|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
|
|
They didn't do shit in the first 12 minutes of the 4th quarter. They got lucky as fuck for 3 minutes. Boostick catches a ball that bounces off his face and it is over.
--------------------
|
Bassfreak
ManBearPig



Registered: 08/24/10
Posts: 18,014
Last seen: 8 years, 8 months
|
|
yeah magic but the pats do the same exact shit to their opponents. were a scary second half team
-------------------- Tom Brady is a God Free Tom Brady
|
kr0nik0
Ole' Salty


Registered: 02/13/12
Posts: 17,756
Loc: Western Slope, CO
|
|
Quote:
zappaisgod said:
Quote:
kr0nik0 said: The deflategate stupidity doesn't make me think lesser of the Pats. I might not like the Pats, but they are without a doubt a good team.
I'm just convinced the Seahawks are better.
This is a completely legitimate discussion of the game. I was just surprised that you said the line was Pats minus 6. That's a lot.
I just don't like how the 'Hawks got completely dominated for 57 minutes. They got lucky as fuck. Bostick just totally shit the bed and then, when they needed to, GB drove right down to tie it.
I aint seeing Seattle dominating like last year. They aint the same team and nobody is going to be surprised by Wilson.
On paper it looks like a game that's up for grabs. Last year it did as well and that game was a fluke.
I agree that Seattle won't burn the Pats, but I can see the hawks holding them to around 20 points and being able to score close to 30 themselves.
--------------------
“[...]the only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes “Awww!”
|
Magicman69
All About the Benjamins


Registered: 05/29/13
Posts: 6,876
|
|
That's why the game is 4 quarters. Packers couldn't finish.
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
|
|
One. Play. One extremely lucky play.
--------------------
|
Bassfreak
ManBearPig



Registered: 08/24/10
Posts: 18,014
Last seen: 8 years, 8 months
|
|
Quote:
zappaisgod said: They didn't do shit in the first 12 minutes of the 4th quarter. They got lucky as fuck for 3 minutes. Boostick catches a ball that bounces off his face and it is over.
i still blame mccarthy
-------------------- Tom Brady is a God Free Tom Brady
|
Bassfreak
ManBearPig



Registered: 08/24/10
Posts: 18,014
Last seen: 8 years, 8 months
|
Re: Super Bowl Thread [Re: kr0nik0]
#21196683 - 01/29/15 01:13 PM (9 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
kr0nik0 said:
Quote:
Bassfreak said:
Quote:
kr0nik0 said: The deflategate stupidity doesn't make me think lesser of the Pats. I might not like the Pats, but they are without a doubt a good team.
I'm just convinced the Seahawks are better.
still waitin on an answer. whos been better than the pats in the last 15 years?
dont let your judgement be clouded by hate. just be real here
Consistently since 00' no one has. I thought I established that.
lol so u dont like the patriots (clearly the best team since 2000), AND you say there is no best team in the league since that timeframe????
lol riiiiiight
-------------------- Tom Brady is a God Free Tom Brady
|
Magicman69
All About the Benjamins


Registered: 05/29/13
Posts: 6,876
|
|
Quote:
zappaisgod said: One. Play. One extremely lucky play.
One play? They stopped the Packers on the 1 yard line twice. If they score either of those times it's game over. Clinton-Dix misses a rainbow pass right by him for the 2 pt conversion. Kearse burns their CB for the TD. Rodgers throws 2 picks and has less than 200 yards passing.
In the end Seattle scored 4 TDs and GB only scored 1 TD. It wasn't only that one onside kick. The whole team melted when it counted the most and Seattle made the big plays when it counted the most.
|
Bassfreak
ManBearPig



Registered: 08/24/10
Posts: 18,014
Last seen: 8 years, 8 months
|
Re: Super Bowl Thread [Re: kr0nik0]
#21196692 - 01/29/15 01:14 PM (9 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
kr0nik0 said:
Quote:
zappaisgod said:
Quote:
kr0nik0 said: The deflategate stupidity doesn't make me think lesser of the Pats. I might not like the Pats, but they are without a doubt a good team.
I'm just convinced the Seahawks are better.
This is a completely legitimate discussion of the game. I was just surprised that you said the line was Pats minus 6. That's a lot.
I just don't like how the 'Hawks got completely dominated for 57 minutes. They got lucky as fuck. Bostick just totally shit the bed and then, when they needed to, GB drove right down to tie it.
I aint seeing Seattle dominating like last year. They aint the same team and nobody is going to be surprised by Wilson.
On paper it looks like a game that's up for grabs. Last year it did as well and that game was a fluke.
I agree that Seattle won't burn the Pats, but I can see the hawks holding them to around 20 points and being able to score close to 30 themselves.
do you seriously watch football? or try to pay attention?
-------------------- Tom Brady is a God Free Tom Brady
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
|
Re: Super Bowl Thread [Re: Bassfreak]
#21196695 - 01/29/15 01:15 PM (9 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
For what? Taking 6 when he could have gotten none?
No. It's all on Bostick as far as I'm concerned. He was chosen specifically because of his catching ability and the ball was an easy as fuck grab that he let bounce off his face.
--------------------
|
Bassfreak
ManBearPig



Registered: 08/24/10
Posts: 18,014
Last seen: 8 years, 8 months
|
|
Quote:
zappaisgod said: For what? Taking 6 when he could have gotten none?
No. It's all on Bostick as far as I'm concerned. He was chosen specifically because of his catching ability and the ball was an easy as fuck grab that he let bounce off his face.
page 331 at the bottom of the nfl thread. thats what you want to see
-------------------- Tom Brady is a God Free Tom Brady
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
|
|
Quote:
Magicman69 said:
Quote:
zappaisgod said: One. Play. One extremely lucky play.
One play? They stopped the Packers on the 1 yard line twice. If they score either of those times it's game over. Clinton-Dix misses a rainbow pass right by him for the 2 pt conversion. Kearse burns their CB for the TD. Rodgers throws 2 picks and has less than 200 yards passing.
In the end Seattle scored 4 TDs and GB only scored 1 TD. It wasn't only that one onside kick. The whole team melted when it counted the most and Seattle mad the big plays when it counted the most.
Are you fucking shitting me? First of all how many chances to score a TD in OT did GB have.
The fact of the matter is that if Bostick makes that easy as fuck catch the game is over. O Vurr
--------------------
|
Bassfreak
ManBearPig



Registered: 08/24/10
Posts: 18,014
Last seen: 8 years, 8 months
|
|
i blame mccarthy not having the balls to go for it on 4th and goal twice
-------------------- Tom Brady is a God Free Tom Brady
|
Magicman69
All About the Benjamins


Registered: 05/29/13
Posts: 6,876
|
|
Yeah, that's true. If four other things happen it's game over too. It wasn't only that one play. When the Packers had a chance to put the game away before that kick they failed.
|
Magicman69
All About the Benjamins


Registered: 05/29/13
Posts: 6,876
|
Re: Super Bowl Thread [Re: Bassfreak]
#21196733 - 01/29/15 01:20 PM (9 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Bassfreak said: i blame mccarthy not having the balls to go for it on 4th and goal twice
That and the offense. They got gifted beautiful field position and 5 turnovers, yet only managed 1 TD and less than 200 yards on 30+ attempts. Not good enough.
Edited by Magicman69 (01/29/15 01:28 PM)
|
kr0nik0
Ole' Salty


Registered: 02/13/12
Posts: 17,756
Loc: Western Slope, CO
|
Re: Super Bowl Thread [Re: Bassfreak]
#21196749 - 01/29/15 01:23 PM (9 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Well they clearly weren't the best team in the NFL the 9 out of those 15 years they didn't reach the SB.
I don't understand what you're rambling on about. The Pats haven't even played in a SB since 07-08 which they lost.
There's a big difference between being consistently good throughout the years as the Pats have been, and being the best team in the NFL on a given year.
--------------------
“[...]the only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes “Awww!”
|
SunnyD
WiZarD oF LoVe



Registered: 04/29/13
Posts: 25,236
Loc: Planet earth
Last seen: 5 months, 7 days
|
|
I don't really care tbh
Its been years since ive sat down n watched a full football game, I don't have cable is part of it, and the lack of interest for another
--------------------
        And to everyone who thinks life is just a game, Do you like the part you are playing? This is the time in life I am living! And I face each day with a smile My music Library of Synthesizer goodness
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
|
Re: Super Bowl Thread [Re: Bassfreak]
#21196883 - 01/29/15 01:52 PM (9 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Bassfreak said: i blame mccarthy not having the balls to go for it on 4th and goal twice
All moot if Bostick makes the easiest play in the world. How do you know they would have succeeded? You don't
--------------------
|
Bassfreak
ManBearPig



Registered: 08/24/10
Posts: 18,014
Last seen: 8 years, 8 months
|
Re: Super Bowl Thread [Re: kr0nik0]
#21197457 - 01/29/15 03:23 PM (9 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
kr0nik0 said: Well they clearly weren't the best team in the NFL the 9 out of those 15 years they didn't reach the SB.
I don't understand what you're rambling on about. The Pats haven't even played in a SB since 07-08 which they lost.
There's a big difference between being consistently good throughout the years as the Pats have been, and being the best team in the NFL on a given year.
lol you just dont wanna admit what you know is true
you cant NOT have a best team. thats why you play competitive sports. unless you can give me a team whos been better since 2000, then we both know its the patriots
oh and btw the pats were in the super bowl in 2010, so your wrong. 4 straight afc championships isnt fucking around
-------------------- Tom Brady is a God Free Tom Brady
Edited by Bassfreak (01/29/15 03:37 PM)
|
kr0nik0
Ole' Salty


Registered: 02/13/12
Posts: 17,756
Loc: Western Slope, CO
|
Re: Super Bowl Thread [Re: Bassfreak]
#21197549 - 01/29/15 03:46 PM (9 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
lol. No they were not in the super bowl in 2010.
I did forget about the 11-12' season though When the Pats lost to the Giants...again.
--------------------
“[...]the only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes “Awww!”
|
|