|
Starter
Stranger
Registered: 05/16/03
Posts: 1,148
Loc: Australia
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: Xlea321]
#1928644 - 09/18/03 10:19 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Who knows what shaktas' story is, he'll die with his secret.
|
shakta
Infidel
Registered: 06/03/03
Posts: 2,633
Last seen: 19 years, 10 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: Starter]
#1928652 - 09/18/03 10:26 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I accidentally directed it at Alex instead of you and yes you called me filth, and said my country was full of 'tards. So again, go fuck yourelf. You started the namecalling, and I will finish it. I am tired of trying to debate things with the likes of you two.
For the record I was being a smart ass with the whole inmate thing. You do illustrate a good point though. Anytime someone challenges your delusions both of you either ignore it, or change the subject. Blix said he thought that they had probably destroyed their weapons in '91, and people like you take it as if God himself said it. Again I am sick of it and I will not be posting in this forum again. I have always admitted when I was wrong in the past. One more thing, why does your lunacy give you some superior right to post your opinion on this board?
|
st0nedphucker
Rogue State
Registered: 04/17/03
Posts: 1,047
Loc: Wales (yes it is a countr...
Last seen: 15 years, 8 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: shakta]
#1928657 - 09/18/03 10:29 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
They're libbies dont let their misguidedness get to you....
They simply post sources and then jump around proclaiming their correctness, we however at least analyse what has been written and give the other side of the story ....
-------------------- The punishment which the wise suffer, who refuse to take part in government, is to live under the government of worse men.
|
Starter
Stranger
Registered: 05/16/03
Posts: 1,148
Loc: Australia
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: shakta]
#1928676 - 09/18/03 10:41 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
What a wanker. Shakta says it wasn't directed at me, then changes his mind in the next post along that it is, if not the other post before where he edited, but Alex caught him on it LMAO. With that sort of convenient post shifting what other BS spins does he emply in his game plan? Food for thought. You're a sore loser and a little boy shakta. Go mash your pimples, you're not up to this. Edited: For the record, no I said neo-cons are 'tards and you specifically "filth", so don't go doing what your masters so conveniently do, wrap themselves in a national flag to shepherd an agenda to whip up the lemmings...you sad sap.
|
st0nedphucker
Rogue State
Registered: 04/17/03
Posts: 1,047
Loc: Wales (yes it is a countr...
Last seen: 15 years, 8 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: Starter]
#1928796 - 09/18/03 11:41 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Stop flaming, if you cant debate normally then go back to nursery
-------------------- The punishment which the wise suffer, who refuse to take part in government, is to live under the government of worse men.
|
Xlea321
Stranger
Registered: 02/25/01
Posts: 9,134
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: st0nedphucker]
#1928826 - 09/18/03 11:55 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Look who started the flaming for pitys sake, don't get on starters case after shak's just twisted his panties all to hell.
-------------------- Don't worry, B. Caapi
|
shakta
Infidel
Registered: 06/03/03
Posts: 2,633
Last seen: 19 years, 10 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: Xlea321]
#1928865 - 09/18/03 12:08 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Alex123 said: Look who started the flaming for pitys sake, don't get on starters case after shak's just twisted his panties all to hell.
Your damn right I got pissed. I originally thought you posted it. Your bullshit crawling on the belly crap pisses me off too. He started the flaming by calling me filth and a ringworm. He also insulted my country, and then claimed he intellectually beat me, when in fact the first post I responded to sounded like a drunk bum wrote it.
|
Starter
Stranger
Registered: 05/16/03
Posts: 1,148
Loc: Australia
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: shakta]
#1928877 - 09/18/03 12:17 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
shakta said:
Again I am sick of it and I will not be posting in this forum again.
Can't you make good on what you say? umm.
|
Xlea321
Stranger
Registered: 02/25/01
Posts: 9,134
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: shakta]
#1928880 - 09/18/03 12:18 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Your damn right I got pissed. I originally thought you posted it. Your bullshit crawling on the belly crap pisses me off too. He started the flaming by calling me filth and a ringworm. He also insulted my country, and then claimed he intellectually beat me, when in fact the first post I responded to sounded like a drunk bum wrote it.
Easy shak, easy. We're complete strangers on a shroom board. There's no need to get your blood pressure up over this. As the buddhists teach, the person you think has done you the most wrong can often be your greatest teacher.
-------------------- Don't worry, B. Caapi
|
shakta
Infidel
Registered: 06/03/03
Posts: 2,633
Last seen: 19 years, 10 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: Starter]
#1928881 - 09/18/03 12:18 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
It is already proving difficult not to respond. I won't be the first on this forum to get pissed and then get over it.
|
shakta
Infidel
Registered: 06/03/03
Posts: 2,633
Last seen: 19 years, 10 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: shakta]
#1928886 - 09/18/03 12:21 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I am sure some of you will say I am stupid for this, but I apologize for the flames. Starter and Alex just really pissed me off. If I need to be banned or whatever that is fine.
|
Xlea321
Stranger
Registered: 02/25/01
Posts: 9,134
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: shakta]
#1928887 - 09/18/03 12:21 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
It is already proving difficult not to respond
What, to a pair of "pinko bastards?"?
-------------------- Don't worry, B. Caapi
|
Starter
Stranger
Registered: 05/16/03
Posts: 1,148
Loc: Australia
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: shakta]
#1928896 - 09/18/03 12:25 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Shakta, this is just the net, not a contact sport. So go have a chill pill or whatever your GP prescribes and I'll catch up flip side after some kip. Nite.
Take care Alex.
|
Xlea321
Stranger
Registered: 02/25/01
Posts: 9,134
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: shakta]
#1928910 - 09/18/03 12:28 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Remember we love you shak.
-------------------- Don't worry, B. Caapi
|
shakta
Infidel
Registered: 06/03/03
Posts: 2,633
Last seen: 19 years, 10 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: Xlea321]
#1928922 - 09/18/03 12:33 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Alex123 said: It is already proving difficult not to respond
What, to a pair of "pinko bastards?"?
I will try to just think that in the future instead of saying it.
|
Phred
Fred's son
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 2 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: Starter]
#1929250 - 09/18/03 01:58 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Starter, your name is appropriate. You instigated the name-calling. Shakta, you and I have had words on this before.
This is an official warning to both of you. Next time it happens, I will recommend to the Admins that the offender be banned.
I suggest both of you re-read the sticky post at the top of the first page of this forum.
pinky
--------------------
|
unlikelyhero
Ramblin' Man
Registered: 12/31/02
Posts: 106
Loc: Lancaster (Uni), Darlingt...
Last seen: 20 years, 4 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: Phred]
#1931734 - 09/19/03 07:11 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Boys, boys... calm down. No more flaming. Let's not turn this into a name-calling fest when it's way more fun to ask someone to try and deny what was said by Hans Blix and what has been discovered of late. Let's clarify: There never were WMDs. Iraq was never a threat. The whole war was based on a lie.
Can someone argue against that with reputable sources?
UH
-------------------- They lie about marijuana. Tell you pot-smoking makes you unmotivated. Lie! When you're high, you can do everything you normally do, just as well. You just realize that it's not worth the fucking effort. There is a difference - Bill Hicks
|
shakta
Infidel
Registered: 06/03/03
Posts: 2,633
Last seen: 19 years, 10 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: unlikelyhero]
#1931757 - 09/19/03 07:28 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
If it was a reputable argument to begin with maybe. Blix said that they probably destroyed them all in '91. He doesn't know anymore than the rest of us do in truth. As far as the whole war being based on a lie, that remains to be seen as well. Even if there are no weapons left we don't know if our intelligence was falsified, or if anyone knowingly lied. Blix also said that Saddam has kept up appearances of having these weapons. So, if he made the rest of the world think he had them still, even if he didn't, he made himself look like a threat to the outside world. Saddam did have a highly sophisticated security infrastructure, and I don't think it is unreasonable to assume that he was able to make everyone think he had them still even if he didn't.
|
Dava
journeyman
Registered: 03/02/03
Posts: 80
Loc: Belgium
Last seen: 11 years, 5 months
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: shakta]
#1931786 - 09/19/03 07:58 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I d love to work for the intelligence services. Highly paid and the only thing you ve got to do is believeing Saddam and other scum.
-------------------- "These psychedelic substances cause hysterical psychoses in people who have not taken them..." - Timothy Leary
|
Zen Peddler
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 6,379
Loc: orbit
|
Re: Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991 [Re: Xlea321]
#1931811 - 09/19/03 08:13 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Here are some facts: There are currently 44 million citizens of the United States of America that are illiterate. Four cents from every pay cheque earned in the US goes to fund Israeli occupation of the Palestinean territories. This is going directly to a country that only 37% of US citizens polled, could actually identify on a map. Of the pardons provided by the Oval Office since George W frauded his way in, 95% were to corporate directors who represent the top 5% of the population of the united states, yet 75% of the wealth. The top three richest people in the US have assets that could feed every starving child in the world (those below the poverty line) four times, and represent more wealth in value than the assets of every nation in Asia, Africa and South America combined. The US is only one of a few nations - the only developed one - that refused to ratify the UN convention on the rights of the Child. This would undermine to state policy of sending children (some as yhoung as 15 when the crime was committed) to death.
--------------------
|
|