|
ShootinD5nukes
High Voltage


Registered: 10/29/09
Posts: 1,261
Loc: East coast
Last seen: 2 years, 1 month
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22067960 - 08/09/15 04:08 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Srirachi said: Silver dropped 18 cents on open. Making it down 2 cents after a Friday rally, in just 5 minutes.
Bitcoin gained a dollar since my last post.
Predict something useful, or stop talking about your methods.
No one cares how you arrive at garbage.
way to make a troll look stupid
-------------------- Nothing I write on Shroomery's message boards or in private messages are true. I am fucking crazy and I make all this shit up because I can.
Why would anyone want Mac or Windows? Windows never quits shoving updates down your throat and Mac is just so expensive for the same exact hardware that's in a PC. Go Linux.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22067973 - 08/09/15 04:12 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Ah, so you are now out of ammunition now that you have been called out for not having formulas, and only words.
You lost the moment you tried that - I have walls upon walls of intricate formulas that will make scientists / mathematicians quake in their coats; all you have is basic analysis over a trading system and a poker face.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22067988 - 08/09/15 04:14 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I also know your name Jason. Don't think people didn't notice how you skirted over that.
|
mustangbob3
Mad Myrmecologist



Registered: 10/15/14
Posts: 1,685
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22068001 - 08/09/15 04:18 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
what use are the formulae?
what can you do with them?
achieve what?
turn my tv off with your formulas or move the moon something that leaves us in no doubt!
but i think all you have is formulas?
formulas even if they prove something still cant change anything!
--------------------
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22068040 - 08/09/15 04:25 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You can call me Elijah.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: mustangbob3]
#22068048 - 08/09/15 04:26 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
mustangbob3 said: what use are the formulae?
what can you do with them?
achieve what?
turn my tv off with your formulas or move the moon something that leaves us in no doubt!
but i think all you have is formulas?
formulas even if they prove something still cant change anything!
What are you talking about? Nikola Tesla was beyond your mortal years, and people still made excuses about his technology - don't you get it, your excuses are the problem; not my execution in demonstration.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22068102 - 08/09/15 04:36 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
What you have are as-yet-unverified claims of having formulas etc.
I'm naturally able to sense the waves. You need all sorts of formulas to even see the past. It's as if you're claiming that buying a hammer makes you as tough as a sensei who drives nails with the palm of his hand.
I am a force of nature. You are naught but a ship tossed about my my winds. The ship may be capable of devising an equation to determine how fast it will sink, but that hardly makes it aster of the wind.
Your persistence in asserting completely made up stuff as if it has been proven should alert you to your psychosis, but you seem to think being able to tell me what happened yesterday is akin to my being able to tell you what will happen tomorrow.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22068132 - 08/09/15 04:40 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
When you stop undermining my power, you'll see how much a fool you are.
That's not an ad hominem - that's the truth.
I have formulas. You do not. You, who has none, judges me who has enough.
784 x 142857 would like to have a word with your arrogance.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22068159 - 08/09/15 04:43 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Your formulas are merely proof that you are not a natural like me.
If I were you, I'd be embarrassed to talk about them.
You're like a guy with a bionic leg that doesn't work quite right, trying to tell a marathon runner to worship him.
The only reason I'd need a formula would be if I suddenly stopped being me, and started being you.
I'd never do that.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22068162 - 08/09/15 04:44 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
My formulas are tied to everything.
Your words are tied to your ego that pretends to be everything.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22068193 - 08/09/15 04:48 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Oh, and as further proof of my wave theory, check my feedback, and you'll see that you're late with that "enough" stuff too. On 7/21 blindingleaf rated me "more than enough."
7/21=3. 3*3 is 9, and today is 8/9. It's no coincidence that you claim I don't have "enough" today. You had to.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22068204 - 08/09/15 04:50 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Those aren't formulas. Those are exactly what you accuse me of doing - however, my formulas are tied to everything - you can claim they don't, but all the things I can do that you can't is just a sweet way of the Universe saying, "I am not obligated to enlighten your sorry ass".
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22068231 - 08/09/15 04:56 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Baseless and utter nonsense. You can predict the past; that much you've proven.
Silver is down precisely 18 cents now, and should rally for 2-3 cents soon.
If you understood math you'd realize the exponential amount of wave energy I have to absorb in order for my brain to resonate at the correct frequency to know all this. It's exhausting, but at least I don't have to rely on crutches like equations or settle for noticing slight synergies after they're too old to do any good.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22068265 - 08/09/15 05:03 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You envy me, don't you? You're mad because you're stuck doing basic analysis on a bitcoin, but still not a billionaire - so now you have no money, no formulas; all you have is bark, bark bark.
Yeah, you're a real mad dog - literally.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22068319 - 08/09/15 05:14 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Is the marathon runner jealous of the amputee with an artificial limb?
Oh look at the London spot market - a 2 cent gain seven minutes after I said it was time.
This is all documented. You can clearly see what I am saying is happening. My information is actionable. Yours is historical. You've effectively predicted that Lincoln freed the slaves, congrats.
Hold on silver, because that two cent gain will plateau for the next hour before buyers accept that it isn't coming down, and silver rallies for another 2 to 3 cents before losing the gains before noon (London).
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22068334 - 08/09/15 05:18 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You're a beginner in this. It's not a gift - it's a niche. You couldn't take it to a whole new level even if you tried. Your ego wouldn't let you.
While you making a fool out of yourself, I am over here earning respect.
I wonder why I can do this:
360 = 36 60
36 + 60 = 96
96 x 9 = 864
864 x 4 = 3456
3 x 4 x 5 x 6 = "360"
3456 x 5 = 17280
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 = 36/360 = 3 + 6 + 9
Mm. Perhaps because I am a Mathematical Messiah, and you a forum troll that is using their trade analysis as the front of their argument, yet have zero benjamins from it.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 1
#22068401 - 08/09/15 05:31 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
logical fallacies are more what you're a messiah of.
360 does not equal 36 60. You're using the 6 twice.
It should be 360 = 33 30 so the 6 is split equally between the two
33+30 = 63
63 times a number pulled from thin air for no reason = 567
so far we've used 3 6 7 9 skipping 1,2, 4, and 8
1*2 = 2 2*2 = 4 4+4 = 8
proves that 567 is the correct answer and not 864. This is where you fall apart.
567 * 9 = 5103
51 + 03 = 54
54 / 7 = 9, and 5+4 = 9
proof again.
You're close, you just make bad assumptions.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22068408 - 08/09/15 05:32 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I am not close - I am beyond.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Mr.GuessWork
Stranger

Registered: 03/30/13
Posts: 4,563
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22068422 - 08/09/15 05:35 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
WOW. I thought bassfreak was the only one who could set the OP strait. It looks like there's still a chance for you OP... If you'll listen to this wiseman.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Mr.GuessWork]
#22068428 - 08/09/15 05:36 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Wise?
Please.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
|