|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
tyrannicalrex
Strange R



Registered: 04/24/03
Posts: 38,323
Loc: subtropics
|
Re: If you were offered a thumb print would you take it? [Re: MushMaggot] 1
#25334663 - 07/18/18 10:48 PM (5 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
|
MushMaggot
Fibonacci'r



Registered: 08/16/17
Posts: 903
Loc:
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
|
Re: If you were offered a thumb print would you take it? [Re: tyrannicalrex]
#25334864 - 07/19/18 03:43 AM (5 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
lol you made my day hahaha
|
Bardy



Registered: 04/02/14
Posts: 2,188
Last seen: 15 minutes, 16 seconds
|
Re: If you were offered a thumb print would you take it? [Re: Rebelutionsssss]
#25334905 - 07/19/18 04:59 AM (5 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Rebelutionsssss said: My guy has trouble talking after his thumbprint and he's pretty hard to understand. And it's not once in a lifetime, the family gives out prints to people they trust and that will take them all the time.
And you were still thinking of trying it? WTF?? What an absolutely perplexing notion.
|
relic
of a bygone era


Registered: 10/14/14
Posts: 5,623
Loc: the right coast
|
Re: If you were offered a thumb print would you take it? [Re: Blabble40]
#25335301 - 07/19/18 11:20 AM (5 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Blabble40 said: And so we each put specific energy out there that’s predetermined to unify it all into one - either again or for the first time all over. It would be cooler if you can probably tune in and out of the divine frequencies moving through a groove of heavenly celestial acceleration. Time could also stand still. It would be like getting memory flashed in Men in Black or dying and just waking up as if from a dream but not realizing it until after a certain point (you need acid as a medicine to “wake up” properly?), sounds like hippie bullshit but that’s just the cosmic joke - which you can’t say or remember because if you do you’ll die, they’ll pay any amount of money if it’s what gets them off.
can you dumb-down the part i've quoted into something that is easier to understand? if you feel like it.
|
Bardy



Registered: 04/02/14
Posts: 2,188
Last seen: 15 minutes, 16 seconds
|
Re: If you were offered a thumb print would you take it? [Re: relic]
#25335981 - 07/19/18 06:56 PM (5 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
They’ve already dumbed it down to a point where no one can understand it.
|
Blabble40
Scorpio

Registered: 11/11/14
Posts: 1,182
Last seen: 1 year, 28 days
|
Re: If you were offered a thumb print would you take it? [Re: KetaminePeen] 1
#25366525 - 08/04/18 01:58 PM (5 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
KetaminePeen said: Also man you know as little as whats going on as anyone else.
I believe reality is cyclical but not in the way you're describing.
Black holes are either singularities or spheres which means if they spontaneously explode; and are all made of the same superdense material; the spontanous (or collision) explosion of a black hole of a specific mass; IE The big bang would likely explode and cool into matter in a similar way everytime guided by only 4 fundamental forces of nature;
gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces.
That's just the standard model anyway that everyone already knows and describes. Whether there was a Big Bang or not is crazier than any man, woman, or human can comprehend alone in one lifetime at that to begin with. There's likely enough chance it will be the same everytime. But you really don't know which minute, nearly non existent, and vaguely irrelevant as well, events are occurring on those quantum scales related to the three or four types of black holes that exist. If you go back far enough in time, the four fundamental forces that you find in nature are one anyway - gravity, electromagnetism, the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force, which bind atomic nuclei to their structures, and which governs the mechanical, inner working processes of the atoms, as in radioactive decay, respectively.
Quote:
so if you go far enough in space and the universe is infinite and time is eternal in both directions you'd see we've had this exact conversation before somewhere else in time right now probably infinitely and somewhere else in space everywhere infinitely.
That's assuming the donut or torus shaped universe repeats itself that way, as if through gravitational lensing optical illusions. That effect just illustrates the beauty of physics and doesn't say space actually warps itself so much that you could time travel like that. Rather, instead, the multiverse is a concept that came into existence because of quantum principles such as Schrodinger's cat and the wave function collapse equation. String theory is mostly BS and just provides a framework for "M-Theory" (or the "multiverse" speculations) because it doesn't go deep enough on the surface, just describes tiny, miniscule vibrational "strings" that can only be seen if you exceed the amount of energy possible that we can even construct let alone hypothesize - which is 10^-33 cms, or the Plank length, on the correlating scale of quantum gravity. So if anything, it wouldn't just be repeating itself through space time. It would be constantly creating new frames from vacuum energy potential, and these states are like a holographic laser in that each pixel contains the whole message, even if it isn't the whole, actual message itself.
Quote:
I believe the universe is one thing, divided into infinitely many tiny strings and energy is just the strings wobbling; matter is just 2 energy wavelengths that are resonating to create a field
This is all stuff we know because we have technology that wouldn't work were it not (semiconducters, transistors, lasers, mris, electron microscopes, oscilloscopes

None of that means this is a game and those are cool science gizmos that you can play with. Doesn't mean you can die and wake up the next day in a new reality like nothing ever happened, your family will still suffer in this cold, uncaring version of the universe. Don't be stupid or reckless and careless with your decisions and life, still. You can't just commit suicide and leave it at that.
Quote:
and we're all just flesh robots that are because we wouldn't exist were it not for at least something existing.
This reality is not a simulation or a mirage or an illusion: this is it. There was no divine creator. No mathematician who inspired this; it inspired mathematicians.
A hydrogen atom is what it is and any other atom, Hydrogen is just an electron (and proton), have specific orbits that define it - there is no escape. It isn't a total cloud of negative, ignorant confusion. Hard work still cracks the case. A helium atom is still two electrons and so on until you run out of atoms on the periodic table to mention. Earlier, I don't remember saying meth was similar to DMT. Only that a methyl group (CH3) can essentially make the molecule hit the brain with more impact. That's why serotonin doesn't do anything if you eat it; its lack of meth on the molecule makes it unable to pass the BBB (blood brain barrier - if you put two methyl groups on the tryptamine alpha nitrogen atom it changes the polarity to polar, instead of non polar, so that it could be absorbed by the brain and the user can feel effects, particularly psychedelic or sedative like sensations, and those similar to LSD except for a shorter duration.
Edited by Blabble40 (08/04/18 02:30 PM)
|
Blabble40
Scorpio

Registered: 11/11/14
Posts: 1,182
Last seen: 1 year, 28 days
|
Re: If you were offered a thumb print would you take it? [Re: KetaminePeen]
#25426153 - 08/31/18 12:25 PM (5 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
KetaminePeen said: @Blabble40
The thing about your above post I really disagree with is that you can somehow understand what meth is like by reading experiences because you damn well can not.
Just like you could never describe LSD to someone in any meaningful way.
It's an experience. The chief difference in though processes on meth tend more towards the psychedelic side but it's a unique effect. Meth makes information easier to understand and more accurate to understand if your mind functions logically and rationally.
If you're not comfortable with who you are you might get anxiety from meth. Being on meth all the time requires maintaining your health manually.
Meth is nothing like DMT. Imagine acid without visuals and more clarity. At high doses meth produces a sort of stupifying state similar to 2c-b or DOC. It's nothing like DMT.
I never really said that, I just said the methyl groups make the molecule pass the blood brain barrier. Just use whatever medicine you need, you probably don't have to try them all to understand the mind and reality as if you're missing out on certain states of consciousnes, mind sets, and/or ecstasy. Trying to describe anything doesn't impress anyone who hasn't tried it and doesn't know.
That's why they say meth might not be as bad as they say despite its demonstrated user base. It never made sense why people seek it out despite the evidence in before/after pictures. It could certainly be more effective than caffeine. People who do meth think they're hella tight and don't necessarily need psilocybin or LSD to keep up, hypothetically, according to that data.
The psychedelic amphetamines sound interesting. Some people might need Adderall or ADD/ADHD meds. MDMA is psychedelic for some people then there are all of Shulgin's substituted compounds which could be useful or fun, not to mention mescaline/peyote as far as psychedelia might go. They're all basically amphetamines with extra atoms, so meth being vaguely "psychedelic" might be a thing. LSD is 6-N-methyl-LAD, and isn't really psychedelic, just gives you racing thoughts and occasional visions. Being high or stoned just means you have a transient psychosis. Except, LSD is basically psychedelic at higher doses.
Edited by Blabble40 (08/31/18 06:32 PM)
|
Bardy



Registered: 04/02/14
Posts: 2,188
Last seen: 15 minutes, 16 seconds
|
Re: If you were offered a thumb print would you take it? [Re: Blabble40]
#25489645 - 09/26/18 04:11 AM (5 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
The number of protons is what dictates the element, not the number of electrons. Shows how much you actually talk out your arse.
|
|