Home | Community | Message Board


Mushrooms.com
Please support our sponsors.

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics >> The Ethnobotanical Garden

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Amazon Shop: San Pedro

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Offlineadamj
Superhero
Male User Gallery

Registered: 11/11/03
Posts: 1,562
Loc: Ontario, CAN
Last seen: 2 months, 18 days
I know this isn't the appropriate forum -- San Pedro Cactus!
    #2183964 - 12/16/03 10:59 PM (13 years, 7 months ago)

I've been searching for cactus forums and such, but I couldn't find any. So I figured that there are alot of experienced and knowlegable people on this board, hopefully some who have seen/grown a San Pedro cactus.

I printed out a picture of a San Pedro cactus and went to my local garden store. Well these were the only two cactuses (in weblink) that closely resembled the picture. I asked one of the people working there, and they immediately said "Oh yeah, they look the same". I figured they just wanted me to buy it. If you ask me right now, I believe that these are San Pedro cactuses. But, I wanna verify for sure. I for some reason believe that there are 100 identical cactuses species out there. So if anyone can help, thanks! :smile:

Weblink: http://www.geocities.com/adamizero/cactus.htm


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineEkstaza
stranger thanmost
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/11/03
Posts: 4,317
Loc: Around the corner
Last seen: 1 month, 17 days
Re: I know this isn't the appropriate forum -- San Pedro Cactus! [Re: adamj]
    #2184090 - 12/17/03 12:05 AM (13 years, 7 months ago)



--------------------
YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH ANY GIVEN DRUG ISN'T THE DEFINITIVE MEASURE OF THE DRUGS EFFECTS.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinebobmarley4prez
Male User Gallery
Registered: 10/20/03
Posts: 87
Loc: southwest
Last seen: 4 years, 5 months
Re: I know this isn't the appropriate forum -- San Pedro Cactus! [Re: Ekstaza]
    #2184139 - 12/17/03 12:23 AM (13 years, 7 months ago)

nope therenot SP. sorry, sp look taller and skinner, plus along any peticular ridge they are almost perectly streight.


--------------------
Anything above this line is a lie. i do not cultivate psychadelic mushrooms nore do I intend to.

One day I encountered a bufo toad. Since that day I have been instilled with the power of the devil.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinellamaboy
the weasel thatsnagged the bee

Registered: 11/08/03
Posts: 563
Loc: Portland PNW
Last seen: 7 years, 9 months
Re: I know this isn't the appropriate forum -- San Pedro Cactus! [Re: adamj]
    #2184253 - 12/17/03 01:24 AM (13 years, 7 months ago)

heh, and it's cacti (just to be an ass)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleeric_the_red
 User Gallery

Registered: 02/28/03
Posts: 12,831
Loc: happy land
Re: I know this isn't the appropriate forum -- San Pedro Cactus! [Re: adamj]
    #2184402 - 12/17/03 03:04 AM (13 years, 7 months ago)

it is hard to tell for sure from those small pics, but those look like pedros to me.

bob, all my younger pedros can have concave indentions between the spine sites, though they don't appear to be as deep as those.


--------------------


Anno cock? is that some kind of Greek liqueur? -Geo's All Knowing Sex Slave


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleHarveyWalbanger
Demiurge
Male

Registered: 06/24/02
Posts: 3,070
Loc: 8b
Re: I know this isn't the appropriate forum -- San Pedro Cactus! [Re: adamj]
    #2184725 - 12/17/03 08:20 AM (13 years, 7 months ago)

Those are myrtillos.... Grade A grafting material, not magical.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineJorge
Stranger

Registered: 12/22/03
Posts: 8
Last seen: 13 years, 6 months
Re: I know this isn't the appropriate forum -- San Pedro Cactus! [Re: adamj]
    #2195179 - 12/22/03 08:11 AM (13 years, 6 months ago)

Hi Friends!!! this is my first post. Adamj, I can tell you that you have a  Myrtillocactus geometrizans , the red one is a  Gymnocalycium mihanovichii var. fiedricchi and the one with white thorns maybe is a  Mammillaria sp .

Saludos  :thumbup:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineJorge
Stranger

Registered: 12/22/03
Posts: 8
Last seen: 13 years, 6 months
Re: I know this isn't the appropriate forum -- San Pedro Cactus! [Re: Jorge]
    #2195181 - 12/22/03 08:16 AM (13 years, 6 months ago)

By the way, Eric the Red, the Pedro of your second photo needs more sun....

Saludos  :thumbup:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Amazon Shop: San Pedro

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics >> The Ethnobotanical Garden

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Is this San Pedro?!
( 1 2 all )
ZenXi6 2,618 23 04/29/09 12:51 PM
by satyr
* growing san pedro questions 1stimer 1,424 6 02/06/03 05:05 PM
by AJ420
* san pedro doing well without roots? Pupenhause 660 6 06/09/08 10:05 PM
by Pupenhause
* my san pedro...sick? Hamurabi 1,135 11 03/09/05 08:24 PM
by faslimy
* san pedro? pics* beavis190 1,439 13 05/17/06 06:45 PM
by stemmer
* Exclusive Pictorial: How To Prepare San Pedro (Photos)
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
mjshroomer 49,810 140 09/15/16 05:31 AM
by Mostly_Harmless
* Growing San Pedro Deaf 51,819 2 12/21/05 11:23 AM
by Deaf
* san pedro...
( 1 2 all )
iamhimheisme 2,235 24 11/24/03 10:39 PM
by medicinebag

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Magash, karode13, naum, Mostly_Harmless
1,076 topic views. 1 members, 10 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Kratom Eye
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2017 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.019 seconds spending 0.003 seconds on 16 queries.