|
psyconaught
Chemical Connoisseur


Registered: 11/04/10
Posts: 6,100
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
#19251239 - 12/09/13 05:06 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sulfurshelfsean said: How does laughing at a stupid person equate to you approving of their stupidity? Mush for Brains: Grasper of Straws!
yeah he tends to do that.
-------------------- Think for yourself, question authority
|
Mush4Brains
LOOL HACKED!!!

Registered: 07/31/13
Posts: 4,419
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
#19252162 - 12/09/13 07:49 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sulfurshelfsean said: How does laughing at a stupid person equate to you approving of their stupidity? Mush for Brains: Grasper of Straws!
There is nothing funny about people this stupid being in positions of power.
|
Mush4Brains
LOOL HACKED!!!

Registered: 07/31/13
Posts: 4,419
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Mush4Brains]
#19252171 - 12/09/13 07:51 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
|
psyconaught
Chemical Connoisseur


Registered: 11/04/10
Posts: 6,100
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Mush4Brains]
#19252194 - 12/09/13 07:55 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Mush4Brains said:
Quote:
Sulfurshelfsean said: How does laughing at a stupid person equate to you approving of their stupidity? Mush for Brains: Grasper of Straws!
There is nothing funny about people this stupid being in positions of power.
i'll repeat the question for you. How does laughing at stupidity mean you approve of said dumbass position?
-------------------- Think for yourself, question authority
|
Sulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes



Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 4,012
Last seen: 1 day, 9 hours
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Mush4Brains]
#19253088 - 12/09/13 10:47 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Mush4Brains said:
Quote:
Sulfurshelfsean said: How does laughing at a stupid person equate to you approving of their stupidity? Mush for Brains: Grasper of Straws!
There is nothing funny about people this stupid being in positions of power.
No. But they're capacity for stupidity is. So....Again, how does that equate to approving of their political positions, or of them holding office?
--------------------
   Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!
|
Mush4Brains
LOOL HACKED!!!

Registered: 07/31/13
Posts: 4,419
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
#19253245 - 12/09/13 11:25 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
If you think something is "hilarious," then you are giving their position a positive light. If you think it is funny someone could be so stupid, you are implicitly agreeing with the rationale.
|
Sulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes



Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 4,012
Last seen: 1 day, 9 hours
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Mush4Brains]
#19253420 - 12/10/13 12:22 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Your logic is mind numbing. Because I laugh at a person for being stupid, or their statements for the fact that they are baseless and pulled straight from their asses, means I agree with that person somehow? Or that I am painting their position in a positive light somehow?
--------------------
   Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!
|
psyconaught
Chemical Connoisseur


Registered: 11/04/10
Posts: 6,100
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
#19253569 - 12/10/13 01:09 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
its obvious because i think its funny when the guys on Jackass smash each other in the nuts that obviously means I want to smash myself in the nuts Come on Mush you've made some dumb ass arguments on here but this one takes the cake.
-------------------- Think for yourself, question authority
|
starfire_xes
I Am 'They'



Registered: 10/24/09
Posts: 21,590
Loc: Dallas with all the assho...
Last seen: 7 months, 26 days
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: psyconaught] 1
#19253921 - 12/10/13 04:53 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
What I find a sad state of affairs is someone having to run not against women, but against a main stream media who makes a statement such as 'someone should defecate on sarah palin' or '....that right wing slut Laura Ingraham' etc.
Mush and Sweeper let me say in advance: I don't care what you think.
|
sweeper54



Registered: 11/07/12
Posts: 2,865
Last seen: 6 days, 6 hours
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: starfire_xes]
#19254080 - 12/10/13 06:23 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
First of I doubt you even hear what he said, and I totally agree with him.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/04/martin-bashir-resigns-msnbc_n_4385884.html
It starts @ 1:16
I agree with what he said.
There's a difference between telling one woman from the lunatic fringe and telling all the women in the US they should suck it up and be grateful we gat them the right to vote.
|
Sulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes



Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 4,012
Last seen: 1 day, 9 hours
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: starfire_xes]
#19254638 - 12/10/13 10:17 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Shit spews out of her mouth all the time. What's wrong with putting some in for once?
--------------------
   Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: sweeper54]
#19255365 - 12/10/13 01:13 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
sweeper54 said: First of I doubt you even hear what he said, and I totally agree with him.
I heard what he said. I see what you write. So you think that someone in public life who you stupidly disagree with should have shit and piss poured in her mouth? What do you think should be done with me?
--------------------
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
#19255370 - 12/10/13 01:14 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sulfurshelfsean said: Shit spews out of her mouth all the time. What's wrong with putting some in for once?
This is, of course, complete nonsense. You have never written a post as cogent as her arguments.
--------------------
|
Sulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes



Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 4,012
Last seen: 1 day, 9 hours
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: zappaisgod]
#19255582 - 12/10/13 02:05 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
"The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil." –-Sarah Palin, in a message posted on Facebook about Obama's health care plan, Aug. 7, 2009
Her arguments are laughable at best.
Or how about this nice steaming turd?
"But obviously, we've got to stand with our North Korean allies." --Sarah Palin, after being asked how she would handle the current hostilities between the two Koreas, interview on Glenn Beck's radio show, Nov. 24, 2010
--------------------
   Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!
Edited by Sulfurshelfsean (12/10/13 02:09 PM)
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
#19255623 - 12/10/13 02:16 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sulfurshelfsean said: "The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil." –-Sarah Palin, in a message posted on Facebook about Obama's health care plan, Aug. 7, 2009
Her arguments are laughable at best.
She was spot on about thatQuote:
Or how about this nice steaming turd?
"But obviously, we've got to stand with our North Korean allies." --Sarah Palin, after being asked how she would handle the current hostilities between the two Koreas, interview on Glenn Beck's radio show, Nov. 24, 2010
Typo She obviously didn't mean North Korea
--------------------
|
Sulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes



Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 4,012
Last seen: 1 day, 9 hours
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: zappaisgod]
#19255655 - 12/10/13 02:23 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Oh really? What death panels were implemented in the cluster-fuck known as Obamacare? Where in the law does it outline who can be on these panels? And I doubt it was a typo, she just doesn't care to now the difference between the two.
--------------------
   Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!
|
sweeper54



Registered: 11/07/12
Posts: 2,865
Last seen: 6 days, 6 hours
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: zappaisgod]
#19255681 - 12/10/13 02:28 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
zappaisgod said:
Quote:
sweeper54 said: First of I doubt you even hear what he said, and I totally agree with him.
I heard what he said. I see what you write. So you think that someone in public life who you stupidly disagree with should have shit and piss poured in her mouth? What do you think should be done with me?
Zap unfortunately for your argument, I don't think about you.
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
#19255682 - 12/10/13 02:29 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/time-choosing/2013/dec/6/sebelius-grim-reaper-obamas-hhs-head-controls-medi/
Quote:
On Monday of last week, Mark Halperin, political editor for Time Magazine and a well-respected liberal journalist was on “The Steve Malzberg Show” on NewsMax radio and was asked the following question : “…so, you believe there will be rationing, a.k.a. “death panels (in Obamacare)?”
His response was, “It’s built into the plan. It’s not like a guess or a judgment. That’s part of how costs are controlled.”
Halperin is correct, and these Obamacare “death panels” are innocuously referred to as the Independent Payment Advisory Board (“IPAB”). IPAB is a board made up of up to 15 unelected bureaucrats. Progressive Democrat Sen. Howard Dean of Vermont described it well in a July 28, 2013 op-ed in the Wall Street Journal as follows:
“The IPAB is essentially a health-care rationing body. By setting doctor reimbursement rates for Medicare and determining which procedures and drugs will be covered and at what price, the IPAB will be able to stop certain treatments its members do not favor by simply setting rates to levels where no doctor or hospital will perform them.”
Your ignorance does not mean she is wrong. For the most part it just means you are ignorant.
--------------------
|
Sulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes



Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 4,012
Last seen: 1 day, 9 hours
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: zappaisgod]
#19255715 - 12/10/13 02:37 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
"The ACA does not allow IPAB to recommend rationing health care. The text of ACA explicitly states that IPAB cannot make "any recommendation to ration health care... or otherwise restrict benefits or modify eligibility criteria." A Politifact analysis reported that IPAB is "forbidden from submitting 'any recommendation to ration health care.'" Washington Post's Glenn Kessler pointed out that the ACA "explicitly says that the recommendations cannot lead to rationing of health care"
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/11/26/fox-news-uses-nuclear-option-to-revive-death-pa/197065
Misleading people by calling it a death panel, doesn't make it a death panel. It mostly means you're misleading.
--------------------
   Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: It's a sad state of affairs when your party needs to be coached on how to run against women. [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
#19255927 - 12/10/13 03:27 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sulfurshelfsean said: "The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil." –-Sarah Palin, in a message posted on Facebook about Obama's health care plan, Aug. 7, 2009
Her arguments are laughable at best.
Or how about this nice steaming turd?
"But obviously, we've got to stand with our North Korean allies." --Sarah Palin, after being asked how she would handle the current hostilities between the two Koreas, interview on Glenn Beck's radio show, Nov. 24, 2010
Did you consider it a "nice steaming turd" when Obama said there were 57 states?
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
|