|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,967
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: nksfo5]
#19193362 - 11/26/13 06:02 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Let me ask you this: Do you think that an employer has an interest in making sure you're the kind of person that can follow the rules? If so, don't you think your willingness to break the law indicates that you might also be willing to break the boss' rules? Certainly, the consequences for breaking the law are far greater than the consequences for breaking his rules...yet you break the law regularly...
Don't you think the employer can consider that as a sign that you might be a risky employee to have around since you don't respect rules and authority?
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,967
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
Quote:
Mush4Brains said:
Actually, it is quite likely he will pass the lab test with no problems.
It sure is...that's why I said "there's a chance." I hope he gets away with it this time AND learns a lesson from it.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Mush4Brains
LOOL HACKED!!!

Registered: 07/31/13
Posts: 4,419
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: Enlil] 1
#19193376 - 11/26/13 06:05 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
People break laws every day, knowingly and unknowingly. Breaking the law isn't always people saying "fuck you" to the man. Drug users can be great employees, and non-drug users can be fucking awful.
Quote:
It sure is...that's why I said "there's a chance." I hope he gets away with it this time AND learns a lesson from it.
For a defense attorney, you sure do judge people quite harshly.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: nksfo5]
#19193379 - 11/26/13 06:05 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
nksfo5 said: agreed employers should be able to fire and hire at wim but that means also that i as a human should be able to smoke or not smoke at choice as well and not have it held against me unless it prevents from my ability to work
The two are at odds with one another.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
nksfo5
traverse traveler


Registered: 12/19/12
Posts: 689
Last seen: 4 days, 20 hours
|
|
they are one in the same if i can work and do my job as im asked and do it efficiently my home life should be of no concern to my employer
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: nksfo5]
#19193433 - 11/26/13 06:18 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
nksfo5 said: they are one in the same if i can work and do my job as im asked and do it efficiently my home life should be of no concern to my employer
They aren't the same. Your stated that an employer should be able to hire and fire on a "wim". Now you're saying he shouldn't. Which is it?
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
nksfo5
traverse traveler


Registered: 12/19/12
Posts: 689
Last seen: 4 days, 20 hours
|
|
my choice to smoke marijuana while im not at work or dont have to go to work should be of no concern to an employer. im not saying they shouldnt be able to hire or fire as they choose im saying that they legally need a reason to fire some one smoking marijuana just happens to be one (which in case) is why i used sythetic urine. my point was that they shouldnt need a reason if they dont like me that should be enough to fire me if they dont want me there and at the same time i should be able to have my personal life left out of the work environment but i dont
|
TheFakeSunRa
Bitch Splitter



Registered: 03/01/05
Posts: 16,449
Loc: Dirdy SOUF
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: nksfo5]
#19193521 - 11/26/13 06:35 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Could y'all just let it rest instead of picking apart what he's saying?
Just because there's a logical inconsistency in something doesn't mean it's clever to pick it out.
-------------------- [quote]Asante said: You constantly make posts thatr fling middle school insults at people you don't like mixed in with maladjusted psychopathic comments about wanting to beat up the other poster with a crowbar. You know how shit you are, you just don't give a fuck for precisely that reason. I disendorse you.[/quote]
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: nksfo5]
#19193536 - 11/26/13 06:38 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
nksfo5 said: my choice to smoke marijuana while im not at work or dont have to go to work should be of no concern to an employer.
Yet it is. Sometimes for legal reasons. Sometimes for safety reasons. Sometimes for insurance reasons. I smoke pot and do many other drugs. I'd still fire any employee that came to work high. With no hesitation. I choose to not piss test because I agree that what you do at home is your business. That's my choice just as it is for others to decide to test.
Quote:
im not saying they shouldnt be able to hire or fire as they choose im saying that they legally need a reason to fire some one smoking marijuana just happens to be one (which in case) is why i used sythetic urine.
You're once again contradicting yourself.
Quote:
my point was that they shouldnt need a reason if they dont like me that should be enough to fire me if they dont want me there and at the same time i should be able to have my personal life left out of the work environment but i dont
Contradiction again.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
|
Quote:
TheFakeSunRa said: Could y'all just let it rest instead of picking apart what he's saying?
Nope.
Quote:
Just because there's a logical inconsistency in something doesn't mean it's clever to pick it out.
Sure it is. Plus hopefully he'll learn from it.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,967
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
Quote:
Mush4Brains said:
For a defense attorney, you sure do judge people quite harshly.
When people do stupid shit, I do judge them. The guy knew he would be tested and used anyway. That's the kind of shit that makes defense attorneys crazy.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
nksfo5
traverse traveler


Registered: 12/19/12
Posts: 689
Last seen: 4 days, 20 hours
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: Enlil]
#19193567 - 11/26/13 06:43 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
all im saying is that corprate shouldnt have to jump through stupid hoops just to fire someone but they also shouldnt be able to fire someone if theyve worked sufficiently and correctly and have a different lifestyle than that of their own choosing
you all can continue to argue this has simply became a waste of my time though
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: nksfo5]
#19193577 - 11/26/13 06:45 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
That's not what you said.
This is what you said:
Quote:
agreed employers should be able to fire and hire at wim
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
nksfo5
traverse traveler


Registered: 12/19/12
Posts: 689
Last seen: 4 days, 20 hours
|
|
yes they should be able to hire. and fire. as they choose. WITHOUT jumping through hoops.
me being able to do as they ask. should have nothing to do with the choices i make outside of work.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: nksfo5]
#19193607 - 11/26/13 06:51 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
And again, your position is contradictory.
If you feel they should be able to hire and fire at will that would include your personal choices as well.
Perhaps your position is better summed up thus:
"They should be able to hire and fire at will, unless I disagree. Then they should have to employ me despite their wishes."
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
nksfo5
traverse traveler


Registered: 12/19/12
Posts: 689
Last seen: 4 days, 20 hours
|
|
maybe i look as though im contracdicting myself because of knowledge i have not shared the woman who drug tested me. we have had conversations. she would not pass a drug test with her urine. this is the situation. when i got tested the problem being was not through her but the man bigger than us that watched the test as well. and when i say hire and fire at will. i say it on a basis of work relation if im doing my job correctly that would be no reason to fire me wether i smoked or didnt smoke
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: nksfo5]
#19193709 - 11/26/13 07:13 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
No, you look like your contradicting yourself because you are.
An employer should be able to hire and fire at will, or they should not. It's that simple.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
nksfo5
traverse traveler


Registered: 12/19/12
Posts: 689
Last seen: 4 days, 20 hours
|
|
let me rephrase
an employer should be able to hire or fire their employee based on work ethic and efficiency. his or her personal life style should be a secondary factor that has no role in any part of obtaining or keeping the job unless it otherwise interferes with performance of tasks required for the job.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Quick Fix ----- FAIL [Re: nksfo5]
#19193756 - 11/26/13 07:25 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
That's a far cry from your previous position.
Let me remind you:
"employers should be able to fire and hire at wim"
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
nksfo5
traverse traveler


Registered: 12/19/12
Posts: 689
Last seen: 4 days, 20 hours
|
|
yeah im just not caring about this thread anymore youve been much more correct and ive been lost in my own head for quite some time i withdrawl all previous statements as im not sure what the hell im talking about right now.
have a good day or a pleasant evening whichever comes first
|
|