Home | Community | Message Board

World Seed Supply
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
OfflinePatlal
You ask too many questions
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/09/10
Posts: 44,812
Loc: Ottawa Flag
Last seen: 9 hours, 49 minutes
Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) * 1
    #14782994 - 07/17/11 06:46 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

I found this on Erowid. Wonderful website.

Maybe some of you have read this already but I think its worth posting:


INTRO

One of the main powers that law enforcement officers carry is the power to intimidate citizens into voluntarily giving up their rights. Police are trained to believe in their authority and trained to perform their interactions with private citizens with confidence. It is their job to deal with problems and they learn to manage uncomfortable situations through strength. Most people, when confronted by police get a mild panic reaction, become anxious, and try to do whatever they can to minimize the time spent with the officer. Because of the imbalance of power between citizen and officer, when a law enforcement officer makes a strongly worded request, most people consent without realizing that they are giving up constitutional protections against improper meddling by the State in the private affairs of citizens.

A common situation is that of the traffic stop. A person is pulled over for a real or perceived vehicle violation and, after checking the driver's license and registration, the officer asks the driver if they have any weapons or illegal drugs in their car. When the citizen answers "no", the police officer asks (in the strongest language he can without demanding) to check that for himself. "Then you wouldn't mind if I took a look in your trunk." or "Why don't you step out of your car." Most people acquiesce to the 'requests' because they don't realize they have the right to say no.



WHY YOU HAVE TO SAY "NO" CLEARLY

The Federal Supreme Court has ruled that as long as the police do not force an individual to do something, the individual is acting voluntarily, even if a normal person would feel very intimidated and would not reasonably feel they could say no. (see Florida v. Bostick, 1991) If you do what a policeman tells you to do before you are arrested, you are 'voluntarily' complying with their 'requests'.

Unfortunately police will often try to push citizens to accept a search, to the point of ignoring when you say "no". Its important to say very clearly "I do not consent to a warrantless search." Or "This is a private event/home/place, you may not enter without a warrant." Don't simply answer questions about searches with a simple "yes" or "no". See this case where drug police asked a confusing question and claimed they misunderstand the answer "yes" to mean they could search (October 24, 2000. Gregg County CODE officers, defendant Dockens, judge Steger, federal court, east district Texas).

Until you say "No, I don't think I'd like to do that." you are cooperating as a peer with the law enforcement officer who is trying to make the world safer. When you say "no" to a request by a police officer, you are asserting your lawful rights as a private citizen. If the officer demands you comply, then in most cases you have little choice. Usually, however, the officer is likely to try to convince you to comply voluntarily. Until and unless you say "no" and stick to it, the police don't even need any real authority to tell you what to do.



WHAT A POLICEMAN CAN MAKE YOU DO

What a Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) can demand of a citizen depends heavily on the context of the order. Most generally, police are allowed by the courts to act as any reasonable private citizen would. They may ask questions, look through windows that they happen to be near, walk or drive in public areas, etc. Without a warrant or any suspicion of illegal activity, they are allowed to interact with other citizens, but they have a limited amount of authority to demand compliance, search, or detain people or things.

In highly volatile or dangerous situations, a LEO's authority to require compliance is much higher than in non-threatening contexts. The Supreme Court has ruled (with Terry v. Ohio being one of the primary cases) that the police are allowed to protect themselves from potentially dangerous people or situations. Under the umbrella of "concern for safety" or "search for weapons" the police have wide latitude to do what they want and to order citizens to comply with their demands.

The Terry v. Ohio case created the "weapons search", "terry search", or "terry pat" exception to the 4th Amendment 'probable cause requirement' for searches. The court ruled that if a police officer "[has] reasonable cause to believe that [someone] might be armed" they can require they submit to a quick patdown. What this has meant is that it is now standard practice to pat down anyone that a LEO wants to, without the need for arrest, probable cause, or even suspicion of a crime.

Many police use weapons pats as a way to intimidate and harass citizens, since it is a power the courts have allowed them to use with little justification. Often a LEO will find something during their patdown which is clearly not a weapon which they would like to see, but this is beyond their Court-approved authority ( see below ).

Also under the 'concern for safety' umbrella, police are given wide latitude by courts to ask individuals to comply with simple non-intrusive commands such as "stand over there" or "wait here for a moment", but the line between order and request becomes very fuzzy when an officer starts telling people where to go unless the situation is volatile / dangerous. There are many stories of two (or more) individuals confronted by police ( one example ) whom the police intentionally separate to try to intimidate or to compare stories. This is generally a 'fishing' maneuver which would not fall under the 'concern for safety' umbrella. ( see below )

During a stop for a traffic violation, police have the power to demand a proper driver's license and other state-required documentation (registration, insurance). In most [ed-all?] states they also have the power to demand sobriety tests [ed - do they need reasonable suspicion of intoxication ?]. The courts have also given police the power to frisk a driver based on the Terry v. Ohio decision (the police should have some reason to think there is danger) and some decisions have even allowed an officer (with no suspicion or cause) to search the area around the driver's seat. [ed-citation for this?]

When a private, law abiding citizen encounters police, the amount of intrusion a Law Enforcement Officer is allowed to demand is limited. Some areas have laws against "disobeying a police officer" or "obstructing an officer from their duties", but the bounds of what officers can reasonably require someone not suspected of any other criminal activity in a peaceful situation have not been clearly drawn by the courts. If someone interferes with a police officer engaged in an arrest or investigation, police tend to have very little patience and will quickly threaten or implement detainment or arrest. Generally, courts give police wide latitude in executing their duties and disobeying a "reasonable" direct order from an officer could be prosecuted in most jurisdictions.

As an encounter proceeds, the police gather data that they can use to formulate 'reasonable, articulable suspicion' or (stronger) 'probable cause' that the individual has contraband or is involved in a crime. As the level of suspicion rises, so does the LEO's authority to intrude into a person's affairs. Once the level rises to 'probable cause' to believe that there is contraband in a vehicle, the Supreme Court has made some very disturbing decisions allowing the police broad power to search in certain cases, including the power to search closed containers without a warrant. (see United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982) )

In a recent decision (Wyoming v. Houghton, April 1999), the Supreme Court ruled that even passengers' belongings, if left in the car, may be searched thoroughly if the driver is suspected of a crime.

In most states, you are not required to identify yourself or show the police your ID (unless you are in a vehicle). We have been unable to confirm that in Nevada that police try to charge people with obstruction of justice for people who refuse to identify themselves to police. However, if you choose to identify yourself, you are required to tell the truth. It is a crime to lie to federal police agents and it is a crime to give false identification to police in many areas [ed- find a cite for this?].

The Supreme Court has said: "A brief stop of a suspicious individual, in order to determine his identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information, may be most reasonable in light of the facts known to the officer at the time." Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146 (1972).

If you want to avoid long and unpleasant interactions with police, do not give them any reasons to suspect you of criminal activity. Courteously decline to participate in 'fishing expeditions' or any other actions you do not wish to perform.

Police may search you 'incident to arrest': after or while arresting someone, police are allowed to search the body of the person being arrested. Recent decisions by the Supreme Court have also allowed the police to do exhaustive searches of any vehicle the arrestee was in and any containers therein. The Supreme Court held "that the police may examine the contents of any open or closed container found within the passenger compartment, 'for if the passenger compartment is within the reach of the arrestee, so will containers in it be within his reach.'" 453 U.S., at 460 (footnote omitted). See also Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692, 702 (1981).

In Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977), the Supreme Court "held that police Officers may order persons out of [463 U.S. 1032, 1048] an automobile during a stop for a traffic violation, and may frisk those persons for weapons if there is a reasonable belief that they are armed and dangerous."



WHAT A POLICEMAN CAN NOT MAKE YOU DO
Police are not allowed to frisk for anything except weapons. If, during a weapons pat, an officer discovers something 'suspicious' you don't have to show it to them.

Although the police have been given a lot of leeway to 'check for weapons', the Supreme Court has ruled (in the key decision Minnesota v Dickerson, 1993) that a weapons search may not be used as a pretext for a more general search. In Minnesota v Dickerson, a man was stopped coming out of a 'notorious crack house' and was patted down in a 'Terry Stop'. The officer noticed something in the man's pocket which he said 'felt to be a lump of crack cocaine in cellophane'. He reached in the defendant's pocket and found some crack-cocaine. The Supreme Court ruled that in order to determine whether the item was crack or not required a further, unwarranted search was necessary which was not acceptable by 4th Amendment standards.

Police are not allowed to search everyone (see Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979). In Ybarra v. Illinois, a man was patted down in a bar where the police were arresting a bar owner for selling heroin. An officer identified "a cigarette pack with objects in it" in the man's pocket during the pat down and decided to search Ybarra. The High Court ruled that the officer overstepped his authority by searching everyone in the bar, even though they had a warrant to arrest the bartender and search the bar for evidence of drug sales.

A common situation where police attempt to search many individuals without probable cause is a raided party. Sometimes police tell people to 'empty your pockets' or they pat everyone down as they are leaving or they target a few people based on appearance for a full blown search. Most raids on parties are done without a judge-issued warrant and are based on noise complaints, city ordainances about event sizes, etc. In these cases, most searches will be citizens 'voluntarily' complying with requests except in the case of violence, extreme intoxication, or obvious criminal activity. Be polite and considerate of the difficult job the LEO's have, but do not consent to any warrantless search and do not offer information to the police regarding any criminal activity they suspect you of.


HOW TO SAY NO

So, when a policeman says "Empty your pockets for me?" or "Why don't you step over here for a moment?" What does a reasonable, law abiding citizen say if s/he doesn't want to? Unfortunately there may be no simple answer to this. Because of the nature of most police-citizen interactions, tensions can be high and LEO's may interpret any dissent as hostility or 'suspicious behaviour'.
Stay Calm. Speak calmly and slowly and don't be surprised if the officer becomes irritated, angry, or belligerent. Move slowly.
Ask Questions. One way to Say No is to ask questions in return: "Is that a request or an order?" "Am I under arrest?" "Am I free to go?" "Why do you want me to *whatever*?" "Am I a suspect in a crime?"
Say No. Another way to Say No is to very clearly say no: "No, I would like to leave." "No, I do not consent to any warrantless searches." "You do not have my permission to search me / my car / my belongings."
Defuse Tensions. Do everything you can to defuse the tensions and seem peaceful. If an LEO thinks you might be dangerous, the courts have ruled that they have a greater authority to force you to comply.
Do not Resist. Do not Argue with a Cop. Do not Touch a cop. Don't Run. Don't complain or threaten an officer legally.
Comply when Required. Knowing when you are required to comply can be difficult (see What You Must Do and What You Don't Have to Do ) The moment an LEO pulls a gun, do what they say. If they make you do something through force, your Constitutional Rights are not as important as staying healthy and alive. You can challenge the arrest in court if your rights are violated.
Give the Cop a Break. Remember that police have a very difficult job to do and most cops are doing their best to try to keep their communities safe. When it comes to dealing with unusual or strange individuals or confronting drug issues, officers (and many people in the world) make some bad snap judgements. But most cops think of themselves as the Good Guys, so try to let em know you're on their side.
Ask for a Lawyer. As soon as its clear you will be arrested, ask for a lawyer and then keep quiet. Police will try to get you to talk. Don't.


CAN SAYING NO GET ME IN MORE TROUBLE?

The short answer to this is, of course, yes and no. A lot is dependent on your rapport with the individual officer(s). Saying No to a police officer should be done gently to avoid enraging them so you don't get beaten up. Saying No to a warrantless search may cause a police officer to harass you further to try to get you to comply. Saying No, however, is always the best idea when it gets to the point of arrest and prosecution. It is never in your interest to cooperate with the police in helping them collect evidence against you. If you do say No and a policeman searches anyway, evidence can sometimes be suppressed (thrown out). If you agree to a search, you have no grounds to dispute the evidence.

It is common to have an officer 'ask' forcefully first and if the suspect gives any indication of saying No, they threaten to arrest them and take them to the station. They say things like "if you don't open your trunk/pocket/whatever for me, I can arrest you and we can open it up down at the station". Often officers will imply that if the suspect cooperates, the cop will go easier on them. While it is true that a police officer controls whether you are arrested or not, very few police officers will overlook anything illegal they find in a search (including very small amounts of cannabis)


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePrisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: Patlal]
    #14783024 - 07/17/11 06:52 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

the appropriate phrase is always "I do not consent to a search of my vehicle"

if a cop says "do you mind if I search your vehicle?" and you respond with a
NO, you're giving him consent as in "no, I do not mind if you search my
vehicle", always use the phrase I stated above so there is no confusion, do
not discuss further, do not argue that you have nothing to hide when they
bring it up always a simple and polite "I do not consent to a search of my
vehicle"


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDoc_T
Random Dude
Male User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/06/09
Posts: 42,395
Loc: Colorado Flag
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #14783060 - 07/17/11 07:02 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:


:blah:

Stay calm. Be polite, say "no sir, I do not consent to a search."

:blah:

:blah:

:blah:






--------------------
You make it all possible. Doesn't it feel good?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinePatlal
You ask too many questions
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/09/10
Posts: 44,812
Loc: Ottawa Flag
Last seen: 9 hours, 49 minutes
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #14783071 - 07/17/11 07:04 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

This information should stay on the 1st page of the pub permanently


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinenice1
Not the droid your looking for
 User Gallery


Registered: 09/26/09
Posts: 10,449
Loc: earth
Last seen: 11 years, 1 month
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: Patlal]
    #14783096 - 07/17/11 07:08 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

Yeah but realisticly they can just make up some shit and still fuck you.

We don't get an option here but they have to have a reasonable suspicion in the first place.  They could bend that but generally they don't bother :shrug:

I imagine by not consenting it would be seen as an act of incrimination.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*
Other

Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan Flag
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: nice1]
    #14783422 - 07/17/11 08:21 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

Saying No to a police officer should be done gently to avoid enraging them so you don't get beaten up.




:facepalm: :rofl2:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinestarfire_xes
I Am 'They'
Male User Gallery


Registered: 10/24/09
Posts: 21,590
Loc: Dallas with all the assho...
Last seen: 7 months, 26 days
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: Patlal]
    #14783469 - 07/17/11 08:33 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

what would be a good law would be for a 'peace officer' to have audio visual recording going for interaction.


--------------------
:smug: [/url][/url] 
:smirk: IF THE NEIGHBORS COMPLAIN BECAUSE THE MUSIC'S TOO LOUD, TURN IT UP SO YOU CAN'T HEAR THEM BITCH    :smirk:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePrisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: nice1]
    #14783473 - 07/17/11 08:33 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

nice1 said:
Yeah but realisticly they can just make up some shit and still fuck you.







maybe in england but in the US it's easy to get an illegal search dismissed
and any evidence it yeilded will also be even if it's a dead body in the trunk

Quote:

I imagine by not consenting it would be seen as an act of incrimination.




not in the US, supreme court has already ruled on this


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinenice1
Not the droid your looking for
 User Gallery


Registered: 09/26/09
Posts: 10,449
Loc: earth
Last seen: 11 years, 1 month
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #14783743 - 07/17/11 09:29 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

I mean I bety the police officer will really want to search you if you decline because hes gonna think you got something.  Can't he just rope you in for disorderly conduct or something and then search you?  I imagine there are things they can just make up.  Here they can just say you looked intoxicated and then they can arrest you although 99% of police are not that mean.  Most cops I've spoken to here have been very reasonable people.

Quote:

even if it's a dead body in the trunk




So your saying theres no repercussion at all for murder if the search was not consented to?  I can't believe that.  What would the proof that you didn't consent even be?  Surely there can't be any because its word of mouth.  Your word against the word of a police officer and if you have a corpse nobody will believe you.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePrisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: nice1]
    #14783885 - 07/17/11 09:53 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

nice1 said:
I mean I bety the police officer will really want to search you if you decline because hes gonna think you got something.  Can't he just rope you in for disorderly conduct or something and then search you?  I imagine there are things they can just make up




they can and often will make up shit to try and validate their search but
once again, if the search is illegal it's illegal and they cant just
charge you with something based on your refusal



Quote:

Quote:

even if it's a dead body in the trunk




So your saying theres no repercussion at all for murder if the search was not consented to?  I can't believe that.  What would the proof that you didn't consent even be?




no I didnt say that, I said the evidence would be thrown out, if tey saw blood dripping from the trunk they'd have probable cause that a crime has been committed and could search the trunk, if a smell of a decomposing body were present they could but if they stopped you for speeding, asked to search, you refused and they decided to make up the excuse of the odor of drugs or any other reason the judge would toss that out as inadmissible "fruit of the poisonous tree"

they would have to find other evidence to use to convict you


as for evidence, cops have cameras and are wired for sound int he US that
way they can use everything as evidence against you as the need arises,
the nice thing is that it can be used against them as well


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinenice1
Not the droid your looking for
 User Gallery


Registered: 09/26/09
Posts: 10,449
Loc: earth
Last seen: 11 years, 1 month
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #14783934 - 07/17/11 10:01 PM (12 years, 7 months ago)

OK i understand.

My mates have been searched so many times because the car stinks of weed and they never seem to find the stuff.  Most of the times they hid it somewhere but other times its been sat on the floor and they still didn't find it :grin:  One time my mate shoved a few ounces up underneath the steering wheel and they saw him duck down to do it but just looked in the footwell but couldnt see it, lol.

Lucky for us they never use sniffer dogs :shrug:  Dunno why but our cops just don't use them.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinejivangilad
Stranger
Male User Gallery
Registered: 06/02/08
Posts: 714
Loc: Israel
Last seen: 2 years, 5 months
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: nice1]
    #21099916 - 01/11/15 03:14 AM (9 years, 1 month ago)

Such a wonderful advice.
To stay calm, and polite, and not to complain/ argue.
Thanks.
I have been investigated, and I complained about why they disturb peaceful people. Although I was right to some extent, They got upset and nearly put me handcuffs.
I realize now it was a mistake, and I should also understand the policemen.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe Librarian
The Accountant
Male


Registered: 01/03/15
Posts: 393
Loc: Hiding under a Mushroom
Last seen: 8 years, 7 months
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: Patlal]
    #21099939 - 01/11/15 03:30 AM (9 years, 1 month ago)

There's lots of videos on YouTube how to deal with police.

Most of the good ones end up with police trying to intimidate
the person by rallying lots of police and bullying the person.

If you keep a calm head and don't anything stupid you will most likely prevail.

Knowing the law helps too as most police don't know the law.

Reading your Constitutional Laws and understanding them is your best ally.

Having witnesses, a video camera or cell phone is another great ally.

If you broke the law I can assure you they won't ask you for any consent.
You'll be in cuffs in no time flat. When they ask for consent it's because
they want you to waive your rights plain and simple.

Don't ever go anywhere alone with them.



--------------------
Spore prints or it didn't happen.           Consolidate is a fancy word for: "If you touch it some more any time soon you'll kill it all."                              Great Scorpions Song
       


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblemantis
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/26/03
Posts: 5,235
Loc: Bunker Alpha, GMC Flag
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: Patlal]
    #21100440 - 01/11/15 08:39 AM (9 years, 1 month ago)

Good information :thumbup:

Practice your 4th amendment rights while we still have something vaguely resembling them.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDistorted Vision
The best. Of the worst.
Male


Registered: 07/30/09
Posts: 4,292
Loc: Indiana Flag
Re: Guidelines for Saying No to Police Searches (without getting your ass kicked and thrown to jail) [Re: mantis]
    #21100685 - 01/11/15 09:34 AM (9 years, 1 month ago)

I've said clearly I do not consent. They said it smells like pot, so they are allowed. It did not smell..

They searched and found nothing. I'm guessing the court would have not cared if he searched illegally or not. I have declined a search and it actually worked though. Cops can pretty much do anything they want and get away with it 95% of the time.

"I don't make the laws, I just enforce them." :fuckyou:


--------------------


"Yo yo just here to spread my clit and show ya'll what a wonderful and free being we are all inside lets take the acid and turn inside into the outside come on over baby lets smell the roses ohh ohh come on we're about to get lit show my undies to your baby I'll hug it down three times go around frown come on we aint a nice clown kiss me upside down down down come on sorry if you cant handle my wokeness come on lets take her panties off write shroomery on my asshole and taste it lick it make if feel like we was 1978 come on baby lets do the locamotion"-Twig dude


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Im getting my ass kicked badly....
( 1 2 all )
OldSpice 4,454 36 05/04/04 02:56 PM
by notapillow
* Mike Gordon gets assed kicked by Hell's Angles Adom 15,579 4 08/19/03 11:23 AM
by Quintessence
* Police
( 1 2 3 all )
Fungushungry 4,427 46 12/05/05 06:19 PM
by XUL
* Police: Man dies after trying to swallow bag of pot
( 1 2 3 all )
Stein 6,696 49 11/20/03 11:02 PM
by OldSpice
* Illegal Search?
( 1 2 all )
Cujo 3,749 29 10/21/05 06:17 PM
by SoulSuuckinJERK
* Hey look a newbie, let's kick it!
( 1 2 3 all )
DVine 4,013 52 03/14/04 07:56 PM
by ninetynine
* wa state kicks ass a gain onetime 761 5 07/30/04 07:39 PM
by mntlfngrs
* Roommate Guidelines psyka 1,515 19 10/10/04 09:37 AM
by A3eyedfish

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
2,541 topic views. 8 members, 51 guests and 27 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.04 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 14 queries.