|
 Rono
DSYSB since '01
 
Registered: 01/25/01
Posts: 16,259
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
Last seen: 1 year, 10 months
|
 Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights  [Re: ]
#2199935 - 12/24/03 03:59 PM (21 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Is there any chance you kids can actually discuss the topic at hand before I lock the thread?
Christ...I feel like a fucking babysitter.
--------------------
"Life has never been weird enough for my liking"
Edited by Rono (12/24/03 03:59 PM)
|
 luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,248
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: Rono]
#2199957 - 12/24/03 04:14 PM (21 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
You're a little late seeing as the last post was 3.5 hours ago.
--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Baby_Hitler
Errorist
Registered: 03/06/02
Posts: 27,986
Loc: To the limit!
Last seen: 6 hours, 25 minutes
|
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: Rono]
#2200025 - 12/24/03 04:55 PM (21 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
I think the Guantanamo Bay prisoners ROCK!!!
--------------------
Morality is just aesthetics, meatbags.
|
mntlfngrs
The Art of Casterbation
Registered: 07/18/02
Posts: 3,937
Last seen: 6 years, 4 months
|
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: Xlea321]
#2200443 - 12/25/03 01:00 AM (21 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Alex123 said:
Depends if they've commited a crime or not. Attacking devastated stone-age countries like Afghanistan you arn't going to find nice neat columns of men in expensive military uniforms. Does that mean everyone who fights you is a "terrorist"?
What if the "government" of a stone age contry is allowing a known terrorist group to freely operate within it's boarders and refuses to turn over or at least stand aside ( if they can't turn over) after said terrorist commit a crime? Doesn't that make them an accomplice and therby accountable? Don't they in essence join the terrorists in the crime at that point? Besides are you implying that after selling so much heroin to the worls they couldn't afford uniforms. Did the UN even reconize the Taliban as a legitimate government?
--------------------
Be all and you'll be to end all
|
Phred
Fred's son
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 10 years, 10 days
|
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Righ [Re: mntlfngrs]
#2200679 - 12/25/03 04:18 AM (21 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
At its peak popularity, the Taliban was recognized as the legitimate government of Afghanistan by a whopping three countries out of the one hundred and ninety-one countries in the world. It was not recognized as such by the UN.
By October 2001, there was only one country who recognized it -- Pakistan -- and that was only because they had been asked not to withdraw their recognition in order that a diplomatic channel could be kept open.
pinky
--------------------
|
Swami
Eggshell Walker
Registered: 01/18/00
Posts: 15,413
Loc: In the hen house
|
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: mntlfngrs]
#2200767 - 12/25/03 08:33 AM (21 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Most of the known 9/11 terrorists were Saudis not Iraqis nor Afghanis, yet no mention of a possible attack on Saudi Arabia - go figure.
--------------------
The proof is in the pudding.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,248
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: Swami]
#2200778 - 12/25/03 09:09 AM (21 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
The nationalities matter not. What does matter is where the base of operations is. Not that I find the Saudis totally blameless but Afganistan is where the plot was hatched and the leaders were hanging out.
--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
falcon
Registered: 04/01/02
Posts: 8,170
Last seen: 9 hours, 57 minutes
|
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: luvdemshrooms]
#2200788 - 12/25/03 09:33 AM (21 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Dude who supported the taliban in its struggle with the warlords?
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Righ [Re: luvdemshrooms]
#2201014 - 12/25/03 02:31 PM (21 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
hey LDS, who supported the taliban in its struggle with the warlords?
|
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Red Vein Kratom 
Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order
Edit 
Reply 
1 2 all )
Swami
luvdemshrooms
Edame
silversoul7
Xlea321
