|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? 1
#22042108 - 08/04/15 01:06 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
3.142857142857 is more accurate than 3.141592653589, as I can prove the absolute precision of that statement of mine within this video I had made somewhat last night and today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi3JtKboxTI
Teaser: 552 x 522 = 288144 = 144144144.
288 + 144 = 432 Universal Frequency; 1/2 of Sun's Diameter; Music Theory: A Note.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,060
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 32 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22042204 - 08/04/15 01:32 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
None of your YouTube links work, so why should we believe any of your nonsense
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods] 1
#22042233 - 08/04/15 01:42 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Okay, I watched The Justice League, I know how to flash now.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
CHeifM4sterDiezL
Chief Globerts


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 22,546
Loc: United States
Last seen: 1 minute, 16 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22042255 - 08/04/15 01:51 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Mels is super smart koods idk why you would flame all his posts calling his ideas nonsense
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods]
#22042275 - 08/04/15 01:57 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: None of your YouTube links work, so why should we believe any of your nonsense
What I gather is that he's claiming that pi's true value is 418/133, and justifying this claim with the usual mumbo jumbo. I guess mathematicians are wrong about pi's irrationality for some mystery reason that seems to involve adding up numerical values for words or something.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi] 1
#22042322 - 08/04/15 02:10 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I am telling you that mathematicians and scientists alike, are as backwards and regressed as the common people are - they are all full of themselves, wanking off in the scientific community, claiming to be onto new found discoveries, despite that they only know how to toy with God, by screwing with space and matter via CERN's hadron collider.
What they do not know, is that you can know everything, without building destructive toys out of premature speculative design plans.
For an example, my formula is 100% precise - in fact, my formula is able to regenerate "Tau", the Yin & Yang power of our entire reality.
16 / 14 = 1.14285714286, the 14286 is the regenerative source of Tau.
11428 = 628 [Tau], or 314 [Pi] + 314 [Pi].
We're living in a system of self-intelligent circles creating an autonomous experience we call consciousness.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,060
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 32 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 1
#22042342 - 08/04/15 02:14 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: I am telling you that mathematicians and scientists alike, are as backwards and regressed as the common people are - they are all full of themselves, wanking off in the scientific community, claiming to be onto new found discoveries, despite that they only know how to toy with God, by screwing with space and matter via CERN's hadron collider.
What they do not know, is that you can know everything, without building destructive toys out of premature speculative design plans.
For an example, my formula is 100% precise - in fact, my formula is able to regenerate "Tau", the Yin & Yang power of our entire reality.
16 / 14 = 1.14285714286, the 14286 is the regenerative source of Tau.
11428 = 628 [Tau], or 314 [Pi] + 314 [Pi].
We're living in a system of self-intelligent circles creating an autonomous experience we call consciousness.
Except your circles are all fucked up because your value for Pi is wrong.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Sun King



Registered: 02/15/14
Posts: 4,069
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi]
#22042343 - 08/04/15 02:14 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
psi said:
Quote:
koods said: None of your YouTube links work, so why should we believe any of your nonsense
What I gather is that he's claiming that pi's true value is 418/133, and justifying this claim with the usual mumbo jumbo. I guess mathematicians are wrong about pi's irrationality for some mystery reason that seems to involve adding up numerical values for words or something.
What about Op's irrationality?
--------------------
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods]
#22042356 - 08/04/15 02:17 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Prove it.
Let's see you try to challenge my precision.
Show the community how "wrong" my formula is.
After I generated pure 144's out of it and tied it to Universal Properties.
As well as creating an infinite Tau formula, that regenerates itself mathematically via a conscientious matrix.
Step up to the plate - you have made a claim, now prove it.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,060
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 32 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 3
#22042366 - 08/04/15 02:21 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I don't need to prove it. The value of Pi has been demonstrated to be accurate for centuries. Millennia even.
Satellites wouldn't have stable orbits. Buildings would crumble. Technology would be a joke if we didn't know the accurate value of Pi.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
CHeifM4sterDiezL
Chief Globerts


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 22,546
Loc: United States
Last seen: 1 minute, 16 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods]
#22042378 - 08/04/15 02:24 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
obv mels has a much deeper understanding of numbers than you
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,060
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 32 seconds
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: CHeifM4sterDiezL] 2
#22042382 - 08/04/15 02:25 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
7 8 9
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 1
#22042395 - 08/04/15 02:29 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: they are all full of themselves, wanking off in the scientific community, claiming to be onto new found discoveries
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods]
#22042398 - 08/04/15 02:30 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
They are using an approximation of Pi.
It's not difficult to draw a circle, a child can do it. This Universe is so interesting because of its ability to become simple enough for a child to understand it, on top of its deeply encoded matrix.
The Ancients used 3.14285714286 to create precise monuments that stood to this day.
At least the scientists have admitted that 3.1428571428576 stretches longer than 3.141592653589 recently, so even they are starting to notice that 3.141592653589 is the approximation - as 3.14285714286 is the precision of the Universal Design.
We as a collective group need to start realizing that our scientific community is far behind the ancient knowledge that once existed in our time.
The scientific community is built on individual ideas of people who are far beyond the practice of the scientific community, itself.
3 x 1 x 4 x 1 x 5 x 9 x 2 x 6 x 5 x 3 x 5 x 8 x 9 = 3499200. Keep in mind that Speed Of Light is "299 792 458".
This is an approximation of Pi.
Here's the precise version: 3 x 1 x 4 x 2 x 8 x 5 x 7 x 1 x 4 x 2 x 8 x 6 = 2580480
25848 is 7848, which is again 3.142857, or 1512, or 25.20, Sacred Cubit.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/04/15 02:37 PM)
|
Love_spirit
Circle Of Power


Registered: 07/18/15
Posts: 1,208
Last seen: 7 months, 27 days
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: koods]
#22042400 - 08/04/15 02:30 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
I am telling you that mathematicians and scientists alike, are as backwards and regressed as the common people are - they are all full of themselves, wanking off in the scientific community, claiming to be onto new found discoveries, despite that they only know how to toy with God, by screwing with space and matter via CERN's hadron collider.
Your projecting dude.
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22042428 - 08/04/15 02:36 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
HatingMeIsEasier said: At least the scientists have admitted that 3.1428571482576 stretches longer than 3.141592653589 recently, so even they are starting to notice that 3.141592653589 is the approximation - as 3.14285714286 is the precision of the Universal Design.
Nobody denies that 3.141592653589 or any other representation of pi with a fixed number of digits is an approximation. There are algorithms that will calculate as many digits as needed. The idea that pi is a rational number has been out of fashion for quite some time though.
|
HatingMeIsEasier
Stranger

Registered: 05/01/15
Posts: 398
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: psi]
#22042454 - 08/04/15 02:42 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
The thing people are denying though is, the scientific system doesn't get to classify or verify all scientific facts - as apparently, individuals who spend more time searching for the truth than pretending to be a scientist, are not possible to exist according to the society.
I will never understand how anyone can be stupid enough to believe that individuals cannot surpass entire systems made up of individuals full of themselves by using hive mind as an excuse, pretending to be a system that surpasses individual potential, despite that this same bloody system is extremely dependent on various individual expertise far beyond its time and not the collective arrogance that they build their system around along with their collective smug sense of importance.
I can literally explain why there is a war between which is correct: Pi, or Tau - I can prove that the two are intertwined mathematically; something nobody has done yet.
-------------------- E I S P E M I R H E G E E I A A B B
Edited by HatingMeIsEasier (08/04/15 02:43 PM)
|
LSDreamer
Materialist



Registered: 03/11/08
Posts: 10,052
Last seen: 7 years, 8 days
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier] 1
#22042469 - 08/04/15 02:46 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Who would have thought that a scientific breakthrough of this magnitude would be published on the Shroomery? Amazing.
--------------------
|
ModestMouse
IM WALKIN ON SUNSHINE



Registered: 05/06/13
Posts: 19,227
Loc: Upstate
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22042477 - 08/04/15 02:48 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Are you avoiding something in your life? Social contact? Work? Family?
Stop putting random numbers together in pictures and videos and go outside. I don't care if this account is a troll or not, it's old hat and at this point you look stupid as fuck either way.
-------------------- Anyone got a lowpass filter in this biiiiash?
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,456
Loc: 613
|
Re: Can we stop saying 3.141592653589 is more accurate than 3.14285714286? [Re: HatingMeIsEasier]
#22042479 - 08/04/15 02:48 PM (8 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Tau is just 2*pi, there's no mystery whatsoever about how the two numbers are intertwined.
|
|