Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next > | Last >
InvisibleModestMouse
IM WALKIN ON SUNSHINE
 User Gallery


Registered: 05/06/13
Posts: 19,227
Loc: Upstate
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
    #22043210 - 08/04/15 05:03 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

I actually used my birth year:
1994

And subtracted 4 = 1990 = modest
1990 + 1 + 1 = 1992 = mouse
2 and 4 is 24 and there's 24 hours in a day so it was destined to happen.


--------------------
Anyone got a lowpass filter in this biiiiash?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBoomer The Great
Male

Registered: 10/30/14
Posts: 5,504
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: ModestMouse]
    #22043221 - 08/04/15 05:05 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

ModestMouse said:
I actually used my birth year:
1994

And subtracted 4 = 1990 = modest
1990 + 1 + 1 = 1992 = mouse
2 and 4 is 24 and there's 24 hours in a day so it was destined to happen.




:rofl2::lol::lmafo: +5 :mushroom2:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: ShootinD5nukes]
    #22043245 - 08/04/15 05:10 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

I'm not one to give out that form of information until you have shown your loyalty through action and time.


--------------------
E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineShootinD5nukes
High Voltage
Male

Registered: 10/29/09
Posts: 1,261
Loc: East coast
Last seen: 2 years, 1 month
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
    #22043303 - 08/04/15 05:21 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

HatingMeIsEasier said:
I'm not one to give out that form of information until you have shown your loyalty through action and time.





whatever it takes, my master.


--------------------
Nothing I write on Shroomery's message boards or in private messages are true.  I am fucking crazy and I make all this shit up because I can.



                     

Why would anyone want Mac or Windows?  Windows never quits shoving updates down your throat and Mac is just so expensive for the same exact hardware that's in a PC. 

Go Linux.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineShootinD5nukes
High Voltage
Male

Registered: 10/29/09
Posts: 1,261
Loc: East coast
Last seen: 2 years, 1 month
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: ModestMouse]
    #22043313 - 08/04/15 05:22 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

ModestMouse said:
I actually used my birth year:
1994

And subtracted 4 = 1990 = modest
1990 + 1 + 1 = 1992 = mouse
2 and 4 is 24 and there's 24 hours in a day so it was destined to happen.





I thought you were full of shit until you pointed out that there is 24 hours in a day.  Your the real deal.


--------------------
Nothing I write on Shroomery's message boards or in private messages are true.  I am fucking crazy and I make all this shit up because I can.



                     

Why would anyone want Mac or Windows?  Windows never quits shoving updates down your throat and Mac is just so expensive for the same exact hardware that's in a PC. 

Go Linux.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblenooneman
Male

Registered: 04/24/09
Posts: 14,561
Loc: Utah
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
    #22043342 - 08/04/15 05:27 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

Equations are really much better representations of numbers than decimal based approximations. This is especially evident in stuff like pi. Pi seems complicated to people who haven't learned much about math, but pi is actually as simple as any number. The vast majority of numbers are like pi in that when expressed as decimal approximations they have an infinite number of digits. Decimals are really bad at representing numbers. Take for example the fact that 0.999... = 1. That's not going to make much sense if you're used to decimal based approximation, but it's extremely simple to understand if you're used to algebra.

It's really sad that you love numbers so much but you don't want to learn even basic algebra. I think algebra would be really mind opening and a lot of fun for you.

Here's some stuff to get you started. I hope you take the time to really look into it:
http://www.intmath.com/basic-algebra/basic-algebra-intro.php


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: ShootinD5nukes]
    #22043352 - 08/04/15 05:27 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

1992 is interconnected with 3.142857.

Look.

1 + 8 = 9

2 + 7 = 9

4 + 5 + 3 = 12


--------------------
E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: nooneman]
    #22043364 - 08/04/15 05:29 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

No, actually the decimal system is the correct system.

Check this out.

1.618 x 10 = 16.18 <--- That decimal point is obnoxiously wrong.

1.618 x 1.0 = 1.618. <--- Universal harmony.


--------------------
E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblenooneman
Male

Registered: 04/24/09
Posts: 14,561
Loc: Utah
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] * 2
    #22043373 - 08/04/15 05:31 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

No, it isn't, and if you took the time to learn algebra, you'd understand why.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblepsi
TOAST N' JAM
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613 Flag
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: nooneman]
    #22043394 - 08/04/15 05:34 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

Yeah all of those "adding up the digits" tricks would produce totally different results under base 12 or base 16 or whatever. Base 10 just happens to be what we are the most used to in our culture.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: nooneman]
    #22043410 - 08/04/15 05:36 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

If you took the time to stop using words like "algebra", which came from a garbage disposal disguised as mathematics, you'd elevate your mathematical comprehension significantly.

Allow me to demonstrate the new and improved way of dealing with decimals, as they should have been dealt with in the 400,000 years of mathematical illiteracy.

3944 / 888 = 4.44144144144

A decimal within the matrix simply breaks a number down, into many pieces.

Therefore, 3944 / 888 = 444 + 144 + 144 + 144 = 876 <--- Order.


--------------------
E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B



Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/04/15 05:37 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblenooneman
Male

Registered: 04/24/09
Posts: 14,561
Loc: Utah
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
    #22043433 - 08/04/15 05:40 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

Here's pi:


That's the entirety of pi, right there. You'll notice how it doesn't go on forever, and how everything involved is clean and simple. It's a small, simple equation, and it's a better representation of pi than decimals are physically capable of. This equation doesn't "result in pi." This equation IS PI, just as the number 1 is the number 1. It's clean, elegant, simple, and easy to understand. Compare that to the decimal based approximation which looks like a never ending series of numbers that don't appear to have much connection.


Edited by nooneman (08/04/15 05:43 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: nooneman]
    #22043455 - 08/04/15 05:45 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

I will never understand why you guys keep using those damn formulas that replace numbers with symbols, where only the people who understand those symbols can understand the formulas.

I use formulas strictly naked and purely in their essential form.

Something people who use symbols cannot achieve, because those symbols are placeholders for what essentially exists beneath as the thing in itself.

I can explain Planck's Constant, or Speed of Light, or the Speed of Darkness [yes, something these wannabe scientists / mathematicians cannot do with symbols because they can't put a symbol on what they cannot see due to their intellectual capacity].

I had already showed you how to turn decimals into coherent formulas - no more bullshitting us with your falsifiable claims.

Einstein said it best, "if you can't explain it to a 7 year old, then you do not understand it enough".

Using complicated formulas is exactly why the scientific community is equivalent to that guy who thinks his dick is bigger than everyone else's - why else does science come up with those ridiculous words? Ah, yes. They are arrogant and have long forgotten the grace of teaching with simplicity.



--------------------
E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B



Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/04/15 05:52 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 23 minutes, 38 seconds
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
    #22043482 - 08/04/15 05:49 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

I use formulas strictly naked




Pics or GTFO


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblenooneman
Male

Registered: 04/24/09
Posts: 14,561
Loc: Utah
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
    #22043522 - 08/04/15 05:55 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

These symbols are not any more difficult to understand than numbers like 1, 2, 3, etc. They're all part of the same thing.

You can learn how to understand these symbols, too. They're really not that difficult with a little practice. Think about it, you had to learn how to add and subject, multiply and divide once in your life too. This is just like that, just another part of math to learn.

Take that big E on the left of the equation. That means a series. A series is when you add things together over and over.

How many times do we add it together? That's specified by the number above the E looking symbol. In this case, there is an infinite sign above the E looking symbol. That means that this equation adds an infinite number of things together.

Where do we start? That's the number below. k=0, so this equation starts at 0 and adds an infinite number of things together.

What does it add together? That's to the right of the E looking thing. We are adding this equation on the right together an infinite number of times.

Why would we add the same equation together over and over? Because each time, the number k is going to have a different value. First, it's going to start at 0. Then it's going to be 1, and then 2, and so on to infinity. k is the number that changes

Is it possible to add something together an infinite number of times and end up with a finite number? The answer surprisingly is yes. This equation for instance IS the number pi. And as you know, pi is less than 4 but more than 3. This equation therefore is less than 4 but more than 3.

You can learn these things, and once you understand them they'll open up a whole new field of mathematics to you. Don't be daunted by how these things look. You can learn these equations just like you learned numbers, addition, subtraction. Whole fields of mathematics are at your disposal. Please, learn them.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods]
    #22043524 - 08/04/15 05:56 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

My numbers are as naked as naked can get.

Hell, my numbers created nakedness with quantum intelligence.



--------------------
E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: nooneman]
    #22043558 - 08/04/15 06:01 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

Why are you still attempting to exaggerate the importance of algebra, when I already taught you how to deal with decimals? Just because you are part of the algae brah club, doesn't mean you are on top of the mathematical pyramid - I am, hence why I am not responding with stuff I learned from other idiots who learned from other idiots. I am responding with my own work that I spent a lot of time assembling into one piece, so that I can explain every drop of my proposed consensuses without having to struggle to put it together on the spot.

Face it, you are mathematically brainwashed. You have no idea how backwards your system is, after I already proved you wrong with decimals by demonstrating in two ways how decimal systems are simply numbers, on a much, much higher level.


--------------------
E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineShootinD5nukes
High Voltage
Male

Registered: 10/29/09
Posts: 1,261
Loc: East coast
Last seen: 2 years, 1 month
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
    #22043567 - 08/04/15 06:02 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

HatingMeIsEasier said:
My numbers are as naked as naked can get.

Hell, my numbers created nakedness with quantum intelligence.







Can you use your smartphone to record you and your wife explaining this please?  Surely you or your "wife"(if she's real) have a smartphone.


--------------------
Nothing I write on Shroomery's message boards or in private messages are true.  I am fucking crazy and I make all this shit up because I can.



                     

Why would anyone want Mac or Windows?  Windows never quits shoving updates down your throat and Mac is just so expensive for the same exact hardware that's in a PC. 

Go Linux.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblepsi
TOAST N' JAM
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613 Flag
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
    #22043623 - 08/04/15 06:10 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

HatingMeIsEasier said:
3944 / 888 = 4.44144144144

A decimal within the matrix simply breaks a number down, into many pieces.

Therefore, 3944 / 888 = 444 + 144 + 144 + 144 = 876 <--- Order.




Quote:

3944 / 888 = 4.44144144144




The two sides of your equals sign aren't actually equal, that's just an approximation and you should instead be using a symbol like "≃". The sequence "441" really is repeated an infinite number of times after the decimal point, so if you really want to sum all those digits you get an infinite number, not 876.

3944 / 888 = 4.441      #    i.e. 4.441441441441441441441441441441441441...

= 4 + (441 * 0.001)

= 4 + (441 * (1 / 999))


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: ShootinD5nukes]
    #22043643 - 08/04/15 06:14 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

I do not have a phone, as I generally have been isolated by all the friends I did have when I lied to myself, pretended to be a part of the society and pretended to be "normal", whatever the fuck that is, so I have no need for a phone.


--------------------
E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next > | Last >

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Stop Making Sense (OMR3021's Most Important Post Ever)
( 1 2 all )
OneMoreRobot3021 3,995 32 06/13/06 10:14 AM
by Phychotron
* How to stop masturbation
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Super_Blunt 22,372 71 11/13/06 11:25 AM
by JoelLoveland5
* How can I stop masturbating??
( 1 2 all )
GnuBobo 4,591 39 12/02/05 01:02 PM
by Meat_hod
* california stop kaiowas 1,217 18 01/18/05 12:28 PM
by Burke Dennings
* You Have 24 Hours to Stop the Broadcast Flag Xionide 733 0 06/21/05 03:59 AM
by Xionide
* How to stop puking/dry heaves???
( 1 2 all )
barfightlard 54,418 32 05/25/05 07:45 AM
by barfightlard
* just had to tell someone at work to stop sexualy harassing the women
( 1 2 all )
Phychotron 2,965 26 11/03/05 04:31 AM
by Anonymous
* Can't Stop, Eating Shrooms??? GGreatOne234 4,009 16 08/27/03 02:12 PM
by World Spirit

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
13,500 topic views. 3 members, 56 guests and 30 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.033 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 15 queries.