|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,510
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Trump [Re: qman]
#23607703 - 09/03/16 11:29 AM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I think you might want to look up the word before you start making up your own definition.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Maroon
Stranger

Registered: 08/25/15
Posts: 1,897
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
|
Re: Trump [Re: Enlil]
#23607710 - 09/03/16 11:32 AM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Yeah look it up and while your at check out the conduct of the whores that hang out here for a meager living.
Peep da sig
-------------------- UNDENIABLE PROOF A MODERATOR (Enlil) USES FRAUDULENT POSTS TO SUPOORT HIS OPINIONS. https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/23596771#23596771 anyone can verify my original post in its unedited format. This proves the length the disinfo whores will go to defend pseudo theories. What quack jobs. Time to get out of moms basement. One must ask why they would be complicit in crimes against humanity? Is debt based money really worth whoring out your credibility for?
|
Crumist
Stranger


Registered: 11/02/13
Posts: 781
Last seen: 7 years, 1 month
|
Re: Trump [Re: qman]
#23607784 - 09/03/16 11:50 AM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
You were objecting to improving our immigration procedures and providing a path to citizenshipEDIT Quote:
It wouldn't. The best way to reduce illegal immigration is to make legal immigration easy.
, we weren't talking about the border.
A nation is defined by its monopoly on the legitimate use of violence within defined geographical borders. I don't see anything about requiring a monolithic white christian culture or keeping the short, poor, brown people out.
EDIT2: @maroon: ban hammer! ban hammer! ban hammer!
-------------------- 'I am all for resources being allocated to the widowed single mother of 3, lost husband over seas fighting for our country. I am for vets getting mental health access and resources following war. I am not for free money cause a woman can't close her legs or some chump with low testosterone no going to work cause "i'm sad."' -finalexplosion Nice knowin ya'll! https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/23904704/vc/1#23904704
Edited by Crumist (09/03/16 11:55 AM)
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
qman said: Yeah, your open borders for everyone doesn't fly with the US population, try again.
He just wants more criminals in the US, it's good for business
yeah, that's what he said.
Quote:
qman said: Borders and citizenship do define a nation. If you don't have borders you don't have a nation. 
yeah, that's what was said.
|
The Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 33,369
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 1 hour, 23 minutes
|
Re: Trump [Re: qman]
#23607822 - 09/03/16 11:59 AM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
The Ecstatic said: Project much?
Knock yourself out
Thanks for proving my point.
So you read all of that and then commented in 180 seconds?
You should lend some of that ability to your brethren.
--------------------
|
sweeper54



Registered: 11/07/12
Posts: 2,865
Last seen: 8 days, 20 hours
|
Re: Trump *DELETED* [Re: Enlil]
#23607985 - 09/03/16 12:58 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by sweeper54Reason for deletion: Working on it
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,510
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
Quote:
sweeper54 said: Ho come you never worry about the $6.2 Billion/year the government pays out in benefits to Walmart Workers.
Is that something I should worry about? I worry about the nearly $600 billion spent on the military.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
sweeper54



Registered: 11/07/12
Posts: 2,865
Last seen: 8 days, 20 hours
|
Re: Trump [Re: qman]
#23608001 - 09/03/16 01:02 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
The Ecstatic said:
Quote:
Peteyboy said: What about the wall would you like to discuss?
How is the US going to force Mexico to pay for it
How much will it cost us to build, maintain, and staff
How much will it stem illegal immigration and smuggling in general
Is it cost efficient
Most Americans don't give a fuck who pays for the wall, Trump said the wall would cost $12 billion, experts are calling for $15 to $25 billion, so be it.
"Is it cost efficient"
How come you never worried about the $130 billion PER YEAR illegals and their children cost US taxpayers? Deporting illegals and buying a wall is cheap relative to having them live in the US, the wall offers an excellent return on investment.
60% of the illegals fly in and overstay their visas. A wall no matter how 'Beautiful' will not stop them.
|
sweeper54



Registered: 11/07/12
Posts: 2,865
Last seen: 8 days, 20 hours
|
Re: Trump [Re: Enlil]
#23608006 - 09/03/16 01:05 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
And there's a lot more in Anti-terrorism
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,510
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
At least Walmart workers are providing a service. The military only serves to make us less safe and more hated.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
sweeper54



Registered: 11/07/12
Posts: 2,865
Last seen: 8 days, 20 hours
|
Re: Trump [Re: Enlil]
#23608431 - 09/03/16 03:38 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I use of the military by the government make us more hated.
|
Douglas Howard
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/15
Posts: 1,678
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
Quote:
sweeper54 said:
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
The Ecstatic said:
Quote:
Peteyboy said: What about the wall would you like to discuss?
How is the US going to force Mexico to pay for it
How much will it cost us to build, maintain, and staff
How much will it stem illegal immigration and smuggling in general
Is it cost efficient
Most Americans don't give a fuck who pays for the wall, Trump said the wall would cost $12 billion, experts are calling for $15 to $25 billion, so be it.
"Is it cost efficient"
How come you never worried about the $130 billion PER YEAR illegals and their children cost US taxpayers? Deporting illegals and buying a wall is cheap relative to having them live in the US, the wall offers an excellent return on investment.
60% of the illegals fly in and overstay their visas. A wall no matter how 'Beautiful' will not stop them.
I noticed that Trump had was referring to the criminal illegals, not the illegals that are over here on expired visa. But those illegals that has committed a crime while they are over here on an expired visa. But the ones that are here on a valid visa, the tourist, that has committed a crime, will be deported back to there country like any other tourist that has committed crime. Like if we goes to another country like France or Italy, when we committed a violent crime, our visa will be revoke and we are deported back at that moment. But those tourist that comes over here and commits a crime, that they are sent back. But some hides from the law and still work without a green card. But then there are some that committed a crime over here and were deported back, but comes back under a new name and commits another crime and goes back, but come again under another new name. Mexico has to keep better documents of there citizens. The way things look over there, that there documents says that there population is over a trillion, and three quarters of the people of the country has the same first and last name and lived over 200 years old. They are most likely actually taking up their parents name by holding onto their I.D. as if it were theirs. I remember that when I was young a kid, I had thought that every Mexican name were Danny Rodriguez because there were so many of them with that name. Back in the days, I had knew people that are born and raised here that had two or more social security numbers. But now, the government keeps track of who is born, but death is still a problem with the democrats voters. The same people has been still voting for the Democratic party ever since Andrew Jackson were alive.
|
ballsalsa
Universally Loathed and Reviled



Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,863
Loc: Foreign Lands
|
|
Quote:
hostileuniverse said:
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
The Ecstatic said:
Quote:
Peteyboy said: What about the wall would you like to discuss?
How is the US going to force Mexico to pay for it
How much will it cost us to build, maintain, and staff
How much will it stem illegal immigration and smuggling in general
Is it cost efficient
Most Americans don't give a fuck who pays for the wall, Trump said the wall would cost $12 billion, experts are calling for $15 to $25 billion, so be it.
"Is it cost efficient"
How come you never worried about the $130 billion PER YEAR illegals and their children cost US taxpayers? Deporting illegals and buying a wall is cheap relative to having them live in the US, the wall offers an excellent return on investment.
Exactly, isn't it funny how fiscally conservative progressives become when it comes to a program they oppose?
Yes, they can make Mexico pay for it with a variety of different tactics, taxing remittances to Mexico, tarriffs, and trade deals. Only progressives think it's gonna be Mexico "giving us a check" how fucking dumb
Taxing remittances wouldn't cost Mexico anything, it would cost the people who send the remittances be they Americans, Mexicans, or what have you.
Tariffs also would not cost Mexico anything, though Exporters in Mexico, and perhaps the end users would have to pony up some dough.
Trade deals is a pretty vague term, so i'm not gonna touch that one.
what else have you got?
--------------------
Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here
|
Douglas Howard
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/15
Posts: 1,678
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
|
sweeper54



Registered: 11/07/12
Posts: 2,865
Last seen: 8 days, 20 hours
|
|
Quote:
Douglas Howard said:
Quote:
sweeper54 said:
60% of the illegals fly in and overstay their visas. A wall no matter how 'Beautiful' will not stop them.
I noticed that Trump had was referring to the criminal illegals, not the illegals that are over here on expired visa. But those illegals that has committed a crime while they are over here on an expired visa. But the ones that are here on a valid visa, the tourist, that has committed a crime, will be deported back to there country like any other tourist that has committed crime. Like if we goes to another country like France or Italy, when we committed a violent crime, our visa will be revoke and we are deported back at that moment. But those tourist that comes over here and commits a crime, that they are sent back. But some hides from the law and still work without a green card. But then there are some that committed a crime over here and were deported back, but comes back under a new name and commits another crime and goes back, but come again under another new name. Mexico has to keep better documents of there citizens. The way things look over there, that there documents says that there population is over a trillion, and three quarters of the people of the country has the same first and last name and lived over 200 years old. They are most likely actually taking up their parents name by holding onto their I.D. as if it were theirs. I remember that when I was young a kid, I had thought that every Mexican name were Danny Rodriguez because there were so many of them with that name. Back in the days, I had knew people that are born and raised here that had two or more social security numbers. But now, the government keeps track of who is born, but death is still a problem with the democrats voters. The same people has been still voting for the Democratic party ever since Andrew Jackson were alive.
Doug the point is that the wall won't stop most of the illegals coming into this country, it's just another to way hate on Browns and stir up a fight between the parties, not a solution to the problem.
|
Crumist
Stranger


Registered: 11/02/13
Posts: 781
Last seen: 7 years, 1 month
|
|
Quote:
ballsalsa said:Taxing remittances wouldn't cost Mexico anything, it would cost the people who send the remittances be they Americans, Mexicans, or what have you.
Tariffs also would not cost Mexico anything, though Exporters in Mexico, and perhaps the end users would have to pony up some dough.
Trade deals is a pretty vague term, so i'm not gonna touch that one.
what else have you got?
Each of those things would admittedly put a lot of pressure on Mexico and its possible we might even be able to extort multiple billion from the gov't. But then who the fuck are we as a nation?
Demanding protection money from our neighbors and NATO allies? Fuck that America. Is that your proposed route to greatness?
What Trump's website suggests is actually requiring documentation of legal status before permitting anyone to wire a remittance. This is reasonable, but Im doubtful of its efficacy. Its 2016 and Western Union is a fucking telegram company. There are several work arounds that are nearly as convenient. Someone remind me to stock up on bitcoin if it looks like Trump is going to win.
-------------------- 'I am all for resources being allocated to the widowed single mother of 3, lost husband over seas fighting for our country. I am for vets getting mental health access and resources following war. I am not for free money cause a woman can't close her legs or some chump with low testosterone no going to work cause "i'm sad."' -finalexplosion Nice knowin ya'll! https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/23904704/vc/1#23904704
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 2 hours, 59 minutes
|
Re: Trump [Re: Enlil]
#23608868 - 09/03/16 06:11 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Enlil said: I think you might want to look up the word before you start making up your own definition.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nation
"a more or less defined territory and government...a territorial division containing a body of people"
"you might want to look up the word"
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 2 hours, 59 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Crumist said: You were objecting to improving our immigration procedures and providing a path to citizenshipEDIT Quote:
It wouldn't. The best way to reduce illegal immigration is to make legal immigration easy.
, we weren't talking about the border.
A nation is defined by its monopoly on the legitimate use of violence within defined geographical borders. I don't see anything about requiring a monolithic white christian culture or keeping the short, poor, brown people out.
You do know immigration laws are not based on race, so why are you bringing it up? Calling people racist doesn't mean you won the debate. 
The illegal Eastern Europeans also need to be deported. BTW, I'm a Polish American.
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 2 hours, 59 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Crumist said:
Quote:
ballsalsa said:Taxing remittances wouldn't cost Mexico anything, it would cost the people who send the remittances be they Americans, Mexicans, or what have you.
Tariffs also would not cost Mexico anything, though Exporters in Mexico, and perhaps the end users would have to pony up some dough.
Trade deals is a pretty vague term, so i'm not gonna touch that one.
what else have you got?
Each of those things would admittedly put a lot of pressure on Mexico and its possible we might even be able to extort multiple billion from the gov't. But then who the fuck are we as a nation?
Demanding protection money from our neighbors and NATO allies? Fuck that America. Is that your proposed route to greatness?
So you don't mind your paycheck getting ripped to pieces to provide free military support for EU and Asian nations? The military industrial complex and EU/Asian citizens enjoy your generosity.
|
Crumist
Stranger


Registered: 11/02/13
Posts: 781
Last seen: 7 years, 1 month
|
Re: Trump [Re: qman] 1
#23608933 - 09/03/16 06:35 PM (7 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I didn't claim to have won the debate. Nor did I call anyone racist, the same way I'm sure everyone is thinking about the myriad of undocumented immigrants when Trump says "illegals" and speaks about building a border wall. Or the how everyone thinks of the ritzy neighborhoods of Manhattan when talking about the "inner city." Are you now the champion of PC speech? Why are conservative codewords permissible but liberal terms are destroying the country and a form of mind-control?
Many of those countries don't even want our bases there (eg. Okinawa). Do you intend to demand payment for these countries for the privilege of being occupied by troublemaking US troops? The EU and Asian nations curse you for your mafioso style protection racket.
-------------------- 'I am all for resources being allocated to the widowed single mother of 3, lost husband over seas fighting for our country. I am for vets getting mental health access and resources following war. I am not for free money cause a woman can't close her legs or some chump with low testosterone no going to work cause "i'm sad."' -finalexplosion Nice knowin ya'll! https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/23904704/vc/1#23904704
|
|