|
FreeTheSoul
The wonderer.
Registered: 01/04/14
Posts: 2,297
Last seen: 2 years, 2 months
|
Amerithrax
#21897381 - 07/04/15 04:18 PM (8 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
There was a anthrax attack in 2001, but the facts of it all doesnt add up for me. It says in 2005 Irvins was a suspect in the anthrax attacks.April 11th, 2007 Irvins was put under periodic surveillance. On August 6th,2008 7 days after Irvins overdosed on acetaminophen the FBI announced that they believed he was the person who did it based on circumstantial evidence. In 2010 the FBI formally closed the Amerithrax case.
Heres the part thats sketchy, from 2003 to 2006 the FBI did tests and determined that the anthrax came from a flask that Irvins had sole control over. If they had that evidence why was he not charged in court over it? Why dont they require 24/7 video monitoring/recording in anthrax labs? If they did they would 100% be able to determine whether or not he took the anthrax from the lab?
|
FreeTheSoul
The wonderer.
Registered: 01/04/14
Posts: 2,297
Last seen: 2 years, 2 months
|
|
Some information about Irvins mental problems is still under seal.
A lawsuit filed by a widow of the first anthrax victim was paid 2.5million with no admission of liability. Supposibly the settlement was reached solely for the purpose of avoiding the expenses and risks of further litigation's.
Shit is so sketchy, seems like such a coverup to me. Supposibly the DOJ was about to put charges on him when he committed suicide, but what took them so long if they had the evidence already?
The evidence they had that linked him was found between 2003 and 2006, they determined the anthrax was from a flask Irvins had sole control over. Why would they let him stay free till 2008? Did they think they could catch him doing it possibly again? Or did they know they possibly wouldn't win the case so they just waited and watched for something to occur to sink him for good?
|
Salomon
ಠ︵ಠ balance ಠ_ಠ weaver ಠ‿ಠ

Registered: 01/17/09
Posts: 25,128
Loc: America, FUCK YEAH
|
|

thats enough digging, mr anderson.
-------------------- EVERYTHING EVENTUALLY BECOMES A DESERT
|
FreeTheSoul
The wonderer.
Registered: 01/04/14
Posts: 2,297
Last seen: 2 years, 2 months
|
Re: Amerithrax [Re: Salomon]
#21898086 - 07/04/15 06:59 PM (8 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
What movie is that?
|
MichAnon.ael
Dark Stranger


Registered: 12/15/14
Posts: 892
Last seen: 6 years, 11 months
|
|
I guarantee, after you eat that cookie, you'll feel right as rain
|
lowbrow
Paddy Time!!!!


Registered: 09/12/08
Posts: 9,662
Last seen: 2 days, 3 hours
|
|
Your asking too many questions sir. That's not very patriotic. Do you want to be known as unpatriotic sir?
-------------------- Amanita86 said: Sui is trying to mod right now. Kinda like a newborn calf tryin ta stand fer the first time ain’t it..
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
Quote:
FreeTheSoul said: There was a anthrax attack in 2001, but the facts of it all doesnt add up for me. It says in 2005 Irvins was a suspect in the anthrax attacks.April 11th, 2007 Irvins was put under periodic surveillance. On August 6th,2008 7 days after Irvins overdosed on acetaminophen the FBI announced that they believed he was the person who did it based on circumstantial evidence. In 2010 the FBI formally closed the Amerithrax case.
Heres the part thats sketchy, from 2003 to 2006 the FBI did tests and determined that the anthrax came from a flask that Irvins had sole control over. If they had that evidence why was he not charged in court over it? Why dont they require 24/7 video monitoring/recording in anthrax labs? If they did they would 100% be able to determine whether or not he took the anthrax from the lab?
because the feds like closed cases
|
Lucis
Nutritional Yeast

Registered: 03/28/15
Posts: 15,622
Last seen: 1 month, 29 days
|
|
-------------------- ©️
|
|