018 12 07/17/08 05:10 PM
by g00ru
* .
( 1 2 all )
dr_gonz 2,927 34 05/13/10 11:22 PM
by Don King

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
17,211 topic views. 10 members, 65 guests and 52 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 15 queries.