|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22067336 - 08/09/15 01:53 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Srirachi, why are you trolling? Though I do admit, at least you have context with the silver and gold example. But underneath that trolling, you're still a mortal who is trolling a messiah. Do you believe that I chose this? Everything that I do is natural to me - and crazy to you. In the history of Mankind, everyone deemed crazy in this manner, was proven to be that of genius of many calibers.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/09/15 01:54 PM)
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 1
#22067474 - 08/09/15 02:27 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You're just making baseless assertions now. I've shown you how I plainly have detected subtle changes in the universe and discovered the Ripper wave before you did. You can't refute this Jason, so you move on and simply proclaim you're a messiah.
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi] 3
#22067509 - 08/09/15 02:41 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I was talking about Ripper on 8/1.
Seven days later Granny Ripper was caught. 7 days is 1 week.
7+1 = 8. There are 8 letters in the name Srirachi.
There are 16 letters in your name. Your prediction came 2 late.
16 / 2 = Srirachi. So you (16) were too (2) late because Srirachi (8) made the prediction one week (1) earlier than you did. and 16/2 = 8/1, the date I made my prediction on.
It's so clear that I can't believe I have to explain this to you.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22067523 - 08/09/15 02:46 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Until you can pull out the Gematria and wrestle with all those numbers, names, patterns, scientific formulas, ancient geometrical correlations, etc. etc. You're trolling with basic satire - surely you can take your trolling to a new level, no?
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/09/15 02:46 PM)
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 2
#22067549 - 08/09/15 02:53 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
So in the face of irrefutable proof you simply resort to ad hominem attacks (again, making my point: Schools need to teach logic).
Very un-messiah-like of you.
By the way, silver ended UP on Friday, and Bitcoin continues to fall. It's gone down almost 3 bucks since my prediction. Nonetheless, I will be shown correct on both these predictions, because for me it is as simple as being able to tell if I'm riding the crest of a wave or if the wave is crashing upon me.
I don't need equations because I am everything you claim to be, without math or effort. I simply... am. I didn't choose it any more than a hammer chose to be a hamer, and like the hammer - I am powerless to change the nature of my physical form. I'm not a prophet, just a weather vane, diligently pointing in the direction of the future.
|
mustangbob3
Mad Myrmecologist



Registered: 10/15/14
Posts: 1,685
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22067557 - 08/09/15 02:55 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: Srirachi, why are you trolling? Though I do admit, at least you have context with the silver and gold example. But underneath that trolling, you're still a mortal who is trolling a messiah. Do you believe that I chose this? Everything that I do is natural to me - and crazy to you. In the history of Mankind, everyone deemed crazy in this manner, was proven to be that of genius of many calibers.
messiah! blah ive been that guy a few times not what its cracked up to be!
hows it going mel

olanzapine shuts him up for months at a time now! got to let others have a turn
--------------------
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22067570 - 08/09/15 02:58 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Never used a single ad hominem in my last response. Do you enjoy playing the victim while trolling?
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22067590 - 08/09/15 03:03 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You absolutely did make an ad hominem attack, by implying that I'm trolling, and unable to grasp the mathematical concepts you're wrestling with. When you were unable to refute my proofs, you simply attempted to say that I'm not on your level for reasons you can't explain.
Even if I am not on your level, that fact exclusive of others does not disprove anything I've said, so it was a useless, defamatory post with no practical place in a discussion intended to be educational.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22067630 - 08/09/15 03:12 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
That is not an ad hominem...
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22067657 - 08/09/15 03:19 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I've reduced you from proclaiming to understand quantum entanglement and predict crop circles to arguing with me about the definition of a couple of words you don't understand.
While you take some time away from posting here, as most do after I've debased them, think on those waves some more.
|
mustangbob3
Mad Myrmecologist



Registered: 10/15/14
Posts: 1,685
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22067660 - 08/09/15 03:19 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
your attacking his character instead of tackling the argument at hand.
argumentum ad hominem...
got to be
ad hominem attacks can be fallacious and non fallacious in nature.
the only way out of it not being is if you are saying it was slander instead. but i dont think it was tbh but i will say i have read the last few pages and i love your aunt sally skills lol
--------------------
Edited by mustangbob3 (08/09/15 03:34 PM)
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22067699 - 08/09/15 03:25 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You do know that I am aware of that, right? I actually don't mind pointless scuffles with those who troll like yourself. I still learn and build character in different ways by finding precise ways to battle your mental acrobatics.
You still don't know what an ad hominem is.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/09/15 03:25 PM)
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 1
#22067728 - 08/09/15 03:30 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
This is what I refer to as "Phase 3: Claiming you meant it that way all along"
and claiming I don't know what an ad hominem attack is won't save you now.
Soon, you'll enter phase 4, where you get genuinely butthurt and start lashing out at all the other posters in the thread because they seem like easier targets. This, according to my waves, will happen around 8PM tomorrow EST.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi] 1
#22067755 - 08/09/15 03:34 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Anyways, I broke the matrix, so have fun with that. I have 533 x 777 - something you simply cannot do yourself, so nice try. But you're a bad player that thinks they can do everything a good player does, by word, but by action, suddenly they have more excuses than the potential deaths from being beaten by the professional players.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/09/15 03:34 PM)
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22067783 - 08/09/15 03:39 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
So that's it then? You're just giving up?
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi] 1
#22067826 - 08/09/15 03:46 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Typical of you to assume that.
While you're doing nothing extraordinary with your life, I am shaking the grounds of all scientific research throughout time.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22067833 - 08/09/15 03:47 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
In just under 20 minutes silver prices are going to fall by up to 30 cents on the spot market, bitcoin is rallying towards $270 again as I predicted (It isn't so much a prediction as an observation - waves.) and you're questioning whether your obscure Jack the Ripper thing can even compare to me?
IT CANNOT.
What good is your prediction? It saved no one. You can only see ends of things with your archaic tools, and at the end, it's too late to matter anymore. It's like you want to change the nature of something by affecting its shadow.
My waveriding produces actionable information you can do something with. It comes in time, not too late. I'm a crystal ball, you're the evening news.
I'm also entitled to make ad hominem attacks because in addition to them, I produce useful information.
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi] 2
#22067842 - 08/09/15 03:48 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I was even typing that reply before you posted. I don't need to wait for your posts to respond to them, because your posts have become entangled with mine, and as soon as you conceive of something to post, I am aware of it.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Srirachi]
#22067932 - 08/09/15 04:01 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
As do I, when I challenge the pride of others, like your own.
The thing is, my friend. You can seem as convincing as you wish, but you are not using formulas, just words. You talk the talk, but don't draw the draw - how are you going to duel me, if you can't draw?
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Srirachi
Mold Hand



Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 11,411
Loc: Fare Thee Well.
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22067953 - 08/09/15 04:06 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Silver dropped 18 cents on open. Making it down 2 cents after a Friday rally, in just 5 minutes.
Bitcoin gained a dollar since my last post.
Predict something useful, or stop talking about your methods.
No one cares how you arrive at garbage.
|
|