|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi]
#22042490 - 08/04/15 02:51 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
No mystery at all you say?
Remember the numbers I got from my formula I designed through meticulous formulaic knowledge which surpasses this entire planet's current level of intelligence? 552 x 522 = 288144, which is 144144144.
Guess what?
314 + 314 = 628 [Tau].
3 x 1 x 4 x 3 x 1 x 4 = 144
Do you yet see the power I possess? Or must I entertain your skepticism longer?
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/04/15 02:51 PM)
|
LSDreamer
Materialist



Registered: 03/11/08
Posts: 10,052
Last seen: 7 years, 8 days
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi]
#22042504 - 08/04/15 02:53 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Having untreated schizophrenia must really suck.
--------------------
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: LSDreamer] 2
#22042528 - 08/04/15 02:59 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
For every excuse you have that contains false descriptions, I have something profound to say that contains genuine explanations.
For an example, I know how to create 142857 from scratch by following a singular mathematical algorithm containing "1 2 3 4 5":
1 1+1+2=4 1+1+2+4+3=11 <--- 1+1 = 2 1+1+2+4+3+11+4=26 <--- 2+6 = 8 1+1+2+4+3+11+4+26+5=57
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Confucian
...


Registered: 03/31/09
Posts: 1,741
Loc: USA
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 1
#22042539 - 08/04/15 03:02 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Edited by Confucian (08/04/15 03:04 PM)
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 29 minutes, 51 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22042545 - 08/04/15 03:03 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
my formula I designed through meticulous formulaic knowledge which surpasses this entire planet's current level of intelligence
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 29 minutes, 51 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22042549 - 08/04/15 03:05 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: For every excuse you have that contains false descriptions, I have something profound to say that contains genuine explanations.
For an example, I know how to create 142857 from scratch by following a singular mathematical algorithm containing "1 2 3 4 5":
1 1+1+2=4 1+1+2+4+3=11 <--- 1+1 = 2 1+1+2+4+3+11+4=26 <--- 2+6 = 8 1+1+2+4+3+11+4+26+5=57
11 is 10 + 1 not 1 + 1. (Unless you are in kindergarten)
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 29 minutes, 51 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods]
#22042555 - 08/04/15 03:06 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
142857
Holy fuck I just created that from scratch. Nobel prize please.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
LSDreamer
Materialist



Registered: 03/11/08
Posts: 10,052
Last seen: 7 years, 8 days
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods]
#22042560 - 08/04/15 03:07 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
my formula I designed through meticulous formulaic knowledge which surpasses this entire planet's current level of intelligence

Eh...the guy pretty clearly has an untreated delusional/psychotic disorder of some kind. Personally, I can't bring myself to laugh at people like this. It just makes me kinda sad.
--------------------
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 1
#22042561 - 08/04/15 03:08 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: No mystery at all you say?
Remember the numbers I got from my formula I designed through meticulous formulaic knowledge which surpasses this entire planet's current level of intelligence? 552 x 522 = 288144, which is 144144144.
Guess what?
314 + 314 = 628 [Tau].
3 x 1 x 4 x 3 x 1 x 4 = 144
Do you yet see the power I possess?
The power to waste lots of time punching numbers into a calculator and drawing wacky conclusions? Cool.
552 x 522 = 288144 552 x 522 = 2001 x 144 2001 = 3 x 23 x 29, three of the channels that come in on my tv antenna, and the title of a famous movie that may at some point have aired on those channels. 3 + 23 + 29 = 55, the 10th Fibonacci number, and the first two digits of the number 552 from before. 5 + 5 = 10, the exact number of toes I have.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 29 minutes, 51 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi] 4
#22042566 - 08/04/15 03:10 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
psi said: 5 + 5 = 10, the exact number of toes I have.
Poor zombi3
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Boomer The Great


Registered: 10/30/14
Posts: 5,504
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi] 1
#22042568 - 08/04/15 03:10 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Wait when did the value of Pi change?? I really must live under a rock
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods] 1
#22042570 - 08/04/15 03:10 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
No, I am simply beyond your expectations for what is considered mathematically correct.
Allow me to demonstrate your ignorance.
11 + 11 = 22 11 x 11 = 121, which if you add those 1's, what do you get? 22.
Do you really want to challenge me, when you cannot see even the basic molecular patterns within numerical values?
How often do you work with numbers in your own time? Be honest.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Boomer The Great


Registered: 10/30/14
Posts: 5,504
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Confucian]
#22042586 - 08/04/15 03:13 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Confucian said:


What a discovery!!! Give this man the Nobel Prize.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Boomer The Great]
#22042597 - 08/04/15 03:16 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
They forgot to mention that "369" is right there in the time frame.
306, is 3 & 6, while 3+3+3 = 9.
That's a beautiful synchronization between the context of the video being displayed and the numbers that appear at that moment being correspondent to thereof.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/04/15 03:17 PM)
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 29 minutes, 51 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22042606 - 08/04/15 03:17 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
3:33 is pi to the Devil's tau
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods] 1
#22042635 - 08/04/15 03:21 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
333 is half of 666. It is also said by the ancients to be The Solar Plexus. 666 + 666 = 1332, which is again, 333.

It's really depressing when human logic dares to say it is better than quantum logic, despite that numbers can do things human logic is too afraid to understand.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/04/15 03:23 PM)
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 29 minutes, 51 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22042640 - 08/04/15 03:22 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
333 is half of 666.
Dats wat I sed
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Boomer The Great


Registered: 10/30/14
Posts: 5,504
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods]
#22042649 - 08/04/15 03:24 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
All these numbers are making me want another beer maybe things will fall more into place then. This shall be accomplished NOW!
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods]
#22042650 - 08/04/15 03:24 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quite frankly, you said as much as a politician.
You still have not answered my question.
How often do you work with numbers in your own time?
If you do not spend any of your time with them, why do you even try to argue with me?
Once more your traits of a politician show up by you attempting to judge an environment you, yourself, never attempted to understand.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/04/15 03:25 PM)
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 29 minutes, 51 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 1
#22042741 - 08/04/15 03:47 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I propose we have a constitutional amendment to protect Pi from those who want to redefine it.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
|