|
jewunit
Brutal!


Registered: 01/11/07
Posts: 34,264
Loc: Ohio
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: zappaisgod]
#19184089 - 11/24/13 07:04 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I just don't see what it has to do with anything. Yeah, sure, they shit the bed in the 70s. And they haven't in the last twenty years.
In those 20 years, they've been to the Rose Bowl twice and won both times.
At this point I'm just starting to get all my shit mixed up
-------------------- !
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
|
Quote:
TheFakeSunRa said:
Quote:
jewunit said: I didn't say they weren't part of the Big Ten... What are you trying to say?
Utah is undefeated in BCS games, but they are still garbage right now. I think that was SunRa's point.

It's Cali's house. Coliseum, Rose Bowl, Stanford, Berkeley. That's permanent.
Lol what???
Cali does not own the pac 12. Cali recruits do, but they pretty much own College football as a whole.
Its crazy when i find myself agreeing with zappa.
|
TheFakeSunRa
Bitch Splitter



Registered: 03/01/05
Posts: 16,449
Loc: Dirdy SOUF
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: elax420]
#19185633 - 11/25/13 06:56 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Right now Fresno State and Northern Illinois are ranked too low to get a BCS bowl bid. 12th is the cut off.
Current BCS rankings
1 Alabama .9881 2 Florida State .9697 3 Ohio State .9200 4 Auburn .8236 5 Missouri .8077 6 Clemson .7726 7 Oklahoma State .7615 8 Stanford .6665 9 Baylor .6456 10 South Carolina .6101 11 Michigan State .5780 12 Arizona State .5052 13 Oregon .4950 14 Northern Illinois .4620 15 Wisconsin .4448 16 Fresno State .4124 17 LSU .3737 18 Oklahoma .3380 19 UCF .3364 20 Louisville .2522 21 Texas A&M .2243 22 UCLA .1921 23 USC .1779 24 Duke .0885 25 Notre Dame .0674
I just don't see what good a 4 team playoff system is going to do. It's just going to continue to be the same elitist bullshit.
-------------------- [quote]Asante said: You constantly make posts thatr fling middle school insults at people you don't like mixed in with maladjusted psychopathic comments about wanting to beat up the other poster with a crowbar. You know how shit you are, you just don't give a fuck for precisely that reason. I disendorse you.[/quote]
|
Pureless
Crushed it


Registered: 07/16/12
Posts: 1,979
Loc: Blueridge
Last seen: 9 years, 3 days
|
|
Yeah, it really doesn't help anything... also the loser of the sec champ probably won't get in....meaning it's likely only 1 sec team will get in the 4 game playoff, we all know that's BS.
they should just get to the 8-game playoff already, I really don't see the benefits of a 4-game
watch them make conference championships not count towards the playoffs
Edited by Pureless (11/25/13 08:08 AM)
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: Pureless]
#19186316 - 11/25/13 10:37 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Yup they need at least 6. SEC should not get 2 teams in there unless some weird shit happens.
8 or 12 would be better but the logistics of that would be hard.
|
TheFakeSunRa
Bitch Splitter



Registered: 03/01/05
Posts: 16,449
Loc: Dirdy SOUF
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: elax420]
#19186376 - 11/25/13 10:53 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
The logistics are easy. Play a few more games. Make more money if youre good.It should be 16 teams. All teams should play 5 conference games and 5 RANDOMLY selected opponents from the entire FBS. Then run the tournament with sixteen teams. That would take 4 weeks.
-------------------- [quote]Asante said: You constantly make posts thatr fling middle school insults at people you don't like mixed in with maladjusted psychopathic comments about wanting to beat up the other poster with a crowbar. You know how shit you are, you just don't give a fuck for precisely that reason. I disendorse you.[/quote]
|
jewunit
Brutal!


Registered: 01/11/07
Posts: 34,264
Loc: Ohio
|
|
I think six is fine. Even four is usually enough. When was the last time there were 8 teams who had a legitimate claim to play for the title? The point of a playoff in college football is because there's often more than two teams who have that claim. Even having four is a bit rare, let alone more than four.
-------------------- !
|
TheFakeSunRa
Bitch Splitter



Registered: 03/01/05
Posts: 16,449
Loc: Dirdy SOUF
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: jewunit]
#19187149 - 11/25/13 01:57 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
With 103 teams in the race way too much of it is based on history and name recognition. That's why real schedule reform has to be a part of it. We only believe it's four teams or less because it's spoon fed to us that way. Ten wild card teams have advanced to the Super Bowl and that's out of a mere 32 opponents. #1 seeds are anything but a sure lock for the Final Four in the tourney. Who's to say. This shit of not settling it on the field is idiotic. Unless you want to admit there is no champion.
-------------------- [quote]Asante said: You constantly make posts thatr fling middle school insults at people you don't like mixed in with maladjusted psychopathic comments about wanting to beat up the other poster with a crowbar. You know how shit you are, you just don't give a fuck for precisely that reason. I disendorse you.[/quote]
|
jewunit
Brutal!


Registered: 01/11/07
Posts: 34,264
Loc: Ohio
|
|
Ten wild card teams have also advanced because there are only 32 teams and the level of parity in the NFL is WAY higher than college football.
Your point about the NCAA tournament is because there's 64 68 teams in a single elimination tournament. If you think the NCAA tournament is a good indicator of who the best team in college basketball is in any given year then we probably just wouldn't come to an agreement on this. Single elimination tournaments are a horrible way to determine a champion. Yes, sometimes the best team wins, but plenty of times they don't. Syracuse wasn't the best team in college basketball in 2003 for example.
Part of college football is a lot does get settles on the field, sometimes a bit too much. There's already a 12-13 game playoff system in place called the regular season. For the most part it's a decent indicator of who the best teams in the country are. It would be nice to have a system that doesn't let the 8th best team in the country get a shot at a national championship; you can do it in other sports because you can play a series and that weeds out the lesser teams. Single elimination allows worse teams to advance because you only have to win once.
Have six teams. Have the highest ranked team from a non-AQ get in. If you're worried about that just being Notre Dame every year, make a requirement that if you're an independent you have to be in the top six, not just the highest ranked non-AQ.
-------------------- !
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: jewunit]
#19187299 - 11/25/13 02:28 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
They need a minimum of 6. Utah would have been out of it both years they would have won a title
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: elax420]
#19187516 - 11/25/13 03:19 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
elax420 said: They need a minimum of 6. Utah would have been out of it both years they would have won a title 
Send me some shrooms
--------------------
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: zappaisgod]
#19189037 - 11/25/13 08:55 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Okay Officer Goldstein.
|
sonamdrukpa
Wayfarer


Registered: 10/18/11
Posts: 2,777
Last seen: 3 months, 2 days
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: elax420]
#19191710 - 11/26/13 12:10 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
elax420 said: They need a minimum of 6. Utah would have been out of it both years they would have won a title 
The voters would've rigged the vote to make sure Utah got in, the same way they rigged the vote to make sure Michigan didn't play a rematch against OSU the year all the SEC reign of terror started. It was nothing but titanic bullshit when they declined to do that with LSU/Alabama.
Fresno or NUI gets in if they're in the top 16 and higher than the champion of one of the AQ leagues. UCF is gonna win the whatever-they-call-the-not-Big-East, but it's iffy as to whether or not they'll pass up Fresno or NIU. It's also possible one or both of them could lose a game as well.
--------------------
|
Brian Jones
Club 27



Registered: 12/18/12
Posts: 12,372
Loc: attending Snake Church
Last seen: 16 hours, 17 minutes
|
|
Whatever they do for the National Championship, mathematically it will have to be 2,4,8,16 etc.
Otherwise there would have to be a bye week, and they wont do that.
-------------------- "The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body" John Lennon I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either. The worst thing about corruption is that it works so well,
|
sonamdrukpa
Wayfarer


Registered: 10/18/11
Posts: 2,777
Last seen: 3 months, 2 days
|
|
They could do a pre-Christmas game. Might be a good way for the BCS to cash in before New Years.
--------------------
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
|
they should do
1 bye 2 bye 3-6 4-5
but that won’t happen.
|
jewunit
Brutal!


Registered: 01/11/07
Posts: 34,264
Loc: Ohio
|
|
Quote:
sonamdrukpa said:
Quote:
elax420 said: They need a minimum of 6. Utah would have been out of it both years they would have won a title 
The voters would've rigged the vote to make sure Utah got in, the same way they rigged the vote to make sure Michigan didn't play a rematch against OSU the year all the SEC reign of terror started. It was nothing but titanic bullshit when they declined to do that with LSU/Alabama.
Fresno or NUI gets in if they're in the top 16 and higher than the champion of one of the AQ leagues. UCF is gonna win the whatever-they-call-the-not-Big-East, but it's iffy as to whether or not they'll pass up Fresno or NIU. It's also possible one or both of them could lose a game as well.
There's no way whoever lost that game should have played in the national championship. That's backed up even furthermore by Florida's absolute domination over us in that game.
-------------------- !
|
elax420
Anal Destroyer


Registered: 10/16/12
Posts: 15,536
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: jewunit]
#19208521 - 11/30/13 12:51 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Fuckeyes finally woke up 
UCLA is the only other team i want to win. Hopefully Auburn beats bama, but i hate both teams.
|
jewunit
Brutal!


Registered: 01/11/07
Posts: 34,264
Loc: Ohio
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: elax420]
#19208781 - 11/30/13 02:10 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Now... War Eagle!
-------------------- !
|
jewunit
Brutal!


Registered: 01/11/07
Posts: 34,264
Loc: Ohio
|
Re: College Football '13 [Re: jewunit]
#19208820 - 11/30/13 02:20 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
-------------------- !
|
|