|
Anonymous #1
|
Analog Law
#19352010 - 12/31/13 05:30 PM (10 years, 30 days ago) |
|
|
If any of you have experience dealing with legal situations or are lawyers what do you think about the analog law. I know technically in the united states proof is supposed to lie with the accuser but it doesn't seem to always work that way. If you were caught with analogs of illegal drugs how would they bust you if its only illegal to consume them. Could you say you purchased them to do research at a later time, assuming you are not a scientist and have no equipment. Would you have to state at all what you are doing with them? How would they prove that you are ingesting them unless they did a urine analysis? To sum things up, not technically but in reality do you think you would be legally fine to purchase analogs of illegal chemicals.
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,505
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
They don't have to prove you're ingesting them...only that you intend for them to be consumed by humans. Proving that can be tricky or it can be easy depending on what other evidence they have.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Anonymous #1
|
Re: Analog Law [Re: Enlil]
#19354778 - 01/01/14 01:42 PM (10 years, 29 days ago) |
|
|
Do you think possessing other drugs that are meant for consumption would make it easy to prove you intend on human consumption? If you had weed, lsd, mushrooms, and so on. If this is not the type of evidence you are referring to could you tell me what kind of evidence you think would get you in trouble?
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,505
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
If the analog were stored with the others, yeah, that'd be some good evidence. Similarly, if the analog were divided into small portions for distribution, that'd be evidence, too. Also, the presence of paraphernalia for consuming would be evidence.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Anonymous #1
|
Re: Analog Law [Re: Enlil]
#19354870 - 01/01/14 02:08 PM (10 years, 29 days ago) |
|
|
Even if there were no residues of the analogs on pipes and bongs ( I only use them for weed )? Do you think ordering an analog chemical would warrant a search of your house? The only reason I worry is because all the sites I have found lately only accept bank transfers. If they searched my house it actually wouldn't matter why, I would be in prison with all the stuff I have thats not drug related.
|
Anonymous #2
|
|
Depending on the substance, prosecutors don't like to use the analog act because it can be labor intensive and expensive. Prosecuting can involve numerous "expert witnesses" and the science can be shaky surrounding semi-arbitrary issues such as "structurally and pharmacologically similar", etc.
|
Shpongle1



Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 3,163
Loc: Above The Clouds
Last seen: 2 years, 5 months
|
|
This has always really confused me. The Analog Act has been around for a while but people have been "legally" getting certain RC's for a while, and certain others they're still getting. I'd like to hear as much info about this as possible and I'll be watching this thread for updates.
-------------------- There are more people imprisoned for the commission of drug offenses in the United States - close to 500,000 - than are incarcerated in England, France, Germany, and Japan for all crimes combined. Examined in another way, the United States has 100,000 more people incarcerated for nonviolent drug offenses than all the countries of the European Union combined, despite the fact that the European Union has 100 million more citizens.
- "Drugs and Drug Policy: The Control of Consciousness Alteration, 2007.
|
|