|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22047842 - 08/05/15 02:52 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: If you took the time to stop using words like "algebra", which came from a garbage disposal disguised as mathematics, you'd elevate your mathematical comprehension significantly.
Allow me to demonstrate the new and improved way of dealing with decimals, as they should have been dealt with in the 400,000 years of mathematical illiteracy.
3944 / 888 = 4.44144144144
A decimal within the matrix simply breaks a number down, into many pieces.
Therefore, 3944 / 888 = 444 + 144 + 144 + 144 = 876 <--- Order.
Quote:
nooneman said: Here's pi:

That's the entirety of pi, right there. You'll notice how it doesn't go on forever, and how everything involved is clean and simple. It's a small, simple equation, and it's a better representation of pi than decimals are physically capable of. This equation doesn't "result in pi." This equation IS PI, just as the number 1 is the number 1. It's clean, elegant, simple, and easy to understand. Compare that to the decimal based approximation which looks like a never ending series of numbers that don't appear to have much connection.
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: I will never understand why you guys keep using those damn formulas that replace numbers with symbols, where only the people who understand those symbols can understand the formulas.
I use formulas strictly naked and purely in their essential form.
Something people who use symbols cannot achieve, because those symbols are placeholders for what essentially exists beneath as the thing in itself.
I can explain Planck's Constant, or Speed of Light, or the Speed of Darkness [yes, something these wannabe scientists / mathematicians cannot do with symbols because they can't put a symbol on what they cannot see due to their intellectual capacity].
I had already showed you how to turn decimals into coherent formulas - no more bullshitting us with your falsifiable claims.
Einstein said it best, "if you can't explain it to a 7 year old, then you do not understand it enough".
Using complicated formulas is exactly why the scientific community is equivalent to that guy who thinks his dick is bigger than everyone else's - why else does science come up with those ridiculous words? Ah, yes. They are arrogant and have long forgotten the grace of teaching with simplicity.

Quote:
nooneman said: These symbols are not any more difficult to understand than numbers like 1, 2, 3, etc. They're all part of the same thing.
You can learn how to understand these symbols, too. They're really not that difficult with a little practice. Think about it, you had to learn how to add and subject, multiply and divide once in your life too. This is just like that, just another part of math to learn.
Take that big E on the left of the equation. That means a series. A series is when you add things together over and over.
How many times do we add it together? That's specified by the number above the E looking symbol. In this case, there is an infinite sign above the E looking symbol. That means that this equation adds an infinite number of things together.
Where do we start? That's the number below. k=0, so this equation starts at 0 and adds an infinite number of things together.
What does it add together? That's to the right of the E looking thing. We are adding this equation on the right together an infinite number of times.
Why would we add the same equation together over and over? Because each time, the number k is going to have a different value. First, it's going to start at 0. Then it's going to be 1, and then 2, and so on to infinity. k is the number that changes
Is it possible to add something together an infinite number of times and end up with a finite number? The answer surprisingly is yes. This equation for instance IS the number pi. And as you know, pi is less than 4 but more than 3. This equation therefore is less than 4 but more than 3.
You can learn these things, and once you understand them they'll open up a whole new field of mathematics to you. Don't be daunted by how these things look. You can learn these equations just like you learned numbers, addition, subtraction. Whole fields of mathematics are at your disposal. Please, learn them.
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: Why are you still attempting to exaggerate the importance of algebra, when I already taught you how to deal with decimals? Just because you are part of the algae brah club, doesn't mean you are on top of the mathematical pyramid - I am, hence why I am not responding with stuff I learned from other idiots who learned from other idiots. I am responding with my own work that I spent a lot of time assembling into one piece, so that I can explain every drop of my proposed consensuses without having to struggle to put it together on the spot.
Face it, you are mathematically brainwashed. You have no idea how backwards your system is, after I already proved you wrong with decimals by demonstrating in two ways how decimal systems are simply numbers, on a much, much higher level.
When confronted with your own ignorance of some new piece of information, you vigorously defend your refusal to even try to understand it. When you're in the opposite situation of making claims that seem coherent only to yourself, you're suddenly a crusader against willful ignorance.
Edited by psi (08/05/15 03:16 PM)
|
TheMule73
Stranger


Registered: 08/26/11
Posts: 1,797
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi]
#22047852 - 08/05/15 02:53 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
^That about sums it up
|
Mr.GuessWork
Stranger

Registered: 03/30/13
Posts: 4,563
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22047853 - 08/05/15 02:53 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I don't have any questions, so your statement is a non sequitur, much like your math.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi] 1
#22047873 - 08/05/15 02:56 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I like how you skipped my explanation of decimals, to pretend you're making a point.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Mr.GuessWork] 1
#22047899 - 08/05/15 02:59 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
If you do not have questions, then you're never going to learn.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/05/15 03:00 PM)
|
Mr.GuessWork
Stranger

Registered: 03/30/13
Posts: 4,563
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22047903 - 08/05/15 03:00 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Questions don't seem to be helping you learn though.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Mr.GuessWork] 1
#22047919 - 08/05/15 03:03 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Limiting your level of logic to a society that claims authority over what is logic and not, is why you will never learn, even if you asked questions. Why? You do not know how to ask the right questions.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/05/15 03:03 PM)
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22047980 - 08/05/15 03:14 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: I like how you skipped my explanation of decimals, to pretend you're making a point.
I'll paste it in there if you like, although it has little to do with the point I was making.
- When you are unable to make sense of something someone else says, the fact that you don't understand it is a failure on the part of the part of the person explaining it to you. ("Einstein said it best, "if you can't explain it to a 7 year old, then you do not understand it enough".") - When others are unable to make sense of something you say, their not understanding it is their fault because they're stupid and ignorant.
Why the double standard? Because you just have this feeling that you're smarter than everyone else.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi] 1
#22048001 - 08/05/15 03:18 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
It's not a double standard.
You clearly do not know how to not compare The Source of All Knowledge, to Knowledge, do you?
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22048022 - 08/05/15 03:22 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: It's not a double standard.
You clearly do not know how to not compare The Source of All Knowledge, to Knowledge, do you?
Quote:
Why the double standard? Because you just have this feeling that you're smarter than everyone else.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi]
#22048067 - 08/05/15 03:31 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Do you know what is amusing about that?
Me being what I am bothers you, more than it bothers me.
People ignore me before I ignore them. I spend my time and energy to help people elevate their senses with a rough way of teaching because diamonds are made with pressure. If you cannot understand my pressure, it is because you are an opal, not a diamond.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22048130 - 08/05/15 03:44 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I'm not bothered, I find debating enjoyable. Talking number theory would be more enjoyable for me, but you don't seem to want a real dialog on that.
|
Mr.PhilCybin
Master Baiter


Registered: 06/13/11
Posts: 11,642
Loc: Gnarnia
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22048145 - 08/05/15 03:48 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Nerd!
-------------------- I'm stupid, Falcon91Wolvrn03 is smart. I'm ugly, Falcon91Wolvrn03 is beautiful. I'm a loser, Falcon91Wolvrn03 is a winner. Someday, I hope to be like Falcon91Wolvrn03 but secretly know I never will.
|
Diploid
Cuban



Registered: 01/09/03
Posts: 19,274
Loc: Rabbit Hole
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 3
#22048149 - 08/05/15 03:50 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
First you bitch about this:
Quote:
If you do not have questions, then you're never going to learn.
and follow-up with this:
Quote:
you will never learn, even if you asked questions. Why? You do not know how to ask the right questions.
So basically, we can't win. Ordinary humans are too ignorant to approach your radiance, and we're also too stoopid even to formulate questions so we may be enlighten by your grandeur.
If you're going to bitch at how inferior people are to you no matter what they say or do, even when they try to follow your instructions, then it would be more efficient if you skip all the math schizo-babble cluttering your posts and just bitch at people directly, don't you think? All the number theory jibberish seems secondary to your apparent intention with this thread of proclaiming your superiority and insulting the rest of us as inferior. 
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi]
#22048150 - 08/05/15 03:51 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You are bothered by it, which is why you cannot let me be when I express my confidence.
But when you see others express their ignorance, you don't get uppity about it.
You are intimidated by me - that is the only reason for your response's behavioral patterns.
If you actually were mutual and non-personal, you would be curious and entertained, not competitive and egotistical.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Diploid]
#22048153 - 08/05/15 03:51 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Or you could just Ask the right questions.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Diploid
Cuban



Registered: 01/09/03
Posts: 19,274
Loc: Rabbit Hole
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22048196 - 08/05/15 04:00 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You said we are incapable of asking the right questions because we are way too far behind your mind-boggling intelligence to even formulate one.
Get your story straight or people might stop taking you seriously. 
-------------------- Republican Values: 1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you. 2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child. 3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer. 4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.
|
Psychonautica
Cuddly Wuddly Fuccboi


Registered: 04/20/15
Posts: 10,854
Loc: Free Soul & IISkuNkII
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Diploid]
#22048215 - 08/05/15 04:04 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You should make less number posts.
And more I hate Pris posts.
-------------------- The chances of you even being born, Were forty million to one. There's two parts of the statistic And I want you to live through one 3/8/95 - 7/10/15 Rest In Paradise, Brother. Sheekle said: yeah, i said i was afraid of psychonautica

|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: Diploid]
#22048219 - 08/05/15 04:05 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
It's called evolving and transforming.
Do you have a tree next to your house?
Is it always green?
No.
Life shuffles through stages in one way, and climbs or falls stages in another way.
We, like caterpillar and butterfly transformation, can climb stages, or sit on our miserable asses feeling sorry for ourselves by dwelling.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
Psychonautica
Cuddly Wuddly Fuccboi


Registered: 04/20/15
Posts: 10,854
Loc: Free Soul & IISkuNkII
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22048227 - 08/05/15 04:06 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I live in Florida. The trees are always green here.
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW
-------------------- The chances of you even being born, Were forty million to one. There's two parts of the statistic And I want you to live through one 3/8/95 - 7/10/15 Rest In Paradise, Brother. Sheekle said: yeah, i said i was afraid of psychonautica

|
|